[
AGREE Collaboration. (2003). Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project. Qual. Saf. Health Care, 12 (1), 18–23. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.18.10.1136/qhc.12.1.18174367212571340
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Al-Qahtani, A. S. (2012). Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: A prospective randomized study. Amer. J. Rhinol. Allergy, 26 (4), 332–334. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3789.10.2500/ajra.2012.26.378922732136
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ali, M. J., Baig, F., Lakshman, M., Naik, M. N. (2015a). Scanning electron microscopic features of nasolacrimal silastic stents retained for prolong durations following dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 31, 414–417. DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000395.10.1097/IOP.000000000000039525689783
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ali. M. J., Manderwad, G., Naik, M. N. (2013). The microbiological spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity profile of extubated silicone stents following dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit, 32, 298–303. DOI: 10.3109/01676830.2013.815231.10.3109/01676830.2013.81523124024780
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ali, M. J., Wormald, P. J., Psaltis, A. J. (2015b). The dacryocystorhinostomy ostium granulomas: Classification, indications for treatment, management modalities and outcomes. Orbit, 34, 146–151. DOI: 10.3109/01676830.2015.1014510.10.3109/01676830.2015.101451025901394
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ben Simon, G. J., Joseph, J., Lee, S., Schwarcz, R. M., Mc-Cann, J. D., Goldberg, R. A. (2005). External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Oph-thalmology, 112, 1463–1468. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.015.10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.01515953636
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caldwell, G. W. (1893). Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct, with preservation of the canaliculi and an incidental description of a new lacrimal probe. NY Med. J., 57, 581–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2011.52.12.1391.10.3341/jkos.2011.52.12.1391
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Callejas, C. A., Tewfik, M. A., Wormald, P. J. (2010). Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with selective stenting. Laryngoscope, 120 (7), 1449–1452. DOI: 10.1002/lary.20916.10.1002/lary.2091620564733
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cavaliere, M., Luca, P. D., Scarpa, A., Bonis, E. D., Troisi, D. Cassandro, C., Concilio, G., D’Ascanio, L., Stadio, A. D. (2022). Longitudinal randomized study to evaluate the long-term outcome of endoscopic primary dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tube. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 279 (2), 1105–1109. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07104-w.10.1007/s00405-021-07104-w34586476
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cetin, Y. S., Akin, R., Duzenli, U., Turan, M., Bozan, N. (2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Effect of silver nitrate application on the success of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Amer. J. Rhinol. Allergy, 36 (2), 216–221. DOI: 10.1177/19458924211042786.10.1177/1945892421104278634499002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, S. M., Feng, Y. F., Xu, L., Li, Y., Huang, J. H. (2013). Efficacy of mitomycin C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. www.plosone.org. PMID: 23675423 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062737.10.1371/journal.pone.0062737365281323675423
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chong, K. L. L., Lai, F. H. P., Ho, M., Luk, A., Wong, B. W., Young, A. (2013). Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology, 20 (10), 2139–2145. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.036.10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.03623672972
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cokkeser, Y., Evereklioglu, C., Er, H. (2000). Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 123, 488–491. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.105470.10.1067/mhn.2000.10547011020191
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fayers, T., Dolman, P. T. (2016). Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology, 123 (10), 2255–2259. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.026.10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.02627432206
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, D. C. (1967). New probe for the intubation of lacrimal
]Search in Google Scholar
[
canaliculi with silicone rubber tubing. Brit. J. Opthalmol., 51, 198. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.51.3.198.10.1136/bjo.51.3.1985063616019817
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, J., Malek, J., Chin, D., Snidvongs, D., Wilcsek, G., Tumuluri, K., Sacks, K., Harvey, R. J. (2014). Systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes for endoscopic versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit, 33, 81–90. DOI: 10.3109/01676830.2013.842253.10.3109/01676830.2013.84225324354575
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jo, A., Lee, S. H., Song, W. C., Shin, H. J. (2018). Effects of ostium granulomas and intralesional steroid injections on the surgical outcome in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol., 256, 1993–2000. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-4024-7.10.1007/s00417-018-4024-729858678
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaçaniku, G., Ajazaj, V., Shabani, A., Dida, E. (2018). Assessing the usefulness of different silicone tubes in external dacryocystorhinostomy. Med. Arch., 72, 414–417. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.414-417.10.5455/medarh.2018.72.414-417634060830814772
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, S. E., Lee, S. J., Lee, S. Y., Yoon, J. S. (2012). Clinical significance of microbial growth on the surfaces of silicone tubes removed from dacryocystorhinostomy patients. Amer. J. Ophthalmol., 153, 253–257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.030.10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.03021920491
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Limbu, B., Lyons, H. S., Shrestha, M. K., Tabin, G. C., Saiju, R. (2019). Comparison of early versus standard timing for silicone stent removal following external dacrocystorhinostomy under local anaesthesia. Nepal J. Ophthalmol., 11 (21), 24–28. DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v11i1.254013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Longari, F., Moboraki, P. D., Ricci, A. L., Lapenna, R., Cagini, C., Ricci, G. (2016). Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 273 (8), 2079–2084. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3876-2.10.1007/s00405-015-3876-226732693
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nerad, J. A. (2010). Techniques in Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery. Saunders of imprint if Elsevier Inc. Book. 499 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Okuyucu, S., Gorur, H., Oksuz, H., Akoglu, E. (2015). Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone, polypropylene, and T-tube stents; randomized con-trolled trial of efficacy and safety. Amer. J. Rhinol. Allergy, 29, 63–68. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4119.10.2500/ajra.2015.29.411925590323
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ricca, A. M., Kim, A. K., Chahal, H. S., Shriver, E. M. (2018). Nasolacrimal Stents: An Introductory Guide. EyeRounds.org. http://EyeRounds.org/tutorials/Stents/ (accessed 01.04.2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Samimi, D. B., Ediriwickrema, L. S., Bielory, B. P., Miller, D., Lee, W., Johnson. T. E. (2016). Microbiology and biofilm trends of silicone lacrimal implants: Comparing infected versus routinely removed stents. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 32 (6), 452–457. DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000590.10.1097/IOP.000000000000059026588208
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singh, M. (2015). Lacrimal stents and intubation systems: An insight. Delhi J. Ophthalmol., 26 (1), 14–19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7869/djo.128.10.7869/djo.128
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsirbas, A., Davis, G., Wormald, P. J. (2004). Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 20, 50–56. DOI: 10.1097/01.IOP.0000103006.49679.23.10.1097/01.IOP.0000103006.49679.2314752311
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ullrich, K., Malhotra, R., Patel, B.C. (2022). Dacryocystorhinostomy. http://www.pubmed.gov. PMID: 32496731 Bookshelf ID: NBK557851 (accessed 01.04.2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wakaki, S., Marumo, H., Tomioka, K. (1958). Isolation of new fractions of
]Search in Google Scholar
[
antitumor mitomycins. Antibiot Chemother., 8 (5), 228–240.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yim, M., Wormald, P.J., Doucet, M., Gill, A., Kingdom, T., Orlandi, R., Crum, A., Marx, D., Alt. J. (2021). Adjunctive techniques to dacryocystorhinostomy: An evidence-based review with recommendations. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol., 11 (5), 885–893. DOI: 10.1002/alr.22699.10.1002/alr.2269932981236
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, B., Xia, Y., Sun, J. Y., Ye, Q., Tu, Y. H., Zhou, G. M., Wu, W. C. (2021). Surgical outcomes in acute dacryocystitis patients undergoing endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tube intubation. Int. J. Ophthalmol., 14 (6), 844–848. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.06.08.10.18240/ijo.2021.06.08816562834150538
]Search in Google Scholar
