Computational Evaluation of the Limiting Thrust of the Peripheral Thruster Taking into Account the Propeller Blade Yield Stress and the Thrust Breakdown Due to Cavitation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Wikipedia, Voith Schneider Propeller, 09.05.2024. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voith_Schneider_PropellerSearch in Google Scholar
Wikipedia, Pump-jet, 09.05.2024, Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump-jetSearch in Google Scholar
Kongsberg, Super silent tunnel thruster, 09.05.2024, Retrieved from https://www.kongsberg.com/maritime/products/propulsors-and-propulsion-systems/thrusters/super-silent-tunnel-thruster/Search in Google Scholar
Wikipedia, Rim-driven thruster, 09.05.2024, Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rim-driven_thrusterSearch in Google Scholar
Det Norske Veritas, “Assessment of station keeping capability of dynamic positioning vessels”. Standard No. DNV-ST-0111, December 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Maritime Advanced Research Centre CTO S.A. Experimental analysis of the hydrodynamic characteristics of the peripheral thruster. Technical Report, March 2022.Search in Google Scholar
Huang Y., Chen L., Chen P., Negenborn RR, van Gelder PHAJM. Ship collision avoidance methods: State-of-the-art. Safety Science 2020, vol. 121, pp. 451–473. ISSN 0925-7535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.018.Search in Google Scholar
Lindau JW, Boger DA, Medvitz RB, Kunz RF. Propeller cavitation breakdown analysis. J Fluids Eng. 2005, vol. 127, pp. 995–1002. doi: 10.1115/1.1988343.Search in Google Scholar
Rehman S, Wajiha S, Paboeuf J. A comparison of different fluid-structure interaction analysis techniques for the marine propeller. ASME 2021 Power Conference. doi: 10.1115/POWER2021-64369.Search in Google Scholar
Savio L, Sileo L, Ås SK. A comparison of physical and numerical modeling of homogenous isotropic propeller blades. J Mar Sci Eng 2020, vol. 8, p. 21. doi: 10.3390/jmse8010021.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider T, Hu Y, Gao X, Dumas J, Zorin D, Panozzo D. A large scale comparison of tetrahedral and hexahedral elements for solving elliptic PDEs with finite element ACM Trans. Graph. 41, 3, Article 23 (June 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3508372.Search in Google Scholar
Shayanpoor A, Hajivand A, Moore M. Hydroelastic analysis of composite marine propeller basis fluid-structure interaction (FSI), Int J Marit Technol, 2020, vol. 13, pp. 51–59.Search in Google Scholar
Young YL. Time-dependent hydroelastic analysis of cavitating propulsors. Journal of Fluids and Structures 2007, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 269–295. ISSN 0889-9746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2006.09.003.Search in Google Scholar
Magionesi F, Dubbioso G, Muscari R. Fluid–structure interaction of a marine rudder at incidence in the wake of a propeller. Phys Fluids 2024, vol. 36. doi: 10.1063/5.0201867.Search in Google Scholar
Schnerr GH, Sauer J. Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. Fourth International Conference on Multiphase Flow, 2001, ICMF New Orleans.Search in Google Scholar
, 