[
1. Y. Wang and G. Tae Yeo, “The Selection of a Foreign Seafarer Supply Country for Korean Flag Vessels,” Asian J. Shipp. Logist., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 221–227, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j. ajsl.2016.12.005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. A. S. Kamis, A. F. Ahmad Fuad, M. N. Mohd Fadzil, and S. I. Saadon, “The Impact of Basic Training on Seafarers’ Safety Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviour,” J. Sustain. Sci. Manag., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 137–158, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.46754/jbsd.2020.08.012.10.46754/jbsd.2020.08.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. IMO, “STCW : including 2010 Manila amendments: STCW Convention and STCW Code : International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.imo.org/en/about/conventions/listofconventions/pages/international-convention-on-standards-of-training,-certification-and-watchkeeping-for-seafarers-(stcw).aspx. [Accessed: 17 Jul. 2018].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. K. Skora and A. Wolski, “Voyage Planning,” Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp., vol. 92, pp. 123–128, 2016, doi: 10.20858/sjsutst.2016.92.12.10.20858/sjsutst.2016.92.12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. D. J. House, “Preventing Collisions at Sea,” in Seamanship Techniques, London: Elsevier, 2004, pp. 395–444.10.1016/B978-075066315-1/50017-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Y. Wang, S. Chai, and H. D. Nguyen, “Experimental and numerical study of autopilot using Extended Kalman Filter trained neural networks for surface vessels,” Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng., vol. 12, pp. 314–324, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j. ijnaoe.2019.11.004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. IMO MSC, “Adoption of the Revised Performance Standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS) MSC 82/24/Add.2,” 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. A. M. Lekkas and T. I. Fossen, “Minimization of cross-track and along-track errors for path tracking of marine underactuated vehicles,” 2014 Eur. Control Conf. ECC 2014, no. October 2015, pp. 3004–3010, 2014, doi: 10.1109/ ECC.2014.6862594.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. S. Vujičić, R. Mohović, and I. Đ. Tomaš, “Methodology for controlling the ship’s path during the turn in confined waterways,” Pomorstvo, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2018, doi: 10.31217/p.32.1.2.10.31217/p.32.1.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. N. Anwar, Navigation Advanced Mates/Masters, 2nd ed. Weatherby Seamanship International, a Division of Witherbys Publishing Group Limited, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. R. E. Reid, “Improvement of Ship Steering Control for Merchant Ships - Phase IIA,” Kings Point, New York, 1978.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. M. Chaal, “Ship Operational Performance Modelling for Voyage Optimization through Fuel Consumption Minimization,” World Maritime University Dissertations, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. R. Lu, O. Turan, E. Boulougouris, C. Banks, and A. Incecik, “A semi-empirical ship operational performance prediction model for voyage optimization towards energy efficient shipping,” Ocean Eng., vol. 110, no. July 2014, pp. 18–28, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.042.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. TAIC, “Final report MO-2016-202: Passenger ship, Azamara Quest, contact with Wheki Rock, Tory Channel, 27 January 2016,” no. January, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. MAIB, “MAIB Report No 30/2014 - Navigator Scorpio -Less Serious Marine Casualty,” 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. ATSB, “Near grounding of Aquadiva,” 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. T. Takemoto, T. Nomura, H. Yabuki, and K. Inoue, “Characteristics of Pilot’s Collision Avoiding Action and Prevention of Marine Collision Accidents,” J. Japan Inst. Navig., vol. 124, pp. 47–55, 2011, doi: 10.9749/jin.124.47.10.9749/jin.124.47
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. USCG, “Lesson from casualties,” Proceedings Merch. Mar. Counc., vol. 6, no. 1, 1949.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. GARD, “Pilot on the bridge - Role, authority and responsibility - GARD,” 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www.gard.no/web/updates/content/52439/pilot-on-the-bridge-role-authority-and-responsibility. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2020].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. MAIB, “Report on the investigation of the grounding of the Liberian-registered container ship P&O Nedlloyd Magellan in the Western Approach Channel to Southampton Water on 20 February 2001,” Southampton, 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. ATSB, “Independent investigation into the grounding of the Hong Kong registered products tanker, Atlantic Blue,” 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. TSB, “Marine Investigation Report M14P0014 Grounding Container vessel Cap Blanche Fraser River, British Columbia,” Canada, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Gard, “Pilotage: A selection of articles previously published by Gard AS,” 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. MAIB, “Faults Pilots for Double Grounding in UAE,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/maib-faults-pilots-for-double-grounding-in-uae. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2020].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Y. A. Park, T. L. Yip, and H. G. Park, “An Analysis of Pilotage Marine Accidents in Korea,” Asian J. Shipp. Logist., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.03.007.10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.03.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. D. Gregory and P. Shanahan, The Human Element: A Guide to Human Behavior in The Shipping Industry. The Stationery Office (TSO), 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. ICS, Bridge Procedure Guide, Fifth ed. London: Marisec Publications, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. MAIB, “Report on the investigation of the grounding and flooding of the ro-ro ferry Commodore Clipper in the approaches to St Peter Port, Guernsey on 14 July 2014,” 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Steamship Mutual, “The Importance of ECDIS Training and Good Watch-keeping Practices,” no. November, pp. 43–45, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. IMO, “Guidelines for voyage planning - Resolution A.893(21),” 1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. G. A. Quick, “Master / Pilot Relationship the Role of the Pilot in Risk Management,” Group of the International Organisation of Masters, Mates & Pilots of Maryland. pp. 1–15, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. G. Rutkowski, “ECDIS Limitations, Data Reliability, Alarm Management and Safety Settings Recommended for Passage Planning and Route Monitoring on VLCC Tankers,” TransNav, Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 483–490, 2018, doi: 10.12716/1001.12.03.06.10.12716/1001.12.03.06
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. ISES, “The majority of international fleet now fitted with ECDIS - ISES Association.” [Online]. Available: https://www.isesassociation.com/the-majority-of-international-fleet-now-fitted-with-ecdis/. [Accessed: 21 May 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. IMO, SOLAS Consolidated Edition. London: International Maritime Organization, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Marine Insight, “Understanding Different Types of Manoeuvres of a Vessel,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.marineinsight.com/naval-architecture/different-types-of-manoeuvres-of-a-vessel/. [Accessed: 21 May 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. J. Wu, J. Thorne-Large, and P. Zhang, “Safety first: The risk of over-reliance on technology in navigation,” J. Transp. Saf. Secur., pp. 1–28, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1080/19439962.2021.1909681.10.1080/19439962.2021.1909681
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. K. Aarsæther and T. Moan, “Combined maneuvering analysis, AIS and full-mission simulation,” TransNav Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. M. J. Van Hilten and P. H. M. Wolkenfelt, “The rate of turn required for geographically fixed turns: A formula and fast-time simulations,” J. Navig., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 146–155, 2000, doi: 10.1017/S0373463399008590.10.1017/S0373463399008590
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Jithin, “Constant Radius Turn | Knowledge Of Sea,” Navigation, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://knowledgeofsea.com/constant-radius-turn/. [Accessed: 23 Feb 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. M.-S. Kim, H.-O. Shin, K.-M. Kang, and M.-S. Kim, “Variation of the Turning Circle by the Rudder Angle and the Ship’s Speed-Mainly on the Training Ship KAYA-,” Bull. Korean Soc. Fish. Technol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 156–164, May 2005, doi: 10.3796/KSFT.2005.41.2.156.10.3796/KSFT.2005.41.2.156
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. V. N. Drachev, “Calculating Wheel-Over Point,” Asia-Pacific J. Mar. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–46, 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. IMO, “Standards For Ship Manoeuvrability,” London, 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. TTEG, “Guidelines on Voluntary Pilotage Services in The Straits of Malacca and Singapore,” 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. ITTC, “Full Scale Measurements Manoeuvrability Full Scale Manoeuvring Trials Procedure,” 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. E. O. Voit, “Introduction to Mathematical Modeling,” in: A First Course in Systems Biology, pp. 19–50, 2020, doi: 10.4324/9780203702260-2.10.4324/9780203702260-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. IMO ISM, International Safety Management Code (ISM Code). London: IMO Publishing, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. IMO MSC, “Adoption of the Revised Performance Standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS) Msc 82/24/Add.2. MSC Resolution (Vol. 82).” 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. M. Kristić, S. Žuškin, D. Brčić, and S. Valčić, “Zone of confidence impact on cross track limit determination in ECDIS passage planning,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 8, 2020, doi: 10.3390/JMSE8080566.10.3390/jmse8080566
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. S. Bansilal, “The application of the percentage change calculation in the context of inflation in Mathematical Literacy,” Pythagoras, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.4102/pythagoras.v38i1.314.10.4102/pythagoras.v38i1.314
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. K. Beck, “How to Calculate Percent Difference,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://sciencing.com/calculate-percent-difference-6331196.html. [Accessed: 20 Dec 2020].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. N. Nachar, “The Mann-Whitney U: A Test for Assessing Whether Two Independent Samples Come from the Same Distribution,” Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2008, doi: 10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p013.10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. A. Hart, “Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: differences in spread can be important,” BMJ, vol. 323, no. 7309, pp. 391–393, Aug. 2001, doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7309.391.10.1136/bmj.323.7309.391112098411509435
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. R. Latorre, “Naval Architecture,” in Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, vol. 105, no. 1, Elsevier, 2003, pp. 343–360.10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00474-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. A. F. Molland, The Maritime Engineering Reference Book. Elsevier, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. P. Mucha, T. Dettmann, V. Ferrari, and O. el Moctar, “Experimental investigation of free-running ship manoeuvers under extreme shallow water conditions,” Appl. Ocean Res., vol. 83, no. May 2018, pp. 155–162, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2018.09.008.10.1016/j.apor.2018.09.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. M. G. Jeong, E. B. Lee, M. Lee, and J. Y. Jung, “Multi-criteria route planning with risk contour map for smart navigation,” Ocean Eng., vol. 172, no. August 2018, pp. 72–85, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.11.050.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.11.050
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. T. Statheros, G. Howells, and K. McDonald-Maier, “Autonomous ship collision avoidance navigation concepts, technologies and techniques,” J. Navig., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 129–142, 2008, doi: 10.1017/S037346330700447X.10.1017/S037346330700447X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. B. Belev, D. Dimitranov, A. Spasov, and A. Ivanov, “Application of information technologies and algorithms in ship passage planning,” Cybern. Inf. Technol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 190–200, 2019, doi: 10.2478/CAIT-2019-0011.10.2478/cait-2019-0011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. G. Rutkowski, “Determining Ship’s Safe Speed and Best Possible Speed for Sea Voyage Legs,” TransNav, Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 425–430, 2017, doi: 10.12716/1001.10.03.07.10.12716/1001.10.03.07
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. K. Tiwari, K. Hariharan, T. V. Rameesha, and P. Krishnankutty, “Prediction of a research vessel manoeuvring using numerical PMM and free running tests,” Ocean Syst. Eng., vol. 10(3), pp. 333–357, 2020, doi: 10.12989/OSE.2020.10.3.333.
]Search in Google Scholar
