[
1. A. Ekmekçioğlu, K. Ünlügençoğlu, and U. B. Çelebi, ‘Ship emission estimation for Izmir and Mersin international ports – Turkey’, Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 184–195, 2019, doi: 10.18186/thermal.654319.10.18186/thermal.654319
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. C. Trozzi, ‘Emission estimate methodology for maritime navigation’, Co-leader of the Combustion & Industry Expert Panel, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. R. Yan, S. Wang, and Y. Du, ‘Development of a two-stage ship fuel consumption prediction and reduction model for a dry bulk ship’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 138, no. July 2019, p. 101930, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101930.10.1016/j.tre.2020.101930
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. L. Huang, Y. Wen, Y. Zhang, C. Zhou, F. Zhang, and T. Yang, ‘Dynamic calculation of ship exhaust emissions based on real-time AIS data’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 80, no. August 2019, p. 102277, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102277.10.1016/j.trd.2020.102277
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. T. A. Tran, ‘Effect of ship loading on marine diesel engine fuel consumption for bulk carriers based on the fuzzy clustering method’, Ocean Engineering, vol. 207, no. January 2019, p. 107383, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107383.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107383
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. X. Yan, K. Wang, Y. Yuan, X. Jiang, and R. R. Negenborn, ‘Energy-efficient shipping: An application of big data analysis for optimizing engine speed of inland ships considering multiple environmental factors’, Ocean Engineering, vol. 169, no. August, pp. 457–468, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j. oceaneng.2018.08.050.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. T. Cepowski, ‘Regression formulas for the estimation of engine total power for tankers, container ships and bulk carriers on the basis of cargo capacity and design speed’, Polish Maritime Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 82–94, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0010.10.2478/pomr-2019-0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. W. J. Requia, B. A. Coull, and P. Koutrakis, ‘Evaluation of predictive capabilities of ordinary geostatistical interpolation, hybrid interpolation, and machine learning methods for estimating PM2.5 constituents over space’, Environmental Research, vol. 175, no. April, pp. 421–433, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.025.10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.02531154232
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. T. Uyanık, Ç. Karatuğ, and Y. Arslanoğlu, ‘Machine learning approach to ship fuel consumption: A case of container vessel’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 84, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102389.10.1016/j.trd.2020.102389
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. L. Barua, B. Zou, and Y. Zhou, ‘Machine learning for international freight transportation management: A comprehensive review’, Research in Transportation Business and Management, no. July 2019, p. 100453, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100453.10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100453
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Y. Peng, H. Liu, X. Li, J. Huang, and W. Wang, ‘Machine learning method for energy consumption prediction of ships in port considering green ports’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 264, p. 121564, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.121564.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. J. H. Jeong, J. H. Woo, and J. G. Park, ‘Machine learning methodology for management of shipbuilding master data’, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 428–439, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j. ijnaoe.2020.03.005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. C. Gkerekos, I. Lazakis, and G. Theotokatos, ‘Machine learning models for predicting ship main engine fuel oil consumption: A comparative study’, Ocean Engineering, vol. 188, no. August, p. 106282, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j. oceaneng.2019.106282.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. A. Jonquais and F. Krempl, ‘Predicting Shipping Time with Machine Learning’, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. O. Bodunov, F. Schmidt, A. Martin, A. Brito, and C. Fetzer, ‘Grand challenge: Real-time destination and ETA prediction for maritime traffic’, DEBS 2018 – Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Distributed and Event-Based Systems, pp. 198–201, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3210284.3220502.10.1145/3210284.3220502
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. J. Yuan and V. Nian, ‘Ship energy consumption prediction with Gaussian process metamodel’, Energy Procedia, vol. 152, pp. 655–660, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.09.226.10.1016/j.egypro.2018.09.226
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Y. B. A. Farag and A. I. Ölçer, ‘The development of a ship performance model in varying operating conditions based on ANN and regression techniques’, Ocean Engineering, vol. 198, no. July 2019, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j. oceaneng.2020.106972.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. L. Bui-Duy and N. Vu-Thi-Minh, ‘Utilization of a deep learning-based fuel consumption model in choosing a liner shipping route for container ships in Asia’, Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2020.04.003.10.1016/j.ajsl.2020.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. H. Cui, O. Turan, and P. Sayer, ‘Learning-based ship design optimization approach’, CAD Computer Aided Design, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 186–195, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2011.06.011.10.1016/j.cad.2011.06.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. M. Peker, O. Özkaraca, and B. Kesimal, ‘Modeling heating and cooling loads by regression-based machine learning techniques for energy-efficient building design’, International Journal of Informatics Technologies, pp. 443–449, 2017, doi: 10.17671/gazibtd.310154.10.17671/gazibtd.310154
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. V. Bertram and H. Schneekluth, Ship Design for Efficiency and Economy. Elsevier, 1998.
]Search in Google Scholar
