[1. DNV G. ,: Support structures for wind turbines DNV GL AS, Hovik, Det Norske Veritas 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. API RP2A-WSD. Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-working stress design. American petroleum institute, Washington (DC), American 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Knowledge L. List of offshore wind farms. Available at: http://www.lorc.dk/offshore-wind-farms-map/list.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Karimirad M. Offshore Energy Structures For Wind Power, Wave Energy and Hybrid Marine Platforms, Springer International Publishing, Cham 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Haskell JJM, Cubrinovski M and Bradley BA. Sensitivity analysis and its role in pseudo-static design of pile foundations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2012, 42, pp. 80-94.10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.014]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Lozano-Minguez E, Kolios AJ and Brennan FP, Multicriteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures. Renewable Energy 2011, 36, pp. 2831-2837.10.1016/j.renene.2011.04.020]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Lee K, Effects on the various rubber fenders of a tripod offshore wind turbine substructure collision strength due to boat. Ocean Engineering 2013,72, pp. 188-194.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.014]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Yu H, Zeng X and Wang X, Seismic centrifuge modelling of offshore wind turbine with tripod foundation, IEEE Energytech, Energytech 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Yeter B, Garbatov Y and Guedes Soares C. , Evaluation of fatigue damage model predictions for fixed offshore wind turbine support structures. International Journal of Fatigue 2016, 87, pp. 71-80.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.01.007]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Cullen AC, Frey HC, and Frey CH, Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment: a handbook for dealing with variability and uncertainty in models and inputs. Springer Science & Business Media 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Pająk M, Fuzzy modeling of cardinal features of a complex technical system in Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Proceedings of ESREL 2016 (Glasgow, Scotland, 25-29 September 2016). CRC Press, 2016, pp. 2762-2767.10.1201/9781315374987-420]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Borgonovo E, A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2007, 92, pp. 771-784.10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Pająk, M. Identification of the operating parameters of a complex technical system important from the operational potential point of view. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2018, 232, pp. 62-78.10.1177/0959651817735771]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Andersen LV, Vahdatirad MJ, Sichani MT, et al. Natural frequencies of wind turbines on monopile foundations in clayey soils-A probabilistic approach. Computers and Geotechnics 2012, 43, pp. 1-11.10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.01.010]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Nour El-Din M and Kim J. Sensitivity analysis of pile-founded fixed steel jacket platforms subjected to seismic loads. Ocean Engineering 2014, 85, pp. 1-11.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.04.008]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Lee YS, Choi BL, Lee JH, et al. , Reliability-based design optimization of monopile transition piece for offshore wind turbine system. Renewable Energy 2014, 71, pp. 729-741.10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.017]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Yang H, Zhu Y, Lu Q, et al. , Dynamic reliability based design optimization of the tripod sub-structure of offshore wind turbines. Renewable Energy 2013, 78, pp. 16-25.10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.061]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Vahdatirad MJ, Bayat M, Andersen LV, et al, Probabilistic finite element stiffness of a laterally loaded monopile based on an improved asymptotic sampling method. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2015, 21, pp. 503-513.10.3846/13923730.2014.890660]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Zhang JH, Xie YQ and Gao DW, Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Behaviors on Key Design Parameters of Tripod for Offshore Wind Farm. The Twelfth ISOPE Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium. Australia 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Commission IE. Wind Turbines-Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines. No. IEC61400-3, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Zhang L, Zhao J and Zhang JH, Analysis of Environmental Loads on Pile Foundation of Offshore Wind Turbines. International conference on marine science and technology for green shipping 2009, pp. 69-77.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Pilger GG, Costa JFC and Koppe JC. Improving the efficiency of the sequential simulation algorithm using Latin Hypercube Sampling. Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer 2005, pp. 989-998.10.1007/978-1-4020-3610-1_103]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Hess PE, Bruchman D, Assakkaf IA, et al, Uncertainties in material and geometric strength and load variables. Naval Engineers Journal 2002, 114, pp. 139-165.10.1111/j.1559-3584.2002.tb00128.x]Search in Google Scholar
[24. ASTM A. A500-93, Standard Specification for Cold-Formed Welded and Seamless Carbon Steel Structural Tubing in Rounds and Shapes, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Code JPM, Joint committee on structural safety. 2001 URL: www. jcss. ethz. ch.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Nowak AS and Collins KR. Reliability of structures: CRC Press 2012.10.1201/b12913]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Wang F, Chen Q and Yu GC, Research on large scale wind driven generator group tower rigidity. New Energy and Technology 2005, 20, pp. 38-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Gulvanessian H, Calgaro J-A and Holicky M. Designer’s guide to EN 1990: eurocode: basis of structural design: Thomas Telford 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. ISO I. 2394. General Principles on Reliability for Structures. Zurich: ISO 2015.]Search in Google Scholar