Negation Polarizes Agreement Dynamics During Sentence Comprehension

Abrams, R. A., & Balota, D. A. (1991). Mental chronometry: Beyond reaction time. Psychological Science, 2, 153–157.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00123.xSearch in Google Scholar

Anderson, S., Huette, S., Matlock, T., & Spivey, M. (2010). On the temporal dynamics of negated perceptual simulations. In F. Parrill, V. Tobin, & M. Turner (Eds.), Meaning, Form, & Body (pp. 1–20). Stanford, CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0.Search in Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1): 9, 1–20.10.5334/joc.10Search in Google Scholar

Cohen J. D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., & Provost J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(2), 257–271.10.3758/BF03204507Search in Google Scholar

Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K., (2004). Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30(2), 498–513.10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.498Search in Google Scholar

Dale, R., & Duran, N. D. (2011). The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification. Cognitive Science, 35, 983–996.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01164.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dale, R., Kehoe, C., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 15–28.10.3758/BF03195938Search in Google Scholar

Dittmann, A. T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1968). Relationship between vocalizations and head nods as listener responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(1), 79.10.1037/h0025722Search in Google Scholar

Duran, N. D., Dale, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). The action dynamics of overcoming the truth. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 17(4), 486–491.10.3758/PBR.17.4.486Search in Google Scholar

Farmer, T., Cargill, S., Hindy, N., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. (2007). Tracking the continuity of language comprehension: Computer mouse trajectories suggest parallel syntactic processing. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 889–909.10.1080/03640210701530797Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, H., Sanford, A. J., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time-course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds. Brain Research, 1236, 113–125.10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.099Search in Google Scholar

Fischler, I., Childers, D. G., Achariyapaopan, T., & Perry Jr., N. W. (1985). Brain potentials during sentence verification: Automatic aspects of comprehension. Biological Psychology, 21(2), 83–105.10.1016/0301-0511(85)90008-0Search in Google Scholar

Gold, J., & Shadlen, M. (2000). Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. Nature, 404, 390–394.10.1038/35006062Search in Google Scholar

Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438–441.10.1126/science.1095455Search in Google Scholar

Huette, S. (2016). Putting context into context: Sources of context and a proposed mechanism for linguistic negation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(8), 1000–1014.10.1080/23273798.2016.1161807Search in Google Scholar

Huette, S., & Anderson, S. (2012). Negation without symbols: The importance of recurrence and context in linguistic negation. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 11, 295–312.10.1142/S0219635212500239Search in Google Scholar

Huette, S., & McMurray, B. (2010). Continuous dynamics of color categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 348–354.10.3758/PBR.17.3.348Search in Google Scholar

Incera, S., & McLennan, C. T. (2016). Mouse tracking reveals that bilinguals behave like experts. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 610–620.10.1017/S1366728915000218Search in Google Scholar

Kaup, B., Yaxley, R. H., Madden, C. J., Zwaan, R. A., & Lüdtke, J. (2006). Experiential simulations of negated text information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 976–990.10.1080/17470210600823512Search in Google Scholar

Kaup, B., Zwaan, R. A., & Lüdtke, J. (2007). The experiential view of language comprehension. How is negation represented? In F. Schmalhofer, & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher Language Processes in the Brain (pp. 255–289). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Magnuson, J. S. (2005). Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(29), 9995–9996.10.1073/pnas.0504413102Search in Google Scholar

Maldonado, M., Dunbar, E., & Chemla, E. (2019). Mouse tracking as a window into decision making. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1085–1101.10.3758/s13428-018-01194-xSearch in Google Scholar

McKinstry, C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19(1), 22–24.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02041.xSearch in Google Scholar

McMurray, B., & Aslin, R. N. (2005). Infants are sensitive to within-category variation in speech perception. Cognition, 95(2), B15–B26.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.005Search in Google Scholar

McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M., & Aslin, R. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86, B33–B42.10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00157-9Search in Google Scholar

Nieuwland, M. S., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). When the truth is not too hard to handle: An event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1213–1218.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02226.xSearch in Google Scholar

Nieuwland, M. S., & Martin, A. E. (2012). If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: The role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension. Cognition, 122(1), 102–109.10.1016/j.cognition.2011.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(29), 10393–10398.10.1073/pnas.0503903102Search in Google Scholar

Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634.10.1126/science.7777863Search in Google Scholar

Tomlinson Jr., J. M., Bailey, T. M., & Bott, L. (2013). Possibly all of that and then some: Scalar implicatures are understood in two steps. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(1), 18–35.10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.003Search in Google Scholar