[
1. European Union. Medical Radiation Exposure of the European Population Part 1/2. Radiat Prot N° 180 2014:1-181.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Jaschke W, Schmuth M, Trianni A, Bartal G. Radiation-Induced Skin Injuries to Patients: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017;40:1131-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1674-510.1007/s00270-017-1674-5548963528497187
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Lin PJP, Schueler BA, Balter S, Strauss KJ, Wunderle KA, Lafrance MT, et al. Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: A report of the AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 190. Med Phys 2015;42:6815-29. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4934831.10.1118/1.493483126632039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Patient Dose Optimization in Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures. IAEA-TECDOC-1641. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Announcement of the Minister of Health of 3 April 2017 on the publication of the uniform text of the Regulation of the Minister of Health on the conditions for the safety use of ionizing radiation for all types of medical exposure. Poland: 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Siiskonen T, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Dabin J, Diklic A, Domienik-Andrzejewska J, Farah J, et al. Establishing the European diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology. Physica Medica. 2018;54:42-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.09.01210.1016/j.ejmp.2018.09.01230337009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Hirshfeld JWJ, Ferrari VA, Bengel FM, Bergersen L, Chambers CE, Einstein AJ, et al. 2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging: Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pat. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:e283–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.01610.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.01629729877
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Whitby M, Martin CJ. Radiation doses to the legs of radiologists performing interventional procedures: are they a cause for concern? Br J Radiol 2003;76:321-7. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/6577821510.1259/bjr/6577821512763947
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Edwards AA, Lloyd DC. Risks from ionising radiation: deterministic effects. J Radiol Prot. 1998;18:175-83. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/18/3/00410.1088/0952-4746/18/3/0049791808
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. https://doi.org/10.17226/1134010.17226/11340
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.00310.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.00318082557
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice. IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 457. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Wood EJ. Review of NCRP report No 116: Limitation of Exposure to Ionising Radiation. Occup Environ Med. 1994;51:216.10.1136/oem.51.3.216
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Dance DR, Christofides S, Maidment ADA, McLean ID, Ng KH. Diagnostic radiology physics: A handbook for teachers and students. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): IAEA; 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Patient dosimetry for x rays used in medical imaging. J ICRU. 2005;5:iv–vi. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndi01810.1093/jicru/ndi01824170885
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Brambilla M, Cannillo B, Matheoud R, Compagnone G, Rognoni A, Bongo AS, et al. Conversion factors of effective and equivalent organ doses with the air kerma area product in patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. Physica Medica. 2017;42:189-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.13110.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.13129173914
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Damilakis J, Frija G, Jaschke W, Repussard J, Schegerer AA, Tsapaki V, et al. European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-ray Medical Imaging. (EUCLID). Radiation Protection N° 195. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2833/452154
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Stratis AI, Anthopoulos PL, Gavaliatsis IP, Ifantis GP, Salahas AI, Antonellis IP, et al. Patient dose in cardiac radiology. Hellenic J Cardiol 2009;50:17-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Chaikh A, Gaudu A, Balosso J. Monitoring methods for skin dose in interventional radiology. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2014;3:03011. https://doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.0301.110.14319/ijcto.0301.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB, Miller DL, Vañó E, Bartal G, et al. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:S263-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.03710.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.03719560006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Aly AE, Duhaini IM, Manaa SM, Tarique SM, Kuniyil SE, Naemi HM Al. Patient Peak Skin Dose and Dose Area Product from Interventional Cardiology Procedures. Int J Med Physics, Clin Eng Radiat Oncol. 2015;04:7-12. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2015.4100210.4236/ijmpcero.2015.41002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Hansson B, Karambatsakidou A. Relationships Between Entrance Skin Dose, Effective Dose and Dose Area Product for Patients in Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2000;90:141-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a03310410.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. A report of age- and gender-related differences in the anatomical and physiological characteristics of reference individuals. ICRP Publication 89. Ann ICRP 2002;32:5-265.
]Search in Google Scholar
