[
1. Bogue J, Wan J, Lavey RS, Parsai EI. Dosimetric comparison of VMAT with integrated skin flash to 3D field-in-field tangents for left breast irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(2):24-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.1252710.1002/acm2.12527637101530653831
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Dumane VA, Lo YC, Green S. Combination of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and partially wide tangents (PWT) for improved organ sparing in a left-sided and right-sided breast cancer case receiving regional nodal irradiation (RNI): A technical note. Appl Rad Oncol. 2018;7(2):31-38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Byrne M, Archibald-Heeren B, Hu Y, et al. Comparison of semi-automated tangential VMAT with 3DCRT for breast or chest wall and regional nodes. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(5):684-693. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.1244210.1002/acm2.12442612316630125454
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Sudha SP, Seenisamy R, Bharadhwaj K. Comparison of dosimetric parameters of volumetric modulated arc therapy and three dimensional conformal radiotherapy in post mastectomy patients with carcinoma breast. J Can Res Ther. 2018;14(5):1005-1009. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.18940010.4103/0973-1482.18940030197339
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Fogliata A, Seppäla J, Reggiori G, et al. Dosimetric trade-offs in breast treatment with VMAT technique. Br J Radiol. 2016;90:1070. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.2016070110.1259/bjr.20160701568509827885857
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Clements M, Schupp N, Tattersall M, et al. Monaco treatment planning system tools and optimization processes. Medical Dosimetry. 2018;43(2):106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2018.02.00510.1016/j.meddos.2018.02.00529573922
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Craft D. Multi-criteria optimization methods in radiation therapy planning: a review of technologies and directions. arXiv:1305.1546v1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Craft D, Bortfeld T. How many plans are needed in an IMRT multi- objective plan database? Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(11):2785-2796. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/11/00210.1088/0031-9155/53/11/00218451463
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Craft D, McQuaid D, Wala J, et al. Multicriteria VMAT optimization. Med Phys. 2012;39(2):686-696. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.367560110.1118/1.3675601326779422320778
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. RTOG Oncology Group. Breast Cancer Atlas for Radiation Therapy Planning: Consensus Definitions. https://www.nrgoncology.org/Portals/0/Scientific%20Program/CIRO/Atlases/BreastCancerAtlas_corr.pdf?ver=2018-04-18-144201-270
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Pyshniak V, Fotina I, Zverava A,. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15(4):39-53. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.451410.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4514587549625207394
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Qi XS, Liu TX, Liu AK, et al. Left-sided breast cancer irradiation using rotational and fixed- field radiotherapy. Med Dosim. 2014;(39):227-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2014.02.00510.1016/j.meddos.2014.02.00524857697
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Lee CH, Jhang ZR, Yeh SA, et al. A planning study for evaluation of feasibility and benefit of generalized equivalent uniform dose-assisted optimization in volumetric-modulated arc therapy for recurrent head and neck cancer. Ther Radiol Oncol. 2018;2:36. https://doi.org/10.21037/tro.2018.08.0110.21037/tro.2018.08.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Semenenko VA, Reitz B, Day E, et al. Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system. Med Phys. 2008;35(12):5851-5860. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.301355610.1118/1.301355619175141
]Search in Google Scholar