1. bookVolumen 24 (2018): Heft 2 (June 2018)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1898-0309
Erstveröffentlichung
30 Dec 2008
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Open beam dosimetric characteristics of True Beam medical linear accelerator with flattening filter (WFF) and flattening filter free (FFF) beam

Online veröffentlicht: 26 Jun 2018
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 24 (2018) - Heft 2 (June 2018)
Seitenbereich: 79 - 89
Eingereicht: 25 Jul 2017
Akzeptiert: 18 Apr 2018
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1898-0309
Erstveröffentlichung
30 Dec 2008
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

[1] Shende R, Gupta G, Patel G, Kumar S. Commissioning of TrueBeam TM Medical Linear Accelerator: Quantitative and Qualitative Dosimetric Analysis and Comparison of Flattening Filter (FF) and Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Beam. Int J Med Phys Clin Eng Radiat Oncol. 2016;5(1):55-69.10.4236/ijmpcero.2016.51006Search in Google Scholar

[2] Das IJ, Cheng CW, Watts RJ, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG–106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2008;35(9) 4186-4215.10.1118/1.296907018841871Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chalkley A, Heyes G. Evaluation of a Single-Crystal Diamond Detector for Relative Dosimetry Measurements on a CyberKnife. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1035): 20130768.10.1259/bjr.20130768406461024588671Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dieterich S, Ford E, Pavord D, Zeng J. Practical Radiation Oncology Physics: a Companion to Gunderson & Tepper’s Clinical Radiation Oncology. Elsevier, 2016, Page 21-22.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Huang Y, Willomitzer C, Zakaria GA, Hartmann GH. Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement of cylindrical ionization chambers for high-energy photon and electron beams. Phys Med. 2010;26(3):126-131.10.1016/j.ejmp.2009.10.00119926506Search in Google Scholar

[6] Yao W, Farr JB. Determining the optimal dosimetric leaf gap setting for rounded leaf-end multileaf collimator systems by simple test fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16(4):65-77.10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5321569002026218999Search in Google Scholar

[7] IAEA. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, Technical Reports Series TRS-398; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, et al. AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999;26(9):1847-1870.10.1118/1.59869110505874Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wang Y, Easterling SB, Ting JY. Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(5):262-268.10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3758571822222955642Search in Google Scholar

[10] Central axis depth dose data for use in radiotherapy. Br J Radiol Suppl. 1996;25.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Installation Product Acceptance for True Beam / True Beam STx version 1.6, Document part number IPA-HT-16-J, Nov 2013Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, et al. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys. 1994;21(4):581-618.10.1118/1.5973168058027Search in Google Scholar

[13] IAEA. Dosimetry of Small Static Fields Used in External Beam Radiotherapy. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, Technical Reports Series TRS-483; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Followill DS, Kry SF, Qin L, et al. The Radiological Physics Center’s standard dataset for small field size output factors. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(5):3962.10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3962571823522955664Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo