Quality of health care and interdisciplinary collaboration from the perspective of employees and patients

1 Davidson AR, Kelly J, Ball L, et al. What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review. BMC Prim. Care. 2022;23:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01595-6. Search in Google Scholar

2 Didier A, Campbell J, Franco L, et al. Patient perspectives on interprofessional collaboration between healthcare professionals during hospitalization: a qualitative systematic review protocol. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020;18(6):1208-1270. doi: 10.11124/ JBISRIR-2016-003302. PMID: 28800050. Search in Google Scholar

3 Karam M, Brault I, Van Durme T, et al. Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: A systematic review of the qualitative research. Inter. J. of Nursing Studies. 2017;79:70-83. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijnurstu.2017.11.002 Search in Google Scholar

4 Halinski D. Quality improvement: What is it and who is responsible for it? Nephro. Nurs. J. 2022;49(2):157-163. Search in Google Scholar

5 Morgan S, Pullon S, McKinlay E. Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: an integrative literature review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2015; 52(7):1217-1230. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.008 Search in Google Scholar

6 Gainer RA, Curran J, Buth KJ, et al. Toward optimal decision making among vulnerable patients referred for cardiac surgery: a qualitative analysis of patient and provider perspectives. Med. Decis. Making. 2017;37(5):600-610. Search in Google Scholar

7 Stucky CH, Wymer JA. Progressing toward specialty certification as the National Standard for Nursing. Nurs. Forum. 2020;55(3):531-534. Search in Google Scholar

8 Busse R, Klazinga N, Panteli D, et al. (Ed.) Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies, Health Policy Series, No. 53. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019. Search in Google Scholar

9 Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implementation Sci. 2018; 13:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z. Search in Google Scholar

10 Morley L, Cashell A. Collaboration in health care. J. of medic imaging and radiation sci. 2017; 48: 207-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2017.02.071. Search in Google Scholar

11 Ebbers T, Kool RB, Smeele LE, et al. The Impact of Structured and Standardized Documentation on Documentation Quality; a Multicenter, Retrospective Study. J. Med. Syst. 2022; 46: 46. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01837-9. Search in Google Scholar

12 Johnson CB. A Personalized Shared Decision-Making Tool for Osteoarthritis Management of the Knee. Orthop Nurs. 2021;40(2):64-70. DOI: 10.1097/ NOR.0000000000000739. Search in Google Scholar

13 Bole V. Scope of the health care system - where is Slovenia? Econom movements. 2017; 498: 6-27. Search in Google Scholar

14 Lankhorst NE, Damen J, Oei EH, et al. Incidence, prevalence, natural course and prognosis of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee study. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2017;25(5): 647-653. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.006. Search in Google Scholar

15 Hustoft M, Hetlevik Ø, Aßmus J, et al. Communication and Relational Ties in Interprofessional Teams in Norwegian Specialized Health Care: A Multicentre Study of Relational Coordination. Inter. J. of Integr. Care. 2018;18(2):9. doi: 10.5334/ ijic.3432. Search in Google Scholar

16 Pullon S, McKinlay E, Stubbe M, et al. Patients’ and health professionals’ perceptions of teamwork in primary care. J. Prim. Health Care. 2011;3(2):128-135. DOI:10.1071/ HC11128. Search in Google Scholar

17 Lamb BW, Jalil RT, Shah S, et al. Cancer patients’ perspectives on multidisciplinary team working: an exploratory focus group study. Urol. Nurs. 2014;34(2):83-91,102. Search in Google Scholar

18 Robida A, Skela-Savič B, Trunk A. Defining skills and competencies for middle management in a hospital: final report of a research group. Ljubljana: Inter Institute for Management Development in Healthcare. 2008. Search in Google Scholar

19 Bola Natek A. Competences of doctors - managers and the introduction of modern forms of organization: master’s thesis [online]. University of Primorska, Faculty of Management. 2014, [Accessed 13 July 2022]. Retrieved from: https://repozitorij.upr.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=slv&id=6157 Search in Google Scholar

20 Wiig S, Aase K, von Plessen C, et al. Talking about quality: exploring how ‘quality’ is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014;14:478. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-47840. Search in Google Scholar

21 Šimec M, Krsnik S, Erjavec K. Integrated Clinical Pathways: Communication and Participation in a Multidisciplinary Team. Open Access Macedon J. of Medical Sci. 2021;9(B):1549-1555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7205. Search in Google Scholar

22 Šimec M, Krsnik S, Erjavec K. Assessment of nurses’ communication with department and hospital management in implementation of integrated clinical pathways in Slovenia. Nursing in the 21st Century. 2022;21:48-61. Search in Google Scholar

23 Erjavec K, Knavs N, Bedenčič K. Communication in interprofessional health care teams from the perspective of patients and staff. J. of Health Sci. 2022;12(1):29-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17532/jhsci.2022.1591. Search in Google Scholar

24 de la Perrelle L, Radisic G, Cations M, et al. Costs and economic evaluations of Quality Improvement Collaboratives in healthcare: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2020;20:155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4981-5. Search in Google Scholar

25 Kroll T, Neri MT. Experiences with care co-ordination among people with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, or spinal cord injury. Disabil. Rehabil. 2003;25(19):1106-1114. DOI: 10.1080/0963828031000152002. Search in Google Scholar

26 Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL, et al. Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2010;85(1):53-62. doi: 10.4065/ mcp.2009.0248. Search in Google Scholar

27 Didier A, Dzemaili S, Perrenoud B, et al. Patients’ perspectives on interprofessional collaboration between health care professionals during hospitalization: a qualitative systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020;18(6):1208-1270. doi: 10.11124/ JBISRIR-D-19-00121. Search in Google Scholar

28 Leskovic L, Erjavec K, Leskovar R. Burnout and job satisfaction of healthcare workers in Slovenian nursing homes in rural areas during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann. Agric. Environ Med. 2020;27(4):664-671. DOI: 10.26444/aaem/128236. Search in Google Scholar

29 Maunder RG, Heeney ND, Strudwick G, et al. Burnout in hospital-based healthcare workers during COVID-19. Science Briefs of the Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table. 2021;2(46). https://doi.org/10.47326/ocsat.2021.02.46.1.0. Search in Google Scholar

30 Šimec M, Krsnik S, Erjavec K. Health Service Quality and its Relationship to Team Collaboration and Communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Open Access Macedon J. of Medical Sci. 2023;11(E):1-6. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11454. Search in Google Scholar