Polish anaesthesiology nursing documentation: a complex, multi-faceted nursing practice in the context of evidence-based professional practice

1. Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 16 grudnia 2016 r. w sprawie standardu organizacyjnego opieki zdrowotnej w dziedzinie anestezjologii i intensywnej terapii (Dz. U z dnia 29 grudnia 2016 r. Poz. 2218).Search in Google Scholar

2. Zalecenie Grupy Roboczej do spraw Praktyki w Pielęgniarstwie Anestezjologicznym i Intensywnej Opiece PTPAiIO dotyczące dokumentacji pielęgniarki anestezjologicznej. http://www.ptpaio.pl/dokumenty/5.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

3. Alexander EL, Rothrock JC, Mcewen DR. Alexander’s Care of the Patient in Surgery, 2011, 14th. Mosby/Elsevier, St. Louis, MO.Search in Google Scholar

4. Braaf S, Manias E, Riley R. The role of documents and documentation in communication failure across the perioperative pathway. A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2011; 48: 1024–1038.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.05.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Joint Commission (2019) Joint Commission International. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org/ (accessed 30 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

6. WHO (2018) Patient Safety. Available at: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/en/ (accessed 2 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

7. International Federation of Perioperative Nurses (2014) Guideline for Developing Standards, Patient Safety – Our Primary Goal. Available at: https://www.inmo.ie/tempDocs/EORNA%20IFPN%20Patient%20Safety.pdf (13 January 2019)Search in Google Scholar

8. AORN Perioperative Nursing Data Set [Homepage of Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses] [Online]. Available at: http://www.aorn.org/education/facility-solutions/aorn-syntegrity/aorn-syntegrity-standardized-documentation (accessed 17 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

9. Chappy S. Perioperative patient safety: a multisite qualitative analysis. Association of Operating Room Nurses Journal. 2006; 83: 871–874, 877–888, 891–897.10.1016/S0001-2092(06)60008-2Search in Google Scholar

10. Junttilla K, Lauri S, Salantera S, Hupli M. Initial validation of the perioperative nursing data set in Finland. Nursing Diagnosis. 2002; 13: 41–52.10.1111/j.1744-618X.2002.tb00165.xSearch in Google Scholar

11. Lee E, Lee M. Comparison of nursing interventions performed by medical- surgical nurses in Korea and the United States. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2006; 17: 108–117.10.1111/j.1744-618X.2006.00025.x16848881Search in Google Scholar

12. Wilbanks BA. An integrative literature review of contextual factors in perioperative information management systems. Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2013; 31: 622–628.10.1097/CIN.000000000000000724145890Search in Google Scholar

13. Rudnik K. Odpowiedzialność prawna i dokumentacja medyczna pielęgniarki anestezjologicznej. Pielęgniarstwo w anestezjologii i intensywnej opiece. 2015; 1(3): 145-148.10.15374/PwAiIO2015008Search in Google Scholar

14. Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 9 maja 2015 roku w sprawie rodzajów, zakresu i wzorów dokumentacji medycznej oraz sposobu jej przetwarzania (Dz. U z dnia 8 grudnia 2015 r. Poz. 2069).Search in Google Scholar

15. Mellin-Olsen J, Staender S, Whitaker DK, Smith AF. The Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27(7): 592-597.10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833b1adf20520556Search in Google Scholar

16. Petrini F, Solca M, De Robertis E, et al.The Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anesthesiology: a way forward with the European Board and the European Society of Anesthesiology. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010; 76(11): 971-977.Search in Google Scholar

17. Whitaker DK, Brattebø G, Smith AF, Staender SE. The Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology: putting words into practice. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011; 25(2): 277-290.10.1016/j.bpa.2011.02.00121550551Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Sorensen EE, Olsen IO, Tewes M, Uhrenfeldt L. Perioperative nursing in public university hospitals: an ethnography. Bio Med Central Nursing. 2014; 13: 1–9.10.1186/s12912-014-0045-7426432825506263Search in Google Scholar

19. Usselmann E, Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW. The Evaluation og Electronic Perioperative Nursing Documentation Using a Cognitive Walkthrough Approach.2015Search in Google Scholar

20. Yontz LS, Zinn JL, Schumacher EJ. Perioperative nurses’ attitudes toward the electronic health record. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. 2015; 30: 23–3210.1016/j.jopan.2014.01.00725616883Search in Google Scholar

21. Killen AR, Kleinbeck SV, Gollar K, et al. The prevalence of perioperative nurse clinical judgments. Association of Operating Room Nurses Journal. 1997; 65: 101–108.10.1016/S0001-2092(06)63026-3Search in Google Scholar

22. Tiusanen TS, Junttila K, Leinonen T, Salantera S. The validation of AORN recommended practices in Finnish perioperative nursing documentation. Association of Operating Room Nurses Journal. 2010; 91: 236–247.10.1016/j.aorn.2009.06.02720152197Search in Google Scholar

23. Aholaakko TK. Reducing surgical nurses’ aseptic practice-related stress. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2011; 20: 3339–335010.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03844.x22074147Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Junttila K, Salantera S, Hupli M. Perioperative documentation in Finland. Association of Operating Room Nurses Journal. 2000; 72: 862–866, 868, 870–873.10.1016/S0001-2092(06)62018-8Search in Google Scholar

25. Park HA, Lee HJ, Yoon K. The perioperative nursing data set in Korean: translation, validation, and testing. Association of Operating Room Nurses Journal. 2007; 86: 424–445.10.1016/j.aorn.2007.04.00117822646Search in Google Scholar