<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>In this paper we deal with a not so slight misunderstanding about Heidegger’s conception of science(s). We try to show that instead of a so-called «anti-scientism» we find rather a <italic>critical</italic> thought on the part of Heidegger. Critical in two senses: one that implies a questioning and an explicitation of the pre-scientific, non-scientific foundations (or conditions) of science and the analysis of the relation between sciences as «regional ontologies» and philosophy as «fundamental ontology»; another that suggests the «need of another thinking», an alternative (certainly discussible) to the predominant calculative thinking of «the era of science».</p>
</abstract>

In this paper we deal with a not so slight misunderstanding about Heidegger’s conception of science(s). We try to show that instead of a so-called «anti-scientism» we find rather a critical thought on the part of Heidegger. Critical in two senses: one that implies a questioning and an explicitation of the pre-scientific, non-scientific foundations (or conditions) of science and the analysis of the relation between sciences as «regional ontologies» and philosophy as «fundamental ontology»; another that suggests the «need of another thinking», an alternative (certainly discussible) to the predominant calculative thinking of «the era of science».

Heidegger e as Ciências

Phainomenon

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Heidegger e as Ciências"}

In this paper we deal with a not so slight misunderstanding about Heidegger’s conception of science(s). We try to show that instead of a so-called...

Heidegger e as Ciências

Online veröffentlicht: 14. Dez. 2021

Seitenbereich: 43 - 55

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/phainomenon-2001-0009

© 2001 Nuno Melim, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.