[
Bafumi, J. & Shapiro, R. Y. (2009): A New Partisan Voter. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608090014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bárd, P. (2020): The rule of law and academic freedom or the lack of it in Hungary. European Political Science, 19(1): 87–96, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0171-x>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, P. (1975): The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19–47, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400602>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, P. (1983): The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12(4), 311–356, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90012-8>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clinton, J., Cohen, J., Lapinski, J., & Trussler, M. (2021): Partisan pandemic: How partisanship and public health concerns affect individuals’ social mobility during COVID-19. Science Advances, 7(2), eabd7204. <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd7204>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Conway, L. G., Woodard, S. R., Zubrod, A. & Chan, L. (2021): Why are conservatives less concerned about the coronavirus (COVID-19) than liberals? Comparing political, experiential, and partisan messaging explanations. Personality and Individual Differences, 183, 111–124, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111124>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2008): A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 26–35, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26–35>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eberl, J.-M., Huber, R. A., Mede, N. G. & Greussing, E. (2023): Populist attitudes towards politics and science: How do they differ? Political Research Exchange, 5(1), 2159847, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2159847>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Enyedi, Z. (2018): Democratic Backsliding and Academic Freedom in Hungary. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 1067–1074, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002165>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Enyedi, Z. (2022): Academic Solidarity and the Culture War in Orbán’s Hungary. PS: Political Science & Politics, 55(3), 582–584, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000129>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farkas, E., Böcskei, B., & Szabó, A. (2022): When Ideology Matters More – Science and Vaccine Scepticism in Light of Political Ideologies and Partisanship during the Third COVID-19 Wave in Hungary. Politics in Central Europe, 18(2), 251–269, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2022-0011>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2010): Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America (3rd edition). Boston: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gauchat, G. (2012): Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412438225>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hadley, S., & Gray, C. (2017): Hyperinstrumentalism and cultural policy: Means to an end or an end to meaning? Cultural Trends, 26(2), 95–106, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2017.1323836>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváth, S. (2022): Mozgástértől a szabadságig: Hatalmi stratégiák és döntési dilemmák politika és tudomány találkozásakor. Politikatudományi Szemle, 31(1), 7–30, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.30718/POLTUD.HU.2022.1.7>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012): Affect, Not IdeologyA Social Identity Perspective on Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kennedy, J. (2019): Populist politics and vaccine hesitancy in Western Europe: An analysis of national-leveldata.European Journal of Public Health, 29(3), 512–516, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz004>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kmetty, Z. (2014): Diskurzusok, nexusok és politikai részvétel: A politikai hálózatok és a politikai diskurzus szerepe a részvételben és a tömbösödésben. [Discourses, nexuses and political participation: the role of political networks and political discourse in participation and bloc formation]. Socio.hu, 4(2), 43–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kmetty, Z. (2015): Ideológiai és kapcsolathálózati törésvonalak a társadalmi-politikai térben a 2014-es országgyűlési választások előtt. [Ideological and networking fault lines in the socio-political space ahead of the 2014 parliamentary elections]. In G. Szabó (Ed.), Politika az intézményeken túl. Kapcsolatok, interakciók, élmények (pp. 8–34). MTA TK PTI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Körösényi, A. (2013): Political polarization and its consequences on democratic accountability. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 4(2), 3–30, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2013.02.01>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kristóf, L. (2017): Cultural Policy in an Illiberal State. The case study of Hungary after 2010. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 3(3), 8–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kristóf, L. (2021): From Cultural Policy towards Cultural Politics? The Case of the Hungarian Cultural Sphere. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(2), <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2021.1873964>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kutasi, K., Koltai, J., Szabó-Morvai, Á., Röst, G., Karsai, M., Biró, P., & Lengyel, B. (2022): Understanding hesitancy with revealed preferences across COVID-19 vaccine types. Scientific Reports, 12(1), Article 1, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15633-5>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Láncos, P. L. (2021): The State of Academic Freedom in Hungary: The Saga of the Central European University and the Research Network of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Light of National and European Guarantees of Academic Freedom. In: M. Seckelmann, L. Violini, C. Fraenkel-Haeberle & G. Ragone (eds.): Academic Freedom Under Pressure? Springer International Publishing, 61–90, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77524-7_6>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lesschaeve, C. (2017): The predictive power of the left-right self-placement scale for the policy positions of voters and parties. West European Politics, 40(2), 357–377, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1229088>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E. & Oberauer, K. (2013): The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science. PLOS ONE, 8(10), e75637, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2016): Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 338–358, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mede, N. G., & Schäfer, M. S. (2020): Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 473–491, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520924259>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pap, A. L. (2021): Academic freedom: A test and a tool for illiberalism, neoliberalism and liberal democracy. Brown Journal of World Affairs 27(2), 105–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patkós, V. (2022): Does partisan polarisation predict economic growth? Evidence from 27 European countries. Contemporary Politics, 28(2), 182–203, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1992100>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patkós, V. (2023): Measuring partisan polarization with partisan differences in satisfaction with the government: The introduction of a new comparative approach. Quality & Quantity, 57(1), 39–57, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01350-8>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rutjens, B. T., Sengupta, N., der Lee, R. van, van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Martens, J. P., Rabelo, A. & Sutton, R. M. (2022): Science Skepticism Across 24 Countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 102–117, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211001329>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rutjens, B. T., Sutton, R. M. & van der Lee, R. (2018): Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 384–405, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741314>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stokes, D. E. (1992): Valence Politics. In D. Kavangh (Ed.), Electoral Politics, 141–164. Oxford: Claredon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szabados, K. (2019): Can We Win the War on Science? Understanding the Link between Political Populism and Anti-Science Politics. Populism, 2(2), 207–236, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-02021028>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tóka, G. (2005): A magyarországi politikai tagoltság nemzetközi összehasonlításban. [Electoral Alignments in Hungary in a Cross-National Comparison]. In: R. Angelusz & R. Tardos (eds.), Törések, hálók, hidak: Választói magatartás és politikai tagolódás Magyarországon [Cleavages, Nets, and Bridges: Voting Behavior and the Political Process in Hungary]. Budapest: DKMKA, 243–322.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yan, P., Schroeder, R., & Stier, S. (2022): Is there a link between climate change scepticism and populism? An analysis of web tracking and survey data from Europe and the US. Information, Communication & Society, 25(10), 1400–1439, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1864005>.
]Search in Google Scholar
