1. bookVolumen 17 (2021): Heft 4 (December 2021)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1801-3422
Erstveröffentlichung
16 Apr 2015
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
access type Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Efforts to Disrupt the Authoritarian Equilibrium within the EU. Effects and Counter-effects

Online veröffentlicht: 30 Dec 2021
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 17 (2021) - Heft 4 (December 2021)
Seitenbereich: 723 - 741
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1801-3422
Erstveröffentlichung
16 Apr 2015
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Abstract

The study, leaning on the concept of ‘authoritarian equilibrium’ introduced by R. Daniel Kelemen on the one hand, and new intergovernmentalism as a fresh theoretical approach of the European integration on the other hand, investigates if we can talk about the disruption of the ‘authoritarian equilibrium’ as a consequence of the split up between Fidesz and the EPP, and the adoption of the rule of law conditionality mechanism. In other words, whether we can talk about an initial authoritarian dis-equilibrium? Or can we rather talk about a converse process due to the mechanisms of new intergovernmentalism resulting in the further stabilisation of authoritarian governments and the ineffectiveness of the EU measures devoted to the protection of rule of law? Using qualitative resource analysis of the relevant secondary literature and the documents and legal acts of the EU and its institutions the paper comes to the conclusion that while we have witnessed efforts to disrupt the partisan and the financial support of the Hungarian governing party, these efforts were neutralised by the mechanisms of new intergovernmentalism and as a consequence we still cannot talk about an initial authoritarian disequilibrium in the EU.

Banks, Martin (2020): Tamas Deutsch suspended from EPP group following ‘Gestapo’ remarks, The Parliament Magazine, 2020/12/18, Available at https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/news/article/tamas-deutsch-suspended-from-epp-group-following-gestapo-remarks (27 March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Benton, Allyson Lucinda (2012): Bottom-Up Challenges to National Democracy. Comparative Politics. Vol.44, No.3, p. 253–71.10.5129/001041512800078931 Search in Google Scholar

Bickerton, Christopher J. – Hodson, Dermot – Puetter, Uwe (2015a): The New Intergovernmentalism and the Study of European Integration, In Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot, Puetter, Uwe eds., The New Intergovernmentalism. States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford University Press, p. 1–48.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703617.003.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Blauberger, Michael – Kelemen, R. Daniel. (2016): Can courts rescue national democracy? Judicial safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 24, No.3, p. 321–336. Search in Google Scholar

Bozóki, András – Hegedűs, Dániel (2018): An externally constrained hybrid regime: Hungary in the European Union. Democratization. Vol. 25, No. 7, p. 1173–1189.10.1080/13510347.2018.1455664 Search in Google Scholar

EPP (2015): EPP ‘Statutes & Internal Regulations’. October, Available at https://www.epp.eu/files/uploads/2015/09/EPP-Statute_EN.pdf (24 March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

EURACTIV (2021): Commission extends deadline to approve Hungarian recovery plan. Available athttps://www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/commission-extends-deadline-to--approve-hungarian-recovery-plan/ (28August2021). Search in Google Scholar

Euronews (2021): MEPs in new threat to sue Commission over making EU cash handouts conditional.Availableathttps://www.euronews.com/2021/08/25/eu-commission-misses-deadline--to-trigger-rule-of-law-mechanism-and-faces-potential-lawsuit (28August2021) Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2016): European Structural and Investment Funds. Country factsheet – Hungary (May 19 2016). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/what/investment-policy/esif--country-factsheet/esi_funds_country_factsheet_hu_en.pdf (15 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2018): Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the Union’s budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States. 2 May 2018 Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0324&from=EN (17 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Council (2020a): Special meeting of the European Council (17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 July 2020) – Conclusions. Available at https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/45109/210720-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf(19April2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Council (2020b): European Council meeting (10 and 11 December 2020) – Conclusions. Availableathttps://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/47296/1011-12-20-euco-conclusions-en.pdf (19 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2019): European Parliament legislative resolution of 4 April 2019 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the Union’s budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States. Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/seance_pleniere/textes_adoptes/provisoire/2019/04-04/0349/P8_TA-PROV(2019)0349_EN.pdf (19 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2020): European Parliament resolution of 17 December 2020 on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021–2027, the Interinstitutional Agreement, the EU Recovery Instrument and the Rule of Law Regulation (2020/2923(RSP). Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0360_EN.pdf (27 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2021a): European Parliament resolution of 25 March 2021 on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092, the rule-of -law conditionality mechanism (2021/2582(RSP)). Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0103_EN.pdf (27 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2021b): European Parliament resolution of 10 June 2021 on the rule of law situation in the European Union and the application of the Conditionality Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 (2021/2711(RSP)) Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0287_EN.html (28 August 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2021c): European Parliament resolution of 8 July 2021 on the creation of guidelines for the application of the general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (2021/2071(INI)) Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0348_EN.html (28 August 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2020): Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R2092&from=EN (24 March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Gervasoni, Carlos (2010): A rentier theory of subnational regimes: Fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the Argentine provinces. World Politics. Vol. 62, No. 2, 302–340. Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward L. (2005): Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries. World Politics. Vol.58, No.1, 101–32.10.1353/wp.2006.0018 Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward L. (2012): Boundary control: Subnational authoritarianism in federal democracies, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139017992 Search in Google Scholar

Giraudy, Augustina (2010): The Politics of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Reproduction in Argentina and Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America. Vol.2, Issue 2, p. 53–84.10.1177/1866802X1000200203 Search in Google Scholar

Giraudy, Augustina (2015): Democrats and autocrats, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198706861.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Hegedűs, Dániel (2021): Orbán leaves EPP group – the beginning of a long endgame. euobserver. 2021/3/5 Available at https://euobserver.com/opinion/151131 (7 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Hungary Today (2020): Orbán on Veto: ‘I don’t want to compromise… it’s about finding a solution2020/11/27Availableathttps://hungarytoday.hu/eu-hungary-poland-compromise-orban--veto/ (04 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, Mehreen (2020): Parties in European parliament threaten to reject coronavirus budget. Financial Times. 23 July 2020 Available at https://www.ft.com/content/c4bfed3d-4014-498d--b03a-0b1ea4ebffa0 (28 August 2021) Search in Google Scholar

Kállay, László (2015): The Corruption Risks of EU Funds in Hungary. Transparency International Hungary Foundation. Available at https://transparency.hu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/The--Corruption-Risks-of-EU-funds.pdf(15April2021). Search in Google Scholar

Kelemen, R. Daniel (2017): Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union. Government and Opposition. Vol. 52, No. 2, 211–238. Search in Google Scholar

Kelemen, R. Daniel (2020): The European Union’s authoritarian equilibrium. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 27, No. 3, 481–499. Search in Google Scholar

Kelemen, R. Daniel and Pech, Laurent (2019): Of Red Lines and Red Herring: The EPP’s Delusions about Restraining Orbán. VerfBlog. 2019/3/15 Available at Of Red Lines and Red Herring: The EPP’s Delusions about Restraining Orbán – Verfassungsblog (20 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Keller-Alánt, Ákos (2021): Szelektív hallás: egyre kevesebb elmarasztaló ítéletet hajt végre a magyar kormány. Szabad Európa 2021/02/23 Available at https://www.szabadeuropa.hu/a/magyarorszag-nemzetkozi-birosag-itelet-jogallam/31116992.html(15April2021). Search in Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry – Pech, Laurent (2016): Better Late than Never? On the European Commission’s Rule of Law Framework and its First Activation. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 54, No. 5, 1062–1074. Search in Google Scholar

Magen, Amichai (2016): Cracks in the Foundations: Understanding the Great Rule of Law Debate in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 54, No. 5, 1050–1061. Search in Google Scholar

Maximov, Vlagyiszlav (2021): Commission pushes Hungary to implement NGO judgement among worries it is ‘too little too late. EUROACTIV.com. 2021/02/18 Available at https://www.euractiv.com/section/justice-home-affairs/news/commission-pushes-hungary-to-implement-ngo--judgement-among-worries-it-is-too-little-too-late/(15April2021). Search in Google Scholar

Novák, Katalin (2021): Katalin Novák’s letter to Antonio López-Istúriz White, 18 March, available at: https://twitter.com/KatalinNovakMP/status/1372571031244791813 (23 March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

OLAF (2020): The OLAF Report 2019. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/sites/default/files/olaf_report_2019_en.pdf (15 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, Peter – Stefanelli, Justine (2016): Strengthening the Rule of Law in the EU: The Council’s Inaction. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 54, No.5, 1075–1084.10.1111/jcms.12402 Search in Google Scholar

Orbán, Viktor (2021): Viktor Orbán’s letter to Manfred Weber, 3 March Available at:https://twitter.com/KatalinNovakMP/status/1367053668458106881/photo/1 (23 March 2021) Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, John (2015): The Commission and the New Intergovernmentalism, In Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot, Puetter, Uwe eds., The New Intergovernmentalism. States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. 185–207, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703617.003.0009 Search in Google Scholar

Puetter, Uwe (2015): The European Council. The Centre of New Intergovernmentalism, In Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot, Puetter, Uwe eds., The New Intergovernmentalism. States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. 164–184, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703617.003.0008 Search in Google Scholar

Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R2092&from=EN (22 March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Sargentini, Judith – Dimitrovs, Aleksejs (2016): The European Parliament’s Role: Towards New Copenhagen Criteria for Existing Member States?. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 54, No.5, 1085–1092.10.1111/jcms.12403 Search in Google Scholar

Sedelmeier, Ulrich (2016): Political safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU: the limits of material sanctions and the scope of social pressure. Journal of European Public Polic., Vol. 24, No. 3, 337–351. Search in Google Scholar

Valero, Jorge (2020): Commission considers options for recovery fund without Hungary and Poland. EURACTIV.com. 2020/12/2, Available at https://www.euractiv.com/section/economy--jobs/news/commission-considers-options-for-recovery-fund-without-hungary-and-poland/ (04 April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

von der Leyen, Ursula (2019): A Union that strives for more. My agenda for Europe. Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission 2019–2024. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/political-guidelines-next-commission_en_0.pdf (28 August 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Sarah (2015): Integrating in Justice and Home Affairs: A case of New Intergovernmentalism Par Excellence?, In Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot, Puetter, Uwe eds., The New Intergovernmentalism. States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. pp. 146–162, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703617.003.0006 Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo