[
Alibhai, S. K. & Gipps, J. H. W. 1991. Field Vole Microtus agrestis. – In: Corbet, G. B. & Harris, S. (eds.) The Handbook of British Mammals. – Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp. 203–208.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andries, A. M., Gulinck, H. & Herremans, M. 1994. Spatial modelling of the Barn Owl Tyto alba habitat using landscape characteristics derived from SPOT data. – Ecography 17: 278–287. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1994.tb00104.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Askew, N. P., Searle, J. B. & Moore, N. P. 2007. Agri-environment schemes and foraging of Barn Owls Tyto alba. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118(1): 109–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baláž, I., Ambros, M., Tulis, F., Veselovský, T., Klimant, P. & Augustiničová, G. 2013. Hlodavce a hmyzožravce Slovenska [Rodents and insectivores of Slovakia]. – FPV UKF, Nitra, edícia Prírodovedec č. 547 [FNS KFU, edition Prírodovedec č. 547] Nitra
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balestrieri, A., Gazzola, A., Formenton, G. & Canova, L. 2019. Long-term impact of agricultural practices on the diversity of small mammal communities: a case study based on owl pellets. – Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191(12): 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7910-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barti, L. 2011. Unusual occurrence of the Bicoloured White-toothed Shrew (Crocidura leucodon, Soricomorpha: Soricidae) in a mature beech forest in the Ciomad-Puturosu Mountains (Eastern Carpathians, Central Romania). – Acta Siculica 2011: 119–124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Battersby, J. 2005. UK Mammals: Species Status and Population Trends. First Report by the Tracking Mammals Partnership. – JNCC/Tracking Mammals Partnership
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Battisti, C., Dodaro, G., Di Bagno, E. & Amori, G. 2019. Small mammal assemblages in land-reclaimed areas: do historical soil use changes and recent anthropisation affect their dominance structure? – Ethology, Ecology & Evolution 32(3): 282–288. DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2019.1693433
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bego, F., Kryštufek, B., Paspali, G. & Rogozi, E. 2008. Small terrestrial mammals of Albania: annotated list and distribution. – Hystrix 19(2): 83–101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A. & Wilson, J. D. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? – Trends in ecology and evolution 18(4): 182–188. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Billeter, R., Liira, J., Bailey, D., Bugter, R. & Arens, P. 2008. Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. – Journal of Applied Ecology 45(1): 141–150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01393.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bond, G., Burnside, N. G., Metcalfe, D. J., Scott, D. M. & Blamire, J. 2005. The effects of land-use and landscape structure on Barn Owl (Tyto alba) breeding success in southern England, UK. – Landscape Ecology 20(5): 555–566. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-004-5037-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borowski, Z. 2003. Habitat selection and home range size of Field Voles Microtus agrestis in Słowiński National Park, Poland. – Acta Theriologica 48(3): 325–333. DOI: 10.1007/BF03194172
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bosé, M. & Guidali, F. 2001. Seasonal and geographic differences in the diet of the Barn Owl in an agro-ecosystem in northern Italy. – Journal of Raptor Research 35(3): 240–246.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bossard, M., Feranec, J. & Otahel, J. 2000. CORINE land cover technical guide – Addendum 2000. Technical Report No 40, European Environmental Agency
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Broughton, R. K., Shore, R. F., Heard, M. S., Amy, S. R. & Meek, W. R. 2014. Agri-environment scheme enhances small mammal diversity and abundance at the farm-scale. – Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 192: 122–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burel, F., Butet, A., Delettre, Y. R. & Millán de la Peña, N. 2004. Differential response of selected taxa to landscape context and agricultural intensification. – Landscape and Urban Planning 67(1): 195–204. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00039-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charter, M., Izhaki, I., Meyrom, K., Motro, Y. & Leshem, Y. 2009. Diets of Barn Owls differ in the same agricultural region. – The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121(2): 378–383. DOI: 10.1676/08-083.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chao, A., Gotelli, N. J., Hsieh, T. C., Sander, E. L., Ma, K. H., Colwell, R. K. & Ellison, A. M. 2014. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. – Ecological Monographs 84(1): 45–67. DOI: 10.1890/13-0133.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colvin, B. A. 1985. Common Barn-owl population decline in Ohio and the relationship to agricultural trends. – Journal of Field Ornithology 56(3): 224–235.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colwell, R. K. & Elsensohn, J. E. 2014. EstimateS turns 20: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, with non-parametric extrapolation. – Ecography 37(6): 609–613. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.00814
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Contoli, L. 1980. Borre di Strigiformi e ricerca teriologica in Italia [Owl pellet analysis and theriological research in Italy]. – Natura e montagna 3: 73–94. (in Italian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Durant, J. M., Hjermann, D. Ø. & Handrich, Y. 2013. Diel feeding strategy during breeding in male Barn Owls (Tyto alba). – Journal of Ornithology 154(3): 863–869. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-013-0956-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) 2012. ArcGIS Desktop Software, Release 10.1. – Redlands European
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Environmental Agency 2007. Land-use scenarios for Europe: qualitative and quantitative analysis on a European scale. – EEA Technical report No 9/2007, European Environmental Agency
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, C. & Schröder, B. 2014. Predicting spatial and temporal habitat use of rodents in a highly intensive agricultural area. – Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 189: 145–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, C., Thies, C. & Tscharntke, T. 2011. Small mammals in agricultural landscapes: opposing responses to farming practices and landscape complexity. – Biological Conservation 144(3): 1130–1136. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frey, C., Sonnay, C., Dreiss, A. & Roulin, A. 2011. Habitat, breeding performance, diet and individual age in Swiss Barn Owls (Tyto alba). – Journal of Ornithology 152(2): 279–290. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-010-0579-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geiger, F., Bengtsson, J., Berendse, F., Weisser, W. W. & Emmerson, M. 2010. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. – Basic and Applied Ecology 11(2): 97–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2009.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gentili, S., Sigura, M. & Bonesi, L. 2014. Decreased small mammals species diversity and increased population abundance along a gradient of agricultural intensification. – Hystrix 25(1): 39–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gorman, M. L. & Reynolds, P. 1993. The impact of land-use change on voles and raptors. – Mammal Review 23: 121–126. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1993.tb00423.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanowski, J. M., Niemi, G. J. & Christian, D. C. 1997. Influence of within-plantation heterogeneity and surrounding landscape composition on avian communities in hybrid poplar plantations. – Conservation Biology 11: 936–944. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96173.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansson, L. 1977. Spatial dynamics of Field Voles Microtus agrestis in heterogeneous landscapes. – Oikos 29: 539–544. DOI: 10.2307/3543592
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heroldová, M., Bryja, J., Zejda, J. & Tkadlec, E. 2007. Structure and diversity of small mammal communities in agriculture landscape. – Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 120(2–4): 206–210. DOI: 10.1016/j. agee.2006.09.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hindmarch, S. & Elliott, J. E. 2015. A specialist in the city: the diet of Barn Owls along a rural to urban gradient. – Urban Ecosystem 18(2): 477–488. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-014-0411-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hindmarch, S., Krebs, E. A., Elliott, J. E. & Green, D. J. 2012. Do landscape features predict the presence of Brn Owls in a changing agricultural landscape? – Landscape and Urban Planning 107(3): 255–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hodara, K. & Poggio, S. L. 2016. Frogs taste nice when there are few mice: do dietary shifts in Barn Owls result from rapid farming intensification? – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 230: 42–46. DOI: 10.1016/j. agee.2016.05.027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváth, G. F. 2000. Comparative analysis of the small mammal fauna of the river Drava plain region. I. Species richness, diversity and biomass based on the analysis of Barn Owl Tyto alba (Scop., 1769) pellets. – Tiscia 32: 47–53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváth, G. F. 2007. Csalitjáró pocok Microtus agrestis [Field vole Microtus agrestis]. – In: Bihari, Z., Csorba, G. & Heltai, M. (eds.) Magyarország emlőseinek atlasza [Atlas of the Hungarian Mammals]. – Kossuth Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 160–161. (in Hungarian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváth, G. F. 1998. Kisemlős (Mammalia) faunisztikai vizsgálatok a gyöngybagoly (Туto alba) köpetanalízise alapján a Dráva mentén (1995–1997) [The investigation of the small mammal fauna of the River Dráva plain region, based on the analysis of Brn Oowl (Tyto alba) pellets between 1995–1997.]. – Dunántúli Dolgozatok Természettudományi Sorozat 9: 475–488. (in Hungarian with English Summary)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváth, A., Morvai, A. & Horváth, G. F. 2018. Food-niche pattern of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in intensively cultivated agricultural landscape. – Ornis Hungarica 26(1): 27–40. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2018-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváth, A., Morvai, A. & Horváth, G. F. 2022. Difference in small mammal assemblages in the diet of the Common Barn-owl Tyto alba between two landscapes. – Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 68(2): 189–216. DOI: 10.17109/AZH.68.2.189.2022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváth, G. F., Molnár, D., Németh, T. & Csete, S. 2005. Landscape ecological analysis of Barn Owl pellet data from the Drava lowlands, Hungary. – Natura Somogyiensis 7: 179–189. DOI: 10.24394/NatSom.2005.7.179
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H. & Chao, A. 2016. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). – Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7(12): 1451–1456. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12613
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hutterer, R. & Kryštufek, B. 2016. Sorex araneus, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. – https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/29661/115170489.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hutterer, R., Kryštufek, B., Fernandes, M. & Meinig, H. 2016. Sorex minutus, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. – https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/29667/115171222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iannella, M., Liberatore, L. & Biondi, M. 2016. The effects of a sudden urbanization on micromammal communities: a case study of post-earthquake L’Aquila (Abruzzi Region, Italy). – Italian Journal of Zoology 83(2): 255–262. DOI: 10.1080/11250003.2016.1149235
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacob, J., Manson, P., Barfknecht, R. & Fredricks, T. 2014. Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) ecology and management: implications for risk assessment of plant protection products. – Pest Management Science 70(6): 869–878. DOI: 10.1002/ps.3695
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaksić, F. M., Seib, R. L. & Herrera, C. M. 1982. Predation by the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in Mediterranean habitats of Chile, Spain and California: A comparative approach. – The American Midland Naturalist 107(1): 151–162. DOI: 10.2307/2425196
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jost, L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. – Oikos 113(2): 363–375. DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x Kessler, J. E. 2015. Osteological guide of songbirds from Central Europe. – Ornis Hungarica 23(2): 62–155. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2015-0016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klein, R. G. & Cruz-Uribe, K. 1984. The analysis of animal bones from archeological sites. – University of Chicago, Chicago
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kowalski, K. & Ruprecht, A. L. 1981. The Field Vole (Microtus agrestis). – In: Pucek, Z. (ed.) Keys to vertebrates of Poland, Mammals. – Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, pp. 189–190.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kozakiewicz, M., Gortat, T., Kozakiewicz, A. & Barkowska, M. 1999. Effects of habitat fragmentation on four rodent species in a Polish farm landscape. – Landscape Ecology 14(4): 391–400. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008070610187
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kryštufek, B. & Macholán, M. 1998. Morphological differentiation in Mus spicilegus and the taxonomic status of mound-building mice from the Adriatic coast of Yugoslavia. – Journal of Zoology 245(2): 185–196. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00086.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kryštufek, B., Voharalík, V., Zima, J. & Zagorodnyuk, I. 2008. Microtus agrestis, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. – https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/13426/115112050.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lešo, P., Le, O. & Kropil, R. 2008. Unusual occurrence of the Bicoloured White-toothed Shrew (Crocidura leucodon) in a fir-beech forest in central Slovakia (Soricomorpha: Soricidae). – Lynx 39(1): 191–194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leveau, L. M., Teta, P., Bogdaschewsky, R. & Pardiñas, U. F. J. 2006. Feeding habits of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) along a longitudinal-latitudinal gradient in central Argentina. – Ornitologia Neotropical 17(3): 353–362.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Łopucki, R., Mróz, I., Berliński, Ł. & Burzych, M. 2013. Effects of urbanization on small-mammal communities and the population structure of synurbic species: an example of a medium-sized city. – Canadian Journal of Zoology 91(8): 554–561. DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2012-0168
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Love, R. A., Webon, C., Glue, D. E., Harris, S. & Harris, S. 2000. Changes in the food of British Barn Owls (Tyto alba) between 1974 and 1997. – Mammal Review 30(2): 107–129. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2000.00060.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lyman, R. L. 2012. Rodent-prey content in long-term samples of Barn Oowl (Tyto alba) pellets from the northwestern United States reflects local agricultural change. – The American Midland Naturalist 167(1): 150–163. DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031-167.1.150
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macholán, M. 1996. Multivariate morphometric analysis of European species of the genus Mus (Mammalia, Muridae). – Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde 61: 304–319.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marti, C. D. 1988. A long-term study of food-niche dynamics in the Common Barn-owl: comparisons within and between populations. – Canadian Journal of Zoology 66(8): 1803–1812. DOI: 10.1139/z88-261
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marti, C. D. 2010. Dietary trends of Barn Owls in an agricultural ecosystem in northern Utah. – The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122: 60–67. DOI: 10.1676/09-025.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, J. M., Branch, L. C., Raid, R. N. & Beyeler, S. C. 2010. Temporal instability of agricultural habitat reduces reproductive success of Barn Owls (Tyto alba). – The Auk 127(4): 909–916. DOI: 10.1525/auk.2010.09211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martínez, J. A. & Zuberogoitia, I. 2004. Habitat preferences and causes of population decline for Barn Owls Tyto alba: a multi-scale approach. – Ardeola 51(2): 303–317.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
März, R. 1972. Gewöll- und Rupfungskunde [The science of pellets and pluck]. – Akademie Verlag, Berlin (in German)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazzotti, S. & Caramori, G. 1998. Analysis of small mammal communities in south-eastern Po Valley. – Gortania Atti Museo Friulano Storia Naturale 20: 253–262.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGarigal, K. 2015. Fragstats help version 4.2. – http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/fragstats.help.4.2.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A. & Ene, E. 2012. FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. – http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meek, W. R., Burman, P. J., Nowakowski, M., Sparks, T. H. & Burman, N. J. 2003. Barn Owl release in lowland southern England – a twenty-one year study. – Biological Conservation 109(2): 271–282. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00155-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meek, W. R., Burman, P. J., Sparks, T. H., Nowakowski, M. & Burman, N. J. 2012. The use of Barn owl Tyto alba pellets to assess population change in small mammals. – Bird Study 59(2): 166–174. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2012.656076
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyrom, K., Motro, Y., Leshem, Y., Aviel, S., Izhaki, I., Argyle, F. & Charter, M. 2009. Nest-box use by the Barn Owl Tyto alba in a biological pest control program in the Beit She’an valley, Israel. – Ardea 97(4): 463–467. DOI: 10.5253/078.097.0410
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Michel, N., Burel, F. & Butet, A. 2006. How does landscape use influence small mammal diversity, abundance and biomass in hedgerow networks of farming landscapes? – Acta Oecologica 30(1): 11–20. DOI: 10.1016/j. actao.2005.12.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mikkola, H. 1983. Owls of Europe. – T. & AD. Poyser, Carton
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milchev, B. 2015. Diet of Barn Owl Tyto alba in Central South Bulgaria as influenced by landscape structure. – Turkish Journal of Zoology 39(5): 933–940. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1409-24
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millán de la Peña, N., Butet, A., Delettre, Y., Paillat, G., Morant, P., Le Du, L. & Burel, F. 2003. Response of the small mammal community to changes in western French agricultural landscapes. – Landscape Ecology 18(3): 265–278. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024452930326
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Møller, A. P. 1984. Community structure of birds in agricultural areas in summer and winter in Denmark. – Ecography 7: 413–418. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1984.tb01142.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moreira, F., Beja, P., Morgado, R., Reino, L., Gordinho, L., Delgado, A. & Borralho, R. 2005. Effects of field management and landscape context on grassland wintering birds in southern Portugal. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 109: 59–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.02.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mortelliti, A. & Boitani, L. 2009. Distribution and coexistence of shrews in patchy landscapes: a field test of multiple hypotheses. – Acta Oecologica 35(6): 797–804. DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2009.07.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moysi, M., Christou, M., Goutner, V., Kassinis, N. & Iezekiel, S. 2018. Spatial and temporal patterns in the diet of Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in Cyprus. – Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki 25(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.1186/s40709-018-0080-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niethammer, J. & Krapp, F. 1978. Handbuch der säugetiere Europas. – Teil 1, Nagetiere 1 [Handbook of the Mammals of Europe. – Part 1, Rodents 1]. – Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden (in German)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niethammer, J. & Krapp, F. 1982. Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas – Teil 2, Nagetiere 2 [Handbook of Mammals of Europe – Part 2, Rodents 2]. – Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden (in German)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niethammer, J. & Krapp, F. 1990. Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas – Teil 3, Insektenfresser, Herrentiere [Handbook of Mammals of Europe – Part 3, Insectivores, Primates]. – Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden (in German)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paspali, G., Oruci, S., Koni, M., Wilson, I., Kryštufek, B. & Bego, F. 2013. Seasonal variation of small mammals in the diet of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in the Drinos River valley, southern Albania. – Turkish Journal of Zoology 37(1): 97–105. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1203-25
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavluvčík, P., Poprach, K., Machar, I., Losík, J., Gouveia, A. & Tkadlec, E. 2015. Barn Owl productivity response to variability of vole populations. – PloS One 10(12): e0145851. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145851
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paz, A., Jareño, D., Arroyo, L., Viñuela, J., Arroyo, B., Mougeot, F., Luque-Larena, J. J. & Fargallo, J. A. 2013. Avian predators as a biological control system of Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in northwestern Spain: experimental setup and preliminary results. – Pest Management Science 69(3): 444–450. DOI: 10.1002/ps.3289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prete, S., Battisti, C., Marini, F. & Ciucci, P. 2012. Applying abundance/biomass comparisons on a small mammal assemblage from Barn Owl (Tyto alba) pellets (Mount Soratte, central Italy): a cautionary note. – Rendiconti Lincei 23(4): 349–354. DOI: 10.1007/s12210-012-0183-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Purger, J. J. 1998. A Dráva mente Somogy megyei szakaszának kisemlős (Mammalia) faunája, gyöngybagoly, Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) köpetek vizsgálata alapján [Small mammal fauna of the region of Dráva river in country Somogy (Hungary), obtained by Bam Owl, Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) pellet analysis]. – Dunántúli Dolgozatok Természettudományi Sorozat 9: 489–500. (in Hungarian with English Summary)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
R Development Core Team 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. – https://www.r-project.org/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Renwick, A. R. & Lambin, X. 2011. Abundance thresholds and the underlying ecological processes: Field Voles Microtus agrestis in a fragmented landscape. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 144(1): 364–369. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rocha, R. G., Ferreira, E., Leite, Y. L., Fonseca, C. & Costa, L. 2011. Small mammals in the diet of Barn Owls, Tyto alba (Aves: Strigiformes) along the mid-Araguaia River in central Brazil. – Zoologia (Curitiba) 28(6): 709–716. DOI: 10.1590/S1984-46702011000600003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romano, A., Séchaud, R. & Roulin, A. 2020. Global biogeographical patterns in the diet of a cosmopolitan avian predator. – Journal of Biogeography 47(7): 1467–1481. DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13829
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roulin, A. 2015. Spatial variation in the decline of European birds as shown by the Barn Owl Tyto alba diet. – Bird Study 62(2): 271–275. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2015.1012043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S., Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D. M., Mooney, A. H., Oesterheld, M., Poff, N. L., Sykes, M. T., Walker, B. H., Walker, M. & Wall, D. H. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. – Science 287(5459): 1770–1774. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salvati, L., Ranazzi, L. & Manganaro, A. 2002. Habitat preferences, breeding success and diet of Barn Owls in Rome: urban versus rural territories. – Journal of Raptor Research 36: 224–228.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schaefer, H. 1932. Die Artbestimmung der deutschen Anuren nach dem Skelet [Identification of the German anurans based on the skeleton]. – Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte 97(6): 767–779. DOI: 10.1007/BF02121644 (in German)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt, E. 1967. Bagolyköpet vizsgálatok [Owl pellet analyses]. – Madártani Intézet, Budapest (in Hungarian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shawyer, C. R. & Shawyer, V. M. 1995. An investigation of the Barn Owl population within the Arun and Western Rother catchments. – Hawk and Owl Trust, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biomety: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. – New York, W. H. Freeman
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stoate, C., Báldi, A., Beja, P., Boatman, N. D. & Herzon, I. 2009. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe – a review. – Journal of Environmental Management 91(1): 22–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stoate, C., Boatman, N. D., Borralho, R. J., Carvalho, C. R., De Snoo, G. R. & Eden, P. 2001. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. – Journal of Environmental Management 63(4): 337–365. DOI: 10.1006/jema.2001.0473
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suchomel, J. & Heroldová, M. 2004. Small terrestrial mammals in two types of forest complexes in intensively managed landscape of South Moravia (The Czech Republic). – Ekologia (Bratislava) 23(4): 377–384.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suchomel, J. & Purchart, L. 2011. Occurrence of Crocidura leucodon in plantings of forest trees in southern Moravia, Czech Republic (Soricomorpha: Soricidae). – Lynx 42: 271–274.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szép, D., Klein, Á. & Purger, J. J. 2017. The prey composition of the Barn Owl with respect to landscape structure of its hunting area (Zala County, Hungary). – Ornis Hungarica 25(2): 51–64. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szép, D., Klein, Á. & Purger, J. J. 2019. Investigating the relationship between the prey composition of Barn Owls and the habitat structure of their hunting range in the Marcal Basin (Hungary), based on pellet analysis. – Ornis Hungarica 27(1): 32–43. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2019-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tattersall, F. H., Macdonald, D. W., Hart, B. J., Johnson, P., Manley, W. & Feber, R. 2002. Is habitat linearity important for small mammal communities on farmland? – Journal of Applied Ecology 39(4): 643–652. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00741.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, I. 2004. Barn Owls: Predation-prey relationships and conservation. – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teta, P., Hercolini, C. & Cueto, G. 2012. Variation in the diet of western Barn Owls (Tyto alba) along an urban-rural gradient. – The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 124: 589–596. 10.1676/11-173.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wichmann, M. C., Schwager, M. & Jeltsch F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. – Journal of Biogeography 31(1): 79–92. DOI: 10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torre, I., Gracia-Quintas, L., Arrizabalaga, A., Baucells, J. & Díaz, M. 2015a Are recent changes in the terrestrial small mammal communities related to land use change? A test using pellet analyses. – Ecological Research 30(5): 813–819. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-015-1279-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torre, I., Fernández, L. & Arrizabalaga, A. 2015b Using Barn Owl Tyto alba pellet analyses to monitor the distribution patterns of the Yellow-necked Mouse (Apodemus flavicollis Melchior 1834) in a transitional Mediterranean mountain. – Mammal Study 40(3): 133–142. DOI: 10.3106/041.040.0302
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trejo, A. & Lambertucci, S. 2007. Feeding habits of Barn Owls along a vegetative gradient in northern Patagonia. – Journal of Raptor Research 41: 277–287. DOI: 10.3356/0892-1016(2007)41[277:FHOBOA]2.0.CO;2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tulis, F., Baláž, M., Obuch, J. & Šotnár, K. 2015. Responses of the Long-eared Owl Asio otus diet and the numbers of wintering individuals to changing abundance of the Common Vole Microtus arvalis. – Biologia 70(5): 667–673. DOI: 10.1515/biolog-2015-0074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. – New York, Springer Publishing
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Veselovský, T., Bacsa, K. & Tulis, F. 2017. Barn Owl (Tyto alba) diet composition on intensively used agricultural land in the Danube Lowland. – Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 65(1): 225–233. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201765010225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, M. & Grimm, V. 2007. Home range dynamics and population regulation: an individual-based model of the Common Shrew Sorex araneus. – Ecological Modelling 205(3–4): 397–409. DOI: 10.1016/j. ecolmodel.2007.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yalden, D. W. 1977. Identification of Remains in Owl Pellets. – Mammal Society, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yalden, D. W. & Morris, P. A. 1990. The Analysis of Owl Pellets. – Mammal Society, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yletyinen, S. & Norrdahl, K. 2008. Habitat use of Field Voles (Microtus agrestis) in wide and narrow buffer zones. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 123(1–3): 194–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.06.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zebisch, M., Wechsung, F. & Kenneweg, H. 2004. Landscape response functions for biodiversity – assessing the impact of land-use changes at the county level. – Landscape and Urban Planning 67(1–4): 157–172. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00036-7
]Search in Google Scholar
