[Bioacoustics Research Program 2014. Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software (Version 1.5) [Computer software]. – Ithaca, NY: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology Available from http://www.birds.cornell.edu/raven.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borker, A. L., Halbert, P., McKown, M. W., Tershy, B. R. & Croll, D. A. 2015. A comparison of automated and traditional monitoring techniques for marbled murrelets using passive acoustic sensors. – Wildlife Society Bulletin 39: 813–818. DOI: 10.1002/wsb.60810.1002/wsb.608]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Catchpole, C. K., Slater, P. J. B. 2008. Bird song: biological themes and variations, 2nd ed. – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511754791]Search in Google Scholar
[Garamszegi, L. Zs., Eens, M. & Török, J. 2008. Birds Reveal their Personality when Singing. – PLoS One 3(7). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.000264710.1371/journal.pone.0002647244145418612388]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Garamszegi, L. Zs., Török, J., Hegyi, G., Szöllõsi, E., Rosivall, B. & Eens, M. 2007. Age-dependent expression of song in the Collared Flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. – Ethology 113: 246–256. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01337.x10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01337.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Garamszegi, L. Zs., Zagalska-Neubauer, M., Canal, D., Blazi, Gy., Laczi, M., Nagy, G., Szőllősi, E., Vaskuti, É. Török, J. & Zsebők, S. 2018. MHC-mediated sexual selection on birdsong: Generic polymorphism, particular alleles and acoustic signals. – Molecular Ecology 27: 2620–2633. DOI: 10.1111/mec.1470310.1111/mec.1470329693314]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Garamszegi, L. Zs., Zsebők, S. & Török, J. 2012. The relationship between syllable repertoire similarity and pairing success in a passerine bird species with complex song. – Journal of Theoretical Biology 295: 68–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.11.01110.1016/j.jtbi.2011.11.01122123372]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Haavie, J., Borge, T., Bures, S., Garamszegi, L. Zs., Lampe, H. M., Moreno, J., Qvarnström, A., Török, J. & Sætre, G. P. 2004. Flycatcher song in allopatry and sympatry – Convergence, divergence and reinforcement. – Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 227–237. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2003.00682.x10.1111/j.1420-9101.2003.00682.x15009256]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hafner, S. D. & Katz, J. 2017. {monitoR}: Acoustic template detection in R. Retrieved from http://www.uvm.edu/rsenr/vtcfwru/R/?Page=monitoR/monitoR.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[Hopp, S. L., Owren, M. J. & Evans, C. S. 1998. Animal acoustic communication: sound analysis and research methods. – Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-642-76220-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Lachlan, R. F., Ratmann, O. & Nowicki, S. 2018. Cultural conformity generates extremely stable traditions in bird song. – Nature Communications 9: 2417. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04728-110.1038/s41467-018-04728-1601040929925831]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Laiolo, P. 2010. The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. – Biological Conservation 143: 1635–1645. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.02510.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.025]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mac Aodha, O., Gibb, R., Barlow, K. E., Browning, E., Firman, M., Freeman, R., Harder, B., Kinsey, L., Mead, G. R., Newson, S. E., Pandourski, I., Parsons, S., Russ, J., Szodoray-Paradi, A., Szodoray-Paradi, F., Tilova, E., Girolami, M., Brostow, G. & Jones, K. E. 2018. Bat detective-Deep learning tools for bat acoustic signal detection. – PLoS Computational Biology 14: 1–19. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100599510.1371/journal.pcbi.1005995584316729518076]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Priyadarshani, N., Marsland, S. & Castro, I. 2018. Automated birdsong recognition in complex acoustic environments: a review. – Journal of Avian Biology 49(5): 1–27. DOI: 10.1111/jav.0144710.1111/jav.01447]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[R Core Team 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria – Available online at https://www.R-project.org/]Search in Google Scholar
[Rahman, M. A. & Wang, Y. 2016. Optimizing intersection-over-union in deep neural networks for image segmentation. – Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10072 LNCS: 234–244. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50835-1_2210.1007/978-3-319-50835-1_22]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R. & Farhadi, A. 2016. You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02640v510.1109/CVPR.2016.91]Search in Google Scholar
[Redmon, J. & Farhadi, A. 2018. YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement. – Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02767]Search in Google Scholar
[Stowell, D., Petrusková, T., Šálek, M. & Linhart, P. 2018. Automatic acoustic identification of individual animals: Improving generalisation across species and recording conditions. – Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.09273]Search in Google Scholar
[Stowell, D., Wood, M. D., Pamuła, H., Stylianou, Y. & Glotin, H. 2019. Automatic acoustic detection of birds through deep learning: The first Bird Audio Detection challenge. – Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10: 368–380. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.1310310.1111/2041-210X.13103]Search in Google Scholar
[Sueur, J., Aubin, T. & Simonis. C. 2008. Seewave, a Free Modular Tool for Sound Analysis and Synthesis. Bio-acoustics The International Journal of Animal Sound and its Recording 18:213–226. DOI: 10.1080/09524622. 2008.975360010.1080/09524622.2008.9753600]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tchernichovski, O., Nottebohm, F., Ho, C. E., Pesaran, B. & Mitra, P. P. 2000. A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. – Animal Behaviour 59: 1167–1176. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.141610.1006/anbe.1999.141610877896]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vellema, M., Diales Rocha, M., Bascones, S., Zsebők, S., Dreier, J., Leitner, S., Van der Linden, A., Brewer, J. & Gahr, M. 2019. Accelerated redevelopment of vocal skills is preceded by lasting reorganization of the song motor circuitry. – Elife 8: 1–46. DOI: 10.7554/elife.4319410.7554/elife.43194657052631099755]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zachar, G., Tóth, A. S., Gerecsei, L. I., Zsebők, S., Ádám, Á. & Csillag, A. 2019. Valproate exposure in ovo attenuates the acquisition of social preferences of young post-hatch Domestic Chicks. – Frontiers in Physiology 10: 881. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.0088110.3389/fphys.2019.00881664651731379596]Search in Google Scholar
[Zsebők, S., Blázi, G., Laczi, M., Nagy, G., Vaskuti, É. & Garamszegi, L. Zs. 2018a “Ficedula”: an open-source MATLAB toolbox for cutting, segmenting and computer-aided clustering of bird song. – Journal of Ornithology 159: 1105–1111. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-018-1581-910.1007/s10336-018-1581-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Zsebők, S., Herczeg, G., Blázi, G., Laczi, M., Nagy, G., Török, J. & Garamszegi, L. Zs. 2018b Minimum spanning tree as a new, robust repertoire size comparison method: simulation and test on birdsong. – Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72: 48. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-018-2467-910.1007/s00265-018-2467-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zsebők, S., Herczeg, G., Blázi, G., Laczi, M., Nagy, G., Szász, E., Markó, G., Török, J. & Garamszegi, L. Zs. 2017. Short- and long-term repeatability and pseudo-repeatability of bird song: sensitivity of signals to varying environments. – Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71: 154. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2379-010.1007/s00265-017-2379-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar