[
Aguilera, R.V. (2023). Corporate Purpose in Comparative Perspective: The Role of Governance. Strategy Science, 8(2), 193-201. doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0198
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aguinis, H. & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Al-Tal, M.J.Y. and Emeagwali, O.L. (2019). Knowledge-based HR Practices and Innovation in SMEs. Organizacija, 52(1), 6-21. doi.org/10.2478/orga-2019-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arraya, M. & Ferreira, J.J. (2024). Are We Competitive? A Firm Competitiveness Fit Scale. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 0, 1–15. doi:10.1002/joe.22284
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arraya, M. (2024). Capabilities configurational method for organizations’ sustainability: antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 17(2), 215-233. doi:10.1504/ijmcp.2023.10056206
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ashfaq, B., and Hamid, A. (2021). Person-organization fit and organization citizenship behavior: Modeling the work engagement as a mediator. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(1), 19–39. doi:10.1108/apjba-12-2019-0255
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J. & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339. doi:10.1108/00251740910984578
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barney, J.B., Ketchen, Jr, D.J., & Wright, M. (2021). Resource-Based Theory and the Value Creation Framework. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1936-1955. doi:10.1177/01492063211021655
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blair, M., & Stout, L.A. (1999). A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review, 85(2), 247-328. doi:10.2139/ssrn.425500
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bocken, N.M.P. & Geradts, T.H.J. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 53, 101950. doi.org/10.1016/j. lrp.2019.101950
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonchek, M. (2016). How to Discover Your Company’s DNA. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, September, 2-5. https://hbr.org/2016/12/how-to-discover-your-companys-dna
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Breuer, H. & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2017). Values-Based Network and Business Model Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), Art. 1750028, 1-35. doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500281
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buzzao, G., & Rizzi, F. (2020). On the conceptualization and measurement of dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Building theory through a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and The Environment, 30,135–175. doi.org/10.1002/bse.2614
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Camisón, C., and A. Villar-López. (2014). Organizational Innovation as an Enabler of Technological Innovation Capabilities and firm Performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891–2902. doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2012.06.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carew, D., Kandarian, F., Parisi-Carew, E. & Stoner, J. (2009). Is your organization high performing? In Ken Blanchard (Eds). Leading at a higher level, revised and expanded edition: Blanchard on leadership and creating high performing organizations, 2nd Edition. Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ceylan, C. (2013). Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 24(1), 208-226. doi.org/10.1 080/09585192.2012.680601
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaubey, A., Sahoo, C.K. and Das, K.C. (2022). Examining the effect of training and employee creativity on organizational innovation: a moderated mediation analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(2), 499-524. doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2020-2271
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Q., Wang, C.H. & Huang, S.Z. (2019). Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: evidence from firms in China’s Pearl River Delta. Asia Pacific Business Review, 26(1), 72-96. doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1 592339
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colenbaugh, R. and Reigel, B. (2010). Enabling, engaging, and rewarding employees. A Study of World-at-Work Reward Professionals. HayGroup.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clarke, V.L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, S.E., Stoermer, S., & Froese, F.J. (2019). When the going gets tough: the influence of expatriate resilience and perceived organizational inclusion climate on work adjustment and turnover intentions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1393–1417. doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.15 28558
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drucker, P.F. (1974). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dyer, J., Gregersen, H.B., & Christensen, C. (2011). The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators. Boston, MA., Harvard Business Review Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eisenhardt, K.M. & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. doi. org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellsworth, R.R. (2002). Leading with Purpose: The New Corporate Realities. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farida, I. & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business strategies and competitive advantage: the role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 163. doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fay, D., Shipton, H., West, M. & Patterson, M. (2014). Teamwork and organizational innovation: the moderating role of the HRM context. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 261-277. doi.org/10.1111/caim.12100
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Felin, T. & Foss, N. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3(4), 441–455. doi.org/10.1177/1476127005055796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman, R. & Ginena, K. (2015). Rethinking the purpose of the corporation: Challenges from stakeholder theory. Notizie di Politeia, 31, 9-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fu, N., Flood, P.C., Bosak, J., Morris, T. and O’Regan, P. (2015). How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms?”. Employee Relations, 37(2), 209-231. doi:10.1108/ER-10-2013-0155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gartenberg, C. (2023). The contingent relationship between purpose and profits. Strategy Science, 8(2), 257-269. doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0194
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gartenberg, C., Prat, A., and Serafeim, G. (2019). Corporate Purpose and Financial Performance. Organization Science, 30(1), 1–18. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1230
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbert, M. and Ruigrok, W. (2010). The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of case study rigor: three strategies based on published work. Organization Research Methods, 13, pp. 710–737. doi.org/10.1177/1094428109351319
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grant, R.M. (2010). Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 7th edition. Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grawe, S.J., Chen, H. & Daugherty, P.J. (2009). The relationship between strategic orientation, service innovation, and performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(4), 282-300. doi.org/10.1108/09600030910962249
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. & Tatham, R.L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson, New Jersey.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halbesleben, J.R., Neveu, J.P., Paustian-Underdahl, S.C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364. doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harrison, J.S., Phillips, R.A. and Freeman, R.E. (2020). On the 2019 business roundtable ‘statement on the purpose of a corporation’. Journal of Management, 46(7), 1223-1237. doi.org/10.1177/0149206319892669
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harsch, K. & Festing, M. (2019). Dynamic talent management capabilities and organizational agility—A qualitative exploration. Human Resource Management, 59, 43–61. doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21972
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henderson, R. & Van den Steen, E. (2015). Why Do Firms Have “Purpose”? The Firm’s Role as a Carrier of Identity and Reputation. American Economic Review, 105(5): 326–30. doi:10.1257/aer.p20151072
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henderson, R. (2020). Innovation in the 21st Century: Architectural Change, Purpose, and the Challenges of Our Time. Management Science, Articles in Advance, 1–10. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3746
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., & George, G. (2014). Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management, 57(5), 1227e1234. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.4005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Homer, S.T., & Lim, W.M. (2024). Theory development in a globalized world: Bridging “Doing as the Romans Do” with “Understanding Why the Romans Do It”. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(3), 127–138. doi.org/10.1002/joe.22234
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, J.-C. (2021). Effects of person-organization fit objective feedback and subjective perception on organizational attractiveness in online recruitment. Personnel Review, 51(4), 1262–1276. doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0449
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joly, H. (2021). Creating a Meaningful Corporate Purpose. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, October, 1-12. https://hbr.org/2021/10/creating-a-meaningful-corporate-purpose
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kareem, M.A., Kummitha, H.R., and Kolloju, N. (2024). The Mediating Role of Innovation Capabilities on the Relationship between Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Competitive Performance. Organizacija, 57(1), 56-71. doi: 10.2478/orga-2024-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2020). The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 3018-3033. doi.org/10.1002/csr.2020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kianto, A. (2009). Development and validation of a survey instrument for measuring organisational renewal capability. International Journal Technology Management, 42(1/2), 69–88. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2008.018061
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. doi: 10.4018/ijec.2015100101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lamberti, L. (2013). Customer centricity: The construct and the operational antecedents. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21, 588 - 612. doi.org/10.1080/096525 4X.2013.817476
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawson, B. & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377-400. doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lepeley, M.T. (2017). Human centered management: The five global pillars of organization quality and sustainability. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ma Prieto, I. & Pilar Pérez-Santana, M. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184-208. doi. org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Madden, B.J. (2017). The Purpose of the Firm, Valuation, and the Management of Intangibles. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 29(2), 76-86. doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12235
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Malnight, T.W., Buche, I., & Dhanaraj, C. (2019). Put purpose at the core of your strategy. Harvard Business Review, 97(5), 70-79. https://hbr.org/2019/09/put-purpose-at-the-core-of-your-strategy
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayer, C. (2021). The Future of the Corporation and the Economics of Purpose. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 887-901. doi.org/10.1111/joms.12660
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehta, M., Chandani, A., Moksha, N., & Parul, C. (2016). Trends in employee engagement practices in global and Indian companies: A technique to curb attrition. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(15), 45–48. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i15/92128
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meijerink, J., Bos-Nehles, A., & de Leede, J. (2020). How employees’ pro-activity translates high-commitment HRM systems into work engagement: The mediating role of job crafting. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(22), 2893–2918. doi. org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1475402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Metcalf, L. & Benn, S. (2012). The corporation is ailing social technology: creating a “fit for purpose” design for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics ,111(2), 195–210. doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1201-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Migdadi, M. (2019). Organizational learning capability, innovation and organizational performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 151-172. doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2018-0246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morse, J.M. (1989) Strategies for sampling. In: Morse, J. (ed.) Qualitative nursing research: a contemporary dialogue, pp. 117-31. Rockville, MD, USA: Aspen Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morse, J.M. (2018). Reframing rigor in qualitative inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 796-816). Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morse, J.M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Principles and procedures of mixed methods design. Left Coast Press. Mossholder, K.W., Richardson, H.A., & Settoon, R.P. (2011). Human resource systems and helping in organizations: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 33-52. doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mourkogiannis, N. (2008). HR’s Return to Purpose-Focused Organizations. Employment Relations, 35(2), 25-30. doi.org/10.1002/ert.20198
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nyimbili, F. & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of Purposive Sampling Techniques with Their Examples and Application in Qualitative Research Studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies: English Lang., Teaching, Literature, Linguistics & Communication, 5(1),90-99. doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ocasio, W., Kraatz, M., & Chandler, D. (2023). Making sense of corporate purpose. Strategy Science, 8(2),123-138. doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peters, T. (1987). Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pink, D. (2011). Drive: The surprising Truth of What Motivates Us. Riverhead Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. doi. org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Popa, S, Soto-Acosta, P. & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118(C), 134-142. doi.org/10.1016/j.tech-fore.2017.02.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porter, M.E. & Kramer, M.R. (2019). Creating shared value. In Managing Sustainable Business; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 323–346.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reichheld, F.F., Darnell, D., & Burns, M. (2021). Winning on Purpose: The Unbeatable Strategy of Loving Customers. Harvard Business Review Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rey, C. & Bastons, M. (2019). Three Dimensions of Purpose – Knowledge, Motivation and Action. Chapter 3 (pp.29-42) In: Rey, C., Bastons, M., Sotok, P. (eds), Purpose-driven Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of In0novations, Free Press, New York, NY.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schultz, J.R. (2014). Framing the Organization’s Purpose With Its Ultimate Goals in Mind. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, March/April, 46-55. doi. org/10.1002/joe.21543
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silva, J.J., & Cirani, C.B.S. (2020). The capability of organizational innovation: systematic review of literature and research proposals. Gestão & Produção, 27(4), e4819. doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X4819-20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sisodia, R. & Gelb, M.J. (2019). The healing organization. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, T., Kirkman, B., Chen, G., & Lemoine, G. (2018). Leading Teams Research: When Employees work on Multiple Teams. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, September, 1-5. https://hbr.org/2018/09/research-when-employees-work-on-multiple-teams-good-bosses-can-have-ripple-effects
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teece, D.J. (2023). The Evolution of the Dynamic Capabilities Framework. In: Adams, R., Grichnik, D., Pundziene, A., Volkmann, C. (eds) Artificiality and Sustainability in Entrepreneurship. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thorpe, L.P. & Schmuller, A.M. (1958). Personality: An Interdisciplinary Approach. D Van Nostrand Company: New York, NY, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsang, E.W.K. (2014). Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 369–383. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Upadhyay, P. & Kumar, A. (2020) The intermediating role of organizational culture and internal analytical knowledge between the capability of big data analytics and a firm’s performance. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102100. doi.org/10.1016/j. ijinfomgt.2020.102100
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Ingen, R., Peters, P., De Ruiter, M., & Robben, H. (2021). Exploring the meaning of organizational purpose at a new dawn: The development of a conceptual model through expert interviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 675543. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675543
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verquer, M.L., Beehr, T.A., & Wagner, S.H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473-489. doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00036-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weerawardena, J., Mort, G.S., Salunke, S., Knight, G., & Liesch, P.W. (2015). The role of the market sub-system and the socio-technical sub-system in innovation and firm performance: a dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 221–239. doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0382-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yemiscigil, A. (2019). Purpose: A New Paradigm with Implications for Policy, Business, and Individual Lives. Global Relations Forum, Young Academics Program Analysis Paper Series No.5. https://www.gif.org.tr/files/ayse-yemiscigil-makale.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, Sage, California.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yin, Y., Wang, Y., & Lu, Y. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of employee empowerment practices: a theoretical extension with empirical evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(4), 564–584. doi. org/10.1111/1748-8583.12243
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang., L, Zhang, Y., Dallas, M., Xu, S., & Hu, J. (2018). How perceived empowerment HR practices influence work engagement in social enterprises–a moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(20):2971–2999. doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1479874
]Search in Google Scholar
Orcid-Profil