[
Akhtar, P., Ullah, S., Amin, S. H., Kabra, G., & Shaw, S. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and environmental sustainability for emerging economies’ multinational enterprises. International Studies of Management & Organization, 50(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2020.1726596
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Almeida, F., Faria, D., & Queirós, A. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3, 369–387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arend, R. J. (2014). Social and environmental performance at SMEs: Considering motivations, capabilities, and instrumentalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 541–561.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M., Li, J., & Fernández de Arroyabe, J. C. (2020). Innovation as a driver of eco‐innovation in the firm: An approach from the dynamic capabilities theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1494–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1934-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aydıner, A., Tatoglu, E., Bayraktar, E., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2018). Business analytics and firm performance: The mediating role of business process performance. Journal of Business Research, 96, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.056
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baird, J. A., Hopfenbeck, T., Newton, P., Stobart, G., & Steen-Utheim, A. (2014). Assessment and learning: State of the field review. Oslo: Knowledge Centre for Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ballen, C., & Salehi, S. (2021). Mediation analysis in discipline-based education research using structural equation modeling: Beyond “what works” to understand how it works, and for whom—Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2320
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barriga, R., et al. (2022). Eco-innovation and firm performance: Evidence from South America. Sustainability, 14, 9579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159579
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buzzao, G., & Rizzi, F. (2021). On the conceptualization and measurement of dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Building theory through a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2614
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cai, W., & Li, G. (2018). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Y., & Chang, C. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance are dynamic capabilities, transformational leadership, and creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, C. C., Yang, C. L., & Sheu, C. (2014). The link between eco-innovation and business performance: A Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.068
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Marin, G., & Paglialunga, E. (2017). Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains, and environmental performance in European industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.038
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research: Developments, debates, and dilemmas. Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry, 2, 315-326.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dadanlar, H., & Abebe, M. A. (2018). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: Evidence from U.S. technology firms. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 22(1), 1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dangelico, R. M., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2015). Being ‘green and competitive’: The impact of environmental actions and collaborations on firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1828
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1932
]Search in Google Scholar
[
del Rosario Reyes-Santiago, M., Sánchez-Medina, P. S., & Díaz-Pichardo, R. (2019). The influence of environmental dynamic capabilities on organizational and environmental performance of hotels: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 414-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.062
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.882
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eikelenboom, M., & de Jong, G. (2019). The impact of dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1360-1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.061
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen‐Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esty, D. C., & Winston, A. (2009). Green to gold: How smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results, and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fernando, Y., & Wah, W. X. (2017). The impact of eco-innovation drivers on environmental performance: Empirical results from the green technology sector in Malaysia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 12, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2017.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gana, K., & Broc, G. (2019). Structural equation modeling with lavaan. John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
García-Granero, E. M., Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M. F. D., & Li, J. (2018). Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.207
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
]Search in Google Scholar
[
************
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helfat, C., & Peteraf, M. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hossan, D., Aktar, A., & Zhang, Q. (2020). A study on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLSSEM) as an emerging tool in action research. 2708-7123. https://doi.org/10.47150
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hox, J., & Bechger, T. (1999). An introduction to structural equation modelling. Family Science Review, 11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jantunen, A., Tarkiainen. A., Chari, S., & Oghazi, P. (2018). Dynamic capabilities, operational changes, and performance outcomes in the media industry. Journal of Business Research, 89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, R., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Küçükoğlu, M. T., & Pınar, R. İ. (2015). Positive influences of green innovation on company performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1232–1237.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, J., Nathaniel, S. P., Chupradit, S., Hussain, A., Köksal, C., & Aziz, N. (2022). Environmental performance and international trade in China: The role of renewable energy and eco‐innovation. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 18(3), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4563
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lubin, D. A., & Esty, D. C. (2010). The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 42–50. https://hbr.org/2010/05/the-sustainability-imperative
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moroni, I. T., Seles, B. M. R. P., Lizarelli, F. L., Guzzo, D., & da Costa, J. M. H. (2022). Remanufacturing and its impact on dynamic capabilities, stakeholder engagement, eco-innovation, and business performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133274
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mousavi, S., Bossink, B., & van Vliet, M. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.207
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nieves, J., & Haller, S. (2014). Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources. Tourism Management, 40, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tour-man.2013.06.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O‘Neil, I., & Usbasaran, D. (2016). Balancing ‘what matters to me’ with ‘what matters to them’: Exploring the legitimation process of environmental entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.10.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. (2003). Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1126
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394642
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2011). Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance. Industry and Innovation, 18(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qi, G., Zeng, S., Chiming, T., Yin, H., & Zou, H. (2013). Stakeholders‘ influences on corporate green innovation strategy: A case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.283
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahman, W., Shah, F. A., & Rasli, A. (2015). Use of structural equation modeling in social science research. Asian Social Science, 11(4), 371. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n4p371
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modelling.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749–752.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R. V., & Lorenz, R. (2015). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for board directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2083-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tran, N., & Pham, B. J. M. S. L. (2020). The influence of CEO characteristics on corporate environmental performance of SMEs: Evidence from Vietnamese SMEs. Management Science Letters, 10(8), 1671–1682. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.1.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tseng, S. M., & Lee, P. S. (2014). The effect of knowledge management capability and dynamic capability on organizational performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(5), 618–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-05-2012-0025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilden, R., Devinney, T. M., & Dowling, G. R. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and performance: Strategy, structure, and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yurdakul, M., & Kazan, H. (2020). Effects of eco-innovation on economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Turkey’s manufacturing companies. Sustainability, 12(8), 3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083167
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, Y., Hong, J., Zhu, K., Yang, Y., & Zhao, D. (2018). Dynamic capability matters: Uncovering its fundamental role in decision-making of environmental innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 516–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.208
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, S. S., Zhou, A. J., Feng, J., & Jiang, S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(5), 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
]Search in Google Scholar
