Charophytes are part of the large group Charophyta (Guiry & Guiry 2021), which includes five different classes, but this work covers only the diversity of the family Characeae from the order Charales. It is a group of monophyletic, highly evolved benthic macroalgae. They occupy an important position in the tree of life as modern terrestrial plants descend from this group and therefore have received considerable attention since the beginning of systematic botany (Domozych et al. 2016). Charophytes are distributed throughout the world except Antarctica. They are invasive species of freshwater lakes, streams and rivers; several species are also found in brackish to highly saline waters, while others are found in wetlands (Shepherd et al. 1999). They usually occur as benthophytes and form meadows in lentic or slow slowing waters. Charophytes usually form monospecific communities or occur together with other microalgae (Pełechata & Pełechaty 2010). As pioneer species, charophytes are the first to colonize emerging or disturbed water bodies (Wade 1990).
Charophytes include both extant and fossil members (Feist et al. 2005), with the former grouped in one extant family, i.e. Characeae with six genera and 690 species (Guiry 2012).
Water is an essential component of life and the only habitat for charophytes. Physical and chemical components of water quality significantly affect the spatial distribution of aquatic organisms, especially charophytes. The diversity, distribution, and growth of charophytes are mostly affected by water temperature, pH, salinity, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, and the level of nutrients (Dąmbska 1964; Krause 1981; Blindow 1992; Haas 1994; Blindow & Langangen 1995; Pełechaty et al. 2004; Gąbka et al. 2007; Boszke & Bociąg 2008; Caisova & Gąbka 2009; Becker et al. 2016).
Human impact and consequent environmental changes have led to a progressive decline in the abundance, occurrence and diversity of charophytes over the past decades (Eriksson et al. 2004; Romanov 2009). Some of them have become rare or even extremely rare (Blaženčicć et al. 2006; Helcom 2013). Scientists in different countries study the effects of water quality on the spatial distribution of charophytes, their diversity and ecology (Blindow 2000; Bornette & Arens 2002; Sviridenko & Sviridenko 2003; Torn et al. 2004; Blaženčić et al. 2006; Romanov & Kipriyanova 2010; Romanov & Barinova 2012; Bolpagni et al. 2013; Pukacz & Pełechaty 2013; Noedoost et al. 2015; Torn et al. 2015; Vesić et al. 2016; Blaženčić et al. 2018). However, research on the effects of water quality on the spatial distribution of charophytes are yet to be undertaken in Pakistan.
The Peshawar Valley is an important geographical region in the upper Indus basin in Pakistan. Although this is a hydrologically rich area, no comprehensive research on the effects of water quality on the spatial distribution of charophytes has been carried out here so far. To address this, it was decided to investigate the spatial distribution of charophytes in the Peshawar Valley located in the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Pakistan) and to determine the major environmental factors governing it.
The Peshawar Valley is a geographically important location in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. The valley is located between 33.45′ and 34.30′N latitude and 71.22′ to 72.50′E longitude, at an altitude of about 345 m. The valley is girdled by mountains except its eastern side, where the Indus River forms a natural boundary. The center of the valley is a broad plain, generally level, but with occasional hills and rocky protuberances. The Peshawar Valley has a rich hydrography, including many rivers, streams and wetlands (Fig. 1). The Kabul River collects water from the streams and rivers of the Peshawar Valley and drains it into the Indus River near Attock (Government of Pakistan 1998). All water bodies in the Peshawar Valley were surveyed for the spatial distribution of charophytes and water quality effects, however, the studied algae were found at only 41 sites along the banks of seven rivers, 16 streams and two wetlands (Fig. 1). The geospatial location of each sampling site was recorded using a Garmin GPS Navigator (Table 1).
Study sites in the Peshawar Valley with geographic locations
No. | Site Name | Site Code | Latitude | Longitude |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kabul River–Warsak | KRW | 34°10′6.96″ | 71°24′15.84″ |
2 | Kabul River–Haji Zai | KRHZ | 34°10′6.96″ | 71°35′28.32″ |
3 | Naguman River–Niyami | NRN | 34°8′40.92″ | 71°32′58.56″ |
4 | Naguman River–Naguman | NRNA | 34°7′19.56″ | 71°36′25.2″ |
5 | Naguman River–Jalabella | NRJ | 34°5′54.6″ | 71°41′9.6″ |
6 | Shah Alam River–Michni | SARM | 34°10″17.04″ | 71°26′4.56″ |
7 | Shah Alam River–Shah Alam | SARSA | 34°5′39.48″ | 71°36′41.04″ |
8 | Swat River–Munda | SRM | 34°19′37.2″ | 71°34′23.88″ |
9 | Swat River–Dildar Gharhi | SRDG | 34°14′44.52″ | 71°38′50.28″ |
10 | Swat River–Charsadda | SRC | 34°8′25.44″ | 71°42′19.8″ |
11 | Abazai River–Cheena | ARC | 34°14′30.12″ | 71°41′27.96″ |
12 | Jindi River–Tangi Harichand Road | JRTHR | 34°19′15.96″ | 71°41′39.48″ |
13 | Jindi River–Kanewar | JRK | 34°16′57″ | 71°40′54.48″ |
14 | Jindi River–Umarzai | JRU | 34°14′21.84″ | 71°42′57.6″ |
15 | Jindi River–Prang Majoke | JRPM | 34°8′0.24″ | 71°44′14.64″ |
16 | Indus River–Galla | IRG | 34°2′29.04″ | 72°38′55.68″ |
17 | Indus River–Attock Khurd | IRAK | 33°53′55.32″ | 72°15′12.6″ |
18 | Subhan Khwar Stream–Uchawala | SKSU | 34°11′6″ | 71°34′17.76″ |
19 | Jalala Stream–Jalala | JSJ | 34°19′50.52″ | 71°54′29.52″ |
20 | Jalala Stream–Mahabat Khan Koroona | JSMKK | 34°17′43.44″ | 71°58′35.4″ |
21 | Uch Khwar Stream–Umar Abad | UKSUA | 34°18′12.24″ | 71°59′34.8″ |
22 | Bama Kandah Stream–Hathian | BKSH | 34°23′6.72″ | 71°55′59.16″ |
23 | Ghargo Kandah Stream–Spalano Dheri | GKSSD | 34°23″25.44″ | 71°57′10.8″ |
24 | Lund Khwar Stream–Lund Khwar | LKSLK | 34°23′26.16″ | 71°59′8.52″ |
25 | Shamsi Dan Stream–Shamsi Dan | SDSSD | 34°22′5.52″ | 72°1′21″ |
26 | Shamsi Dan Stream–Said Abad | SDSSA | 34°18′36″ | 71°59′39.84″ |
27 | Balar Stream–Hamzakot | BSH | 34°20′56.4″ | 72°16′43.68″ |
28 | Balar Stream–Bakhshali | BSB | 34°17′1.68″ | 72°9′11.16″ |
29 | Balar Stream–Gari Kapura | BSGK | 34°11′51.36″ | 72°9′26.64″ |
30 | Pacha Tangi Stream–Cheena | PTSC | 34°21′3.6″ | 72°15′58.32″ |
31 | Dagi Stream–Hera Wand | DSHW | 34°20′36.6″ | 72°17′34.44″ |
32 | Machi Stream–Machi | MSM | 34°18′9″ | 72°18′16.92″ |
33 | Gadar Stream–Katlang Road | GSKR | 34°19′33.96″ | 72°3′35.64″ |
34 | Naranji Stream–Turlandi | NST | 34°13′1.56″ | 72°19′20.64″ |
35 | Naranji Stream–Adina | NSA | 34°12′57.96″ | 72°16′26.76″ |
36 | Naranji Stream–Sim Canal Road | NSSCR | 34°10′27.48″ | 72°10′3.36″ |
37 | Bada Stream–Pabaini | BSP | 34°9′10.08″ | 72°35′35.52″ |
38 | Panjman Stream–Panjman | PSP | 34°11′0.24″ | 72°34′56.64″ |
39 | Badri Stream–Mami Khel | BSMK | 34°7′58.8″ | 72°27′58.68″ |
40 | Warsak Wetland–Peshawar | WWP | 34°7′53.76″ | 71°25′18.12″ |
41 | Jamal Gharhi Wetland–Mardan | JGWM | 34°19′16.32″ | 72°0′59.4″ |
Charophyte specimens were collected at each sampling location within a 100 m radius by hand and using grapnels. Collected specimens were immediately preserved in situ with 5% FAA (formalin, acetic acid, and alcohol) solution in standard 500 ml specimen jars. Samples were labelled with a site code and stored in cardboard boxes to avoid spoilage (Edler & Elbrächter 2010). Micromorphology of charophytes was studied according to Urbaniak & Gąbka (2014). Specimens were places in Petri dishes and observed under an Olympus SZH stereo microscope using different magnifications (10× to 400×). Taxonomic identification of collected specimens was based on the standard literature of Urbaniak & Gąbka (2014), Wood & Imahori (1964), Pal et al. (1962), Prescott (1962), and Wood & Imahori (1959). To avoid using synonyms, the identified species were checked at
The main physicochemical parameters of water quality (temperature, pH, oxidation reduction potential, electrical conductivity, resistivity, total dissolved solids, salinity and dissolved oxygen) were measured in situ in parallel with algae sampling at each sampling site using a HANNA HI-98194 multiparameter portable water quality meter (Khuram et al. 2019).
The map of the study area was prepared in ArcGIS version 10.8 using geospatial coordinates. A new statistical method of environmental mapping was used to visualize the environmental variables and species distribution using Statistica version 12.0 according to parameter values and geospatial coordinates of each site (Barinova, 2017). Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) was used for multivariate direct gradient analysis to assess the effect of water quality on the spatial distribution of charophytes. Charophyta species richness data along with water quality data were analyzed using CANOCO version 4.5 (Ter Braak and Šmilauer, 2002). Comparative analysis of species abundance of microalgal communities accompanying charophytes was performed using BioDiversity Pro version 2.0.
A total of six taxa of charophytes were isolated and identified from 126 samples, collected from 41 sampling sites along the banks of seven rivers, 16 streams and two wetlands in the Peshawar Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The species list comprises
Charophyta species and water quality parameters in the Peshawar Valley
Site Code | Temp. °C | pH | ORP mV | EC, μS cm−1 | Resis. Ω-cm | TDS ppm | Sal. PSU | DO mg l−1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRW | − | − | − | − | + | − | 15.84 | 8.19 | 67.4 | 435 | 1786 | 197 | 0.19 | 3.34 |
KRHZ | − | − | − | − | + | − | 14.9 | 8.36 | 88.6 | 468 | 2158 | 240 | 0.24 | 4.16 |
NRN | − | − | − | − | + | − | 11.58 | 8.34 | 147.3 | 471 | 2123 | 236 | 0.23 | 3.12 |
NRNA | − | − | − | − | + | − | 11.94 | 8.25 | 28 | 468 | 2137 | 234 | 0.23 | 3.82 |
NRJ | − | − | − | + | − | − | 14.07 | 8.41 | 86.3 | 438 | 2283 | 219 | 0.21 | 4.42 |
SARM | − | − | − | + | − | − | 18.61 | 8.28 | 101.3 | 437 | 2288 | 218 | 0.21 | 3.48 |
SARSA | − | − | − | + | + | − | 11.66 | 8.39 | −50.8 | 474 | 2110 | 237 | 0.23 | 2.27 |
SRM | − | − | − | + | − | − | 13.9 | 8.66 | 94.9 | 243 | 4115 | 122 | 0.12 | 4.34 |
SRDG | − | − | − | − | + | − | 15.28 | 7.78 | 24.6 | 525 | 1905 | 262 | 0.26 | 3.91 |
SRC | − | + | − | − | − | − | 16.44 | 8.39 | 74.5 | 308 | 3247 | 154 | 0.15 | 4.01 |
ARC | − | − | − | + | − | − | 17.44 | 7.87 | 63.1 | 469 | 2132 | 234 | 0.23 | 3.83 |
JRTHR | − | − | + | − | + | − | 16.42 | 8.49 | 68.2 | 582 | 1718 | 291 | 0.28 | 2.93 |
JRK | − | − | − | + | + | − | 16.09 | 8.53 | 99.1 | 531 | 1883 | 265 | 0.26 | 4.39 |
JRU | − | − | − | − | + | − | 15.24 | 8.07 | 67 | 565 | 1770 | 283 | 0.28 | 4.15 |
JRPM | − | − | + | − | − | − | 14.74 | 8.2 | 82.4 | 549 | 1821 | 274 | 0.27 | 4.29 |
IRG | − | − | + | − | + | + | 16.54 | 8.36 | 131.4 | 311 | 3215 | 156 | 0.15 | 3.44 |
IRAK | − | − | − | − | + | − | 10.32 | 8.25 | 120.1 | 643 | 1555 | 321 | 0.32 | 3.84 |
SKSU | − | − | − | − | + | − | 18.8 | 8.03 | 99.3 | 430 | 1753 | 176 | 0.17 | 4.02 |
JSJ | − | − | − | − | + | − | 15.71 | 5.63 | 236.2 | 586 | 2152 | 297 | 0.29 | 3.34 |
JSMKK | − | − | − | − | + | − | 14.79 | 8.34 | 63.3 | 554 | 1805 | 277 | 0.27 | 4.79 |
UKSUA | − | − | − | − | + | − | 15.03 | 8.3 | 78.8 | 532 | 1880 | 266 | 0.26 | 4.66 |
BKSH | − | − | − | − | + | − | 18.19 | 8.15 | 106.5 | 547 | 1828 | 274 | 0.27 | 4.59 |
GKSSD | − | − | − | − | + | − | 16.93 | 7.8 | 124.5 | 581 | 1721 | 291 | 0.28 | 4.52 |
LKSLK | − | − | − | − | + | − | 17.89 | 8.18 | 105.8 | 258 | 2175 | 315 | 0.31 | 4.46 |
SDSSD | − | − | − | − | + | − | 15.25 | 8.45 | 101.2 | 296 | 2256 | 326 | 0.32 | 6.2 |
SDSSA | − | − | − | − | + | − | 14.86 | 8.38 | 76.4 | 477 | 2096 | 239 | 0.23 | 5.09 |
BSH | − | − | − | − | + | − | 19.37 | 7.71 | 85.7 | 557 | 1795 | 278 | 0.27 | 3.98 |
BSB | − | − | − | + | + | − | 17.53 | 8.77 | 75 | 506 | 1976 | 253 | 0.25 | 8.09 |
BSGK | − | − | − | − | + | − | 14.49 | 8.37 | 70.2 | 552 | 1812 | 276 | 0.27 | 4.59 |
PTSC | − | − | − | − | + | − | 18.5 | 7.92 | 60.9 | 487 | 2053 | 244 | 0.24 | 3.82 |
DSHW | − | − | − | − | + | − | 15.28 | 8.24 | 16.5 | 238 | 4202 | 119 | 0.11 | 2.66 |
MSM | − | − | − | − | + | − | 18.53 | 7.85 | 78.7 | 402 | 2488 | 201 | 0.19 | 3.82 |
GSKR | − | − | − | − | + | − | 18.22 | 8.12 | 87.7 | 579 | 1727 | 289 | 0.28 | 4.11 |
NST | − | − | − | − | + | − | 14.66 | 8 | 71.5 | 468 | 2137 | 234 | 0.23 | 3.52 |
NSA | − | − | + | − | + | − | 14.38 | 8.02 | 87.4 | 501 | 1996 | 250 | 0.24 | 3.46 |
NSSCR | − | − | − | − | + | − | 12.28 | 8.35 | 71.1 | 639 | 1565 | 320 | 0.31 | 3.75 |
BSP | − | − | + | + | + | − | 10.86 | 9.58 | 65.6 | 203 | 4926 | 102 | 0.1 | 4.34 |
PSP | + | − | − | − | + | − | 11.99 | 8.84 | 63.5 | 269 | 3717 | 135 | 0.13 | 4.19 |
BSMK | − | − | + | − | − | − | 16.33 | 8.1 | 54.2 | 509 | 1965 | 255 | 0.25 | 3.58 |
WWP | − | − | − | + | + | − | 18.86 | 8.92 | 28.5 | 513 | 1949 | 256 | 0.25 | 2.22 |
JGWM | − | − | − | − | + | − | 16.62 | 9.28 | 74.9 | 257 | 3891 | 128 | 0.12 | 7.02 |
Note: presence (+) and absence (−)
In the Peshawar Valley,
In our study,
In the Peshawar Valley,
In our study,
In the Peshawar Valley,
In our study,
The water temperature ranges from 10.32°C to 19.37°C, pH from 5.63 to 9.58, ORP from −50.8 mV to 236.2 mV, EC from 203 μS cm−1 to 643 μS cm−1, resistivity from 1555 Ω-cm to 4926 Ω-cm, TDS from 102 ppm to 326 ppm, salinity from 0.1 PSU to 0.32 PSU and DO from 2.22 mg l−1 to 8.09 mg l−1 (Table 2). The results showed that water quality parameters varied within a narrow range. They indicate that water at the surveyed sites was fresh, slightly saline, slightly alkaline and moderately saturated with oxygen. Water pH, EC, TDS, salinity and DO were within standard limits, while water temperature, ORP and resistivity showed deviations from good conditions (Wetzel 1983; Horne & Goldman 1994; Al-Badaii et al. 2013; Adhena et al. 2020; Alam et al. 2020). The sampling season, agricultural and nutrient runoff, domestic and industrial effluents were the major causes of fluctuations in water quality parameters, similar to previous studies conducted in habitats of the Upper Indus River (Ali et al. 2007; Barinova et al. 2013, 2016).
The distribution of the main environmental parameters is shown in Figure 4 in the form of statistically generated maps. Water temperatures in the studied water bodies were higher in small foothill rivers and streams (Fig. 4a). At only one site was the water pH below 7, reflecting the acidification impact (Fig. 4b). Salinity mapping showed that saline water was located in the valley plane (Fig. 4c). The highest dissolved water oxygen concentrations were found in several foothill habitats (Fig. 4d).
Canonical correspondence analysis (Fig. 5) showed that dissolved oxygen positively affected
Statistical plots of Charophyta species in relation to water quality variables demonstrate habitat preferences of the identified Charophyta species (Figs 6, 7).
Comparative analysis of species abundance of microalgae communities associated with charophytes (Fig. 8) revealed high individuality of algae assemblages, as the percentage of similarity in Bray–Curtis analysis was below 25%. The most similar communities were those accompanying
The Charophyta species analyzed in this study were usually assessed not only as indicators of environmental quality but also as indicators of threats to algal communities. Charophytes make up the majority of algae biomass in most habitats, but if one species is endangered, the entire community is threatened. Since Pakistan does not yet have a Red List of Endangered Species, our results will serve as a basis for developing such a list for aquatic species. We compared the six species studied with the Red Lists of Balkans, Poland, Ukraine, the Czech Republic, and Germany in terms of the IUCN risk categories (Palamar-Mordvintseva & Tsarenko 2004; Blaženčić et al. 2006; Caisova & Gąbka 2009; IUCN 2012; Becker et al. 2016). We found that
It is known that pH, conductivity, salinity, total hardness, carbonate hardness, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen are important for charophytes in European habitats (Becker et al. 2016). In Europe,
Charophytes in the Peshawar Valley were represented by six species from the genera