The Rhetorical Handling and Construction of Uncertainty in Tax Litigation Concerning Valuation of Financial Instruments
18. Sept. 2021
Über diesen Artikel
Artikel-Kategorie: Article
Online veröffentlicht: 18. Sept. 2021
Seitenbereich: 27 - 44
Eingereicht: 04. Aug. 2020
Akzeptiert: 12. Apr. 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ntaxj-2021-0001
Schlüsselwörter
© 2021 Niklas Sandell, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Documents studied in chronological order_
| Document | Date | Origin |
|---|---|---|
| Review decision | December 20, 2012 | Tax Agency |
| Reply to the review decision of December 20, 2012 | January 31, 2013 | PwC |
| Appeal to the Administrative Court of the decision of the Tax Agency | March 25, 2013 | PwC |
| Mandatory review decision | March 26, 2013 | Tax Agency |
| Court minutes from oral hearing of representatives of the Tax Agency and by PwC called expert witnesses | October 22, 2013 | Administrative Court in Stockholm |
| Supplementary comments | October 23, 2013 | Tax Agency |
| Comment on the supplementary comment by the Tax Agency as of October 23, 2013 | October 30, 2013 | PwC |
| Court ruling | December 3, 2013 | Administrative Court in Stockholm |
| Appeal to the Administrative Court of Appeal | January 31, 2014 | Tax Agency |
| Plea to the Administrative Court of Appeal | February 28, 2014 | PwC |
| Final remark | April 14, 2014 | Tax Agency |
| Final remark (including a commentary by expert) | May 28, 2014 | PwC |
| Court ruling | December 22, 2014 | Administrative Court of Appeal in Stockholm |