This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Aalen, I., & Iversen, M. H. (2022). Sosiale Media [Social media]. Fagbokforlaget.AalenI.IversenM. H.2022Sosiale Media [Social media]FagbokforlagetSearch in Google Scholar
Baldersheim, H. (2005). Lokalmaktdebatten – fra nessekonger til nettverksstyre [The local power debate – from nessekonger to network governance]. In H. Baldersheim, & L. E. Rose (Eds.), Det kommunale laboratorium: Teoretiske perspektiver på lokal politikk og organisering [The municipal laboratory: Theoretical perspectives on local politics and organization] (2nd ed.) (pp. 87–112) Fagbokforlaget.BaldersheimH.2005Lokalmaktdebatten – fra nessekonger til nettverksstyre [The local power debate – from nessekonger to network governance]InBaldersheimH.RoseL. E.(Eds.),Det kommunale laboratorium: Teoretiske perspektiver på lokal politikk og organisering [The municipal laboratory: Theoretical perspectives on local politics and organization]2nd ed.87112FagbokforlagetSearch in Google Scholar
Barberá, P., Casas, A., Nagler, J., Egan, P. J., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000352BarberáP.CasasA.NaglerJ.EganP. J.BonneauR.JostJ. T.TuckerJ. A.2019Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media dataAmerican Political Science Review1134883901https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000352Search in Google Scholar
Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Political Analysis, 18(3), 221–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410BélandD.HowlettM.2016The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysisJournal of Comparative Political Analysis183221277https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752BennettW. L.SegerbergA.2013The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politicsCambridge University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752Search in Google Scholar
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming. Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78–91.BertotJ. C.JaegerP. T.GrimesJ. M.2012Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. TransformingGovernment: People, Process and Policy617891Search in Google Scholar
Bjørnå, H., Steinveg, B., & Hernes, H.-K. (2022). Local politicians in the age of new media. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 917716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.917716BjørnåH.SteinvegB.HernesH.-K.2022Local politicians in the age of new mediaFrontiers in Political Science4917716https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.917716Search in Google Scholar
Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Borah, P., & Shah, D. V. (2014). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Comuputer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12048BodeL.VragaE. K.BorahP.ShahD. V.2014A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequencesJournal of Comuputer-Mediated Communication193414429https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12048Search in Google Scholar
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001ChadwickA.2017The hybrid media system: Politics and power2nd ed.Oxford University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Dearing, J., & Rogers, E. (1996). Agenda-setting. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243283DearingJ.RogersE.1996Agenda-settingSagehttps://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243283Search in Google Scholar
DePaula, N., Dincelli, E., & Harrison, T. M. (2018). Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003DePaulaN.DincelliE.HarrisonT. M.2018Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentationGovernment Information Quarterly35198108https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003Search in Google Scholar
De Widt, D., & Panagiotopoulos, P. (2018). Informal networking in the public sector: Mapping local government debates in a period of austerity. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.05.004De WidtD.PanagiotopoulosP.2018Informal networking in the public sector: Mapping local government debates in a period of austerityGovernment Information Quarterly353375388https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.05.004Search in Google Scholar
Ellison, N., & Hardey, M. (2014). Social media and local government: Citizenship, consumption and democracy. Local Government Studies, 40(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.799066EllisonN.HardeyM.2014Social media and local government: Citizenship, consumption and democracyLocal Government Studies4012149https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.799066Search in Google Scholar
Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330EnliG. S.SkogerbøE.2013Personalized campaigns in party-centred politicsInformation, Communication & Society165757774https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330Search in Google Scholar
Enli, G. S. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802EnliG. S.2017Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential electionEuropean Journal of Communication3215061https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2022). Norway in the digital economy and society index. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-norwayEuropean Commission2022Norway in the digital economy and society indexhttps://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-norwaySearch in Google Scholar
Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022). Social media and political agenda setting. Political Communication, 39(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390GilardiF.GesslerT.KubliM.MüllerS.2022Social media and political agenda settingPolitical Communication3913960https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390Search in Google Scholar
Graham, M. W. (2014). Government communication in the digital age: Social media's effect on local government public relations. Public Relations Inquiry, 3(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X14545371GrahamM. W.2014Government communication in the digital age: Social media's effect on local government public relationsPublic Relations Inquiry33361376https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X14545371Search in Google Scholar
Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N., & Zohlnhofer, R. (2018). The multiple streams framework: Foundations, refinements, and empirical applications. In C. M. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed.) (pp. 17–53). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284HerwegN.ZahariadisN.ZohlnhoferR.2018The multiple streams framework: Foundations, refinements, and empirical applicationsInWeibleC. M.SabatierP. A.(Eds.),Theories of the policy process4th ed.1753Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284Search in Google Scholar
Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401JungherrA.2016Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature reviewJournal of Information Technology & Politics1317291https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401Search in Google Scholar
Jungherr, A., Posegga, O., & An, J. (2019). Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(4), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219841543JungherrA.PoseggaO.AnJ.2019Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative frameworkThe International Journal of Press/Politics244404425https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219841543Search in Google Scholar
Kalsnes, B. (2016). The social media paradox explained: Comparing political parties’ Facebook strategy versus practice. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116644616KalsnesB.2016The social media paradox explained: Comparing political parties’ Facebook strategy versus practiceSocial Media + Society22111https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116644616Search in Google Scholar
Kalsnes, B., Larsson, A. O., & Enli, G. S. (2017). The social media logic of political interaction: Exploring citizens’ and politicians’ relationship on Facebook and Twitter. First Monday, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i2.6348KalsnesB.LarssonA. O.EnliG. S.2017The social media logic of political interaction: Exploring citizens’ and politicians’ relationship on Facebook and TwitterFirst Monday222https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i2.6348Search in Google Scholar
Karlsson, M., Van Couvering, E., & Lindell, J. (2022). Publishing, sharing, and spreading online news: A case study of gatekeeping logics in the platform era. Nordicom Review, 43(2), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0012KarlssonM.Van CouveringE.LindellJ.2022Publishing, sharing, and spreading online news: A case study of gatekeeping logics in the platform eraNordicom Review432190213https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0012Search in Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.KingdonJ. W.2011Agendas, alternatives, and public policies2nd ed.Pearson Education LimitedSearch in Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (2012). Personalization of national election campaigns. Party Politics, 18(6), 825–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810389643KriesiH.2012Personalization of national election campaignsParty Politics186825844https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810389643Search in Google Scholar
Larsson, A. O., & Kalsnes, B. (2014). ‘Of course we are on Facebook’: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114531383LarssonA. O.KalsnesB.2014‘Of course we are on Facebook’: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politiciansEuropean Journal of Communication296652667https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114531383Search in Google Scholar
Larsson, A. O., & Skogerbø, E. (2018). Out with the old, in with the new? Perceptions of social (and other) media by local and regional Norwegian politicians. New Media and Society, 20(1), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661549LarssonA. O.SkogerbøE.2018Out with the old, in with the new? Perceptions of social (and other) media by local and regional Norwegian politiciansNew Media and Society201219236https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661549Search in Google Scholar
Lev-On, A., & Steinfeld, N. (2015). Local engagement online: Municipal Facebook pages as hubs of interaction. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.007Lev-OnA.SteinfeldN.2015Local engagement online: Municipal Facebook pages as hubs of interactionGovernment Information Quarterly323299307https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.007Search in Google Scholar
Marcos-García, S., Doménech-Fabregat, H., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021). The platformization of institutional political communication: The use of WhatsApp by local administrations. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 79, 100–125. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1520Marcos-GarcíaS.Doménech-FabregatH.Casero-RipollésA.2021The platformization of institutional political communication: The use of WhatsApp by local administrationsRevista Latina de Comunicación Social79100125https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1520Search in Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2747787McCombsM. E.ShawD. L.1972The agenda-setting function of mass mediaThe Public Opinion Quarterly362176187http://www.jstor.org/stable/2747787Search in Google Scholar
Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1996). Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), 420–434.MintromM.VergariS.1996Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy changePolicy Studies Journal243420434Search in Google Scholar
Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013). Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 351–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016MossbergerK.WuY.CrawfordJ.2013Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. citiesGovernment Information Quarterly351358http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016Search in Google Scholar
Polsby, N. W. (1984). Political innovation in America: The politics of policy initiation. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1xp3v5sPolsbyN. W.1984Political innovation in America: The politics of policy initiationYale University Presshttps://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1xp3v5sSearch in Google Scholar
Sandberg, L., Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N. (2022). Populist MPs on Facebook: Adoption and emotional reactions in Austria, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies, 45(4), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12239SandbergL.JacobsK.SpieringsN.2022Populist MPs on Facebook: Adoption and emotional reactions in Austria, the Netherlands, and SwedenScandinavian Political Studies454504528https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12239Search in Google Scholar
Segaard, S. B., & Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Local election blogs: Networking among the political elite. Information Polity, 18(4), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130314SegaardS. B.NielsenJ. A.2013Local election blogs: Networking among the political eliteInformation Polity184299313https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130314Search in Google Scholar
Segaard, S. B. (2015). Perceptions of social media. Nordicom Review, 36(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0017SegaardS. B.2015Perceptions of social mediaNordicom Review3626578https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0017Search in Google Scholar
Severin-Nielsen, M. K. (2023). Politicians’ social media usage in a hybrid media environment: A scoping review of the literature between 2008–2022. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0010Severin-NielsenM. K.2023Politicians’ social media usage in a hybrid media environment: A scoping review of the literature between 2008–2022Nordicom Review442172193https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0010Search in Google Scholar
Skogerbø, E., & Karlsen, R. (2021). Media and politics in Norway. In E. Skogerbø, Ø. Ihlen, N. N. Kristensen, & L. Nord (Eds.), Power, communication and politics in the Nordic countries (pp. 91–111). Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-5SkogerbøE.KarlsenR.2021Media and politics in NorwayInSkogerbøE.IhlenØ.KristensenN. N.NordL.(Eds.),Power, communication and politics in the Nordic countries91111Nordicom, University of Gothenburghttps://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-5Search in Google Scholar
Skogerbø, E., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2015). Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter. Journalism Practice, 9(3), 350–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.950471SkogerbøE.KrumsvikA. H.2015Newspapers, Facebook and TwitterJournalism Practice93350366http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.950471Search in Google Scholar
Solito, L., & Materassi, L. (2020). On a municipality-wide scale. Social media use in Italian municipalities: information and interaction. adComunica, 20, 151–172. https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2020.20.7SolitoL.MaterassiL.2020On a municipality-wide scale. Social media use in Italian municipalities: information and interactionadComunica20151172https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2020.20.7Search in Google Scholar
Stier, S., Bleier, A., & Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication, 35(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728StierS.BleierA.StrohmaierM.2018Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and TwitterPolitical Communication3515074https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728Search in Google Scholar
Torfing, J., & Sørensen, E. (2019). Towards robust hybrid democracy in Scandinavian municipalities? Scandinavian Political Studies, 42(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12134TorfingJ.SørensenE.2019Towards robust hybrid democracy in Scandinavian municipalities?Scandinavian Political Studies4212549https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12134Search in Google Scholar
Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2017). Political talk on mobile instant messaging services: A comparative analysis of Germany, Italy, and the UK. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1715–1731. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1350730ValerianiA.VaccariC.2017Political talk on mobile instant messaging services: A comparative analysis of Germany, Italy, and the UKInformation, Communication & Society211117151731https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1350730Search in Google Scholar
Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737419WolfeM.JonesB. D.BaumgartnerF. R.2013A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studiesPolitical Communication302175192https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737419Search in Google Scholar
Wollebæk, D., Karlsen, R., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Enjolras., B. (2019). Anger, fear, and echo chambers: The emotional basis for online behavior. Social Media + Society, 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119829859WollebækD.KarlsenR.Steen-JohnsenK.EnjolrasB.2019Anger, fear, and echo chambers: The emotional basis for online behaviorSocial Media + Society52https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119829859Search in Google Scholar