[
Agiamoh, R. G. (2021). Inter-Regional Cooperation in Waste Management: New Trends in Moscow and the Moscow Region. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(2), 9–39. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational Research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corpakis, D. (2019). Mainstreaming Smart Specialisation in the EU R&I Framework Programme: Challenges and Opportunities. A View from a Policy Maker's Perspective. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/40821869/Mainstreaming_Smart_Specialisation_in_the_EU_R_and_I_Framework_Programme_challenges_and_opportunities_A_view_from_a_policy_makers_perspective.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cycyota, C. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). What (Not) to Expect When Surveying Executives: A Meta-Analysis of Top Manager Response Rates and Techniques Over Time. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280770
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danson, M., & Todeva, E. (2016). Government and Governance of Regional Triple Helix Interactions. Industry and Higher Education, 30(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2016.0293
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erwin H., H., Sarjon, D., Zefriyenni, Z., Nanik, I. (2022). Local Government Performance Model through Innovation: Leadership, Organizational Culture and Competency in Padang Lawas Utara Regency Indonesia. Administratie si Management Public, 38, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2022.38-05
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Implications for Policy and Evaluation (Working paper 2002:11). Science Policy Institute. https://pdf4pro.com/view/the-triple-helix-of-university-industry-c629d.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix-University-Industry- Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development, EASST Review, 14 (1), 14–19. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2480085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fulton, B. R. (2016). Organizations and Survey Research: Implementing Response Enhancing Strategies and Conducting Nonresponse Analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(2), 240–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115626169
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Interreg A-RING Project. (2021). A-RING. Alpine Research and INnovation Capacity. https://www.alpine-space.eu/project/a-ring/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jiménez, D. L., Dittmar, E. C., & Portillo, J. P. V. (2021). Cooperation and Relationship in the Triple Helix Model of Innovation. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 14(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2021.115025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jukić, T., Pevcin, P., Benčina, J., Dečman, M., & Vrbek, S. (2019). Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-production and Co-creation. Administrative Sciences, 9(4), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9040090
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keping, Y. (2017). Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kóňa, A., Horváth, P., & Brix, R. (2022). Slovakia on the Way to the SMART Future, the Last Opportunity for Municipalities. Administratie Si Management Public, 38, 180–196. https://ramp.ase.ro/vol38/38-ll.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kreiling, L., & Paunov, C. (2021). Knowledge co-creation in the 21st century: A cross-country experience-based policy report (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 115). OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/c067606f-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to Implement Smart Specialization in Practice - Leading Unlike Horses to the Water. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2079–2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leydesdorff, L., Park, H. W. (2014). Can Synergy in Triple Helix Relations Be Quantified? A Review of the Development of the Triple Helix Indicator. Triple Helix Journal 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40604-014-0004-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020). One for All and All for One: Collaboration and Cooperation in Triple Helix Knowledge Cocreation. International Regional Science Review, 43(4), 316–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017619889677
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Medeiros, E. (2020). Principles for Delimiting Transnational Territories for Policy Implementation. Regional Studies, 55(5), 974–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1839642
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paliokaitė, A., Jašinskaitė, E., & Tiits, M. (2021). Global Value Chain Upgrading and Business-academia Collaborations: Case Studies of Successful Innovators. Triple Helix Journal, 8(1), 37-79. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-BJA10016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrović, T., Račić, D., & Sigur, Z. G. (2018). The Benefits and Limitations of Triple-Helix Collaboration: The Case of Zagreb. In D. Tipurić & D. Labaš (Eds.), 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 13-14 April 2018 (pp. 33-48). Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU). https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/ofell8/179981.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, Politics and the State (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Proniewski, M., & Jankowska-Ambroziak, E. (2019). Analysis of Transnational Cooperation Programmes in the European Union. European Research Studies Journal, 22(4), 533-543. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1527
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rijavec, D., Štambuk, A., & Pevcin, P. (2021). Evidence-based Assessment of Readiness to Solve Wicked Problems: The Case of Migration Crisis in Croatia and Slovenia. Social Sciences, 10(6), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10060188
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rindfuss, R. R., Choe, M. K., Tsuya, N. O., Bumpass, L. L., & Tamaki, E. (2015). Do Low Survey Response Rates Bias Results? Evidence from Japan. Demographic Research, 32, 797-828. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2015.32.26
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research. Applied Social Research Methods Series 6. Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rudolf, G., & Kovač, P. (2023). Procedural Challenges of Cross-Border Cooperation and Consistency in Personal Data Protection in the EU. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 16(2), 143-170. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behaviour Sciences, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shikhli, A., Tahboub, Z., Cheaitou, A., Alsyouf, L, Lundberg, J., Sales, L., Josefsson, B., Tasfia, R., Bång, M. (2024). Enhancing Innovation in Aviation: Applying the Triple Helix Model and PMBOK in the UAE-Sweden Partnership. Technology in Society, 79 (102713). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102713
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Škarica, M. (2020). Interplay Between the Tiers in Croatian Local Government: Who Is Winning the Interdependence Game. Hrvatska komparativna javna uprava- Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 20(2), 207-240. http://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.20.2.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skarzauskiene, A., Maciuliene, M., Wildevuur, S., Van Den Berg, M., Bakratsas, T., Psaltoglou, A., Stylianidis, E., Tavantzis, L, & Karatzas, K. (2023). Developing Citizen Science Ecosystem: Critical Factors for Quadruple Helix Stakeholders Engagement. Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy, https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-08-2022-0116
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tiossi, F. M., & Rodrigues, R. G. (2023). Triple helix in the Management of Innovation in Public Policies: A Study of two Countries. Revista De Gestão E Secretariado, 14(8), 14516-14531. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.vl4i8.2690
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Todeva, E. (2019). The Challenges of Mobilising Triple Helix Stakeholders: Introduction by the Editors. In E. Todeva, A. M. Alshamsi, & A. Solomon (Eds.), The role of Government / Academia / Industry in Building Innovation-based Cities and Nations, Vol. 1, Triple Helix Association (pp. 4-10). https://research.stmarys.ac.uk/id/eprint/3800/1/TH-Best-Practice-series-VOL1.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Todeva, E., & Ketikidis, P. (2017). Regional Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management: Actors, Helices and Consensus Space. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.25019/mdke/5T.04
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Villanueva, J. L. W., Kidokoro, T., & Seta, F. (2022). Cross-Border Integration, Cooperation and Governance: A Systems Approach for Evaluating “Good” Governance in Cross-Border Regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(5), 1047¬1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1855227
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yanhong, L., & Bohan, L. (2023). Evolution and Equilibrium of Collaborative Innovation System of Low-Carbon Technology: Simulation of a Multi-stakeholders Game Model. Computing, Performance and Communication Systems, 7(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.23977/cpcs.2023.070105
]Search in Google Scholar
