[Ackoff, Russell Lincoln. 1999. Re-Creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21stCentury. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, Philip. 1999. “Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science.” Organization Science, June. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.216.10.1287/orsc.10.3.216]Search in Google Scholar
[Ashby, William Ross. 1957. An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.10.1063/1.3060436]Search in Google Scholar
[Ashby, W. Ross. 1960. Design for a Brain: The Origin of Adaptive Behavior. London: Chapman and Hall.10.5962/bhl.title.7309]Search in Google Scholar
[Bayes Server. 2018. “Introduction to Bayesian Networks.” 2018. Available at https://www.bayesserver.com/docs/introduction/bayesian-networks (last accessed 9. 4. 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Beer, Stafford. 1966. Decision and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beer, Stafford. 1994. Beyond Dispute: The Invention of Team Syntegrity. Chichester, New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Black, Julia. 2008. “Forms and Paradoxes of Principles Based Regulation.” SSRN Scholarly Paper 1267722. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1267722.]Search in Google Scholar
[Braithwaite, John. 2002. “Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27, 47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Breyer, Stephen G., Richard B. Stewart, Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule. 2006. Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases. 6th edn. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cairney, Paul. 2012. “Complexity Theory in Political Science and Public Policy.” Political Studies Review 10(3), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00270.x.10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00270.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Callier, Frank M. and Charles A. Desoer. 2012. Linear System Theory. Verlag: Springer Science & Business Media.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carnap, Rudolf. 1966. Philosophical Foundation of Physics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Edited by Martin Gardner. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carrier, Richard. 2012. Proving History: Bayes’s Theorem and the Quest for the Historical Jesus. Amherst, N. Y: Prometheus Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cziko, Gary. 2000. The Things We Do: Using the Lessons of Bernard and Darwin to Understand the What, How, and Why of Our Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daellenbach, Hans G. 1996. Systems and Decision Making: A Management Science Approach. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. 5th printing edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Engel, Christoph. 2013. “Legal Experiments – Mission Impossible ?” SSRN Scholarly Paper 2276566. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2276566.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feltz, Bernard, Marc Crommelinck, and Philippe Goujon. 2006. Self-Organization and Emergence in Life Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/1-4020-3917-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisher, George. 2012. Evidence. 3th edn. New York: Foundation Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gambrill, Eileen. 2012. Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerrits, Lasse. 2012. Punching Clouds: An Introduction to the Complexity of Public Decision-Making. Litchfield, AZ: ISCE PUB.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerrits, Lasse and Peter Marks. 2017. Understanding Collective Decision Making: A Fitness Landscape Model Approach. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Graaf, Kars Jan, J. H. Jans, A. T. Marseille and J. Ridder (eds). 2007. Quality of Decision-Making in Public Law: Studies in Administrative Decision-Making in the Netherlands. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grzeszick, Berndt. 2016. “Rationality Requirements on Parliamentary Legislation Under a Democratic Rule of Law.” In Klaus Meßerschmidt and A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana (eds). Rational Lawmaking under Review: Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court. Heidelberg: Springer, 61 – 88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haynes, Philip. 2015. Managing Complexity in the Public Services. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315816777]Search in Google Scholar
[Herweijer, M. 2007. “Inquiries into the Quality of Administrative Decisionmaking.” In Kars Jan Graaf, J. H. Jans, A. T. Marseille and J. Ridder (eds). Quality of Decision-Making in Public Law: Studies in Administrative Decision-Making in the Netherlands, edited by. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 13 – 30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heylighen, Francis. 1999. “The Science of Self-Organization and Adaptivity.” In Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity. Paris: EOLSS, Publishers Co.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heylighen, Francis. 2016. “Stigmergy as a Universal Coordination Mechanism I: Definition and Components.” Cognitive Systems Research, Special Issue of Cognitive Systems Research – Human-Human Stigmergy, 38, 4 – 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.12.002.10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Holland, John H. 2006. “Studying Complex Adaptive Systems.” Journal of Systems Science and Complexity 19(1), 1 – 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z.10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Howard, Ronald A. and Ali E. Abbas. 2015. Foundations of Decision Analysis. Boston: Pearson.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacob, F. 1977. “Evolution and Tinkering.” Science (New York, N. Y.) 196(4295), 1161 – 1166.10.1126/science.860134]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, Daniel. 2013. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Reprint edn. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kant, Immanuel. 1999. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649]Search in Google Scholar
[Kasemets, Aare. 2001. “Impact Assessment of Legislation for Parliament and Civil Society: A Comparative Study.” Proceedings of ECPRD Seminar. Available at https://www.riigikogu.ee/rva/ecprd/04_part_2.pdf (last accessed 9. 4. 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kauffman, Stuart A. 1993. The Origins of Order. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kauffman, Stuart. 1996. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Reprint edn. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kauffman, Stuart A. 2010. Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion. Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelsen, Hans. 2005. Pure Theory of Law. Clark, N. J.: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keshtkar, A. R., A. Salajegheh, A. Sadoddin, and M. G. Allan. 2013. “Application of Bayesian Networks for Sustainability Assessment in Catchment Modeling and Management (Case Study: The Hablehrood River Catchment).” Ecological Modelling 268(C), 48 – 54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiel, L. Douglas. 2014. “Complexity Theory and Its Evolution in Public Administration and Policy Studies.” Complexity, Governance & Networks 1(1), 71 – 78. https://doi.org/10.7564/14-CGN9.10.7564/14-CGN9]Search in Google Scholar
[Klijn, Erik-Hans. 2008. “Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What’s New ?” Public Management Review 10(3), 299 – 317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802002675.10.1080/14719030802002675]Search in Google Scholar
[Koliba, Christopher J., Jack W. Meek, Asim Zia and Russell W. Mills. 2010. Governance Networks in Public Administration and Public Policy. Boca Raton, Fla: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lorenz, Edward N. 1963. “Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 20(2), 130 – 141. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Luhmann, Niklas. 2004. Law as a Social System. Edited by Fatima Kastner, Richard Nobles, David Schiff and Rosamund Ziegert. Translated by Klaus A. Ziegert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Luhmann, Niklas. 2013. Introduction to Systems Theory. Translated by Peter Gilgen. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meadows, Donella H. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. London: Chelsea Green Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merton, Robert K. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1(6), 894 – 904.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meßerschmidt, Klaus and A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana (eds). 2016. Rational Lawmaking under Review: Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Microsoft Research. 2019. “MSBNx.” Microsoft Download Center. 2019. Available at https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=52299 (last accessed 9. 9. 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Morçöl, Göktuğ. 2012. A Complexity Theory for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203112694]Search in Google Scholar
[Nielsen, Thomas Dyhre and Finn Jensen. 2007. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2018. “Regulatory Policy in Slovenia: Oversight Matters, OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform.” Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at http://www.oecd.org/slovenia/regulatory-policy-in-slovenia-9789264291690-en.htm (last accessed 12. 8. 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Page, Scott E. 2018. The Model Thinker: What You Need to Know to Make Data Work for You. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parrillo, Vincent N. 2005. Contemporary Social Problems. 6th edn. Boston and New York: Pearson / Allyn and Bacon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearl, Judea. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803161]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearl, Judea. 2014. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pontier, Jean-Marie. 2001. “L’expérimentation et Les Collectivités Locales.” Revue Administrative 320.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers. 1984. Order Out of Chaos. New York, N. Y.: Bantam Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Room, Graham. 2011. Complexity, Institutions and Public Policy: Agile Decision-Making in a Turbulent World. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar Pub.]Search in Google Scholar
[Room, Graham. 2016. Agile Actors on Complex Terrains: Transformative Realism and Public Policy. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315660769]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenbloom, David, Robert Kravchuk and Richard Clerkin. 2014. Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. 8th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rousseau, Denise M. (ed.). 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruhl, J. B. 1996. “Complexity Theory as a Paradigm for the Dynamical Law-and-Society System: A Wake-Up Call for Legal Reductionism and the Modern Administrative State.” Duke Law Journal 45(5), 851 – 928.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scalia, Antonin and Bryan A. Garner. 2012. Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. 1st edn. St. Paul, MN: West.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schreyögg, G. and J. Sydow. 2009. The Hidden Dynamics of Path Dependence: Institutions and Organizations. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230274075]Search in Google Scholar
[Shmueli, Galit, Peter C. Bruce, Mia L. Stephens and Nitin R. Patel. 2017. Data Mining for Business Analytics: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications with JMP Pro. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sieber, Sam. 1981. Fatal Remedies: The Ironies of Social Intervention. New York and London: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4684-7456-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Snellen, I. G. and Erik-Hans Klijn. 2009. “Complexity Theory and Public Administration: A Critical Appraisal.” In Geert Teisman, Arwin van Buuren, and Lasse M. Gerrits (eds). Managing Complex Governance Systems. London; New York: Routledge, 17 – 36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sutherland, Jabez Gridley. 1891. Statutes and Statutory Construction. Chicago: Callaghan and Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Teisman, Geert, Arwin van Buuren and Lasse M. Gerrits. 2009. Managing Complex Governance Systems. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203866160]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, Kenneth (ed.). 2003. The Early Sociology of Management and Organizations: Papers on the Science of Administration. New York and London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185(4157), 1124 – 1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124]Search in Google Scholar
[Vickers, Geoffrey. 1995. The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldrop, Mitchell M. 1993. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiener, Norbert. 1961. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.1037/13140-000]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiener, Norbert. 1989. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. London: Free Associations Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willems, Jacques Leopold. 1970. Stability Theory of Dynamical Systems. London: Thomas Nelson and Sond Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright, Sewall. 1931. “Evolution in Mendelian Populations.” Genetics 16(2), 97 – 159.]Search in Google Scholar