[Anheier, H. K. 2005. Nonprofit Organizations: Theory, Management, Policy. London and New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHagin, K. 2006. Sovremennye podhody k organizacii predostavleniya social’nyh uslug. Celevye potrebitel’skie subsidii (social’nye vauchery) i zakaz na social’noe obsluzhivanie. [Modern Approaches to the Organization of Social Services. Targeted Consumer Subsidies (social vouchers) and Order for Social Services]. Moscow: Institute of Urban Economics. Available at http://www.urbaneconomics.ru/sites/default/files/2019_import.pdf (last accessed: 23.01.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[CHagin, K. 2010. “Mekhanizmy dostupa NKO k byudzhetnomu finansirovaniyu gosudarstvennyh i municipal’nyh uslug v social’noj sfere: municipal’nyj / gosudarstvennyj zakaz i celevye potrebitel’skie subsidii” [Arrangements of Access of NGOs to Budget Financing of Governmental and Municipal Services in the Social Sphere: Municipal / Governmental Order and Targeted Consumer Subsidies]. In A. SHadrin (ed.). Social’noe partnerstvo i razvitie institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva v regionah i municipalitetah. Мoscow: ASI, 280 – 343.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Vries, M. S. and J. Nemec. 2018. “Contextualizing Alternative Service Delivery Arrangements.” In J. Nemec, V. Potier and M. S. de Vries (eds). Alternative Delivery Service. IASIA / IIAS, 10 – 17. https://www.iias-iisa.org/page/ebook (last accessed: 10.01.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansmann, H. 1987. “Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations.” In W. W. Powell (ed.). The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 27 – 42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jett, Q. R. and R. Shick. 2018. “Provision and Outsourcing of Child Welfare Services: United States and China.” In J. Nemec, V. Potier and M. S. de Vries (eds). Alternative Delivery Service. IASIA / IIAS, 30 – 37. https://www.iias-iisa.org/page/ebook (last accessed: 10.01.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kitchen, H. 2005. “Delivering Local / Municipal Services.” In А. Shah (ed.). Public Services Delivery. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 117 – 152.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krueger, A. 1990. “Government Failures in Development.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4, 9 – 23.10.1257/jep.4.3.9]Search in Google Scholar
[Merickova, B. M., M. M. Svidronova and J. Nemec. 2016. “Innovation in Public Service: Civic Participation in Slovakia.” Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review 4(2), 264 – 282.10.4102/apsdpr.v4i2.113]Search in Google Scholar
[Mersiyanova, I. V. and V. B. Benevolenskij. 2017. “NPOs as Social Services Providers: Organizational Weaknesses Verification.” Public Administration Issues 2, 83 – 104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moskovskaya, A. A. 2018. “Incentives and Barriers to Engaging Non-State Providers in the Provision of Public Social Services: Russian and Foreign Experience.” Public Administration Issues 3, 88 – 116.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murray Svidroňová, M. 2018. “Co-Creation in Local Services Delivery: Case Study from Slovakia.” In J. Nemec, V. Potier and M. S. de Vries (eds). Alternative Delivery Service. IASIA / IIAS, 82 – 92. https://www.iias-iisa.org/page/ebook (last accessed: 10.01.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Osborne, S., Z. Radnor and K. Strokosch. 2016. “Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment ?” Public Management Review 18(5), 639 – 653.10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24(6), 1073 – 1087.10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pestoff, V. 2012. “Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23(4), 1102 – 1118.10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pestoff, V., T. Brandsen and B. Verschuere. 2012. New Public Governance, the Th ird Sector and Co-Production. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203152294]Search in Google Scholar
[Rudnik, B. L. and E. V. Kushtanina. 2018. “Engaging NPOs in Providing Social Services: Transparency of Procedures Used.” Public Administration Issues 3, 117 – 137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salamon, L. M. 1987. “Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure and Third Party Government: The Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State.” Journal of Voluntary Action Research 16, 29 – 49.10.1177/089976408701600104]Search in Google Scholar
[Salamon, L. and S. Toepler. 2015. “Government-Nonprofit Cooperation: Anomaly or Necessity ?” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26(6), 2155 – 2177.10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Suslova, S. V. 2014. “Nonprofit Providers on Regional Social Service Quasi-Market.” Public Administration Issues 3, 72 – 89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Susskind, L. and M. Elliot. 1983. Paternalism. Conflict, and Coproduction: Learning from Citizen Action and Citizen Participation in Western Europe. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-0360-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Weisbrod, B. A. 1988. The Nonprofit Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674045064]Search in Google Scholar
[Winston, C. 2006. Government Failure versus Market Failure. Microeconomics Policy Research and Government Performance. Washington, D.C.: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zabolotnaya, G. M. and A. V. Larionov. 2017. “Regional Practices of Institutionalization of Non-Governmental Social Welfare Services’ Providers.” Public Administration Issues 3, 72 – 91.]Search in Google Scholar