[Baldersheim, H. and L. Rose. 2008. A Comparative Analysis of Territorial Choice in Europe. Oslo: Political Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bours, A. 1993. Management, Tiers, Size and Amalgamations of Local Government: Local Government in the New Europe. London: Belhaven.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovaird, T. and E. Löffler. 2003. “Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 69(3), 313 – 328.10.1177/0020852303693002]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovaird, T. and E. Löffler. 2009. Public Management and Governance. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bucek, M. and J. Nemec. 2012. “Local Government in Slovakia.” In A. M. Moreno (ed.). Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: A Comparative Legal Perspective. Madrid: INAP, 555 – 576.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buncak, J., R. Dzambazovic, M. Hrabovsky and J. Sopoci. 2009. Nazory obcanov na buducnost Slovenska. Bratislava: Academy of Sciences.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahl, R. A. and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy (Vol. 2). Stanford: Stanford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Denters, B. 2002. “Size and Political trust: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom.” Environment and Planning C 20(6), 793 – 812.10.1068/c0225]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Goldsmith, M. and E. Page (eds). 1987. Central and Local Government Relations: A Comparative Analysis of West European Unitary States. London: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grega, M. 2013. “Analyza verejneho obstaravania vo vybranom slovenskom meste v roku 2012.” Acta Aerarii Publici 10(2), 25 – 38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunady, J. 2017. “Individual and Institutional Determinants of Corruption in the EU Countries: The Problem of its Tolerance.” Economia Politica 34(1), 139 – 157.10.1007/s40888-017-0056-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[King, D. N. 1984. Fiscal Tiers: The Economics of Multi-Level Government. London: Allen & Unwin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klimovský, D. 2014. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Slovakia: The Case of Regions with Highly Fragmented Municipal Structure. Novo mesto: Faculty of Organization Studies.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klimovský, D. 2015. “Slovakia as Decentralization Champion: Reality or Myth ?” Regions: The Voice of the Membership 2(298), 14 – 16.10.1080/13673882.2015.11447281]Search in Google Scholar
[Kosorín, F. 2003. Verejná správa (koncepcia, reformy, organizácia). Bratislava: Ekonóm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matejova, L., J. Nemec, M. Krapek and D. Klimovsky. 2017. “Economies of Scale on the Municipal Level: Fact or Fiction in the Czech Republic ?” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1 / 2017, 39 – 60.10.1515/nispa-2017-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Mesiková, E. 2008. “Vývoj územného a správneho členenia na Slovensku.” Politické vedy 11(3), 72 – 96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer-Sahling, J. 2009. “Sustainability of Civil Service Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years after EU Accession.” Sigma Papers 44. Paris: OECD Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mouritzen, P. E. 1989. “City Size and Citizens’ Satisfaction: Two Competing Theories Revisited.” European Journal of Political Research 17(6), 661 – 688.10.1111/j.1475-6765.1989.tb00212.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nechala, P., M. Kormanova, J. Kubikova and M. Pisko. 2015. Slovak Companies Owned by Public Sector Remain Non-Transparent: Transparency of State, City and County Owned Companies in Slovakia – the Results of the Second Ranking. Bratislava: Transparency International Slovakia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J., J. Medved and M. Sumpikova. 2005. “Ohodnotenie výkonnosti verejnej správy: Teoretického východiská a skúsenosti z experimentu v SR.” Politická ekonomie 53(1), 95 – 110.10.18267/j.polek.498]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J., F. Ochrana and M. Sumpikova. 2008. “Czech and Slovak Lessons for Public Administration Perfomance Evaluation, Management and Finance.” Ekonomicky casopis 56(4), 353 – 369.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J., M. Orviska and C. Lawson. 2016. “The Role of Accountability Arrangements in Social Innovations: Evidence from the UK and Slovakia.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 9(1), 73 – 96.10.1515/nispa-2016-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J. and D. Spacek. 2017. 25 Years of Public Administration Developments and Reforms in V4 region. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newton, K. 1982. “Is Small Really so Beautiful ? Is Big Really so Ugly ? Size, Effectiveness, and Democracy in Local Government.” Political Studies 30(2), 190 – 206.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1982.tb00532.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nielsen, H. J. 1981. “Size and Evaluation of Government: Danish Attitudes towards Politics at Multiple Levels of Government.” European Journal of Political Research 9(1), 47 – 60.10.1111/j.1475-6765.1981.tb00588.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2015. OECD Public Governance Reviews: Slovak Republic. Better Co-ordination for Better Policies, Services and Results. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Orviska, M. and J. Hudson. 2003. “Tax Evasion, Civic Duty and the Law Abiding Citizen.” European Journal of Political Economy 19(1), 83 – 102.10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00131-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Osborne, S. 2010. The New Public Governance. London: Routledge. Randma-Liiv, T. and W. Drechsler. 2017. “Three Decades, Four Phases: Public Administration Development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989 – 2017.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 30(6 – 7), 595 – 605.10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0175]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose, L. E. 2002. “Municipal Size and Local Nonelectoral Participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway.” Government and Policy 20(6), 829 – 852.10.1068/c0227]Search in Google Scholar
[SIGMA. 2014. The Principles of Public Administration. Paris: OECD Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sipos, G., S. Spac and M. Kollarik. 2015. Not in Force until Published Online. Bratislava: Transparency International Slovakia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Staňová, L. 2014. Explaining Developments of Central Structures for Civil Service Management: The Case of the Slovak Civil Service Office. Dissertation thesis, Comenius University Bratislava]Search in Google Scholar
[Staroňová, K., L. Staňová and E. Sičáková-Beblavá. 2014. Systémy štátnej služby: Koncepty a trendy. Bratislava: UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swianiewicz, P. 2010. “If Territorial Fragmentation is a Problem, is Amalgamation a Solution ? An East European Perspective.” Local Government Studies 36(2), 183 – 203.10.1080/03003930903560547]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Thijs N., G. Hammerschmid and E. Palaric. 2017. Characteristics, Capacity and Performance of EU Public Administrations. Brussels: European Commission – DGEMPL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tichy, D. 2005. “Združovanie obcí ako predpoklad rýchlejšieho rozvoja samospráv a regiónov.” Ekonomický časopis 53(4), 364 – 382.]Search in Google Scholar
[Velsic, M. 2004. Využívanie zákona o slobodnom prístupe k informáciám. Bratislava: Transparency International Slovakia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vesely, A. 2013. “Accountability in Central and Eastern Europe: Concept and Reality.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 79(2), 310 – 330.10.1177/0020852313477762]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
