Login
Registrieren
Passwort zurücksetzen
Veröffentlichen & Verteilen
Verlagslösungen
Vertriebslösungen
Themen
Allgemein
Altertumswissenschaften
Architektur und Design
Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Buchwissenschaft
Biologie
Chemie
Geowissenschaften
Geschichte
Industrielle Chemie
Informatik
Jüdische Studien
Kulturwissenschaften
Kunst
Linguistik und Semiotik
Literaturwissenschaft
Materialwissenschaft
Mathematik
Medizin
Musik
Pharmazie
Philosophie
Physik
Rechtswissenschaften
Sozialwissenschaften
Sport und Freizeit
Technik
Theologie und Religion
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Veröffentlichungen
Zeitschriften
Bücher
Konferenzberichte
Verlage
Blog
Kontakt
Suche
EUR
USD
GBP
Deutsch
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Warenkorb
Home
Zeitschriften
Materials Science-Poland
Band 39 (2021): Heft 2 (June 2021)
Uneingeschränkter Zugang
Study of load bearing capacity of an infinite sheet weakened by multiple collinear straight cracks with coalesced yield zones
S. Shekhar
S. Shekhar
,
Naved Akhtar
Naved Akhtar
und
S. Hasan
S. Hasan
| 07. Dez. 2021
Materials Science-Poland
Band 39 (2021): Heft 2 (June 2021)
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zusammenfassung
Artikel
Figuren und Tabellen
Referenzen
Autoren
Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Vorschau
PDF
Zitieren
Teilen
Online veröffentlicht:
07. Dez. 2021
Seitenbereich:
265 - 284
Eingereicht:
21. Juni 2021
Akzeptiert:
16. Aug. 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2021-0023
Schlüsselwörter
Multiple collinear cracks
,
stress intensity factor
,
Dugdale model
,
coalesced yield zones
,
inter-crack distance
© 2021 S. Shekhar et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1
Configuration of the main problem.
Fig. 2
Configuration of the Sub-problem A.
Fig. 3
Configuration of the Sub-problem B (when s = 0).
Fig. 4
Configuration of the Sub-problem B (when s = 1).
Fig. 5
Configuration of the Sub-problem B (when s = 2).
Fig. 6
Variation between normalized yield zone and load ratio for yield stress ±a1.
Fig. 7
Variation between normalized yield zone and load ratio for linearly varying yield stress ±a1.
Fig. 8
Variation between normalized yield zone and load ratio for quadratically varying yield stress ±a1.
Fig. 9
Comparison between three stress profiles ±a1.
Fig. 10
Variation between normalized yield zone and load ratio for yield stress at ±b1.
Fig. 11
Variation between normalized yield zone and load ratio for linearly varying yield stress at ±b1.
Fig. 12
Variation between normalized yield zone and load ratio for quadratically varying yield stress at ±b1.
Fig. 13
Comparison between three stress profiles at ±b1.
Fig. 14
Variation between normalized yield zone and load ratio for yield stress at ±c1.
Fig. 15
Variation between normalized yield zone and load ratio for linearly varying yield stress at ±c1.
Fig. 16
Variation between normalized yield zone and load ratio for quadratically varying yield stress at ±c1.
Fig. 17
Comparison between three stress profiles at ±c1.
Fig. 18
Variation between Γ6a1−b1 \frac{{{{\rm{\Gamma }}_6}}}{{{a_1} - {b_1}}} and (σ∞σye)a {\left( {\frac{{{\sigma_\infty }}}{{{\sigma _{ye}}}}} \right)_a} .
Fig. 19
Variation between Γ6a1−b1 \frac{{{{\rm{\Gamma }}_6}}}{{{a_1} - {b_1}}} and (σ∞σye)b {\left( {\frac{{{\sigma_\infty }}}{{{\sigma _{ye}}}}} \right)_b} .
Fig. 20
Variation between Γ52c1 \frac{{{{\rm{\Gamma }}_5}}}{{2{c_1}}} and (σ∞σye)c {\left(\frac{{{\sigma _\infty}}}{{{\sigma _{ye}}}}\right)_c} .
Fig. 21
Variation between Γ6rB \frac{{{{\rm{\Gamma }}_6}}}{{{r_B}}} and (σ∞σye)a {\left( {\frac{{{\sigma _\infty}}}{{{\sigma _{ye}}}}} \right)_a} .
Fig. 22
Variation between Γ6rB \frac{{{{\rm{\Gamma }}_6}}}{{{r_B}}} and (σ∞σye)b {\left( {\frac{{{\sigma _\infty}}}{{{\sigma _{ye}}}}} \right)_b} .
Fig. 23
Variation between Γ5rC \frac{{{{\rm{\Gamma }}_5}}}{{{r_C}}} and (σ∞σye)c {\left( {\frac{{{\sigma _\infty}}}{{{\sigma _{ye}}}}} \right)_c} .
Vorschau