Emerging trends and drivers for knowledge-intensive economy

Breschi, S., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 110(463), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00530.10.1111/1468-0297.00530Search in Google Scholar

Ciriaci, D. (2017). Intangible Resources: The Relevance of Training for European Firms’ Innovative Performance. Economia Politica 34 (1): 31–54. doi:10.1007/s40888-016-0049-8.10.1007/s40888-016-0049-8Search in Google Scholar

Davidescu, A.A., Paul, A.M.V., Gogonea, R.M., & Zaharia, M. (2015). Evaluating Romanian Eco-Innovation Performances in European Context. Sustainability, 7, 12723-12757.10.3390/su70912723Search in Google Scholar

Dima, A.M., Hadad, S., Cantaragiu, R (2016). A conceptual analysis of business-university knoledge transfers in the energy field, Proceedings of the 10^th International Conference on Business Excellence. Energy, climate change and sustainability (Eds. Tantau, A, Dima, M.A, Hadad, S.), Editura Business Excellence, ISSN 2502-0226, ISBN 978-606-92299-1-0, pp. 199-205, 6 pg, http://www.bizexcellence.ro/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ICBE-10th-edition-e-volume.pdf#page=202;Search in Google Scholar

Doey, L., & Kurta, J. (2011). Correspondence Analysis applied to psychological research. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 7(1), 5-14. Retrieved from http://www.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol07-1/p005/p005.pdf10.20982/tqmp.07.1.p005Search in Google Scholar

Doloreux, D., & Frigon, A. (2019). Innovation in Knowledge Intensive Business Services (KIBS). Can J Adm Sci, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1525.10.1002/cjas.1525Search in Google Scholar

Edquist, C., & McKelvey, M. (2000). Systems of innovation: growth. In Competitiveness and employment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2011). Innovation Union Competitiveness report 2011 edition. http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/competitiveness-report/2011/iuc2011-full-report.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2016). Flash Eurobarometer 433 (Innobarometer 2016 – EU Business Innovation Trends. TNS opinion, Brussels. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6771 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.12635Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat indicators on High-tech industry and Knowledge – intensive services, Annex 3 – High-tech aggregation by NACE Rev.2 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/Annexes/htec_esms_an3.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Ghisetti, C., & Montresor S. (2019). Design and eco-innovation: micro-evidence from the Eurobarometer survey. Industry and Innovation, 26:10, 1208-1241, DOI:10.1080/13662716.2018.154947510.1080/13662716.2018.1549475Search in Google Scholar

Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-110.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1Search in Google Scholar

Malerba, F., & Mckelvey, M. (2018). Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics. 1-20.10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2.Search in Google Scholar

Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1997). Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative actvities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 83–118.10.1093/icc/6.1.83Search in Google Scholar

Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2017). Forms of Knowledge and Eco-Innovation Modes: Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms. Ecological Economics 131: 208–221. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.032.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.032Search in Google Scholar

Montresor, S., & Vezzani, A. (2016). Intangible Investments and Innovation Propensity. Evidence from the Innobarometer 2013. Industry and Innovation 23 (4): 331–352.Search in Google Scholar

McKelvey, M. (1996). Evolutionary innovations: the business of biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Metcalfe, J. S. (2001). Institutions and progress. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 561–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.3.561.10.1093/icc/10.3.561Search in Google Scholar

Murmann, J. (2013). The coevolution of industries and important features of their environments. Organization Science, 24(1), 58–78.10.1287/orsc.1110.0718Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. (1994). The coevolution of technology and institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.1.47.10.1093/icc/3.1.47Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2006). Innovation and Knowledge-Intensive Service Activities. ISBN 92-64-02273-2 https://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/innovationandknowledgeintensiveserviceactivities.htm10.1787/9789264022744-enSearch in Google Scholar

Phillips, D. (1995). Correspondence analysis. Social Research Update, Issue 7. Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU7.html.Search in Google Scholar

StatSoft, Inc. (2013). How To Analyze Simple Two-Way and Multi-Way Table, Correspondence Analysis. Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft. Retrieved from http://www.statsoft.com/Textbook/Correspondence-AnalysisSearch in Google Scholar

Tödtling F., Lehner P. & Trippl M. (2006). Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links. European Planning Studies, 14:8, 1035-1058, DOI: 10.1080/09654310600852365.10.1080/09654310600852365Search in Google Scholar

Vertesy, D., & Van Roy, V. (2013). Update on the Composite Indicators of Structural Change towards a More Knowledge-Intensive Economy. Reference Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, doi: 10.2788/51665.Search in Google Scholar

World Economic Forum (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, C.-h. & Chen, M.-N. (2019). Technological regimes in knowledge-intensive industries: The effects on firm innovation behaviour. Proceedings, 1, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.14116abstract10.5465/AMBPP.2019.14116abstractSearch in Google Scholar