The Use of Recurrent Neural Networks (S-RNN, LSTM, GRU) For Flood Forecasting Based on Data Extracted from Classical Hydraulic Modeling

[1] Peleg, N. et al., 2022. Mapping storm spatial profiles for flood impact assessments. Advances in Water Resources, 166(104258). Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chen, T.-H. K., Kincey, M. E., Rosser, N. J. & Seto, K. C., 2024. Identifying recurrent and persistent landslides using satellite imagery and deep learning: A 30 year analysis of the Himalaya. Science of The Total Environment, 922(171161). Search in Google Scholar

[3] Tominaga, M., 1998. Case Study of the Social Impact of Flood. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 31(Issue 28), pp. 69-74. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Guo, K., Guan, M. & Yan, H., 2023. Utilizing social media data to evaluate urban flood impact in data scarce cities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 93(103780). Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P. & Banica, A., 2023. An analysis of natural disasters’ effects – A global commparative study of 'Belssing in Disguise'. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 88(101599). Search in Google Scholar

[6] Tabari, H., 2021. Extreme value analysis dilemma for climate change impact assessment on global flood and extreme precipitation. Journal of Hydrology, 593(125932). Search in Google Scholar

[7] Park, K. & Lee, E. H., 2024. Urban flood vulnerability analysis and prediction based on the land use using Deep Neural Network. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101(104231). Search in Google Scholar

[8] Fischer, S. & Schumann, A. H., 2024. Temporal changes in the frequency of flood types and their impact on flood statistics. Journal of Hydrology X, 22(100171). Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kannapiran, U. M. & Bhaskar, A. S., 2024. “Flood inundation mapping of upstream region in the Adyar River basin: Integrating hydrologic engineering centre's river analysis system (HEC-RAS) approach with groundwater considerations”. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 24(101085). Search in Google Scholar

[10] Panda, R. K., Pramanik, N. & Bala, B., 2010. Simulation of river stage using artificial neural network and MIKE 11 hydrodynamic model. Computers & Geosciences, 36(Issue 6), pp. 735-745. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Banks, J. C., Camp, J. V. & Abkowitz, M. D., 2013. Adaptation planning for floods: a review of available tools. Natural Hazards, Volume 70, pp. 1327-1337. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Alén, G. G., Montalvo, C., Cea, L. & Puertas, J., 2024. Iber-PEST: Automatic calibration in fully distributed hydrological models based on the 2D shallow water equations. Environmental Modelling & Software, 177(106047). Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hoven, K. v. d., Kroeze, C. & Loon-Steensma, J. M. v., 2022. Characteristics of realigned dikes in coastal Europe: Overview and opportunities for nature-based flood protection. Ocean & Coastal Management, 222(106116). Search in Google Scholar

[14] Fenton, J. D., 2024. Convolution, deconvolution, the unit hydrograph and flood routing. Journal of Hydrology, 634(131034). Search in Google Scholar

[15] Apicella, A., Donnarumma, F., Isgrò, F. & Prevete, R., 2021. A survey on modern trainable activation functions. Neural Networksv, Volume 138, pp. 14-32. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Akdemir, E. & Barışçı, N., 2024. A review on deep learning applications with semantics. Expert Systems with Applications, 251(124029). Search in Google Scholar

[17] Nourani, V., Baghanam, A. H., Adamowski, J. & Kisi, O., 2014. Applications of hybrid wavelet–Artificial Intelligence models in hydrology: A review. Journal of Hydrology, Volume 514, pp. 358-377. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ajorloo, S. et al., 2024. A systematic review of machine learning methods in software testing. Applied Soft Computing, Issue 111805. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Bahrami, S. et al., 2024. Application of artificial neural network to multiphase flow metering: A review. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 97(102601). Search in Google Scholar

[20] Camero, A., Toutouh, J. & Alba, E., 2020. Random error sampling-based recurrent neural network architecture optimization. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 96(103946). Search in Google Scholar

[21] Quiroga, V. M., Kure, S., Udo, K. & Mano, A., 2016. Application of 2D numerical simulation for the analysis of the February 2014 Bolivian Amazonia flood: Aplication of the new HEC-Ras version 5. Ribagua - Revista Iberoamericana del Agua, Volume 3(1), pp. 25-33. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Golshanrad, P. & Faghih, F., 2024. DeepCover: Advancing RNN test coverage and online error prediction using state machine extraction. Systems and Software, 211(112024). Search in Google Scholar

[23] Gholami, H. et al., 2023. Interpretability of simple RNN and GRU deep learning models used to map land susceptibility to gully erosion. Science of The Total Environment, 904(166960). Search in Google Scholar

[24] Lindemann, B. et al., 2021. A survey on long short-term memory networks for time series prediction. 14th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, CIRP ICME 20, Volume 99, pp. 650-655. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Cho, K. et al., 2014. Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. Doha, Qatar, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1724-1734. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Parisi, L., Ma, R., RaviChandran, N. & Lanzillotta, M., 2021. hyper-sinh: An accurate and reliable function from shallow to deep learning in TensorFlow and Keras. Machine Learning with Applications, 6(100112). Search in Google Scholar

[27] Setiyono, T. et al., 2024. Application of TensorFlow model for identification of herbaceous mimosa (Mimosa strigillosa) from digital images. Smart Agricultural Technology, Volume 7(100400). Search in Google Scholar

[28] Haghighat, E. & Juanes, R., 2021. SciANN: A Keras/TensorFlow wrapper for scientific computations and physics-informed deep learning using artificial neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Volume 373(113552). Search in Google Scholar

[29] Elsner, J., 2023. Taming the Panda with Python: A powerful duo for seamless robotics programming and integration. SoftwareX, Volume 24(101532). Search in Google Scholar

[30] Abert, C. et al., 2015. A full-fledged micromagnetic code in fewer than 70 lines of NumPy. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Volume Volume 387, pp. 13-18. Search in Google Scholar

[31] [31] ANAR & INHGA, 2023. PLANUL DE MANAGEMENT AL RISCULUI LA INUNDAȚII A.B.A. ARGEȘ – VEDEA CICLUL II DE IMPLEMENTARE A DIRECTIVEI INUNDAȚII 2007/60/CE, București: s.n. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Kraus, K. & Pfeifer, N., 2001. Advanced DTM Generation from lidar data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Volume XXXIV-3/W4, pp. 22-24. Search in Google Scholar

[33] HARUN, M. & RASHID, U., 1990. Estimation of Manning's Roughness Coefficient for Basin and Border Irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, Volume 18, pp. 29-33. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Azmon, B., 1992. Manning coefficient of roughness - a case study along Soreq stream, 1971-1981. Journal of Hydrology, Volume 132, pp. 361-377. Search in Google Scholar

[35] BAO, H.-j. & ZHAO, L.-n., 2011. Hydraulic model with roughness coefficient updating method based on Kalman filter for channel flood forecast. Water Science and Engineering, Volume 4, pp. 13-23. Search in Google Scholar