Multivariate mapping for experienced users: comparing extrinsic and intrinsic maps with univariate maps
25. Juli 2021
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 25. Juli 2021
Seitenbereich: 259 - 271
Eingereicht: 22. Juni 2021
Akzeptiert: 06. Juli 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0068
Schlüsselwörter
© 2021 Jolanta Korycka-Skorupa et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 12

Examples of questions asked in the study
T1v | 1 | Indicate the area visited by the least number of individual tourists. | extracting a single value | open |
What hotel room price per night is possible in the area marked with symbol ‘X’? |
closed | |||
In which areas among those marked with letters are the trail lengths the shortest? |
closed | |||
T2v | 2 | What is the income from tourism in the area visited by the highest number of tourists? |
localising an area according to values of two variables | closed |
Indicate the area with the lowest hotel room price per night and, at the same time, the lowest number of restaurants. | open | |||
Among areas with 11–20 tourists per 10 km of bike routes, indicate the one with the shortest length of bike trails. | open | |||
T4v | 4 | In which group of areas marked with letters are the values of all variables the lowest? |
finding areas representing extreme values of all four variables | closed |
Indicate the area with extreme (min or max) values of at least three variables. | open | |||
Are there areas with the highest values for all four indices? |
closed |
Accuracy of different task types using the three tested maps
T4v | M4v |
73.33 |
4.000 | 0.135 | - | - | - |
M4v |
60.00 |
4.545 | 0.103 | - | - | - | |
M4v |
73.33 |
6.500 | 0.039 |
M4v – M2v |
−1.837 |
0.199 |
Fixation duration on legend AOI while using the three tested maps
T4v | M4v |
12.16 |
8.750 |
24.400 | <0.001 *** | M4v – M2v |
2.191 |
0.085 |
T2v | M4v |
21.61 |
12.237 |
14.533 | <0.001 *** | M4v – M2v |
3.469 |
0.002 ** |
T1v | M4v |
8.56 |
5.669 |
0.533 | 0.766 | - | - | - |
Answer time while solving different task types using the three tested maps
T4v | M4v |
49.44 |
20.003 |
3.733 | 0.155 | - | - | - |
T2v | M4v |
66,71 |
25.925 |
3.733 | 0.155 | - | - | - |
T1v | M4v |
35.89 |
12.147 |
2.133 | 0.344 | - | - | - |
Fixation duration on maps with legends while solving different task types using the three tested maps
T4v | M4v |
27.41 |
12.036 |
8.533 | 0.014 |
M4v – M2v |
1.461 |
0.432 |
T2v | M4v |
31.86 |
14.368 |
3.333 | 0.189 | - | - | - |
T1v | M4v |
16.21 |
5.552 |
12.133 | 0.002 |
M4v – M2v |
-0.183 |
1.000 |
Rating of task difficulty after using the three tested maps
T4v | M4v |
2.80 |
0.262 |
8,619 | 0.013 |
M4v – M2v |
2.373 |
0.053 |
T2v | M4v |
2.80 |
0.327 |
2.476 | 0.290 | - | - | - |
T1v | M4v |
2.20 |
0.200 |
11.886 | 0.003 |
M4v – M2v |
0.730 |
1.000 |
Fixation duration on map AOI while using the three tested maps
T4v | M4v |
15.25 |
7.269 |
0.933 | 0.627 | - | - | - |
T2v | M4v |
10.25 |
5.159 |
6.933 | 0.031 * | M4v – M2v |
−2.556 |
0.032 * |
T1v | M4v |
7.64 |
4.738 |
6.933 | 0.031 |
M4v – M2v |
−1.826 |
0.204 |