<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The efficiency-driven trend towards amalgamation characterising local government reforms in Europe seems to have escaped Romania, which displays a significant increase in the number of local governments post-1989. This is the result of rural first-tier local governments splitting into smaller units. The paper examines objective factors and subjective motivations that have shaped the behaviour of both national and local actors in dealing with territorial reform. First, it explores the rationale and rationality of a central government initiative to facilitate municipal splits against a set of criteria derived from the literature. Second, it examines the municipal splits occurring between 1991 and 2018 against alternative or concurring explanations developed in the literature based on economic, socio-cultural and political elements. The paper argues that in the highly charged political context of the post-communist countries it is reasonable to expect a dominance of subjective rather than objective factors in decision-making on territorial reform.</p>
</abstract>

The efficiency-driven trend towards amalgamation characterising local government reforms in Europe seems to have escaped Romania, which displays a significant increase in the number of local governments post-1989. This is the result of rural first-tier local governments splitting into smaller units. The paper examines objective factors and subjective motivations that have shaped the behaviour of both national and local actors in dealing with territorial reform. First, it explores the rationale and rationality of a central government initiative to facilitate municipal splits against a set of criteria derived from the literature. Second, it examines the municipal splits occurring between 1991 and 2018 against alternative or concurring explanations developed in the literature based on economic, socio-cultural and political elements. The paper argues that in the highly charged political context of the post-communist countries it is reasonable to expect a dominance of subjective rather than objective factors in decision-making on territorial reform.

<bold>Territorial fragmentation</bold> in post-communist Romania: the not so curious case of a de-amalgamation reform

Department of International Relations, Political Science and Security Studies

Miscellanea Geographica

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

 in post-communist Romania: the not so curious case of a de-amalgamation reform

The efficiency-driven trend towards amalgamation characterising local government reforms in Europe seems to have escaped Romania, which displays a significant...

Territorial fragmentation in post-communist Romania: the not so curious case of a de-amalgamation reform

Online veröffentlicht: 29. Jan. 2021

Seitenbereich: 62 - 70

Eingereicht: 29. Apr. 2020

Akzeptiert: 24. Juli 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0044

Schlüsselwörter
Territorial reforms, de-amalgamation, local government, Romania

© 2021 Cristina Stănuș, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Territorial fragmentation in post-communist Romania: the not so curious case of a de-amalgamation reform

Online veröffentlicht: 29. Jan. 2021

Seitenbereich: 62 - 70

Eingereicht: 29. Apr. 2020

Akzeptiert: 24. Juli 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0044

SchlüsselwörterTerritorial reforms, de-amalgamation, local government, Romania

© 2021 Cristina Stănuș, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
Territorial reforms, de-amalgamation, local government, Romania