Mould Resistance of Paper Plaster Made from Cellulose-Containing Waste

1 Vares, M.-L., Ruus, A., Nutt, N., Kubjas, A., & Raamets, J. (2021). Determination of Paper Plaster Hygrothermal Performance: Influence of Different Types of Paper on Sorption and Moisture Buffering. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101830 Search in Google Scholar

2 Nutt, N., Kubjas, A., Nei, L. (2020a). Adding waste paper to clay plaster to raise its ability to buffer moisture. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, 69 (3), 179−185. https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2020.3.01 Search in Google Scholar

3 Nutt, N., & Kubjas, A. (2020). Moisture Buffer Value of Composite Material Made of Clay-Sand Plaster and Wastepaper. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 27 (2), 108−115. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.27.2.2539 Search in Google Scholar

4 Nutt, N., Kubjas, A., Nei, L., & Ruus, A. (2020b). The Effects of Natural Paint on the Moisture Buffering Ability of Paper Plaster. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 57 (5), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2020-0027 Search in Google Scholar

5 Nutt, N., Nei, L., Muoni, H., Kubjas, A., & Raamets, J. (2023). Novel Approach to Making Environmentally Friendly Plaster − Moisture Buffer Value of Plaster Made of Wastepaper and Different Glues. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 61 (6), 59−68. https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2024-0043 Search in Google Scholar

6 Soolepp, M., Ruus, A., Nutt, N., Raamets, J., & Kubjas, A. (2020). Hygrothermal Performance of Paper Plaster: Influence of Different Types of Paper and Production Methods on Moisture Buffering. 12th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics (NSB 2020), E3S Web of Conferences, 172, 14010. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017214010 Search in Google Scholar

7 Brandstätter, F., Kalbe, K., Autengruber, M., Lukacevic, M., Kalamees, T., Ruus, A., Annuk, A., & Füssl, J. (2023). Numerical Simulation of CLT Moisture Uptake and Dry-Out Following Water Infiltration Through End-Grain Surfaces. Journal of Building Engineering, 80, 108097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108097 Search in Google Scholar

8 Kalbe, K., Annuk, A., Ruus, A., & Kalamees, T. (2021). Experimental Analysis of Moisture Uptake and Dry-Out in CLT End-Grain Exposed to Free Water. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2069, 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2069/1/012050 Search in Google Scholar

9 Raamets, J., Ruus, A., Ivask, M., Nei, L., & Muoni, K. (2020). Indoor Air Quality in Residential Buildings with Straw- and Reed-Bale Walls. Agraarteadus: Journal of Agricultural Science, 1, XXXI, 84–95. https://dx.doi.org/10.15159/jas.20.05 Search in Google Scholar

10 Sahlberg, B., Gunnbjörnsdottir, M., Soon, A., Jogi, R., Gislason, T., Wieslander, G., Janson, C., & Norback, D. (2013). Airborne Molds and Bacteria, Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds (MVOC), Plasticizers and Formaldehyde in Dwellings in Three North European Cities in Relation to Sick Building Syndrome (SBS). The Science of The Total Environment, 444, 433−440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.114 Search in Google Scholar

11 Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U. (2012). Prevalence of Dampness and Mold in European Housing Stock. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 22 (5), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.21 Search in Google Scholar

12 Verdier, T., Coutand, M., Bertron, A., & Roques, C. (2014). A Review of Indoor Microbial Growth Across Building Materials and Sampling and Analysis Methods. Building and Environment, 80, 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.030 Search in Google Scholar

13 Torvinen, E., Meklin, T., Torkko, P., Suomalainen, S., Reiman, M., Katila, M.-L., Paulin, L., & Nevalainen, A. (2006). Mycobacteria and Fungi in Moisture-Damaged Building Materials. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72 (10), 6822–6824. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00588-06 Search in Google Scholar

14 Mihucz, V.G., Ruus, A., Raamets, J. Wimmerová, L. Vera,T., Bossi, R., & Huttunen, K. (2021). A Review of Microbial and Chemical Assessment of Indoor Surfaces. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 57 (9−10), 817−889. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2021.1995870 Search in Google Scholar

15 Du, C., Li, B., & Yu, W. (2021). Indoor Mould Exposure: Characteristics, Influences and Corresponding Associations with Built Environment − a Review. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 101983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101983 Search in Google Scholar

16 Beguin, H., & Nolard, N. (1994). Mould Biodiversity in Homes I. Air and Surface Analysis of 130 Dwellings. Aerobiologia, 10 (2−3), 157−166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459231 Search in Google Scholar

17 Reboux, G., Bellanger, A.P., Roussel, S., Grenouillet, F., & Millon, L. (2010). Moisissures et habitat: risques pour la santé et espèces impliquées. Moulds in Dwellings: Health Risks and Involved Species. Revue des Maladies Respiratoires, 27 (2), 169−179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmr.2009.09.003 Search in Google Scholar

18 Curtis, L., Lieberman, A., Stark, M., Rea, W., & Vetter, M. (2004). Adverse Health Effects of Indoor Molds. Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine, 14 (3), 261−274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13590840400010318 Search in Google Scholar

19 McGinnis, M.R. (2007). Indoor Mould Development and Dispersal. Medical Mycology, 45 (1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13693780600928495 Search in Google Scholar

20 Vereecken, E., & Roels, S. (2012). Review of Mould Prediction Models and their Influence on Mould Risk Evaluation. Building and Environment, 51, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003 Search in Google Scholar

21 Viitanen, H. (1994). Factors Affecting the Development of Biodeterioration in Wooden Constructions. Materials and Structures, 27, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02473453 Search in Google Scholar

22 Viitanen, H, Ojanen, T, Peuhkuri, R., Vinha, J., Lähdesmäki, K., & Salminen, K. (2011). Mould Growth Modelling to Evaluate Durability of Materials. XII DBMC: International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components: Conference proceedings. FEUP Edições, 409−416. ISBN (Print) 9789727521326 Search in Google Scholar

23 ASTM International. (2021). Standard Test Method for Resistance of Growth of Mold on the Surface of Interior Coatings in an Environmental Chamber. (ASTM D3273-21). ASTM International. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/14510697/astm-d3273-21 Search in Google Scholar

24 Singh, R.P., & Desrosier, N.W. (2024). Fungi. Encyclopedia Britannica, last updated 31 Jul. 2024. (accessed 6 September 2024). https://www.britannica.com/topic/food-preservation Search in Google Scholar

25 Silveira, V.D.C., Pinto, M.M., & Westphal, F.S. (2019). Influence of Environmental Factors Favorable to the Development and Proliferation of Mold in Residential Buildings in Tropical Climates. Building and Environment, 166, 106421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106421 Search in Google Scholar

26 Fernández-López, M.G., Batista-García, R.A., & Aréchiga-Carvajal, E.T. (2023). Alkaliphilic/Alkali-Tolerant Fungi: Molecular, Biochemical, and Biotechnological Aspects. Journal of Fungi, 9 (6), 652. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060652 Search in Google Scholar

27 Shahid, M., Srivastava, M., Pandey, S., Sharma, A., & Kumar, V. (2014). Optimal Physical Parameters for Growth of Trichoderma Species at Varying pH, Temperature and Gitation. Virology & Mycology, 3 (1), 127. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0517.1000127 Search in Google Scholar

28 Azadi, M., Mohsenian, S., Afsharpour, M., Mozafar, F., & Asnad, G. (2018). The Effect of Temperature, Water Activity, pH and Time on the Growth of Aspergillus Niger, Alternaria Alternate and Penicillium sp. in the Historical Papers. Ganjine-Ye Asnad, 28 (3), 166−202, https://doi.org/10.22034/ganj.2018.2302 Search in Google Scholar

29 Tannous, J., Atoui, A., El Khoury, A., Francis, Z., Oswald, I.P., Puel, O, & Lteif, R. (2015). A Study on the Physicochemical Parameters for Penicillium Expansum Growth and Patulin Production: Effect of Temperature, pH, and Water Activity. Food Science and Nutrition, 4 (4), 611−622. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.324 Search in Google Scholar

30 Sharma, V., Sharma, A., & Seth, R. (2016). Effect of Temperature and pH Variations on Growth Pattern of Keratinophilic Fungi from Jaipur, India. Entomology and Applied Science Letters, 3 (5), 177−181. ISSN 2349-2864 Search in Google Scholar

31 Wu, H., & Wong, J.W.C. (2022). Temperature versus Relative Humidity: which is More Important for Indoor Mold Prevention? Journal of Fungi, 8 (7), 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070696 Search in Google Scholar

32 Johansson, P. (2008). Critical Moisture Conditions for Mould Growth on Building Materials. − Licentiate Thesis, Division of Building Physics. Byggnadsfysik LTH, Lunds Tekniska Högskola. Search in Google Scholar