[Altmann, G., 1978. Towards a theory of language. Glottometrika 1, 1–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Altmann, G., Wimmer, G. (2005): The Unified Derivation of some Linguistic Laws. In: Köhler, R. et al. Quantitative Linguistics, 791–807.]Search in Google Scholar
[Altmann, G., 1980. Prolegomena to Menzerath’s Law. Glottometrika, 2, 1–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andres, J., 2009. On de Saussure’s principle of linearity and visualization of language structures. Glotto-theory, 2(2), 1–14.10.1515/glot-2009-0015]Search in Google Scholar
[Andres, J., Benešová, M., Kubáček, L., Vrbková, J., 2012a. Methodological Note on the Fractal Analysis of Texts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 19(1), 1–31.10.1080/09296174.2011.608604]Search in Google Scholar
[Andres, J., Kubáček, L., Machalová, J., Tučková, M., 2012b. Optimization of parameters in the Menzerath–Altmann law. Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomouc., Fac. rer. nat., Math., 51(1), 5–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andres, J, Benešová, M, Chvosteková, M, Fišerová, E., 2014. Optimization of Parameters in the Menzerath-Altmann Law, II. Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomouc., Fac. rer. nat., Mathematica, 53(1), 3–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andres, J., Benešová, M., Langer J., 2019. Towards a Fractal Analysis of the Sign Language. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, September 2019, 1–18.10.1080/09296174.2019.1656149]Search in Google Scholar
[Baixeries, J., Hernández-Fernández, A., Forns, N., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., 2013. The Parameters of Menzerath-Altmann Law in Genomes. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20(2), 94–104.10.1080/09296174.2013.773141]Search in Google Scholar
[Benešová, M., Faltýnek, D., Zámečník, L. H., 2015. Menzerath-Altmann Law in differently segmented text. In: Tuzzi, A., Benešová, M., Mačutek, J., Recent Contributions to Quantitative Linguistics. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 27–40.10.1515/9783110420296-004]Search in Google Scholar
[Eroglu, S., 2014. Self-organization of genic and intergenic sequence lengths in genomes: Statistical properties and linguistic coherence. Complexity, 21(1), 268–282.10.1002/cplx.21563]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Forns, N., Hernández-Fernández, A., Bel-Enguix, G., Baixeries, J., 2013. The Challenges of Statistical Patterns of Language: The Case of Menzerath’s Law in Genomes. Complexity, 18(3), 11–17.10.1002/cplx.21429]Search in Google Scholar
[Gustison, M. L, Semple, S., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Bergman, T. J., 2016. Gelada vocal sequences follow Menzerath’s linguistic law. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 113(19), E2750–E2758.10.1073/pnas.1522072113]Search in Google Scholar
[Grzybek, P., 2014. Word Length. In Taylor, J. R. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–25., DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.013.37.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.013.37]Search in Google Scholar
[Grzybek, P., 2013. Homogeneity and heterogeneity within language(s) and text(s): theory and practice of word length modeling. In: Köhler, R. Altmann, G. (Eds.), Issues in Quantitative Linguistics 3. Lüdenscheid: RAM, pp. 66–99.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grzybek, P., 2007. History and methodology of word length studies: The State of the Art. In: Grzybek, P. (Ed.), Contributions to the Science of Text and Language. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 15–90.10.1007/1-4020-4068-7_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Grzybek, P., 2006. Introductory remarks: On the science of language in light of the language of science. In: Grzybek, P. (Ed.), Contributions to the Science of Text and Language. Word Length Studies and Related Issues. Dordrecht, NL: Springer, 1–14.10.1007/1-4020-4068-7_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Grzybek, P., Kelih, E., Stadlober, E., 2008. The relation between word length and sentence length. An intra-systemtic perspective in the core data structure. Glottometrics, 16, 111–121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grzybek, P., Stadlober, E., 2007. Do we have problems with Arens’ law? A new look at the sentence-word relation. In: Grzybek P., Köhler R., Exact Methods in the Study of Language and Text Dedicated to Gabriel altmann on the Occasion of his 75th Birthday. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 50–64.10.1515/9783110894219]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlin, S., Buldyrev, S. V., Goldberger, A. L., Mantegna, R. N., Peng, C. K., Simons, M., Stanley, H. E., 1995. Statistical and Linguistic Features of DNA Sequences. Fractals, 3(2), 269–284.10.1142/S0218348X95000229]Search in Google Scholar
[Hřebíček, L., 1997. Lectures on Text Theory. Prague: The Academy of the Sciences of the Czech Republic (Oriental Institute).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelih, E., Andreev, S., Altmann, G., 2018. Polysemy of some Parts of Speech. Glottometrics, 42, 39–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Menzerath, P., 1928. Űber einige phonetische probleme. In Actes du premier congrès international de linguistes. Sijthoff: Leiden, pp. 104–105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Menzerath, P., 1954. Die Architektonik des deutschen Wortschatzes. Bonn: Dümmler.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, P., 2002, Laws and Theories in Quantitative Linguistics. Glottometrics, 5, 62–80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piantadosi, S., 2014. Zipf’s law in natural language: a critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1112–1130.10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Torre, I., G., Luque, B., Lacasa, L., Kello C., T., Hernández-Fernández, A., 2019. On the physical origin of linguistic laws and lognormality in speech. R. Soc. open sci., 6, available at: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191023>.10.1098/rsos.191023]Search in Google Scholar
[Zipf, G. K., 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, (Mass.): Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar