[Albert, D. Z., 1983. On quantum-mechanical automata. Physics Letters A, 98(5—6), 249—252.10.1016/0375-9601(83)90863-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Albert, D. Z., 1987. A quantum-mechanical automation. Philosophy of science, 54(4), 577—585.10.1086/289406]Search in Google Scholar
[Baluška F., Miller Jr., W. B., 2018. Senomic view of the cell: Senome vs Genome // Communicative & Integrative Biology. 11 (3), 1—9.10.1080/19420889.2018.1489184]Search in Google Scholar
[Barbieri, M., 2020. Code biology: A bird’s-eye view. In Gatherings in Biosemiotics XX. Edited by Lacková, Ľ, Rodríguez, C., Kull, K. (Tartu Semiotics Library 20). Tartu University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergshoeff, E., Sezgin, E., Townsend, P. K., 1987. Super-membranes and eleven dimensional supergravity (No. IC—87/10). International Centre for Theoretical Physics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berzelius, J. J., 1835. Årsberättelse om framstegen i fysik och kemi: 1835 [Annual report on progress in physics and chemistry in Swedish].]Search in Google Scholar
[Carr, B., 2015. Hyperspatial models of matter and mind. In Kelly, E. F., Crabtree, A., Marshall, P. (Eds.), Beyond physicalism: Toward reconciliation of science and spirituality, pp. 227—273.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cartesius, 1641. Renati Des-Cartes Meditationes de prima philosophia, in qua Dei existentia et animae immortalitas demonstrantur. apud M. Soly.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cobley, P., Randviir, A., 2009. Introduction: What is sociosemiotics? Semiotica, 2009(173), 1—39.10.1515/SEMI.2009.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Cornish-Bowden, A., 2013. Fundamentals of enzyme kinetics. John Wiley & Sons.10.1016/j.febslet.2013.06.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Cornish-Bowden, A., Cárdenas, M. L., 2020. Contrasting theories of life: Historical context, current theories. In search of an ideal theory. Biosystems 188 (2020), 104063.10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.104063]Search in Google Scholar
[Davenport, D. A., Ireland, K. M., 1989. The Ingenious, Lively and Celebrated Mrs. Fulhame and the Dyer’s Hand. Bull. Hist. Chem, 5, 37—42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deacon, T. W., 2010. A role for relaxed selection in the evolution of the language capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(Supplement 2), 9000—9006.10.1073/pnas.0914624107]Search in Google Scholar
[Deacon, T. W., 2011. Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. WW Norton & Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deacon, T., 2017. Human Variability and the Origins and Evolution of Language. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420190-3.00032-6.10.1016/B978-0-12-420190-3.00032-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Diamond, J., 1989. The Present, Past and Future of Human-Caused Extinctions. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 325, 469—476; discussion 476. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1989.0100.10.1098/rstb.1989.0100]Search in Google Scholar
[Dirac, P. A. M., 1962. An extensible model of the electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 268(1332), 57—67.10.1098/rspa.1962.0124]Search in Google Scholar
[Duff, M. J., Inami, T., Pope, C. N. et al., 1988. Semiclassical quantization of the supermembrane. Nuclear Physics B, 297(3), 515—538.10.1016/0550-3213(88)90316-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Ehrenfreund, P., Rasmussen, S., Cleaves, J. et al., 2006. Experimentally tracing the key steps in the origin of life: the aromatic world. Astrobiology, 6(3), 490—520.10.1089/ast.2006.6.490]Search in Google Scholar
[Faltýnek, D., Lacková, Ľ., Matlach, V., 2017. Arbitrariness Is Not Enough. Theory in Biosciences, 136, 187—191, DOI: 10.1007/s12064-017-0246-1.10.1007/s12064-017-0246-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Faltýnek, D., Zámečník, L., Lacková, Ľ., 2020. Quality and quantity in biosemiotics: Explanatory power of quantitative approach. In Gatherings in Biosemiotics XX. Edited by Lacková, Ľ, Rodríguez, C., Kull, K. (Tartu Semiotics Library 20). Tartu University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fields, C., Hoffman, D. D., Prakash, C. et al., 2017. Eigen-forms, interfaces and holographic encoding. Constructivist Foundations, 12(3), 265—291.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitch, W. T., 2020. Animal cognition and the evolution of human language: why we cannot focus solely on communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1789), 20190046.10.1098/rstb.2019.0046]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitch, W. T., De Boer, B., Mathur, N. et al., 2016. Monkey vocal tracts are speech-ready. Science advances, 2(12), e1600723.10.1126/sciadv.1600723]Search in Google Scholar
[Foerster, H. von, 1976. Objects: Tokens for (eigen-) behaviors. ASC Cybernetics Forum, 8(3—4), 91—96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fomin, I. V., Ilyin, M. V., 2019. Sotsial’naia semiotika: traektorii integratsii sotsiologicheskogo i semioticheskogo znaniia [Social Semiotics: Paths towards Integrating Social and Semiotic Knowledge]. Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal [Sociological Journal], 25(4), 123—141.10.19181/socjour.2019.25.4.6822]Search in Google Scholar
[Fomin, I. V. 2020. Incomplete Nature and Self—Body Problem: Emergentist Transcendence of the Dualism of Spirit and Matter. METHOD: Moscow Year-book of Social Studies, 10, P. 77—90. http://www.doi.org/10.31249/metod/2020.10.0310.31249/metod/2020.10.03]Search in Google Scholar
[Fulhame, E., 1794. An essay on combustion, with a view to a new art of dying and painting. Wherein the phlogistic and antiphlogistic hypotheses are proven erroneous. London: Printed for the author, by J. Cooper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fulhame, E., 1810. An essay on combustion, with a view to a new art of dying and painting : wherein the phlogistic and antiphlogistic hypotheses are proved erroneous. Philadelphia: Printed and sold by James Humphreys.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K., 2007. Language as Social Semiotic: Towards a General Sociolinguistic Theory (1975). In Halliday, M. A. K., Language and Society: Volume 10 (1st ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 169—202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hockett, Ch. F, Ascher, R., 1964. Thu Human Revolution. Current Antropology, 33(1), 7—45.10.1086/204017]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodge, B., Social Semiotics. In Bouissac, P. (Ed.) Semiotics Encyclopedia Online, available at: <http://projects.chass.utoronto.ca/semiotics/dse/S/social_semiotics.html#>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodge, R., Kress, G., 1988. Social Semiotics (1st edition). Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffmeyer, J., 1998. Surfaces inside surfaces. On the origin of agency and life. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 5(1), 33—42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hordijk, W., Steel, M. 2018. Autocatalytic networks at the basis of life’s origin and organization. Life, 8(4), 62.10.3390/life8040062]Search in Google Scholar
[Houle, D., 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics, 130(1), 195—204.10.1093/genetics/130.1.195]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes, J., Liu, J., Polchinski, J., 1986. Supermembranes. Physics Letters B, 180(4), 370—374.10.1016/0370-2693(86)91204-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Ilyin, M. V., 2020. Cartesian moment. New discourse on the method and methods in the old-fashioned manner of Descartes. METHOD: Moscow Yearbook of Social Studies, 10, 22—76, available at: <http://www.doi.org/10.31249/metod/2020.10.02>.10.31249/metod/2020.10.02]Search in Google Scholar
[Ilyin, M. V., Fomin, I. V., Khlebnikov, G. V., 2020. Marcello Barbieri’s Code Biology: Cartesian Aspects (Overview). METHOD: Moscow Yearbook of Social Studies, 10, 287—308, available at: <http://www.doi.org/10.31249/metod/2020.10.15>.10.31249/metod/2020.10.15]Search in Google Scholar
[Jain, S., Krishna, S. 1998. Autocatalytic sets and the growth of complexity in an evolutionary model. Physical Review Letters, 81(25), 5684.10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5684]Search in Google Scholar
[Kauffman, L. H., 2009. Reflexivity and Eigenform: The Shape of Process. Constructivist Foundations, 4(3).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kauffman, L. H., 2017. Eigenform and Reflexivity. Constructivist Foundations, 12(3).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kekulé, A., 1865. Sur la constitution des substances aromatiques. Bulletin de la Société Chimique de Paris, 3(2), 98—110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirschner, M., Gerhart, J., 1998. Evolvability. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(15), 8420—8427.10.1073/pnas.95.15.8420]Search in Google Scholar
[Kissel, M., Fuentes, A., 2018. ‘Behavioral modernity’ as a process, not an event, in the human niche. Time and Mind, 11, 163—183.10.1080/1751696X.2018.1469230]Search in Google Scholar
[Kontsevich, M., 1995. Homological algebra of mirror symmetry. In: Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 120—139.10.1007/978-3-0348-9078-6_11]Search in Google Scholar
[Lacková, Ľ., 2018. A Biosemiotic Encyclopedia: an Encyclopedic Model for Evolution. Biosemiotics, 11(2), 307—322, DOI: 10.1007/s12304-018-9325-z.10.1007/s12304-018-9325-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Lacková, Ľ., 2020. Folding of a peptide continuum: Semiotic approach to protein folding. Semiotica, 2020(233), 77—90.10.1515/sem-2018-0116]Search in Google Scholar
[Lacková, Ľ., Faltýnek, D., 2020. In the Case of Protosemiosis: Indexicality vs. Iconicity of Proteins. Biosemiotics, 2020, DOI: 10.1007/s12304-020-09396-7.10.1007/s12304-020-09396-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Lacková, Ľ., Owsianková, H., Faltýnek, D., 2020. Once again about the hapax grammar Epigenetic Linguistics. Linguistic Frontiers, 3(1), 23—27, DOI: 10.2478/lf-2019-0002.10.2478/lf-2019-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Lacková, Ľ., Zámečník, L., 2020. Logical Principles of a Topological Explanation. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 16(3), 483—514, DOI: 10.1515/css-2020-0027.10.1515/css-2020-0027]Search in Google Scholar
[Laidler, K. J., Cornish-Bowden, A., 1997. Elizabeth Fulhame and the discovery of catalysis: 100 years before Buchner. In Cornish-Bowden, A. (Ed.), New Beer in an Old Bottle. Eduard Buchner and the Growth of Biochemical Knowledge. València: Universitat de València, pp. 123—126.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphor we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levchenko, V. F., Kazansky, A. B., Sabirov, M. A., 2018. Development of the Biosphere in the Context of Some Fundamental Inventions of Biological Evolution. Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry: Advances and Perspectives, 105.10.5772/intechopen.73297]Search in Google Scholar
[Mcbrearty, S., Brooks, A., 2000. The Revolution That Wasn’t: A New Interpretation of the Origin of Modern Human Behavior. Journal of human evolution, 39, 453—563.10.1006/jhev.2000.0435]Search in Google Scholar
[Melkikh, A. V., Khrennikov, A., 2018. Mechanisms of directed evolution of morphological structures and the problems of morphogenesis. Biosystems, 168, 26—44.10.1016/j.biosystems.2018.04.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Mellars, P., Stringer, C. (Eds.), 1989. The human revolution: Behavioural and biological perspectives in the origins of modern humans. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, G. W., 2005. What is a brane. Notices of the AMS, 52(2), 214—215.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morowitz, H. J., Schmitz-Moormann, N., Salmon, J. F., 2005. Looking again at Teilhard, Tillich, and Haught: Teilhard’s two energies. Zygon, 40(3), 721—732.10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00698.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Noble, W., Davidson, I., 1991. The Evolutionary Emergence of Modern Human Behaviour: Language and its Archaeology. Man, 26, 223—253.10.2307/2803830]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmer, B., 2008. Elizabeth Fulhame: The Invisible Chemist. Teaching Science, 54(4), 12—16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Platts, S. N., 2005. The ‘PAH World’: Discotic polynuclear aromatic compounds as mesophase scaffolding at the origin of life. NAI 2005 Biennial Meeting Abstracts.]Search in Google Scholar
[Platts, S. N., 2006. Contributions to chemical questions in origins of life. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pogodaev, A. A., Wong, A. S., Huck, W. T. 2017. Photo-chemical Control over Oscillations in Chemical Reaction Networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 139, 15296-15299.10.1021/jacs.7b08109]Search in Google Scholar
[Rees, M., 1999. Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe. New York, Basic.10.1063/1.1341923]Search in Google Scholar
[Reis, J. E., 2014. Teilhard de Chardin’s idea of progress and theory of cosmological evolution. Spaces of Utopia, 41—52]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodríguez Higuera, C. J. 2016. Just how emergent is the emergence of semiosis?. Biosemiotics, 9(2), 155—167.10.1007/s12304-016-9265-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodríguez Higuera, C. J. 2020. Against Universalism in Biosemiotic Theories, Linguistic Frontiers, 3(1), 48—53, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2020-0005.10.2478/lf-2020-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, J. F., 2003. Chemical Self-Organization, Complexification, and Process Metaphysics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 988(1), 345—352.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb06116.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, J. F., 2005. Teilhard’s Law of Complexity-Consciousness. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 185—202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, J. F., 2009. Emergence in evolution. Foundations of Chemistry, 11(1), 21—32.10.1007/s10698-008-9059-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Schultz, G., 1890. Feier der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft zu Ehren August Kekulé’s. Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft, 23(1), 1265—1312.10.1002/cber.189002301204]Search in Google Scholar
[Sherman, J. 2017. Neither ghost nor machine: The emergence and nature of selves. Columbia University Press.10.7312/sher17332]Search in Google Scholar
[Linguistic Frontiers, 2(1), 28—31. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2018-0015>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szívós, M. 2008. Introduction: The concept of emergence in philosophical and semiotic context. Semiotica, 2008(170), 3—24.10.1515/SEM.2008.044]Search in Google Scholar
[Teilhard de Chardin, P., 1955. Le phénomène humain. P.: Seuil.]Search in Google Scholar
[Teilhard de Chardin, P., 1959. The phenomenon of man. Translated by Bernard Wall with introduction by Sir Julian Huxley. L.: William Collins Sons. Electronic version in PDF available at: <http://globalclimatechange.wdfiles.com/local--files/climate-blog/phenom10.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turing, A., 1952. The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 237(641), 37—72.10.1098/rstb.1952.0012]Search in Google Scholar
[Vishnyatsky, L., 2000. The Pre-Aurignacian and Amudian as Intra-Yabrudian-Episode. BAR International Series, 850.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vyshedskiy, A., 2019. Neuroscience of imagination and implications for human evolution. Available at: <https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/skxwc>.10.31234/osf.io/skxwc]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, G. P., Altenberg, L., 1996. Perspective: Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 50(3), 967—976.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Witzany, G., 2020. What is Life? Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Science, 7, article 7. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2020.0000710.3389/fspas.2020.00007]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolf, F. A., 2018. On Quantum Mechanical Automata, Gödel Numbers, and Self-Referring Consciousness. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 14(1), 217—246.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yau, S. T., Nadis, S., 2010. The shape of inner space: String theory and the geometry of the universe’s hidden dimensions. Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yurov, A. V., 2003. The Gödelizing Quantum-Mechanical Automata. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0301004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yurov, A. V., 2017. Physics of Subjective. RATIO.ru, 18(1), 3—25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zámečník, L. H., Krbec, J., 2019. Describing Life: Towards the Conception of Howard Pattee, Linguistic Frontiers, 2(1), 1—9, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2018-0012.10.2478/lf-2018-0012]Search in Google Scholar
[Zaslow, E., 2008. Mirror Symmetry. In Gowers, T., Barrow-Green, J., Leader, I. (Eds.), The Princeton companion to mathematics. Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zolyan, S. T., 2020. Discourse, Language (Langue), Language Activity (Langage). METHOD: Moscow Year-book of Social Studies, 10, 212—242. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.31249/metod/2020.10.12.10.31249/metod/2020.10.12]Search in Google Scholar
[Zolyan, S. T., Zhdanov, R. I., 2018. Genome as (hyper) text: From metaphor to theory. Semiotica, 2018(225), 1—18.10.1515/sem-2016-0214]Search in Google Scholar
[Zolyan, S., 2019. General Sociolinguistics, Social Semiotics and Semiotics of Culture—Ex Pluribus Unum? Sign Systems Studies, 47(3—4), 400—419.10.12697/SSS.2019.47.3-4.03]Search in Google Scholar
