Representational Systems in Zoosemiotics and Anthroposemiotics Part I: What Have the So-Called “Talking Animals” Taught Us about Human Language?

[1] Fossey, D., 1972. Vocalizations of the Mountain Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla beringei). Animal Behaviour, 20(1) 36–53.10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80171-4Search in Google Scholar

[2] Goodall, J., 1971. In the Shadow of Man. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Lilly, J.C., 1967. The mind of the dolphin: A nonhuman intelligence. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Batteau, D.W., Markey, P.R., 1967. Man/dolphin communication: Final report 15 December 1966–13 December 1967. U.S. Naval Ordnance Test Station (China Lake, California). Contract #NOO123-67-C–1103, available at: <http://www.moshier.net/catalogues/Batteau_Markey.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., 1969. Teaching sign language to a Chimpanzee. Science, 165, 664–672.10.1126/science.165.3894.664Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gardner, B.T., Gardner, A.R., 1971. Two-way communication with an infant Chimpanzee. In Schrier, A.M., Stollnitz, F. (Eds.), Behavior of nonhuman primates: Modern research trends, vol 4. Academic Press, pp. 117–184.10.1016/B978-0-12-629104-9.50010-8Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gardner, B.T., Gardner, A.R., 1974. Comparing the early utterances of child and Chimpanzee. In Pick, A. (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology, vol. 8. Minnesota, United States: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 3–23.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., 1974. Review of Roger Brown’s “a first language”. American Journal of Psychology, 87, 729–36.10.2307/1421982Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., 1975. Evidence for sentence constituents in the early utterances of child and Chimpanzee. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 244–67.10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.244Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., 1978. Comparative psychology and language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 309, 37–76.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb29441.xSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., 1984. A vocabulary test for Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 98, 381–404.10.1037/0735-7036.98.4.381Search in Google Scholar

[12] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., 1988. Feedforward versus feedbackward: An ethological alternative to the law of effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 429–447.10.1017/S0140525X00058258Search in Google Scholar

[13] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., 1989. A crossfostering laboratory. In Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., van Cantfort, E.T. (Eds.), Teaching sign language to Chimpanzees. New York: State University of New York Press. pp. 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Gardner, B.T., Gardner, A.R., 1989. A test of communication. In Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., van Cantfort, E.T. (Eds.), Teaching sign language to Chimpanzees. New York: State University of New York Press. pp. 181–197.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Gardner, B.T., Gardner, A.R., 1994. Development of phrases in the utterances of children and crossfostered Chimpanzees. In Gardner, R.A., Chiarelli, B., Plooij, F.C. (Eds.), The ethological roots of culture. Kluwer Academie Publishers. pp. 223–256.10.1007/978-94-011-0998-7_13Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., 1998. The structure of learning from sign stimuli to sign language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., Drumm, P., 1989. Voiced and signed responses of cross-fostered Chimpanzees. In Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., van Cantfort, E.T. (Eds.), Teaching sign language to Chimpanzees. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. 29–54.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Gardner, B.T., Gardner, A.R., Nichols, S.G., 1989. The shapes and uses of signs in a cross-fostering laboratory. In Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., van Cantfort, E.T. (Eds.), Teaching sign language to Chimpanzees. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. 55–180.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., van Cantfort, E.T., 1989. Teaching sign language to Chimpanzees. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Premack, D., Schwartz, A., 1966. Preparations for discussing behaviorism with Chimpanzee. In Smith, F., Miller, G. (Eds.), The genesis of language: A psycholinguistic approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 295–335.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Premack, D., 1970. The education of Sarah. A Chimpanzee learns the language. Psychology Today, 4(4), 54–8.10.1037/e400302009-003Search in Google Scholar

[22] Premack, D., 1970. A functional analysis of language. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14(1), 107–125.10.1901/jeab.1970.14-107Search in Google Scholar

[23] Premack, D., 1971. Language in Chimpanzee? Science, 172, 808–822.10.1126/science.172.3985.808Search in Google Scholar

[24] Premack, D., 1971. On the assessment of language competence in the Chimpanzee. In Schrier, M., Stollnitz, F. (Eds.), Behavior of nonhuman primates. New York: Academic Press, pp. 185–228.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Premack, A., 1976. Why chimps can read. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Premack, D., 1976. Intelligence in ape and man. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlaum.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Premack, D., 1983. The codes of man and beasts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), pp. 125–37.10.1017/S0140525X00015077Search in Google Scholar

[28] Premack, D., 1984. Possible general effects of language training on the Chimpanzee. Human Development, 27, pp. 268–281.10.1159/000272921Search in Google Scholar

[29] Premack, D., 1988. Minds with and without language. In Weiskrantz, L. (Ed.), Thought without language. A Fyssen Foundation Symposium. New York: Calderon Press, pp. 46–65.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Premack, A., Premack, D., 1972. Teaching language to an ape. Scientific American, 227(4), 92–9.10.1038/scientificamerican1072-92Search in Google Scholar

[31] Premack, D., Premack, A., 1983. The mind of an ape. W. W. New York and London: Norton and Company.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Premack, D., Woodruff, G., 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.10.1017/S0140525X00076512Search in Google Scholar

[33] Woodruff, G., Premack, D., 1979. Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: The development of deception. Cognition, 7, 333–62.10.1016/0010-0277(79)90021-0Search in Google Scholar

[34] Hayes, C., 1951. The ape in our house. New York: Harper.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Hayes, K., Hayes, C., 1951. The intellectual development of a home-raised Chimpanzee. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 95, 105–109.10.1037/e533882004-001Search in Google Scholar

[36] Hayes, K., Hayes, C., 1952. Imitation in a home raised Chimpanzee. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 45, 450–459.10.1037/h0053609Search in Google Scholar

[37] Hayes and Nissen. (1971)Search in Google Scholar

[38] Kellogg, W.N., Kellogg, L.A., 1933. The ape and the child: A comparative study of the environmental influence upon early behavior. New York and London: Hafner Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Kellogg, W.N., 1968. Communication and language in the home-reared Chimpanzee. Science, 162, 423–427.10.1126/science.162.3852.423Search in Google Scholar

[40] Lieberman, P., 1968. Primate vocalization and human linguistic ability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 6, 1574–1584.10.1121/1.1911299Search in Google Scholar

[41] Brown, R., 1970. The first sentences of child and Chimpanzee. Psycholinguistics. New York: Free Press, 208–31.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Brown, R., 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA, United States: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469Search in Google Scholar

[43] Fouts, R., 1974. Language: Origins, definitions and chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution, 3(6), 475–482.10.1016/0047-2484(74)90007-4Search in Google Scholar

[44] Rumbaugh, D.M., Gill, T.V., 1976. The mastery of language-type skills by the chimpanzee. (Pan). In Harnad, S., Steklis, H., Lancaster, J. (Eds.), Origins and evolution of speech and language. New York: Academy of Sciences, 280, 562–78.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25518.xSearch in Google Scholar

[45] Rumbaugh, D.M., Gill, T.V., 1976. Language and the Acquisition of Language-type Skills by a Chimpanzee (Pan). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 270, 90–123.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb34217.xSearch in Google Scholar

[46] Terrace, H.S., Bever, T.G., 1976. What might be learned from studying language in the chimpanzee? The importance of symbolizing oneself. In Harnad, S.R., Steklis, H.D., Lancaster, J. (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, pp. 579–88.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25519.xSearch in Google Scholar

[47] Savage, S.E., Rumbaugh, D.M., 1977. Communication, language, and Lana: A perspective. In Rumbaugh, D.M. (Ed.), Language learning by a chimpanzee: The LANA project. New York: Academic Press, pp. 287–309.10.1016/B978-0-12-601850-9.50023-3Search in Google Scholar

[48] Patterson, F., 1978. The gestures of a gorilla: Language acquisition in another pongid. Brain and Language, 5, 72–97.10.1016/0093-934X(78)90008-1Search in Google Scholar

[49] Miles, L., 1983. Apes and language: The search for communicative competence. In de Luce, J.A., Wilder, H.T. (Eds.), Language in primates: Perspectives and implications. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 43–61.10.1007/978-1-4612-5496-6_3Search in Google Scholar

[50] Terrace, H., Petitto, L.A., Sanders, R.J., et al., 1979. Can an ape create a sentence? Science, 206(4421), 891–902.10.1126/science.504995Search in Google Scholar

[51] Terrace, H., Petitto, L.A., Sanders, R.J., et al., 1980. On the grammatical capacity of apes. In Nelson, K. (Ed.) Children’s Language. New York: Gardner Press, pp. 371–495.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Terrace, H., Petitto, L.A., Sanders, R.J., et al., 1981. Ape language. Science, 211, 87–88.10.1126/science.7444455Search in Google Scholar

[53] Seidenberg, M.S., Petitto, L.A., 1979. Signing behavior in apes: A critical review. Cognition, 7, pp. 177–215.10.1016/0010-0277(79)90019-2Search in Google Scholar

[54] Seidenberg, M.S., Petitto, L.A., 1981. Ape signing: Problems of method and interpretation. In Sebeok, T. A., Rosenthal, R. (Eds.), The Clever Hans phenomenon: Communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 364, pp. 94–114.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Sebeok, T.A., 1980. Looking in the destination for what should have been sought in the source. In Umiker-Sebeok, J., Sebeok, T.A. (Eds.), 1980. Speaking of apes: A critical anthology of two-way communication with man. New York: Springer, pp. 407–428.10.1007/978-1-4613-3012-7_20Search in Google Scholar

[56] Sebeok, T.A., 1981. The ultimate enigma of “Clever Hans”: The union of nature and culture. In Sebeok, T. A., Rosenthal, R. (Eds.), The Clever Hans phenomenon: communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 364, pp. 199–205.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb34473.xSearch in Google Scholar

[57] Wallman, J., 1992. Aping language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611858Search in Google Scholar

[58] Anderson, S.R., 2004. Doctor dolittle’s delusion: Animals and the uniqueness of human language. New Haven, CT, United States: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Tomasello, M.E., 1994. Can an ape understand a sentence? A review of language comprehension in ape and child by E.D. Savage-Rumbaugh et al. Language and Communication, 14, 377–390.10.1016/0271-5309(94)90027-2Search in Google Scholar

[60] Tomasello, M.E., 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674044371Search in Google Scholar

[61] Tomasello, M.E., 2007. If they’re so good at grammar, then why don’t they talk? Hind From apes’ and humans’ use of gestures. Language, Learning and Development, 3. 133–156.10.1080/15475440701225451Search in Google Scholar

[62] Pinker, S., 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[63] Pinker, S., 1994. How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics? Lingua, 92, 377–410.10.1016/0024-3841(94)90347-6Search in Google Scholar

[64] Pepperberg, I.M., 1983. Cognition in the African Grey Parrot: Preliminary evidence for auditory/vocal comprehension of the class concept. Animal Learning and Behavior, 11, 175–85.10.3758/BF03199646Search in Google Scholar

[65] Schusterman, R.J., Gisiner, R., 1988. Artificial language comprehension in dolphins and sea lions: The essential cognitive skills. The Psychological Record, 38, 311–48.10.1007/BF03395027Search in Google Scholar

[66] Beran, M.J., Pate, J.L., Richardson, W.K., et al., 2000. A Chimpanzee’s (Pan troglodytes) longterm retention of lexigrams. Animal Learning and Behavior, 28; 201–207.10.3758/BF03200255Search in Google Scholar

[67] Rumbaugh, D.M., 1977. Language behavior of apes. In Schrier, A.M. (Ed.), Behavioral primatology. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 105–138.Search in Google Scholar

[68] Rumbaugh, D.M. (Ed.), 1977. Language learning by a Chimpanzee: The LANA project. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

[69] Rumbaugh, D.M., Gill, T.V., von Glasersfeld, E.C., 1973. Reading and sentence completion by a chimpanzee (Pan). Science, 182, 731–33.10.1126/science.182.4113.731Search in Google Scholar

[70] Rumbaugh, D.M., Gill, T.V., 1977. Lana’s acquisition of language skills. In Rumbaugh, D.M. (Ed.), Language learning by a chimpanzee: The LANA project. New York: Academic Press, pp. 165–192.10.1016/B978-0-12-601850-9.50016-6Search in Google Scholar

[71] Essock, S.M., Gill, T.V., Rumbaugh, D.M., 1977. Language relevant object- and color-naming tasks. In Rumbaugh, D.M. (Ed.), Language learning by a Chimpanzee: The LANA project. New York: Academic Press, pp. 193–206.10.1016/B978-0-12-601850-9.50017-8Search in Google Scholar

[72] Gill, T.V., Rumbaugh, D.M., 1977. Training strategy and tactics. In Rumbaugh, D.M. (Ed.), Language learning by a Chimpanzee: The LANA project. New York: Academic Press, pp. 157–162.10.1016/B978-0-12-601850-9.50015-4Search in Google Scholar

[73] Hewes, G.W., 1977. Language origin theories. In Rumbaugh, D.M. (Ed.), Language learning by a Chimpanzee: The LANA project. New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–53.10.1016/B978-0-12-601850-9.50008-7Search in Google Scholar

[74] Essock, S.M., 1977. Color perception and color classification. In Rumbaugh, D.M. (Ed.), Language learning by a Chimpanzee: The LANA project. New York: Academic Press, pp. 207–223.10.1016/B978-0-12-601850-9.50018-XSearch in Google Scholar

[75] Pate, J.L., Rumbaugh, D.M., 1983. The languagelike behavior of Lana chimpanzee: Is it merely discrimination and paired-associate learning? Animal Learning and Behavior, 11(1), 134–8.10.3758/BF03212320Search in Google Scholar

[76] Rumbaugh, D.M., Washburn, D.A., Hillix, W.A., 1996. Respondents, operants and emergents: Toward an integrated perspective on behavior. In Pribram, K., King, J. (Eds.), Learning as selforganizing process. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 57–73.Search in Google Scholar

[77] Rumbaugh, D.M., Washburn, D.A., 2003. Intelligence of apes and other rational beings. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300099836.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[78] Hillix, W.A., Rumbaugh, D.M., 2004. Animal bodies, human minds: ape, dolphin, and parrot language skills. New York: Kluwe Academic/Plenum Publishers.10.1007/978-1-4757-4512-2Search in Google Scholar

[79] von Glasersfeld, E., 1977. Linguistic communication: Theory and definition. In Rumbaugh, M. (Ed.), Language Learning by a Chimpanzee: the LANA Project. New York: Academic Press, pp. 56–71.10.1016/B978-0-12-601850-9.50009-9Search in Google Scholar

[80] von Glasersfeld, E., 1977. The Yerkish language and its automatic parser. In Rumbaugh, M. (Ed.), Language Learning by a Chimpanzee: the LANA Project. New York: Academic Press, pp. 91–130.10.1016/B978-0-12-601850-9.50012-9Search in Google Scholar

[81] Patterson, F., 1980. Innovative use of language by a gorilla: A case study. Children’s Language, 497–561.Search in Google Scholar

[82] Patterson, F., 1980 In search of man: Experiments in primate communication. Michigan Quarterly Review 19, 94–114.Search in Google Scholar

[83] Patterson, F., Linden, E., 1981. The education of koko. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

[84] Patterson, F., Cohn, R., 1990. Language acquisition by a lowland gorilla: Koko’s first ten years of vocabulary development. Word, 41(2), 97–142.10.1080/00437956.1990.11435816Search in Google Scholar

[85] Patterson, F., Cohn, R., 1994. Self-recognition and self-awareness in lowland gorillas. In Parker, S.T., Mitchell, R.W., Boccia, M.L. (Eds.), Selfawareness in animals and humans. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 273–290.10.1017/CBO9780511565526.019Search in Google Scholar

[86] Miles, L., 1986. How can I tell a lie? Apes, language and the problem of deception. In Mitchell, R.W., Thompson, N.S. (Eds.), Deception: Perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 245–66.Search in Google Scholar

[87] Miles, L., 1990. The cognitive foundations for reference in a signing orangutan. In Parker, S.T., Gibson, K.R. (Eds.), „Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 511–540.10.1017/CBO9780511665486.021Search in Google Scholar

[88] Miles, L., 1993. Language and the orangutan: The old „person“ of the forest. In Cavalieri, P., Singer, P. (Eds.), The great ape project. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 42–57.Search in Google Scholar

[89] Fouts, R., 1972. The use of guidance in teaching sign language to a Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 80, 515–522.10.1037/h0032989Search in Google Scholar

[90] Fouts, R., 1973. Acquisition and testing of gestural signs in four young Chimpanzees. Science, 180, 978–80.10.1126/science.180.4089.978Search in Google Scholar

[91] Fouts, R., 1976. Transfer of signed responses in American sign language from vocal English stimuli to physical object stimuli by a Chimpanzee (Pan). Learning and Motivation, 7, 458–75.10.1016/0023-9690(76)90050-3Search in Google Scholar

[92] Fouts, R., 1983. Chimpanzee language and elephant tails: A theoretical synthesis. In de Luce, J., Wilder, H.T. (Eds.), Language in primates: Perspectives and implications. New York: Springer, Verlag, pp. 63–75.10.1007/978-1-4612-5496-6_4Search in Google Scholar

[93] Fouts, D., 1994. The use of remote video recordings to study the use of American sign language by chimpanzees when no humans are present. In Gardner, R.A., Chiarelli, B., Plooij, F.C. (Eds.), The ethological roots of culture. Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Publishers. 271–284.10.1007/978-94-011-0998-7_15Search in Google Scholar

[94] Fouts, R., 1994. Transmission of a human gestural language in a Chimpanzee mother-infant relationship. In Gardner, R.A., Chiarelli, B., Plooij, F.C. (Eds.), The ethological roots of culture. Netherlands: Kluwer Academie Publishers. pp. 251–270.10.1007/978-94-011-0998-7_14Search in Google Scholar

[95] Fouts, R., 1997. Next of kin: What Chimpanzees have taught me about who we are. New York: William Morrow and Co.Search in Google Scholar

[96] Fouts, R., Chown, B., Goodin, L., 1976. Transfer of signed responses in American sign language from vocal English stimuli to physical object stimuli by a Chimpanzee (Pan). Learning and motivation, 7, 458–475.10.1016/0023-9690(76)90050-3Search in Google Scholar

[97] Fouts, R., Mellgren, R.L., 1976. Language, signs and cognition in the Chimpanzee. Sign Language Studies, 13(1), 319–346.10.1353/sls.1976.0004Search in Google Scholar

[98] Fouts, R., Shapiro, G., O’Neil, C.H., 1978. Studies of linguistic behavior in apes and children. In Siple, P. (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. Academic Press. pp. 163–185.Search in Google Scholar

[99] Fouts, R.S., Fouts, D., 1989. Loulis in conversation with cross-fostered chimpanzees. In Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B. T., van Cantfort, E. T. (Eds.), Teaching sign language to Chimpanzees. New York: State University of New York Press. 293–307.Search in Google Scholar

[100] Fouts, R., Fouts, D., van Cantfort, T.E., 1989. The infant Loulis learns signs from cross-fostered chimpanzees. In Gardner, A.R., Gardner, B.T., van Cantfort, E.T. (Eds.) 1989. Teaching sign language to Chimpanzees. New York: State University of New York Press. pp. 280–92.Search in Google Scholar

[101] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Rumbaugh, D.M., Boysen, S., 1978. Symbolic communication between two chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). Science, 201, 641–644.10.1126/science.675251Search in Google Scholar

[102] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Rumbaugh, D.M., Boysen, S., 1978. Linguistically mediated tool use and exchange by Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). The Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1, 539–554.10.1017/S0140525X00076536Search in Google Scholar

[103] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1979. Symbolic communication: Its origins and early development in the chimpanzee. In Gardner, H., Wolf, D. (Eds.), New directions in child development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 1–15.10.1002/cd.23219790303Search in Google Scholar

[104] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Rumbaugh, D.M., Smith, S.T., et al., 1980. Reference: The linguistic essential. Science, 2010, 922–4.10.1126/science.7434008Search in Google Scholar

[105] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Pate, J.L., Lawson, J., et al., 1983. Can a chimpanzee make a statement? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 457–492.10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.457Search in Google Scholar

[106] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., McDonald, K., Sevcik, R.A., et al., 1986. Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by Pygmy Chimpanzee (Pan paniscus) Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 211–35.10.1037/0096-3445.115.3.211Search in Google Scholar

[107] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1986. Ape language: from conditioned response to symbol. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/sava90374Search in Google Scholar

[108] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1988. A new look at ape language: Comprehension of vocal speech and syntax. In Leger, D. (Ed.), Comparative perspectives in modern psychology (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1987), University of Nebraska Press, pp. 201–255.Search in Google Scholar

[109] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Sevcik, R.A., Brakke, K.E., et al., 1990. Symbols: their communicative use, comprehension, and combination by bonobos (Pan paniscus). In Rovee-Collier, C., Lipsett, L.P. (Eds.), Advances in infancy research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 6, pp. 221–78.Search in Google Scholar

[110] Greenfield, P.M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1990. Grammatical combination in Pan paniscus: Processes of learning and invention in the evolution and development of language. In Parker, S.T., Gibson, K.R. (Eds.), “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 540–578.10.1017/CBO9780511665486.022Search in Google Scholar

[111] Greenfield, P.M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1991. Imitation, grammatical development, and the invention of protogrammar by an ape. In Krasnegor, N.A., Rumbaugh, D.M., Schiefelbusch, R.L., et al. (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 235–258.Search in Google Scholar

[112] Hopkins, W.D., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1991. Vocal communication as a function of differential rearing experiences in Pan paniscus: A preliminary report. International Journal of Primatology, 12, 559–583.10.1007/BF02547670Search in Google Scholar

[113] Greenfield, P.M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1993. Comparing communicative competence in child and chimp: The pragmatics of repetition. Journal of Child Language, 20, 1–26.10.1017/S0305000900009090Search in Google Scholar

[114] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., McDonald, K., Sevcik, R.A., et al., 1993. Language comprehension in ape and child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 1–221.10.2307/1166068Search in Google Scholar

[115] Tomasello, M.E., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Kruger, A.C., 1993. Imitative learning of actions on objects by children, chimpanzees and enculturated chimpanzees. Child Development, 64, 1688–1705.10.2307/1131463Search in Google Scholar

[116] Toth, N., Schick, K.D., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., et al., 1993. Pan the tool-maker: Investigations into the stone tool-making and tool-using capabilities of bonobo (Pan paniscus) Journal of Archeological Science, 20, 81–91.10.1006/jasc.1993.1006Search in Google Scholar

[117] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Lewin, R., 1994. Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

[118] Sevcik, R.A., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1994. Language comprehension and use by great apes. Language and Communication, 14, 37–58.10.1016/0271-5309(94)90019-1Search in Google Scholar

[119] Brakke, K.B., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1995. The development of language skills in bonobo and Chimpanzee –I. Comprehension. Language and Communication, 15, 121–48.10.1016/0271-5309(95)00001-7Search in Google Scholar

[120] Brakke, K.B., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1996. The development of language skills in pan – II. Production. Language and Communication, 16, 361–80.10.1016/S0271-5309(96)00018-3Search in Google Scholar

[121] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Shanker, S.G., Taylor, T.T., 1998. Apes, language and the human mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195109863.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[122] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Fields, W.M., 1998. Language and culture: A transcultural interweaving. Language Origins Society, 28, 4–14.Search in Google Scholar

[123] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Fields, W.M., 2000. Linguistic, cultural and cognitive capacities of bonobos (Pan paniscus). Culture & Psychology, 6(2), 131–53.10.1177/1354067X0062003Search in Google Scholar

[124] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Fields, W.M., Taglialatela, J., 2000. Ape consciousness – human consciousness: A perspective informed by language and culture. American Zoologist, 40(6), 910–26.10.1093/icb/40.6.910Search in Google Scholar

[125] Lyn, H., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 2000. Observational word learning in two bonobos (Pan paniscus): ostensive and non-ostensive contexts. Language and Communication, 20, 255–73.10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00026-9Search in Google Scholar

[126] Taglialatela, J.P., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Baker, L.A., 2003. Vocal production by a language-competent Pan paniscus. International Journal of Primatology, 24(1), 1–17.10.1023/A:1021487710547Search in Google Scholar

[127] Benson, J.D., Debashish, M., Greaves, W.M., et al., 2004. Mind and brain in apes: A methodology for phonemic analysis of vocalizations of language competent bonobos. Language Sciences 26, 643–660.10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.009Search in Google Scholar

[128] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Fields, W.M., Segerdahl, P., et al., 2005. Culture prefigures cognition in pan/homo bonobos. Theoria, 54, 311–328.10.1387/theoria.565Search in Google Scholar

[129] Segerdahl, P., Fields, W., Savage-Rumbaugh, S. E., 2005. Kanzi’s primal language: the cultural initiation of apes into language. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.10.1057/9780230513389Search in Google Scholar

[130] Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., Rumbaugh, D.M., Fields, W.M., 2006. Language as a window on rationality. In Hurley, S., Nudds, M. (Eds.), Rational animals? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 513–552.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528272.003.0023Search in Google Scholar

[131] Lyn, H., Greenfield, P.M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S. E., 2006. The development of representational play in chimpanzees and bonobos: Evolutionary implications, pretense and the role of interspecies communication. Cognitive Development, 21, 199–213.10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.03.005Search in Google Scholar

[132] Greenfield, P.M., Lyn, H., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 2008. Protolanguage in ontogeny and phylogeny: Combining deixis and representation. Interaction Studies, 9, 34–50.10.1075/is.9.1.04greSearch in Google Scholar

[133] Lyn, H., Franks, B., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 2008. Precursors of morality in the use of the symbols “good” and “bad” in two bonobos (Pan paniscus) and a Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Language and Communication, 28(3), 213–24.10.1016/j.langcom.2008.01.006Search in Google Scholar

[134] Lyn, H., Greenfield, P.M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., et al., 2011. Nonhuman primates do declare! A comparison of declarative symbol and gesture use in two children, two bonobos, and a Chimpanzee. Language and Communication, 31, 63–74.10.1016/j.langcom.2010.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[135] Asano, T., Kojima, T., Matsuzawa, T., et al., 1982. Object and color naming in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, 58(5), 118–22.10.2183/pjab.58.118Search in Google Scholar

[136] Matsuzawa, T., 1985. Use of numbers in a Chimpanzee. Nature, 315, 57–9.10.1038/315057a0Search in Google Scholar

[137] Matsuzawa, T., 1990. Spontaneous sorting in human and Chimpanzee. In Parker, S.T., Gibson, K R. (Eds.), „Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 451–568.10.1017/CBO9780511665486.019Search in Google Scholar

[138] Matsuzawa, T., 2003. The Ai project: historical and ecological contexts. Animal Cognition, 6, 199–211.10.1007/s10071-003-0199-2Search in Google Scholar

[139] Herman, L., 1986. Cognition and language competencies of bottlenosed dolphins. In Schusterman, R.J., Thomas, J.A., Wood, F.G. (Eds.), 1986. Dolphin cognition and behavior: A comparative approach. Hillside: Erlbaum, pp. 221–251.Search in Google Scholar

[140] Herman, L., Richards, D.G., Wolz, J.P., 1984. Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins. Cognition, 16(2), 129–219.10.1016/0010-0277(84)90003-9Search in Google Scholar

[141] Herman, L.M., Forestell, P.H., 1985. Reporting presence or absence of named objects by a language-trained dolphin. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 9(4), 667–681.10.1016/0149-7634(85)90013-2Search in Google Scholar

[142] Herman, L., Kuczaf, S.A. II., Holder, M.D., 1993. Responses to anomalous gestural sequences by a language-trained dolphin: Evidence for processing of semantic relations and syntactic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(2), 184–94.10.1037/0096-3445.122.2.184Search in Google Scholar

[143] Herman, L., Pack, A., Hoffman-Kuhnt, M., 1998. Seeing through sound: dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) perceive the spatial structure of objects through echolocation). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112 (3), 292–305.10.1037/0735-7036.112.3.292Search in Google Scholar

[144] Herman, L.M., Uyeyama, R.K., 1999. The dolphin’s grammatical competency: comments on kako 1999. Learning & Behavior, 27(1), 18–23.10.3758/BF03199426Search in Google Scholar

[145] Herman, L., Abichansani, S., Elhajj, A., et al., 1999. Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referential character of the human pointing gesture. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 1–18.10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.347Search in Google Scholar

[146] Herman, L., Matus, D.S., Herman, E.Y.K., et al., 2001. The bottlenosed dolphin’s (Tursiops truncatus) understanding of gestures as symbolic representations of its body parts. Learning & Behavior, 29(3), 250–264.10.3758/BF03192891Search in Google Scholar

[147] Schusterman, R.J., Krieger, K., 1986. Artificial language comprehension and size transposition by a California Sea Lion (Zalophus califonianus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 100, 348–55.10.1037/0735-7036.100.4.348Search in Google Scholar

[148] Schusterman, R.J., Gisiner, R., 1989. Please parse the sentence: Animal cognition in the procrustean bed of linguistics. Psychological Record, 39, 3–18.10.1007/BF03395051Search in Google Scholar

[149] Schusterman, R.J., Gisiner, R., 1997. Pinnipeds, porpoises and parsimony: Animal language research viewed from a bottom-up perspective. In Mitchell, R.W., Thompson, N.S., Miles, H.L. (Eds.), Anthropomorphism, anecdotes and animals. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 370–82.Search in Google Scholar

[150] Pepperberg, I.M., 1987. Acquisition of the same/different concept by an African Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus): Learning with respect to categories of color, shape, and material. Animal Learning and Behavior. 15, 423–432.10.3758/BF03205051Search in Google Scholar

[151] Pepperberg, I.M., 1987. Evidence for conceptual quantitative abilities in the African Grey Parrot: labeling of cardinal sets. Ethology, 75, 37–61.10.1111/j.1439-0310.1987.tb00641.xSearch in Google Scholar

[152] Pepperberg, I.M., 1990. Conceptual abilities of some nonprimate species, with an emphasis on an African Grey Parrot. In Parker, S.T., Gibson, K.R. (Eds.), „Language“ and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 469–507.10.1017/CBO9780511665486.020Search in Google Scholar

[153] Pepperberg, I.M., 1990. Cognition in an African Gray Parrot (Psittacus erithacus): Further evidence for comprehension of categories and labels. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104(1), 41–52.10.1037/0735-7036.104.1.41Search in Google Scholar

[154] Pepperberg, I.M., 1993. Cognition and communication in an African Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus): studies on a nonhuman, nonprimate, nonmammalian subject. In Roitblat, H.L., Herman, L M., Nachtigall, P.E. (Eds.), Langure and communication: Comparative perspectives. Hillside, New Jersey: Erlbaum, pp. 221–248.Search in Google Scholar

[155] Pepperberg, I.M., 1994. Numerical competence in an African gray parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(1), 36–44.10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.36Search in Google Scholar

[156] Pepperberg, I.M., 1997. Social influences on the acquisition of human-based codes in parrots and nonhuman primates. In Snowdon, C.T., Hausberger, M. (Eds.), Social influences on vocal development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–177.10.1017/CBO9780511758843.009Search in Google Scholar

[157] Pepperberg, I.M., 1999. The Alex studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[158] Pepperberg, I.M., 2006. Grey parrot numerical competence: A review. Animal Cognition, 9(4), 377–391.10.1007/s10071-006-0034-7Search in Google Scholar

[159] Pepperberg, I.M., 2012. Further evidence for addition and numerical competence by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Animal Cognition, 15(4), 711–717.10.1007/s10071-012-0470-5Search in Google Scholar

[160] Pepperberg, I., Kozak, F.A., 1986. Object permanence in the African Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Learning & Behavior, 14(3), 322–30.10.3758/BF03200074Search in Google Scholar

[161] Pepperberg, I., Brese, K.J., Harris, B.J., 1991. Solitary sound play during acquisition of English vocalizations by an African Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus): Possible parallels with children’s monologue speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 151–178.10.1017/S0142716400009127Search in Google Scholar

[162] Linden, E., 1986. Silent partners. New York: Times Books.Search in Google Scholar

[163] Sebeok, T.A., Rosenthal, R. (Eds.), 1981. The Clever Hans phenomenon: Communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 364.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb34458.xSearch in Google Scholar

[164] Sebeok, T.A., Rosenthal, R., 1981. Introduction. In Sebeok, T.A., Rosenthal, R. (Eds.), The Clever Hans phenomenon: Communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 364, pp. vii–1.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb34458.xSearch in Google Scholar

[165] Terrace, H.S., 1979. Nim: A Chimpanzee who learned sign language. New York: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

[166] Terrace, H.S., 1979. How Nim Chimpsky changed my mind. Psychology Today, November 1979, pp. 65–76Search in Google Scholar

[167] Terrace, H.S., 1980: More on monkey talk: Response to Patterson’s rejoinder to Martin Gardners’ review of Nim and speaking of apes. New York Review of Books, 4 December 1980, p. 59.Search in Google Scholar

[168] Terrace, H.S., 1981. A report to the academy, 1980. In Sebeok, T.A., Rosenthal, R., 1981. The Clever Hans phenomenon: Communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 364, pp. 94–114.Search in Google Scholar

[169] Terrace, H.S., 1983: Nonhuman intentional systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 378–379.10.1017/S0140525X00016654Search in Google Scholar

[170] Terrace, H.S., 1984. Language in apes. In Harre, R., Reynolds, V. (Eds.), The meaning of primate signals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–203.Search in Google Scholar

[171] Terrace, H.S., 1985. On the nature of animal thinking. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 9(4), 643–652.10.1016/0149-7634(85)90011-9Search in Google Scholar

[172] Umiker-Sebeok, J., Sebeok, T.A. (Eds.), 1980. Speaking of apes: A critical anthology of two-way communication with man. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4613-3012-7Search in Google Scholar

[173] Umiker-Sebeok, J., Sebeok, T.A., 1980. Introduction: Questioning apes. In Umiker-Sebeok, J., Sebeok, T.A. (Eds.), Speaking of apes: A critical anthology of two-way communication with man. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–60.10.1007/978-1-4613-3012-7_1Search in Google Scholar

[174] Thompson, C.R., Church, R.M., 1980. An explanation of the language of a Chimpanzee. Science, 205, 313–14.10.1126/science.7367862Search in Google Scholar

[175] Straub, R.O., Terrace H.S., 1981 Generalization of serial learning in the pigeon. Learning & Behavior, 9(4), 454–468.10.3758/BF03209775Search in Google Scholar

[176] Terrace, H.S., Son, L.K., Brannon, E.M., 2003. Serial expertise of Rhesus Macaques. Psychological Science, 14(1), 66–73.10.1111/1467-9280.01420Search in Google Scholar

[177] Čadková., 2015Search in Google Scholar

[178] Beck, B.B., 1980. Animal tool behavior: The use and manufacture of tools by animals. New York: Garland Press.Search in Google Scholar

[179] Lestel, D., 2011. What capabilities for the animal? 31 Biosemiotics, 4(1), 83–102.10.1007/s12304-010-9109-6Search in Google Scholar

[180] Pinker, S., Jackendoff, R., 2005. The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition, 95(2), 201–236.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[181] Jackendoff, R., Pinker, S., 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 97(2), 211–225.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006Search in Google Scholar

[182] Anderson, S.R., Lightfoot, D.W., 2002. The language organ: Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613869Search in Google Scholar

[183] Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., Fitch, T., 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579.10.1126/science.298.5598.1569Search in Google Scholar

[184] Hauser, M., Fitch, T., 2003. What are the uniquely human components of the language faculty? In Christiansen, M., Kirby, S (Eds.), Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 158–181.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

[185] Fitch, T., Hauser, M., 2004. Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science, 303(5656), 377–380.10.1126/science.1089401Search in Google Scholar

[186] Fitch, T., Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., 2005. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2), 179–210.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005Search in Google Scholar

[187] Fitch, T., 2011. “Deep homology” in the biology and evolution of language. In Di Sciullo, A.M., Boeckx, C. (Eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 135–168.Search in Google Scholar

[188] Harris., 1995Search in Google Scholar

[189] Frege, G., 1892. On sense and reference. The philosophical review, 57(3), 209–230.10.2307/2181485Search in Google Scholar

[190] Wittgenstein, L., 1953. Philosophical investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. 4th Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

[191] Kripke, S., 1982. Wittgenstein on rules and private language: an elementary exposition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[192] Meier, C., Van Wijnbergen-Huitink, J. (Eds.), 2016. Subjective meaning: Alternatives to relativism. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110402001Search in Google Scholar

[193] Jackendoff, R., 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[194] Elman, J.L., 2009. On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01023.xSearch in Google Scholar

[195] Jackendoff, R., 2007. A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research, 1146, 2–22.10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.111Search in Google Scholar

[196] Goldberg, A.E., 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224.10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9Search in Google Scholar

[197] Koster, J., 2010. Recursion and the lexicon. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.) Recursion and human language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285–300.10.1515/9783110219258.285Search in Google Scholar

[198] Dewar, K., Xu, F., 2007. Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds? Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1227–1238.10.1037/0012-1649.43.5.1227Search in Google Scholar

[199] Bloom, P., 2000. How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA, United States: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3577.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[200] Anderson, J.M., 2012. Types of lexical complexity in English: Syntactic categories and the lexicon. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 47(4), 3–50.10.2478/v10121-012-0010-zSearch in Google Scholar

[201] Anderson, J.M., 1997. A notional theory of syntactic categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519734Search in Google Scholar

[202] Hills, T.T., Maouene, J., Riordan, B., 2010. The associative structure of language: Contextual diversity in early word learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 259–273.10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[203] Conboy, B.T., Thal, D.J., 2006. Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development, 77(3), 712–735.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00899.xSearch in Google Scholar

[204] Dixon, J.A., Marchman, V.A., 2007. Grammar and the lexicon: Developmental ordering in language acquisition. Child Development, 78(1), 190–212.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00992.xSearch in Google Scholar

[205] Pinker, S., 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[206] Shapiro, K.A., Pascual-Leone, A., Mottaghy, F.M., et al., 2001. Grammatical distinctions in the left frontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(6), 713–720.10.1162/08989290152541386Search in Google Scholar

[207] Waxman, S.R., Booth, A.E., 2000. Principles that are invoked in the acquisition of words, but not facts. Cognition, 77(2), B35–B5010.1016/S0010-0277(00)00103-7Search in Google Scholar

[208] Diesendruck, G., Markson, L., 2001. Children’s avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 630–641.10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.630Search in Google Scholar

[209] Markson, L., Bloom, P., 1997. Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children. Nature, 385(6619), 813–815.10.1038/385813a0Search in Google Scholar

[210] Hadzibeganovic, T., Cannas, S.A., 2009. A Tsallis’ statistics based neural network model for novel word learning. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388(5), 732–746.10.1016/j.physa.2008.10.042Search in Google Scholar

[211] Waxman, S.R., Booth, A.E., 2001. On the insufficiency of evidence for a domain-general account of word learning. Cognition, 78(3), 277–279.10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00119-0Search in Google Scholar

[212] Scofield, J., Behrend, D.A., 2007. Two-year-olds differentially disambiguate novel words and facts. Journal of Child Language, 34(04), 875–889.10.1017/S0305000907008100Search in Google Scholar

[213] Behrend, D.A., Scofield, J., Kleinknecht, E.E., 2001. Beyond fast mapping: Young children’s extensions of novel words and novel facts. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 698–705.10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.698Search in Google Scholar

[214] Bloom, P., Markson, L., 1998. Capacities underlying word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(2), 67–73.10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01121-8Search in Google Scholar

[215] Povinelli, D.J., Eddy, T.J., 1996. Chimpanzees: Joint visual attention. Psychological Science, 7(3), 129–135.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00345.xSearch in Google Scholar

[216] Povinelli, D.J., Eddy, T.J., 1997. Specificity of gaze-following in young chimpanzees. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(2), 213–222.10.1111/j.2044-835X.1997.tb00735.xSearch in Google Scholar

[217] Kako, E., 1999. Elements of syntax in the systems of three language-trained animals. Learning & Behavior, 27(1), 1–14.10.3758/BF03199424Search in Google Scholar

[218] Premack, D., 1990. Words: What are they, and do animals have them? Cognition, 37(3), 197–212.10.1016/0010-0277(90)90045-LSearch in Google Scholar

[219] Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., McCowan, B., 2009. A law of word meaning in dolphin whistle types. Entropy, 11(4), 688–701.10.3390/e11040688Search in Google Scholar

[220] Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., McCowan, B., 2012. The span of correlations in dolphin whistle sequences. Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment, 2012, 06, 2–12.10.1088/1742-5468/2012/06/P06002Search in Google Scholar

[221] Sorbi, A., 1997. Complexity, logic, and recursion theory. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar

[222] Kripke, S., 1996. Elementary recursion theory and its applications to formal systems. Princeton: Princeton University Lecture Notes.Search in Google Scholar

[223] Fenstad, J.E., 1980. General recursion theory: An axiomatic approach. Springer, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-662-11824-5Search in Google Scholar

[224] Shoenfield, J.R., 1993. Recursion theory. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.10.1007/978-3-662-22378-9Search in Google Scholar

[225] Lobina, D.J., 2017. Recursion: A computational investigation into the representation and processing of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198785156.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[226] Lowenthal, F., Lefebvre, L. (Eds.), 2014. Language and recursion. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-9414-0Search in Google Scholar

[227] Roeper, T., Speas, M. (Eds.), 2014. Recursion: Complexity in cognition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-319-05086-7Search in Google Scholar

[228] van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), 2010. Recursion and human language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219258Search in Google Scholar

[229] Dijkstra, E.W., 1960. “Recursive programming”. Numerische Mathematik, 2(1), 312–318.10.1007/BF01386232Search in Google Scholar

[230] Barwise, J., Moss, L., 1996. Vicious circles: On the mathematics of non-wellfounded phenomena. United States: Center for the Study of Language and Information – CSLI Lecture Notes 60.Search in Google Scholar

[231] Lolli, G. (Ed.), 2010 Recursion theory and computational complexity. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-11072-6Search in Google Scholar

[232] Greibach, S.A., 1975. Theory of program structures: Schemes, semantics, verification. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/BFb0023017Search in Google Scholar

[233] Er, M.C., 1984. On the complexity of recursion in problem-solving. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 20(6): 537–544.10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80028-0Search in Google Scholar

[234] Roeper, T., 2011. The acquisition of recursion: how formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics, 5(1–2), 57–86.10.5964/bioling.8831Search in Google Scholar

[235] Miller, G.A., Chomsky, N., 1963. Finitary models of language users. In Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., Galanter, E. (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 419–491.Search in Google Scholar

[236] de Roeck, A., Johnson, R., King, M., et al., 1982. A myth about centre-embedding. Lingua, 58(3–4): 327–340.10.1016/0024-3841(82)90039-0Search in Google Scholar

[237] Karlsson, F., 2007. Constraints on multiple centerembedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 43(2), 365–392.10.1017/S0022226707004616Search in Google Scholar

[238] Joshi, A.K., 2014. Recursion in language: Is it indirectly constrained? In Roeper, T., Speas, M. (Eds.), Recursion: Complexity in cognition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 139–158.10.1007/978-3-319-05086-7_7Search in Google Scholar

[239] Fedor, A., Varga, M., Szathmáry, E., 2012. Semantics boosts syntax in artificial grammar learning tasks with recursion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 776–782.10.1037/a0026986Search in Google Scholar

[240] Tomalin, M., 2007. Reconsidering recursion in syntactic theory. Lingua, 117(10), 1784–1800.10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[241] van der Hulst, H., 2010. Re recursion. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Recursion and human language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. xv10.1515/9783110219258Search in Google Scholar

[242] Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J., Gibson, E., et al., 2010. How recursive is language? A Bayesian exploration. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Recursion and human language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 159–178.10.1515/9783110219258.159Search in Google Scholar

[243] van der Hulst, H., 2010. A note on recursion in phonology. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Recursion and human language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285–300.10.1515/9783110219258Search in Google Scholar

[244] Collier, R., 1975. Physiological correlates of intonation patterns. The Journal of the Acoustical 33 Society of America, 58(1), 249–255.10.1121/1.380654Search in Google Scholar

[245] Hockett, C.F., 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203(3), 88–96.10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88Search in Google Scholar

[246] de Boer, B., Sandler, W., Kirby, S., 2012. New perspectives on duality of patterning: Introduction to the special issue. Language and Cognition, 4(04), 251–259.10.1515/langcog-2012-0014Search in Google Scholar

[247] Blevins, J., 2012. Duality of patterning: Absolute universal or statistical tendency? Language and Cognition, 4(04), 275–296.10.1515/langcog-2012-0016Search in Google Scholar

[248] Ladd, D.R., 2012. What is duality of patterning, anyway? Language and Cognition, 4(04), 261–273.10.1515/langcog-2012-0015Search in Google Scholar

[249] Nowak, M.A., Krakauer, D.C., 1999. The evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 96(14), 8028–8033.10.1073/pnas.96.14.8028Search in Google Scholar

[250] Nowak, M.A., Krakauer, D.C., Dress, A., 1999. An error limit for the evolution of language. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 266(1433), 2131–2136.10.1098/rspb.1999.0898Search in Google Scholar

[251] Bochner, J., Garrison, W., Palmer, L., et al., 1997. A computerized adaptive testing system for speech discrimination measurement: The speech sound pattern discrimination test. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2289–2298.10.1121/1.418209Search in Google Scholar

[252] Liberman, A., Mattingly, I., 1989. A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243(4890), 489–494.10.1126/science.2643163Search in Google Scholar

[253] Kluender, K., Greenberg, S., 1989. A specialization for speech perception? Science, 244(4912), 1530.10.1126/science.2740894Search in Google Scholar

[254] Iverson, P., Wagner, A., Pinet, M., et al., 2011. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of/w/-/v/speech and nonspeech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 207(4437), 297–303.10.1121/1.3632048Search in Google Scholar

[255] Ramus, F., Pidgeon, E., Frith, U., 2003. The relationship between motor control and phonology in dyslexic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(5), 712–722.10.1111/1469-7610.00157Search in Google Scholar

[256] Masterson, J.J., Daniels, D.L., 1991. Motoric versus contrastive approaches to phonology therapy: a case study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 7(2), 127–140.10.1177/026565909100700202Search in Google Scholar

[257] Haun, D.B.M., Call, J., 2008. Imitation recognition in great apes. Current Biology, 18(7), 288–290.10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.031Search in Google Scholar

[258] Tennie, C., Call, J., Tomasello, M., 2006. Push or pull: Imitation vs. emulation in great apes and human children. Ethology, 112(12), 1159–1169.10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01269.xSearch in Google Scholar

[259] Call, J., Carpenter, M., 2003. On imitation in apes and children. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 26(3), 325–349.10.1174/021037003322299070Search in Google Scholar

[260] Whiten, A., Custance, D.M., Gomez, J-C., et al., 1996. Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110(1), 3–14.10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.3Search in Google Scholar

[261] Whiten, A., 1998. Imitation of the sequential structure of actions by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112(3), 270–281.10.1037/0735-7036.112.3.270Search in Google Scholar

[262] Webb, D.M., Zhang, J., 2005. FoxP2 in songlearning birds and vocal-learning mammals. Journal of Heredity, 96(3), 212–216.10.1093/jhered/esi025Search in Google Scholar

[263] Knornschild, M., Nagy, M., Metz, M., et al., 2010. Complex vocal imitation during ontogeny in a bat. Biology Letters, 6(2), 156–159.10.1098/rsbl.2009.0685Search in Google Scholar

[264] Stoeger, A.S., Mietchen, D., Oh, S., et al., 2012. An Asian elephant imitates human speech. Current Biology, 22(22), 2144–2148.10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.022Search in Google Scholar

[265] Janik, V.M., Slater, P.J.B., 1997. Vocal learning in mammals. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 26, 59–99.10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60377-0Search in Google Scholar

[266] Reiss, D., McCowan, B., 1993. Spontaneous vocal mimicry and production by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): Evidence for vocal learning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107(3), 301–312.10.1037/0735-7036.107.3.301Search in Google Scholar

[267] Foote, A.D., Griffin, R.M., Howitt, D., et al., 2006. Killer whales are capable of vocal learning. Biology Letters, 2(4), 509–512.10.1098/rsbl.2006.0525Search in Google Scholar

[268] Goodale, E., Kotagama, S.W., 2006. Contextdependent vocal mimicry in a passerine bird. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 273(1588), 875–880.10.1098/rspb.2005.3392Search in Google Scholar

[269] Putland, D.A., Nicholls, J.A., Noad, M.J., et al., 2006. Imitating the neighbours: Vocal dialect matching in a mimic-model system. Biology Letters, 2(3), 367–370.10.1098/rsbl.2006.0502Search in Google Scholar

[270] Tchernichovski, O., Lints, T., Mitra, P.P., et al., 1999. Vocal imitation in zebra finches is inversely related to model abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(22), 12901–12904.10.1073/pnas.96.22.12901Search in Google Scholar

[271] Bolhuis, J.J., Everaert, M., Berwick, R.C., et al., 2013. Birdsong, speech, and language: Exploring the evolution of mind and brain. Cambridge, MA, United States: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9322.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[272] Jarvis, E.D., 2006. Selection for and against vocal learning in birds and mammals. Ornithological Science, 5(1), 5–14.10.2326/osj.5.5Search in Google Scholar

[273] Haesler, S., Wada, K., Nshdejan, A., et al., 2004. FoxP2 expression in avian vocal learners and non-learners. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(13), 3164–3175.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4369-03.2004Search in Google Scholar

[274] Haesler, S., Rochefort, C., Georgi, B., et al., 2007. Incomplete and inaccurate vocal imitation after knockdown of FoxP2 in songbird basal ganglia nucleus area X. PLoS Biology, 5(12), e321.10.1371/journal.pbio.0050321Search in Google Scholar

[275] Heston, J.B., White, S.A., 2015. Behavior-linked FoxP2 regulation enables zebra finch vocal learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(7), 2885–2894.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3715-14.2015Search in Google Scholar

[276] Scharff, C., Haesler, S., 2005. An evolutionary perspective on FoxP2: strictly for the birds? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(6), 694–703.10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[277] Teramitsu, I., Kudo, L.C., London, S.E., et al., 2004. Parallel FoxP1 and FoxP2 expression in songbird and human brain predicts functional interaction. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(13), 3152–63.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5589-03.2004Search in Google Scholar

[278] Teramitsu, I., White, S.A., 2006. FoxP2 regulation during undirected singing in adult songbirds. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(28), 7390–7394.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1662-06.2006Search in Google Scholar

[279] Boeckx, C., 2009. The nature of merge: Consequences for language, mind and biology. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Uriagereka, J., Salaburu, P. (Eds.), Of minds and language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque country. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 44–57.10.1093/oso/9780199544660.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

[280] Boeckx, C., 2012. The emergence of language, from a biolinguistic point of view. In: Tallerman, M., Gibson, K.R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 492–501.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0052Search in Google Scholar

[281] Mitterer, H., Ernestus, M., 2008. The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. Cognition, 109(1), 168–173.10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.002Search in Google Scholar

[282] Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Matelli, M., et al., 1996. Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111(2), 246–252.10.1007/BF00227301Search in Google Scholar

[283] Whiten, A., 2013. Monkeys, apes, imitation and mirror neurons. Cortex, 49(10), 2941–2943.10.1016/j.cortex.2013.07.005Search in Google Scholar

[284] Menenti, L., Gierhan, S.M.E., Segaert, K., et al., 2011. Shared language: Overlap and segregation of the neuronal infrastructure for speaking and listening revealed by functional MRI. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1173–1182.10.1177/0956797611418347Search in Google Scholar

[285] Wohlgemuth, M.J., Sober, S.J., Brainard, M.S., 2010. Linked control of syllable sequence and phonology in birdsong. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(39), 12936–12949.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2690-10.2010Search in Google Scholar

[286] Kreutzer, M.L., 1990. Bird phonology and species recognition: minimal song units are cues inducing strong reactions in male cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus). Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 2(3), 243–252.10.1080/08927014.1990.9525409Search in Google Scholar

[287] Tomasello, M.E., 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[288] Liebal, K., Waller, B.M., Burrows, A.M., et al., 2013. Primate communication a multimodal approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139018111Search in Google Scholar

[289] Berwick, R.C., Chomsky, N., 2016. Why only us: Language and evolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[290] Heim, I., Kratzer, A., 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

[291] Larson, R., Segal, G., 1995. Knowledge of meaning: An introduction to semantic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4076.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[292] Martins, M.D., Fitch, W.T., 2014. Investigating recursion within a domain-specific framework. In Lowenthal, F., Lefebvre, L. (Eds.), Language and recursion. New York: Springer, pp. 15–26.10.1007/978-1-4614-9414-0_2Search in Google Scholar

[293] Corballis, M.C., 2014. Recursive cognition as a prelude to language. In Lowenthal, F., Lefebvre, L. (Eds.), Language and recursion. New York: Springer, pp. 27–36.10.1007/978-1-4614-9414-0_3Search in Google Scholar

[294] Vicari, G., Adenzato, M., 2014. Is recursion language-specific? Evidence of recursive mechanisms in the structure of intentional action. Consciousness and Cognition, 26, 169–188.10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.010Search in Google Scholar

[295] Brattico, P., 2010. Recursion hypothesis considered as a research program for cognitive science. Minds and Machines, 20(2), 213–241.10.1007/s11023-010-9189-8Search in Google Scholar

[296] Martins, M.D., Muršič, Z., Oh, J., et al., 2015. Representing visual recursion does not require verbal or motor resources. Cognitive Psychology, 77, 20–41.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.01.004Search in Google Scholar

[297] Martins, M.D., Martins, I.P., Fitch, W.T., 2015. A novel approach to investigate recursion and iteration in visual hierarchical processing. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1421–1442.10.3758/s13428-015-0657-1Search in Google Scholar

[298] Biederman, I., 1987. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115–117.10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115Search in Google Scholar

[299] Biederman, I., 1995. Visual object recognition. In Kosslyn, S.M., Osherson, D.N. (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Visual cognition. Cambridge, MA, United States: MIT Press. pp. 121–166.Search in Google Scholar

[300] Marr, D., 2010. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 35\10.7551/mitpress/9780262514620.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[301] Pastra, K., Aloimonos, Y., 2012. The minimalist grammar of action. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences, 367(1585), 103–117.10.1098/rstb.2011.0123Search in Google Scholar

[302] Searle, J.R., 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[303] Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., Pribram, K., 1960. Plans and the structure of behaviour. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.10.1037/10039-000Search in Google Scholar

[304] Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.P., 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

[305] Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L., Bergman, T.J., 2005. Primate social cognition and the origins of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 264–266.10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[306] McGonigle, B., Chalmers, M., Dickinson, A., 2003. Concurrent disjoint and reciprocal classification by Cebus apella in seriation tasks: evidence for hierarchical organization. Animal Cognition, 6(3), 185–197.10.1007/s10071-003-0174-ySearch in Google Scholar

[307] Byrne, R.W., 1999. Imitation without intentionality: Using string parsing to copy the organization of behaviour. Animal Cognition, 2(2), 63–72.10.1007/s100710050025Search in Google Scholar

[308] Lieberman, P., 1985. On the evolution of human syntactic ability. Its pre-adaptive Bases—Motor control and speech. Journal of Human Evolution, 14(7), 657–668.10.1016/S0047-2484(85)80074-9Search in Google Scholar

[309] Lieberman, P., 2000. Human language and our reptilian brain: The subcortical bases of speech, syntax, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1353/pbm.2001.0011Search in Google Scholar

[310] Greenfield, P.M., 1991. Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(04), 531–551.10.1017/S0140525X00071235Search in Google Scholar

[311] Greenfield, P.M., Nelson, K., Saltzman, E., 1972. The development of rulebound strategies for manipulating seriated cups: A parallel between action and grammar. Cognitive Psychology, 3(2), 291–310.10.1016/0010-0285(72)90009-6Search in Google Scholar

[312] Crump, T., 1990. The anthropology of numbers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621680Search in Google Scholar

[313] Bloom, P., 1994. Generativity within language and other cognitive domains. Cognition, 51(2), 177–189.10.1016/0010-0277(94)90014-0Search in Google Scholar

[314] Dehaene, S., 1997. Number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. NY, United States: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[315] Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., et al., 1999. Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284(5416), 970–974.10.1126/science.284.5416.970Search in Google Scholar

[316] Wiese, H., 2004. Numbers, language, and the human mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486562Search in Google Scholar

[317] Ifrah, G., 2000. The universal history of numbers: from prehistory to the invention of the computer. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

[318] Everett, C., 2017. Numbers and the making of us: Counting and the course of human cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674979185Search in Google Scholar

[319] Zaslavsky, C., 1993. Multicultural mathematics: Interdisciplinary cooperative-learning activities. Portland, Maine: Walch J Weston.Search in Google Scholar

[320] Frank, M.C., Fedorenko, E., Lai, P., et al., 2012. Verbal interference suppresses exact numerical representation. 64(1–2), 74–92.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[321] Marcus, G.F., 2006. Startling starlings. Nature, 440(7088), 1117–1118.10.1038/4401117aSearch in Google Scholar

[322] Fitch, T., Martins, M.D., 2014. Hierarchical processing in music, language, and action: Lashley revisited. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316(1), 87–104.10.1111/nyas.12406Search in Google Scholar

[323] Badre, D., D’Esposito, M., 2009. Is the rostrocaudal axis of the frontal lobe hierarchical? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(9), 659–669.10.1038/nrn2667Search in Google Scholar

[324] Martins, M.D., 2012. Distinctive signatures of recursion. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences, 367(1598), 2055–2064.10.1098/rstb.2012.0097Search in Google Scholar

[325] Unterrainer, J.M., Owen, A.M., 2006. Planning and problem solving: From neuropsychology to functional neuroimaging. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 99(4–6), 308–317.10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.014Search in Google Scholar

[326] Nardini, M., Jones, P., Bedford, R., et al., 2008. Development of cue integration in human navigation. Current Biology, 18(9), 689–693.10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.021Search in Google Scholar

[327] Martins, M.D., Fischmeister, F.P., Puig-Waldmueller, E., et al., 2014. Fractal image perception provides novel insights into hierarchical cognition. NeuroImage, 96, 300–308.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.064Search in Google Scholar

[328] Martins, M.D., Fitch, W.T., 2015. Do we represent intentional action as recursively embedded? The answer must be empirical. A comment on Vicari and Adenzato 2014. Consciousness and Cognition, 38, 16–21.10.1016/j.concog.2015.10.003Search in Google Scholar

[329] Hailman, J.P., Ficken, M.S., Ficken, R.W., 1987. Constraints on the structure of combinatorial “Chick-a-dee” calls. Ethology, 75(1), 62–80.10.1111/j.1439-0310.1987.tb00642.xSearch in Google Scholar

[330] Hailman, J.P., Ficken, M.S., 1986. Combinatorial animal communication with computable syntax: Chick-a-dee calling qualifies as ‘Language’ by structural linguistics. Animal Behaviour, 34(6), 1899–1901.10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80279-2Search in Google Scholar

[331] Zuberbühler, K., 2001. Predator-specific alarm calls in Campbell’s monkeys, Cercopithecus campbelli. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50(5), 414–422.10.1007/s002650100383Search in Google Scholar

[332] Zuberbühler, K., 2002. A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication. Animal Behaviour, 63(2), 293–299.10.1006/anbe.2001.1914Search in Google Scholar

[333] Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic structures (second edition 2002). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

[334] Carnie, A., 2013. Syntax: A generative introduction (3rd edition). NJ, United States: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

[335] Borsley, R., 1999. Syntactic theory: A unified approach (second edition). London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

[336] Haegeman, L., 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory (Second Edition 1994). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

[337] Johnson, N.F., 1965. The psychological reality of phrase structure rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4(6), 469–475.10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80044-5Search in Google Scholar

[338] Chomsky, N., 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

[339] Jackendoff, R., 1993. Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Search in Google Scholar

[340] Pinker, S., 1995. The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Harper Perennial.10.1037/e412952005-009Search in Google Scholar

[341] Jacobson, P., 2014. Compositional semantics: An introduction to the syntax/semantics interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[342] van Valin, R.D., Jr., 2005. Exploring the syntaxsemantics interface. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[343] Frank, R., 2004. Phrase structure composition and syntactic dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[344] Lohndal, T., 2014. Phrase structure and argument structure: A case study of the syntax-semantics interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677115.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[345] Jackendoff, R., 1977. X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[346] Koktová, E., 1999. Word-order based grammar. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110803396Search in Google Scholar

[347] Sabel, J., Saito, M. (Eds.), 2005. The free word order phenomenon: Its syntactic sources and diversity. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197266Search in Google Scholar

[348] Corbett, G.G., 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[349] Sobin, N., 1997. Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(2), 318–343.Search in Google Scholar

[350] Anderson, J.M., 1977. On case grammar: Prolegomena to a theory of grammatical relations. London: Croom Helm, Humanities Press.Search in Google Scholar

[351] Silverstein, M., 1981. Case marking and the nature of language. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 1(2), 227–244.10.1080/07268608108599275Search in Google Scholar

[352] Wierzbicka, A., 1981. Case marking and human nature. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 1(1), 43–80.10.1080/07268608108599266Search in Google Scholar

[353] Anderson, J.M., 1991. Notional grammar and the redundancy of syntax. Studies in Language, 15(2), 301–333.10.1075/sl.15.2.04andSearch in Google Scholar

[354] Long, D.L., Baynes, K., Prat, C.S., 2005. The propositional structure of discourse in the two cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 95(3), 383–394.10.1016/j.bandl.2005.02.004Search in Google Scholar

[355] Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., 1978. Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(4), 403–417.10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90238-4Search in Google Scholar

[356] Bornkessel, I., Zysset, S., Friederici, A.D.F., et al., 2005. Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. NeuroImage, 26(1), 221–233.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.032Search in Google Scholar

[357] Kroeger, P., 2004. Analyzing syntax: A lexicalfunctional approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801693Search in Google Scholar

[358] Grimshaw, J., 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[359] Goldberg, A.E., 1995. Constructions: A construction approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

[360] Reuland, E., Bhattacharya, T., Spathas, G. (Eds.), 2007. Argument structure (Linguistik Aktuell Linguistics Today). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.108Search in Google Scholar

[361] Babby, L.H., 2009. The syntax of argument structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511576584Search in Google Scholar

[362] Duguine, M., Huidobro, S., Madariaga, N., 2010. Argument structure and syntactic relations: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.158Search in Google Scholar

[363] Corballis, M.C., 2014. The recursive mind: The origins of human language, thought, and civilization. Princeton, NJ, United States: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400851492Search in Google Scholar

[364] Everett, D.L., 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Piraha another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46(4): 621–646.10.1086/431525Search in Google Scholar

[365] Everett, D.L., 2012. What does Piraha grammar have to teach us about human language and the mind? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(6), 555–563.10.1002/wcs.1195Search in Google Scholar

[366] Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D., Rodrigues, C., 2009. Piraha exceptionality: A reassessment. Language, 85(2), 355–404.10.1353/lan.0.0107Search in Google Scholar

[367] Sakel, J., Stapert, E., 2010. Piraha –in need of recursive syntax? In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Recursion and human language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–16.10.1515/9783110219258.1Search in Google Scholar

[368] Kinsella, A., 2010. Was recursion the key step in the evolution of the human language faculty? In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Recursion and human language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 179–192.10.1515/9783110219258.177Search in Google Scholar

[369] Zimmerer, V., Varley, R.A., 2010. Recursion in severe agrammatism. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Recursion and human language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 393–406.10.1515/9783110219258.393Search in Google Scholar

[370] Gardner, T.J., Naef, F., Nottebohm, F., 2005. Freedom and rules: The acquisition and reprogramming of a bird’s learned song. Science, 308(5724), 1046–1049.10.1126/science.1108214Search in Google Scholar

[371] Payne, K., 2000. The progressively changing songs of humpback whales: a window on the creative process in a wild animal. In Wallin, N.L., Merker, B., Brown, S. (Eds.), The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 135–50.10.7551/mitpress/5190.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

[372] Perruchet, P., Rey, A., 2005. Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 307–313.10.3758/BF03196377Search in Google Scholar

[373] Gentner, T.Q., Fenn, K.M., Margoliash, D., et al., 2006. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature, 440(7088), 1204–1207.10.1038/nature04675Search in Google Scholar

[374] Berwick, R.C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G.J.L., et al., 2011. Songs to syntax: The linguistics of birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 113–121.10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.002Search in Google Scholar

[375] Brannon, E.M., Wusthoff, C.J., Gallistel, C.R., et al., 2001. Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychological Science, 12(3), 238–243.10.1111/1467-9280.00342Search in Google Scholar

[376] Hunt, S., Low, J., Burns, K.C., 2008. Adaptive numerical competency in a food-hoarding songbird. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 275(1649), 2373–2379.10.1098/rspb.2008.0702Search in Google Scholar

[377] Scarf, D., Hayne, H., Colombo, M., 2011. Pigeons on par with primates in numerical competence. Science, 334(6063), 1664.10.1126/science.1213357Search in Google Scholar

[378] Ain, S A., Giret, N., Grand, M., et al., 2009. The discrimination of discrete and continuous amounts in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Animal Cognition, 12(1), 145–154.10.1007/s10071-008-0178-8Search in Google Scholar

[379] Tan, L., Grace, R.C., Holland, S., et al., 2007. Numerical reproduction in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33(4), 409–427.10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.409Search in Google Scholar

[380] Olthof, A., Roberts, W.A., 2000. Summation of symbols by pigeons (Columba livia): The importance of number and mass of reward items. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114(2), 158–166.10.1037/0735-7036.114.2.158Search in Google Scholar

[381] Xia, L., Emmerton, J., Siemann, M., et al., 2001. Pigeons (Columba livia) learn to link numerosities with symbols. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115(1), 83–91.10.1037/0735-7036.115.1.83Search in Google Scholar

[382] Corballis, M.C., 2007. Recursion, language, and starlings. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 697–704.10.1080/15326900701399947Search in Google Scholar

[383] Reuland, E., 2013. Recursivity of language: What can birds tell us about it? In Bolhuis, J.J., Everaert, M., Berwick, R.C., Chomsky, N. (Eds.), Birdsong, speech, and language: Exploring the evolution of mind and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 209–228.10.7551/mitpress/9322.003.0015Search in Google Scholar

[384] Braaten, R.F., Hulse, S.H., 1993. Perceptual organization of auditory temporal patterns in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 54(5), 567–578.10.3758/BF03211781Search in Google Scholar

[385] Chomsky, N., 1990. On formalization and formal linguistics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 143–147.10.1007/BF00205534Search in Google Scholar

[386] Lieberman, P., 2013. The unpredictable species: What makes humans unique. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400846702Search in Google Scholar

[387] Terrace, H.S., 2005. Metacognition and the evolution of language. In Terrace, H., Metcalfe, J. (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University press, pp. 84–115.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.003.0003Search in Google Scholar