[Banks, F. (2009). Research on teaching and learning in technology education. In A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 373–389). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burton, D. (2009). Why pupils learn. In S. Capel, M. Leask & T. Turner (Eds.), Learning to teach in the secondary school: A companion to school experience (5th ed.) (pp. 251–266). London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Doherty, R. A., & Canavan, B. (2006). Mapping reform in Scotlandís technology education curriculum: Change and curriculum policy in the compulsory sector. In M. De Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education (pp. 347–375). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gómez Puente, S. M., van Eijk, M. W., & Jochems, W. M. (2012). A sampled literature review of design-based learning approaches: a search for key characteristics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 717–732. doi: 10.1007/ s10798-012-9212-x 10.1007/s10798-012-9212-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, A. (2009). Looking back to look forward: The future of technology education. In A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 685–692). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, A., & Compton, V. (2009). Reviewing the field of technology education in New Zealand. In A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 93–104). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Järvinen, E. M., Karsikas, A., & Hintikka, J. (2007). Children as innovators in action – a Phase of microcontrollers in Finnish comprehensive schools. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 18(2), 37–52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kellough, R. D., & Kellough, N. G. (2011). Secondary school teaching. Boston: Pearson Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koch, D., & Sanders, M. (2011). The effects of solid modeling and visualization on technical problem solving. Journal of Technology Education, 22(2), 3–21.10.21061/jte.v22i2.a.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Kyriacou, C. (2012). Teaching. In J. Arthur & A. Peterson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to education (pp. 107–114). New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Layton, D. (1993). Technologyís challenge to science education: Cathedral, quarry or company store? Buckingham: Open University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsh, C. J. (1997). Planning, management and ideology: Key concepts for understanding curriculum 2. London: Falmer Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meriläinen, M. (2006). Guidelines on ìhow to approach teaching and learning?î Joensuu: Joensuun yliopiston kirjasto.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mita, S., Matsuda, T., Iwaki, J., & Furuta, T. (2006). A change of industrial technology education curriculum and development of a design learning support system for technology education. In M. De Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education (pp. 241–252). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2005). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London, England: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niglas, K. (2013). Faktoranal¸¸s [Factoranalysis]. Retrieved from http://minitorn.tlu.ee/~katrin/cmsSimple/uploads/opmat/faktor.pdf Novakova, H. (2006). Innovative of the concept and content of technology education in the Czech Repuplic in context with their development in the countries of central Europe. In M. De Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education (pp. 463–475). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Owen-Jackson, G., & Steeg, T. (2007). The role of technical knowledge in design & technology. In D. Barlex (Ed.), Design & technology – for the next generation (pp. 171–185). Whitchurch, England: Cliffe & Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parikka, M. (1998). Teknologiakompetenssi. Teknologiakasvatuksen uudistamishaasteita peruskoulussa ja lukiossa [Technological competence. Challenges of reforming technology education in the Finnish comprehensive and upper secondary school]. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän Yliopisto.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parikka, M., & Kantola, J. (2001). Kasvatusoppillisesta veistosta teknologiakasvatukseen [From educational science to technology education]. Tekninen Opettaja [Technology teacher], 1, 18–19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parikka, M., & Ojala, A. (2008). Entrepreneurship and technology education in the context of information society. Journal of the Japan Society of Technology Education, 50(1), 9–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parikka, M., & Rasinen, A. (2009). Teknologiakasvatus tutkimuskohteena [Technology education as a research object]. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parikka, M., Rasinen, A., & Ojala, A. (2011). Technology education. In M. De Vries (Ed.), Positioning technology education in the curriculum (pp. 133–143). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavlova, M. (2006). Comparing perspectives: Comparative research in technology education. In M. De Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education (pp. 19–32). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pıhikooli riiklik ıppekava [National curriculum for basic schools]. (2011). Retrieved December 12, 2012, from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114012011001?leiaKehtiv ]Search in Google Scholar
[Rasinen, A. (2000). Developing technology education: In search of curriculum elements for Finnish general education schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/13388/9513924017.pdf?sequence=1 ]Search in Google Scholar
[Rasinen, A., Virtanen, S., & Miyakawa, H. (2009). Analysis of technology education in the curricula of five EU countries and challenges of technology education – the Finnish perspective. In G. Hoepken, L. S. Lee, H. Miyakawa & A. Ojala (Eds.), Cross border: International cooperation in industrial technology education (pp. 67– 83). Aichi: Aichi University of Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanders, M. (2001). New paradigm or old wine? The status of technology education practice in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 35–55.10.21061/jte.v12i2.a.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Sillaots, M. (2012). Innovaatilised ıpistsenaariumid iTec projekti näitel [Innovative learning scenarios basing on the example of the iTec project]. E-ıppe Uudiskiri [E-learning newsletter]. Retrieved from http://uudiskiri.e-ope.ee/?p=2771]Search in Google Scholar
[Tooding, L. M. (2007). Andmete anal¸¸s ja tılgendamine sotsiaalteadustes [Data analysis and interpretation in social sciences]. Tartu: Tartu ‹likooli Kirjastus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Watkins, C., Carnell, E., & Lodge, C. (2007). Effective learning in classroom. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. 10.4135/9781446211472]Search in Google Scholar
