[Aichholzer, J., and E. Zeglovits. 2015. “Balancierte Kurzskala autoritärer Einstellungen (B-RWA-6).” Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). DOI: https://doi.org/10.6102/zis239.]Search in Google Scholar
[Altemeyer, B. 1981. Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bassili, J.N., and B.S. Scott. 1996. “Response Latency as a Signal to Question Problems in Survey Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60(3): 390–399. DOI: https://org/doi.10.1086/297760.10.1086/297760]Search in Google Scholar
[Beauducel, A., and W.W. Wittmann. 2005. “Simulation Study on Fit Indexes in CFA Based on Data With Slightly Distorted Simple Structure.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 12(1): 41–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3.10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Beierlein, C., F. Asbrock, M. Kauff, and P. Schmidt. 2014. Die Kurzskala Autoritarismus (KSA-3): Ein ökonomisches Messinstrument zur Erfassung dreier Subdimensionen autoritärer Einstellungen. (GESIS-Working Papers, 2014/35). Mannheim: GESIS – Leibnitz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Available at: http://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/kurzskalen/working_papers/KSA3_WorkingPapers_2014-35.pdf (accessed February 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bless, H., G. Bohner, T. Hild, and N. Schwarz. 1992. “Asking Difficult Questions: Task Complexity Increases the Impact of Response Alternatives.” European Journal of Social Psychology 22(3): 309–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220309.10.1002/ejsp.2420220309]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgers, N., and J. Hox. 2001. “Item Nonresponse in Questionnaire Research with Children.” Journal of Official Statistics 17(2): 321–335. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/item-nonresponse-in-questionnaire-research-with-children.pdf (accessed September 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bradburn, N.M., S. Sudman, and B. Wansink. 2004. Asking Questions: The Definitive Guide to Questionnaire Design: For Market Research, Political Polls, and Social and Health Questionnaires. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, J.C., D.W. Webster, and N. Glass. 2009. “The Danger Assessment: Validation of a Lethality Risk Assessment Instrument for Intimate Partner Femicide.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 24(4): 653–674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605083doi.17180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, F.F. 2007. “Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14(3): 464–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.10.1080/10705510701301834]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, J. 1992. “A Power Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 112(1): 155–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2014. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[ESS, European Social Survey. 2014. ESS Round 7 Source Questionnaire. London: ESS ERIC Headquarters, Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University London. Available at: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round7/fieldwork/source/ESS7_source_main_questionnaire.pdf (accessed February 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, F.J., Jr.. 1992. “How Unclear Terms Affect Survey Data.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(2): 218–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/269312.10.1086/26931210119848]Search in Google Scholar
[Gemenis, K. 2013. “Estimating Parties’ Policy Positions through Voting Advice Applications. Some Methodological Considerations.” Acta Politica 48(3): 268–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2012.36.10.1057/ap.2012.36]Search in Google Scholar
[Graesser, A.C. 2006. “Question Understanding Aid (QUAID): A Web Facility that Tests Question Comprehensibility.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(1): 3–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfj012.10.1093/poq/nfj012]Search in Google Scholar
[Grant Levy, S. 2019. “Deconstructing a Double-Barreled Alternative: Evolution and Creationism.” Psychological Reports 122(5): 1995–2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118795145.10.1177/003329411879514530180788]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, Jr., M.P. Cooper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2009. Survey Methodology, (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hox, J.J., E.D. de Leeuw, and E.A.O. Zijlmans. 2015. “Measurement Equivalence in Mixed Mode Surveys.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00087.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00087431828225699002]Search in Google Scholar
[Hu, L., and P.M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1): 1–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.10.1080/10705519909540118]Search in Google Scholar
[Kane, M.T. 2013. “Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores.” Journal of Educational Measurement 50(1): 1–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000.10.1111/jedm.12000]Search in Google Scholar
[Kay, P., and C.J. Fillmore. 1999. “Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? Construction.” Language 75(1): 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/417472.10.2307/417472]Search in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J.A. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5(3): 213–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305.10.1002/acp.2350050305]Search in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J.A., and S. Presser. 2009. “Question and Questionnaire Design.” In Handbook of Survey Research, edited by J.D. Wright and P.V. Marsden., (2nd ed.) (pp. 263–313). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Payne, S. 1951. The Art of Asking Questions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lenzner, T., C. Neuert, P. Hadler, A. Stiegler, C. Beitz, R. Schmidt, Z. Umuc, N. Reisepatt, S. Andrea, and N. Menold. 2017. “Krankheitswissen und Informationsbedarfe – Diabetes mellitus. Fragebogen für Personen mit Diabetes.” Available at: http://pretest.gesis.org/pdf/ProjektBericht/Projektbericht-17-03.pdf (accessed February 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[Lenzner, T., L. Kaczmirek, and A. Lenzner. 2010. “Cognitive Burden of Survey Questions and Response Times: A Psycholinguistic Experiment.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 24(7): 1003–1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1602.10.1002/acp.1602]Search in Google Scholar
[Lord, F.M., and M.R. Novick. 1968. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Menold, N., and T. Raykov. 2015. “Can Reliability of Multiple Component Measuring Instruments Depend on Response Option Presentation Mode?” Educational and Psychological Measurement 76(3): 454–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415593602.10.1177/0013164415593602596555829795873]Search in Google Scholar
[Meredith, W. 1993. “Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance.” Psychometrika 58(4): 525–543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825.10.1007/BF02294825]Search in Google Scholar
[Messick, S. 1989. “Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment.” Educational Researcher 18(2): 5–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018002005.10.3102/0013189X018002005]Search in Google Scholar
[Muthén, B.O. 2002. “Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling.” Behaviormetrika 29(1): 81–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.29.81.10.2333/bhmk.29.81]Search in Google Scholar
[Muthén, B.O., and T. Asparouhov. 2014. “IRT Studies of Many Groups: The Alignment Method.” Frontiers in Psychology 5,978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00978.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00978416237725309470]Search in Google Scholar
[Muthén, L.K., and B.O. Muthén. 2017. Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olson, K. 2008. “Double Barreled Question.” In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, edited by P.J. Lavrakas. (pp. 209–211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n145.10.4135/9781412963947.n145]Search in Google Scholar
[Oppenheim, A.N. 1992. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing, and Attitude Measurement. New York City: St. Martin’s Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raykov, T., and G.A. Marcoulides. 2011. Introduction to Psychometric Theory. New York: Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9780203841624]Search in Google Scholar
[Raykov, T. 2012. “Scale Construction and Development Using Structural Equation Modeling.” In Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, edited by R.H. Hoyle. (pp. 472–492). New York: The Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raykov, T., N. Menold, and G.A. Marcoulides. 2018. “Studying Latent Criterion Validity for Complex Structure Measuring Instruments Using Latent Variable Modeling.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 78(5): 905–917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417698017.10.1177/0013164417698017732822932655175]Search in Google Scholar
[Reise, S. 2012. “The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 47: 667–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.10.1080/00273171.2012.715555377387924049214]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaeffer, N.C., and J. Dykema. 2011. “Questions for Surveys: Current Trends and Future Directions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75(5): 909–961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/-poq/nfr048.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, S.H., B. Breyer, and D. Danner. 2015. “Human Values Scale (ESS).” Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). DOI: https://doi.org/10.6102/zis234.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, S.H. 2003. “A Proposal for Measuring Value Orientations across Nations.” In Questionnaire Development Package of the European Social Survey. Available at: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/core_ess_questionnaire/ESS_core_questionnaire_human_values.pdf (accessed February 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Stafford, L. 2011. “Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors. Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 28(2): 278–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510378125.10.1177/0265407510378125]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., L.J. Rips, and K.A. Rasinski. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819322]Search in Google Scholar
[Vettehen, P.G.H., and L.B. van Snippenburg. 2002. “Measuring Motivations for Media Exposure: A Thesis.” Quality and Quantity 36(3): 259–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016076505379.10.1023/A:1016076505379]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, R.T., A.W. Heinemann, R.K. Bode, C.S. Wilson, J.R. Fann, and D.G. Tate. 2009. “Improving Measurement Properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 with Rating Scale Analysis.” Rehabilitation Psychology 54(2): 198–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015529.10.1037/a001552919469610]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan, T., and R. Tourangeau. 2008. “Fast times and easy questions: the effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 22(1): 51–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1331.10.1002/acp.1331]Search in Google Scholar
[Yorkston, K.M., C.R. Baylor, J. Dietz, B.J. Dudgeon, T. Eadie, R.M. Miller, and D. Amtmann. 2008. “Developing a Scale of Communicative Participation: A Cognitive Interviewing Study.” Disability and Rehabilitation 30(6): 425–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701625328.10.1080/0963828070162532817943516]Search in Google Scholar