[Baker, R., J.M. Brick, N.A. Bates, M. Battaglia, M.P. Couper, J.A. Dever, K.J. Gile, and R. Tourangeau 2013. “Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2013(I): 90–143. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt00810.1093/jssam/smt008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bakker, B.F.M. and P.J.H. Daas 2012. “Methodological Challenges in Register-Based Research.” Statistica Neerlandica (special issue) 66(1): 2–7. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00505.x10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00505.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bavdaz, M. 2010. “Sources of Measurement Errors in Business Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 16(1): 25–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bharosa N., R. van Wijk, N. de Winne, and M. Janssen (eds) 2015. Challenging the Chain. Governing the automated exchange and processing of business information. Amsterdam: IOS Press, Available at: www.iospress.nl/book/challenging-the-chain/ (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Biemer, P.P. and L.E. Lyberg. 2003. Introduction to Survey Quality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/0471458740]Search in Google Scholar
[Born, A. 2016. “Harmonizing Financial Information from Businesses at Statistics Canada.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys: Statistics (ICESV) Switzerland, 20-23 June 2016, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/146_ices15Final00226.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Buiten, G., R. Boom, M. Roos, and G. Snijkers 2016. “Issues in Automated Financial Data Collection in The Netherlands”. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys: Statistics (ICESV) Switzerland, 20-23 June 2016, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/148_ices15Final00209.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Clayton, R.L., M.A. Searson, and Ch. D. Manning. 2000. “Electronic Data Collection in Selected BLS Establishment Programs.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Establishment Surveys (ICESII), Montreal, 18-21 June 2000, 439–448. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2000/proceedings/S08.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P., R.P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C.Z.F. Clark, J. Martin, W.L. Nicholls II, and J.M. O’Reilly. 1998. Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P. and W.L. Nicholls II. 1998. The History and Development of Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection Methods. Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection, edited by M.P. Couper, R.P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C.Z.F. Clarck, J. Martin, W.L. Nicholls II, and J.M. O’Reilly, 1–21. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daas, P., M. Puts, B. Buelens, and P. van den Hurk. 2015. “Big Data as a Source for Official Statistics.” Journal of Official Statistics 31(2): 249–262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2015-0016.10.1515/jos-2015-0016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Daas, P., S. Ossen, M. Tennekes, L.-C. Zhang, C. Hendriks, K. Foldal Haugen, A. Bernardi, F. Cerroni, T. Laitila, A. Wallgren, and B. Wallgren 2011. List of Quality Groups and Indicators Identified for Administrative Data Sources. Luxembourg: Eurostat (BLUE-ETS deliverable 4.1).]Search in Google Scholar
[De Bolster, G.W. and K.J. Metz. 1997. The TELER-EDISENT project. Netherlands Official Statistics (Special issue on EDI: The State of the Dutch Art): 12 (autumn), 51–59. Voorburg/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[Di Consiglio, L., M. Karlberg, M. Skaliotis, and I. Xirouchakis. 2016. “Overview of Big-Data Research in European Statistics Agencies.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys: Statistics (ICESV) Switzerland, 20-23 June 2016, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/187_ices15Final00346.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Erikson, A.-G., J. Erikson, and C. Hertzman 2016. “Automated Data Collection and Reuse of Concepts in Order to Minimise the Burden.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys: Statistics (ICESV) Switzerland, 20-23 June, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/147_ices15Final00184.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Erikson, J. and L. Nordberg. 2000. “Use of Administrative Data as Substitutes for Survey Data for Small Enterprises in the Swedish Annual Structural Business Statistics.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Establishment Surveys (ICESII), Buffalo, NY, 17-21 June 2000, 813–820. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2000/proceedings/S28.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission 2016. European Standards for the 21st Century. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/16980 (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat. 2010. Business registers: Recommendations manual. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/statmanuals/files/KS-32-10-216-EN-C-EN.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat, 2017. Smart Statistics. Paper discussed at the Joint Dime/ITDG plenary sessions, 14-15 February 2017. Luxembourg: Eurostat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. 2011. “Three Eras of Survey Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5): 861–871. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr057.10.1093/poq/nfr057]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. 2013. Official Statistics and “Big Data”. Paper presented at the 2013 European Conference for New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics (NTTS), Brussels, 5-7 March 2013. Luxembourg: Eurostat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2009. Survey Methodology, 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen, J.V. and N.C. Hill. 1989. “Control and Audit of Electronic Data Interchange.” MIS Quarterly 13(4): 403–414. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol13/iss4/2/ (accessed 19 April 2018).10.2307/248724]Search in Google Scholar
[Haraldsen, G. 2013. “Quality Issues in Business Surveys.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 83–125. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch03]Search in Google Scholar
[Haraldsen, G., J. Jones, D. Giesen, and L.-Ch. Zhang 2013. “Understanding and Coping with Response Burden.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 219–252. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch06]Search in Google Scholar
[Haraldsen, G., G. Snijkers, M. Roos, A. Sundvoll, T. Vik, and H.-P. Stax. 2011. Utilizing Web Technology in Business Data Collection: Some Norwegian, Dutch and Danish Experiences, Paper presented at the 2011 European Conference for New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics (NTTS), Brussels, 22-24 February 2011. Luxembourg: Eurostat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, N. 2016. “One hundred years of Current Employment Statistics Data collection.” Monthly Labor Review: January 2016. Washington DC: US Bureau of Labor Statistics.10.21916/mlr.2016.2]Search in Google Scholar
[Lunter. L. 1997. EDIsent after the pilot phase (in Dutch: EDIsent na de pilot fase). Report. Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martineau, P. 2012. Use of the Chart of Accounts in determining the content of Statistics Canada business surveys. Internal document. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pereira, H.J. 2011. “Simplified Business Information (IES) – Is coordination between public entities really possible.” In Proceedings of the International BLUE-ETS Conference on Burden and Motivation in Official Business Surveys Heerlen, 22-23 March 2011, 177–188. Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands. Available at: https://www.blue-ets.istat.it/index.php?id=78&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=25&cHash=75a34e2a1c989b918ff346a3911c90fc (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ravindra, D. 2016. “Challenges and Benefits of Producing Business Statistics within a Highly Centralized Model.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys (ICESV), 20-23 June 2016. Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/153_ices15Final00050.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Reid, G., F. Zabala, and A. Holmberg 2017. “Extending TSE to Administrative Data: A Quality Framework and Case Study from Stats NZ.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(2): 477–511, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-002310.1515/jos-2017-0023]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Saraiva, P. 2016a. Integrated Survey Management System: Statistics Portugal Experience. Presentation at the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys (ICESV), 20-23 June 2016, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saraiva, P. 2016b. The Experience of Statistics Portugal in the Appropriation of Administrative Data for Statistical Purposes. Invited presentation (in Portuguese) at the 3rd National Conference of Producers and users of Statistics, Geographical and Environmental Information (INFOPLAN). IBGE, December 5-9, 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saraiva, P. 2016c. Integrating Data Collection: Wins and Challenges. Presentation at the UNECE Workshop on Statistical Data Collection, ‘Visions on Future Surveying’, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague, 1-5 October 2016. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).]Search in Google Scholar
[Saraiva, P. and A. Moreira. 2016. Motivating Respondents: the Importance of Personalised Feedback. Presentation at the UNECE Workshop on Statistical Data Collection, ‘Visions on Future Surveying’, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague, 1-5 October 2016. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, P. and P. Phipps. 2014. Preface. Journal of Official Statistics (Special Issue on Establishment Surveys) 30(4): 575–577. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-003810.2478/jos-2014-0038]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G. 2016. “Achieving Quality in Organizational Surveys: An Holistic Approach.” In Methodische Probleme in der empirischen Organisationsforschung, edited by S. Liebig and W. Matiaske, 33–59. Wiesbaden: Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-08713-5_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G., R. Göttgens, and H. Hermans. 2011. Data Collection and Data Sharing at Statistics Netherlands: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, Paper presented at the 59th Plenary Session of the Conference of European Statisticians (CES): United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Geneva, June 14–16. Geneva: UNECE Available at: www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/2011/20.e.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G., G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack. 2013. Designing and Conducting Business Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G. and J. Jones. 2013. “Business Survey Communication.” Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 359–430. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch09]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G., M. Roos, T. Hooijmans, Th. van Kasteren, M. Storms, V. de Haan, and G. Buiten. 2014. Reference Chart of Accounts (RCSFI): a case study – toward a quality framework (in Dutch: Referentie Grootboekschema (RGS): een casestudie – aanzet tot een kwaliteitskader). Report. Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[Srinivasan, V. 2017. The Intelligent Enterprise in the Era of Big Data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118834725]Search in Google Scholar
[Statistics Canada 2015. Integrated Business Statistics Program Overview. Catalogue No. 68-515-X. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/68-515-x/2015001/mi-rs-eng.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, R. and P. McSharry 2015. Big Data Revolution: What Farmers, Doctors and Insurance Agents Tell Us about Discovering Big Data Patterns. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torres van Grinsven, V., I. Bolko, and M. Bavdaz. 2014. “In Search of Motivation for Business Survey Response Task.” Journal of Official Statistics, 30(4): 579–606. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-003910.2478/jos-2014-0039]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[UNECE 1995. Guidelines for the Modelling of Statistical Data and Metadata. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/metadatamodeling.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[UNECE. 2000. Terminology on Statistical Metadata. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/coded_files/UNECE_TERMINOLOGY_STAT_METADATA_2000_EN.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[UNECE. 2007. Register-based statistics in the Nordic countries: review of best practices with focus on population and social statistics. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/Register_based_statistics_in_Nordic_countries.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNECE. 2011. Using Administrative and Secondary Sources for Official Statistics: A Handbook of Principles and Practices. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/Using_Administrative_Sources_Final_for_web.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallgren, A. and B. Wallgren 2007. Register-Based Statistics – Administrative Data for Statistical Purposes. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9780470061350]Search in Google Scholar
[Willimack, D.K. and G. Snijkers. 2013. “The Business Context and its Implications for the Business Response Process.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 39–82. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch02]Search in Google Scholar
[Ypma, W.F.H., A.J. Willeboordse, and W.J. Keller. 1997, EDI in the collection of statistical data: an introduction. Netherlands Official Statistics (Special issue on EDI: The State of the Dutch Art) 12 (autumn): 7–15. Voorburg/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang. L.-C. 2012. “Topics of Statistical Theory for Register-Based Statistics and Data Integration.” Statistica Neerlandica, 66(1): 41–63. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar