[American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2009. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Sixth Edition. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/Content/NavigationMenu/ResourcesforResearchers/StandardDefinitions/StandardDefinitions2009new.pdf (accessed January 27, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Baruch, Y. and B.C. Holtom. 2008. “Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational Research.” Human Relations 61: 1139-1160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863.10.1177/0018726708094863]Search in Google Scholar
[Bates, N. and K. Creighton. 2000. “The Last Five Percent: What Can We Learn from Difficult/Late Interviews?” In Proceedings of the Section on Government Statistics: American Statistical Association, August 13, 2000. 120-125. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baur, E.J. 1947. “Response Bias in a Mail Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 11: 595-600. DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.1086/265895.10.1086/265895]Search in Google Scholar
[Borg, I. and T. Tuten. 2003. “Early versus Later Respondents in Intranet-Based, Organizational Surveys.” Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management 4: 134-145.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carroll, R.J. and D. Ruppert. 1988. Transformation and Weighting in Regression. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.10.1007/978-1-4899-2873-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2009. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Filion, F. 1975. “Estimating Bias Due to Nonresponse in a Mail Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 39: 482-492. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268245.10.1086/268245]Search in Google Scholar
[Gannon, M.J., J.C. Nothern, and S.J. Carroll. 1971. “Characteristics of Nonrespondents Among Workers.” Journal of Applied Psychology 55: 586-588. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0031907.10.1037/h0031907]Search in Google Scholar
[Green, K.E. 1991. “Reluctant Respondents: Differences Between Early, Late, and Nonresponders to a Mail Survey.” The Journal of Experimental Education 59: 268-276. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1991.10806566.10.1080/00220973.1991.10806566]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and M. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York, NY: Wiley. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118490082.index.10.1002/9781118490082.index]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., E. Singer, and A. Corning. 2000. “Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation: Description and an Illustration.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 299-308. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/317990.10.1086/31799011114270]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E. and W. de Heer. 2002. “Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: a Longitudinal and International Comparison.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by RobertM. Groves, et al. New York, NY: Wiley. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033.10.1093/poq/nfl033]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis, R.A., C.M. Endo, and J.M. Armer. 1970. “The Use of Potential Nonrespondents for Studying Nonresponse Bias.” Pacific Sociological Review 13: 103-109. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1388313.10.2307/1388313]Search in Google Scholar
[Erickson, T.J. 2005. “The 21st Century Workplace: Preparing for Tomorrow’s Employment Trends Today.” (Testimony submitted before the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, May 26, 2005). Available at: http://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/index.cfm?year¼2005&month¼05 (accessed December 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacoby, J. and M.S. Matell. 1971. “Three-Point Likert Scales are Good Enough.” Journal of Marketing Research 8: 495-500. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150242.10.2307/3150242]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalton, G.F. and I. Flores-Cervantes. 2003. “Weighting Methods.” Journal of Official Statistics 19: 81-97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kraut, A.I. 1996. Organizational Surveys: Tools for Assessment and Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreuter, F. 2013. Improving Surveys with Paradata: Analytic Uses of Process Information. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869.ch1.10.1002/9781118596869.ch1]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J.A. and D.B. Rubin. 2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Second ed. New York, NY: Wiley. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1697.10.1002/sim.1697]Search in Google Scholar
[Macey, W.H. and B. Schneider. 2008. “The Meaning of Employee Engagement.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1: 3-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mayer, C.S. and R.W. Pratt., Jr. 1966. “A Note on Nonresponse in a Mail Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 30: 637-646. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/267461.10.1086/267461]Search in Google Scholar
[Newman, S.W. 1962. “Differences between Early and Late Respondents to a Mailed Survey.” Advertising Research 2: 37-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pace, R.C. 1939. “Factors Influencing Questionnaire Returns from Former University Students.” Journal of Applied Psychology 23: 388-397. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063286.10.1037/h0063286]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogelberg, S.G. and J.M. Stanton. 2007. “Understanding and Dealing with Organizational Survey Nonresponse.” Organizational Research Methods 10: 195-209. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428106294693.10.1177/1094428106294693]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwirian, K.P. and H.R. Blaine. 1966. “Questionnaire-Return Bias in the Study of Blue- Collar Workers.” Public Opinion Quarterly 30: 656-663. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/267463.10.1086/267463]Search in Google Scholar
[Sonquist, J.A., E.L. Baker, and J.N. Morgan. 1974. Searching for Structure. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 2011. 2011 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey: Governmentwide Management Report. Washington, DC: OPM. Available at: http:// www.fedview.opm.gov/2011/Published (accessed January 27, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2013. “Adaptive Contact Strategies in Telephone and Face-to-Face Surveys.” Survey Research Methods 7: 45-55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869.ch7.10.1002/9781118596869.ch7]Search in Google Scholar
[Weeks, M.F. 1987. “Optimal Call Scheduling for a Telephone Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 540-549. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269056. 10.1086/269056]Search in Google Scholar