[Bethlehem, J. and Biffignandi, S. (2012). Handbook of Web Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethlehem, J., Cobben, F., and Schouten, B. (2011). Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. New York: Wiley, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.10.1002/9780470891056]Search in Google Scholar
[Biemer, P.P. and Lyberg, L.E. (2003). Introduction to Survey Quality. New York: Wiley, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.10.1002/0471458740]Search in Google Scholar
[Blyth, B. (2008). Mixed-Mode: The Only “Fitness” Regime? International Journal of Market Research, 50, 241-266. 10.1177/147078530805000207]Search in Google Scholar
[Bosnjak, M., Forsman, G., Isaksson, A., Lozar Manfreda, K., Schonlau, M., and Tuten, T. (2006). Preface to JOS Special Issue onWeb Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 22, iii.]Search in Google Scholar
[Busse, B. and Fuchs, M. (2012). The Components of Landline Telephone Survey Coverage Bias. The Relative Importance of No-Phone and Mobile-Only Populations. Quality and Quantity, 46, 1209-1225. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9431-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Callegaro, M. (2010). Do You Know Which Device Your Respondent Has Used to Take Your Online Survey? Survey Practice, December: www.surveypractice.org. Available at http://surveypractice.org/2010/12/08/device-respondent-has-used/ (accessed August 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook, C., Heath, F., and Thompson, R.L. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- and Internet-Based Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821-836. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164002197093410.1177/00131640021970934]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P. (2000). Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464-494. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1086/31864110.1086/318641]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P. (2008). Designing Effective Web Surveys. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511499371]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P., Kapteyn, A., Schonlau, M., and Winter, J. (2007). Noncoverage and Nonresponse in an Internet Survey. Social Science Research, 36, 131-148. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.10.00210.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E.D. (2008). Choosing the Method of Data Collection. International Handbook of Survey Methodology, E.D. de Leeuw, J.J. Hox, and D.A. Dillman (eds). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, European Association of Methodology (EAM) Methodology Series.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E.D. and De Heer, W. (2002). Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison. In Survey Nonresponse, R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little (eds). New York: Wiley, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E.D. and Hox, J.J. (2011). Internet Surveys as Part of a Mixed Mode Design. Social Research and the Internet. In Advances in Applied Methods and New Research Strategies, M. Das, P. Ester, and L. Kaczmirek (eds). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, European Association of Methodology (EAM) Methodology Series.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., and Christian, L.M. (2009). Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys; The Tailored Design Method. New York: Wiley, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuchs, M. and Busse, B. (2009). The Coverage Bias of Mobile Web Surveys Across European Countries. International Journal of Internet Science, 4, 21-33. Available at: http://www.ijis.net/ijis4_1/ijis4_1_fuchs_pre.html (accessed July 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[GESIS, Eurobarometer Survey Series (2013). Available at: http://www.gesis.org/ eurobarometer-data-service/survey-series (accessed July 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. (1989). Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.10.1002/0471725277]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and Couper, M.P. (1998). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.10.1002/9781118490082]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and Peytcheva, E. (2008). The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias - A Meta-Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 167-189. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011 10.1093/poq/nfn011]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., Fowler, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., and Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Internet World Stats. (2013). Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm (accessed June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreuter, F., Presser, S., and Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys. The Effect of Mode and Question Sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 847-865. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn063]Search in Google Scholar
[Lessler, J.T. and Kalsbeek, W.D. (1992). Nonsampling Error in Surveys. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Link, M.W., and Mokdad, A.H. (2005). Effects of Survey Mode on Self-Reports of Adult Alcohol Consumption: A Comparison of Mail, Web, and Telephone Approaches. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, March 2005, 239-245.10.15288/jsa.2005.66.23915957675]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B. (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781119013563]Search in Google Scholar
[Lohr, S.L. (2008). Coverage and Sampling. In International Handbook of Survey Methodology, E.D. de Leeuw, J.J. Hox, and D.A. Dillman (eds). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, European Association of Methodology (EAM) Methodology Series.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lozar Manfreda, K., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., and Vehovar, V. (2008). Web Surveys versus Other Survey Modes - A Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates. International Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 79-104.10.1177/147078530805000107]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohorko, A., De Leeuw, E., and Hox, J. (2011). Internet Coverage and Coverage Bias in Countries Across Europe and over Time: Background, Methods, Question Wording and Bias Tables. Available at: www.joophox.net (accessed June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohorko, A., De Leeuw, E., and Hox, J. (2013). Coverage Bias in European Telephone Surveys: Developments of Landline and Mobile Phone Coverage across Countries and over Time. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. Available at: http://surveyinsights. org/?p ¼ 828 (accessed February 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Moschner, M. (2012). GESIS, Weighting overview. Available at: http://www.gesis.org/ eurobarometer-data-service/survey-series/candidate-countries-eb/weighting-overview/ (accessed February 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Rookey, B.D., Hanway, S., and Dillman, D.A. (2008) Does a Probability-based Household Panel Benefit from Assignment to Postal Response as an Alternative to Internet-only? Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 962-984. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1093/ poq/nfn061]Search in Google Scholar
[Smyth, J.D. and Pearson, J.E. (2011). Internet Survey Methods: A Review of Strengths, Weaknesses, and Innovations. In Advances in Applied Methods and New Research Strategies, M. Das, P. Ester, and L. Kaczmirek (eds). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, European Association of Methodology (EAM) Methodology Series.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoop, I., Billiet, J., Koch, A., and Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Improving Survey Response. Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9780470688335]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank (2009). Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed May 2011). ]Search in Google Scholar