The Use of Hedging in Research Articles on Applied Linguistics

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. NJ:Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024.10.1017/CBO9780511621024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2006). University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.23.10.1075/scl.23Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Blagojevic, S. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic prose: A contrastive study of academic articles written in English by English and Norwegian native speakers. Kalbu Studijos (Studies about Languages), 5, from http://www.kalbos.It/txt/5/08/htm.Search in Google Scholar

Çakır, H. (2016). Native and Non-Native Writers’ Use of Stance Adverbs in English Research Article Abstracts, Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2016, 6, 85-96 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2016.62008.10.4236/ojml.2016.62008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clark, R., & Ivanic, R. (1997). The politics of writing. London, UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Clyne, M. (1991). The sociolinguistic dimension: The dilemma of the German-speaking scholar. In H. Schroder (Eds), Subject-oriented texts: Languages for special purposes and text theory (pp. 49-68). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110858747.49Search in Google Scholar

Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2000). Adverbial Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 56-73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: some theorethical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 271-287. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/478555/Hedging_in_academic_writing_Some_theoretical_problems.10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00007-0Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, T. B. (1984). Towards an integrated theory of adverb position in English. Indiana Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1997) Theory and practice of writing: an applied linguistic perspective. Harlow: Pearson Education.10.2307/358946Search in Google Scholar

Hinkel, E. (1997). Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 361-386.10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00040-9Search in Google Scholar

Hinkel, E. (2005). Hedging, inflating, and persuading in L2 academic writing. Applied Language Learning, 15(1), 29-53.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying İllocutionary Force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 345-365.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90028-6.10.1016/0378-2166(84)90028-6Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without Conviction: Hedging in Science Research Articles. Applied Linguistics, 17, 433-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433.10.1093/applin/17.4.433Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54.10.1075/pbns.54Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary Discourses: Writer Stance in Research Articles. In H. Candlin, & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices (pp. 99-121). London: Longman.10.4324/9781315840390-6Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interaction in Academic Writing. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Writing. Written Communication, 18, 549-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018004005.10.1177/0741088301018004005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and Invisibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2004). Perspectives on Genre. In K. Hyland (Ed.), Genre and Second Language Writing (pp. 24-50). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.23927Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365.10.1177/1461445605050365Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2017) Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25, 156-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156.10.1093/applin/25.2.156Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kreutz, H., & Harres, A. (1997). Some observations on the distribution and function of hedging in German and English academic writing. In Duszuk, A. (Ed.), Culture and styles in academic discourse. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, pp.181-202.10.1515/9783110821048.181Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 8, 183-228.Search in Google Scholar

Lewin, B. (1998) Hedging: Form and Function in Scientific Research Texts. Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 9. Filologia, pp. 89-108.Search in Google Scholar

Markkanen, R., & Schroder, H. (1997). Hedging: a challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In Markkanen, R., Schroder, H. (Eds.) Hedging and discourse: approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts, pp. 3-20. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110807332.3Search in Google Scholar

Matsuda, P.K. (2015) Identity in written discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000178.10.1017/S0267190514000178Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I.10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

McCutchen, D. (2011). From novice to expert: implications of language skills and writing-relevant knowledge for memory during the development of writing skill. Journal of writing research, 3(1), 51-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3.10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, P. (1997). Hedging strategies in written academic discourse: Strengthening the argument by weakening the claim. In Markkanen, R., Schroder, H. (Eds.), Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, pp.21-41. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110807332.21Search in Google Scholar

Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10, pp.1-35.10.1093/applin/10.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, N. & Castello, M. (2012) Academic writing and authorial voice. doi: 10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000024007.10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000024007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Prince, E., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In R. D. Pietro (Eds.), Linguistics and the professions Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Rounds, P. (1982). Hedging in written academic discourse: Precision and flexibility. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan. Mimeo.Search in Google Scholar

Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170.10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2Search in Google Scholar

Salager-Meyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. In T. Miller (ed.), Functional approaches to written texts: Classroom applications (pp. 127–143). Washington DC: United States Information Agency.Search in Google Scholar

Salager-Meyer, F. (1998). Language is not a physical object. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 295-303.10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00008-2Search in Google Scholar

Skelton, J. (1988). The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT Journal. 42(1), 37-43. doi: 10.1093/elt/42.1.37.10.1093/elt/42.1.37Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Vassileva, I. (1997). Hedging in English and Bulgarian academic writing, culture, and style in academic discourse. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.10.1515/9783110821048.203Search in Google Scholar

Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing English for Specific Purposes 20(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0.10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Vazquez, I. & Giner, D. (2009). Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modeling persuasion in academic discourses. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 22 (2009), 219-237. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2009.22.14.10.14198/raei.2009.22.14Search in Google Scholar

Ventola, E. (1997). Modalization: Probability – an Exploration into its Role in Academic Writing. In Duszak, A. (Ed.), Culture and Styles in Academic Discourse. Mounton de Gruyter: Berlin, pp.157-180.10.1515/9783110821048.157Search in Google Scholar