Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Distribution of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Michigan Corn Fields

Sita Thapa

Sita Thapa

Michigan State University, Department of EntomologyEast Lansing, United States
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Thapa, Sita
, 
Elisabeth Darling

Elisabeth Darling

Michigan State University, Department of EntomologyEast Lansing, United States
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Darling, Elisabeth
, 
Emilie Cole

Emilie Cole

Agronomist, J.R. Simplot CompanyBoise, U.S.A
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Cole, Emilie
, 
Kristin Poley

Kristin Poley

Research Manager, Corn Marketing Program of MichiganLansing, United States
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Poley, Kristin
 und 
Marisol Quintanilla

Marisol Quintanilla

Michigan State University, Department of EntomologyEast Lansing, United States
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Quintanilla, Marisol
  
02. Mai 2023
Distribution of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Michigan Corn Fields's Cover Image
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zitieren
COVER HERUNTERLADEN
Artikel-Kategorie: Research paper
Online veröffentlicht: 02. Mai 2023
Eingereicht: 11. Juli 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0015
Schlüsselwörter
© 2023 Thapa et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figure 1:

Michigan state map showing 20 counties from which soil samples were taken for 2018 study of corn nematodes.
Michigan state map showing 20 counties from which soil samples were taken for 2018 study of corn nematodes.

Figure 2:

Total number of corn fields surveyed within each main category: Tillage (A), Soil type (B), and Irrigation (C).
Total number of corn fields surveyed within each main category: Tillage (A), Soil type (B), and Irrigation (C).

Figure 3:

Michigan maps showing county distribution of lesion nematode (A), needle nematode (B), stunt nematode (C), and total plant parasitic nematodes (D) in corn fields in 2018. The size of the dots correlates with the number of nematodes.
Michigan maps showing county distribution of lesion nematode (A), needle nematode (B), stunt nematode (C), and total plant parasitic nematodes (D) in corn fields in 2018. The size of the dots correlates with the number of nematodes.

Figure 4:

Michigan divided into five different regions for corn nematode sampling. Pie-charts show regional nematode distribution during corn harvest time in 2018. Regions: Southeast (A), Northwest (B), North (C), Southwest (D), East/Central (E).
Michigan divided into five different regions for corn nematode sampling. Pie-charts show regional nematode distribution during corn harvest time in 2018. Regions: Southeast (A), Northwest (B), North (C), Southwest (D), East/Central (E).

Figure 5:

Mean population density (nematodes per 100 cm3 of soil) of lesion nematode (A), stunt nematode (B), and needle nematode (C) in different tillage practices in Michigan corn end-of-season samples in 2018. No significant differences were observed between nematode population densities and different tillage practices (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).
Mean population density (nematodes per 100 cm3 of soil) of lesion nematode (A), stunt nematode (B), and needle nematode (C) in different tillage practices in Michigan corn end-of-season samples in 2018. No significant differences were observed between nematode population densities and different tillage practices (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).

Figure 6:

Mean population density of stunt nematodes per 100 cm3 of soil in different types of soil in Michigan corn grown in 2018. Letters on the top of each bar represent significant differences among the soil types (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).
Mean population density of stunt nematodes per 100 cm3 of soil in different types of soil in Michigan corn grown in 2018. Letters on the top of each bar represent significant differences among the soil types (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).

Figure 7:

Mean population density (nematodes per 100 cm3 of soil) of needle nematode (A) and stunt nematode (B) in irrigated and non-irrigated soils in Michigan corn grown in 2018. Letters on the top of each bar represent significant differences among the soil types (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).
Mean population density (nematodes per 100 cm3 of soil) of needle nematode (A) and stunt nematode (B) in irrigated and non-irrigated soils in Michigan corn grown in 2018. Letters on the top of each bar represent significant differences among the soil types (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).

Plant-parasitic nematode genus prevalence during corn harvest sampling collected between September-October 2018 in Michigan_ Percentage of infested fields for each genus indicates the number of fields that contained at least one individual per 100 cm3 soil sample_

Genus (Common Name) Average ± STD Percent of Fields Infested (N=86)
Helicotylenchus (Spiral) 56.07 ± 161.50 91.01%
Pratylenchus (Lesion) 3.80 ± 6.08 80.90%
Tylenchorhynchus or Merlinius (Stunt) 11.00 ± 28.52 78.65%
Heterodera (Cyst) 10.08 ± 161.50 57.30%
Paratylenchus (Pin) 0.19 ± 1.65 21.35%
Longidorus (Needle) 0.13 ± 0.64 15.73%
Meloidogyne (Root Knot) 0.06 ± 0.19 14.60%
Hoplolaimus (Lance) 0.27 ± 1.90 10.11%
Criconemella (Ring) 0.12 ± 0.74 8.99%
Xiphinema (Dagger) 0.02 ± 0.16 3.37%

Plant-parasitic nematode genus prevalence during initial sampling collected May-June 2018 in Michigan_ Percentage of infested fields for each genus indicates the number of fields that contained at least one individual per 100 cm3 soil sample_

Genus (Common Name) Average ± STD Percent of Fields Infested (N=86)
Helicotylenchus (Spiral) 12.21 ± 31.40 86.05%
Heterodera (Cyst) 2.14 ± 5.60 79.07%
Pratylenchus (Lesion) 2.57 ± 6.53 76.74%
Tylenchorhynchus or Merlinius (Stunt) 5.12 ± 15.79 67.44%
Longidorus (Needle) 0.16 ± 0.65 26.74%
Meloidogyne (Root Knot) 0.26 ± 1.63 20.93%
Hoplolaimus (Lance) 0.07 ± 0.54 13.95%
Criconemella (Ring) 0.09 ± 0.71 10.47%
Xiphinema (Dagger) 0.04 ± 0.45 9.30%
Paratylenchus (Pin) 0.06 ± 0.59 8.13%
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
1 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Biologie, andere
Zeitschrift RSS Feed