[
Stefanov, V., Mijalkovski, S., Despodov, Z., Boev, I., Mirakovski, D. (2023). Selection of factory location. In: 14th International Conference in the field of Underground and Surface Exploitation of Mineral Resources, PODEKS - POVEKS 2023. Ohrid, 284–290.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mijalkovski, S., Efe, F.O. & Zeqiri, K. (2023). Chapter 3: Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Underground Mining Method Selection. In: Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption and Production for Greener Economies, IGI GLOBAL. Pennsylvania, 42-57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mijalkovski, S., Stefanov, V. & Mirakovski, D. (2024a). Application of the TOPSIS method for selecting the location of the main warehouse. Transport & Logistics: the International Journal. 24 (56), 51-58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mijalkovski, S., Stefanov, V. & Mirakovski, D. (2024b). Selection of the location of the main warehouse using the EDAS method. Natural Resources and Technology. 1(18), 32-38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, Y., Tao, S., Chen, X., Huang, F., Xu, X., Liu, X, Liu, Y. & Liu, L. (2022). Method multi-criteria decision-making method for site selection analysis and evaluation of urban integrated energy stations based on geographic information system. Renewable Energy. 194, 273-292.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yousefi, H.; Motlagh, S.G. & Montazeri, M. (2022). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System for Wind Farm Site-Selection Using Geographic Information System (GIS): Case Study of Semnan Province, Iran. Sustainability. 14, 7640.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margana, R.R., Nurazis, Y.R., Prima, M.R., Wineka, F. & Mariza T. (2021). Determination of distribution center location in the Xyz small and medium enterprise (Sme) using center of gravity method. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education. 12(11), 1462-1469.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaikh, S.A., Memon, M. & Kim, K.S. (2021). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Ideal Business Location Identification. Applied sciences. 11(11), 4983, 1-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Şahin, M. (2021). Location selection by multi-criteria decision-making methods based on objective and subjective weightings. Knowledge and Information Systems. 63, 1991–2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arunyanart, S., Sureeyatanapas, P., Ponhan, K., Sessomboon, W., & Niyamosoth, T. (2021). International location selection for production fragmentation. Expert Systems with Applications. 171, 114564.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alkaradaghi, K., Ali, S.S., Al-Ansari, N. & Laue, J. (2020). Landfill Site Selection Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making AHP and SAW Methods: A Case Study in Sulaimaniyah Governorate, Iraq. Engineering. 12, 254-268.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yap, J.Y.L., Ho, C.C. & Ting, C.Y. (2019). A systematic review of the applications of multi-criteria decision-making methods in site selection problems. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(4), 548-563.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Syam, A., Arifin, M. & Purba, H.H. (2018). Determining the optimal location of central spare part warehouse for the leading taxi company in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET). 7(12), 873-878.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mulia, F. (2018). Company location selection in digital technology era, does it still matter?. MANNERS. 1(2), 85-89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chakraborty, R., Ray, A. & Dan, P.K. (2013). Multi criteria decision making methods for location selection of distribution centers. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 4, 491-504.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, E. W. L. & Li, H. (2004). Exploring quantitative methods for project location selection. Building and Environment. 39 (12), 1467-1476.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang, J. & Lee, H. (1997). An AHP decision model for facility location selection. Facilities. 15(9/10), 241-254.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stefanov, V., 2024. Selection of the location of the warehouse of spare parts and consumables for a company with dispersed locations. Master’s thesis (unpublished), Pages: 104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rangelovic, M., 2016. Models for optimization of industrial location decision making in relation to local economic development. Doctoral dissertation (unpublished), Pages: 163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markovic, G., 2014. Model of regional logistics with transport systems. Doctoral dissertation (unpublished), Pages: 183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mijalkovski, S., Peltecki, D., Despodov Z., Mirakovski D., Adjiski V. & Doneva N. (2021a). Methodology for underground mining method selection. Mining science. 28(1), 201-216.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mijalkovski, S., Despodov, Z., Mirakovski, D., Adjiski, V., Doneva, N. & Mijalkovska D. (2021b). Mining method selection for underground mining with the application of VIKOR method. Underground mining engineering. 39(2), 11-22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baloyi, V.D. & Meyer, L.D. (2020). The development of a mining method selection model through a detailed assessment of multi-criteria decision methods. Results in Engineering, 8, 1-19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sitorus, F., Cilliers, J.J. & Brito-Parada, R. (2019). Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: Applications and trends. Expert Systems With Applications. 121, 393-417.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gao, Z., Liang, R.Y. & Xuan, T. (2019). VIKOR method for ranking concrete bridge repair projects with target-based criteria. Results in Engineering. 3(1), 1-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM mehods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research. 156(2), 445-455.
]Search in Google Scholar
, und | 10. Juni 2024