Legal Challenges in Enforcing the Duty to Render Assistance at Sea: Implications for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)

1 Abidi, M. H., Siddiquee, A. N., Alkhalefah, H., & Srivastava, V. (2024). A comprehensive review of navigation systems for visually impaired individuals. Heliyon, 10(11), e31825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31825 Search in Google Scholar

2 Abudu, R., & Bridgelall, R. (2024). Autonomous Ships: A Thematic Review. World, 5(2), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.3390/world5020015 Search in Google Scholar

3 Ahmed, Y. A., Theotokatos, G., Maslov, I., Wennersberg, L. a. L., & Nesheim, D. A. (2024). Regulatory and legal frameworks recommendations for short sea shipping maritime autonomous surface ships. Marine Policy, 166, 106226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106226 Search in Google Scholar

4 Attard, F. G. (2020). The Duty to Render Assistance at Sea under International Law. In Brill | Nijhoff eBooks (pp. 29–126). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004438255_005 Search in Google Scholar

5 Boviatsis, M., & Vlachos, G. (2022). Sustainable Operation of Unmanned Ships under Current International Maritime Law. Sustainability, 14(12), 7369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127369 Search in Google Scholar

6 Burgén, J., & Bram, S. (2024). Safety on automated passenger ships: Exploration of evacuation scenarios for coastal vessels. Maritime Transport Research, 6, 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100110 Search in Google Scholar

7 Cappuccio, M. L., Galliott, J. C., Eyssel, F., & Lanteri, A. (2023). Autonomous Systems and Technology Resistance: New tools for monitoring acceptance, trust, and tolerance. International Journal of Social Robotics, 16(6), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01065-2 Search in Google Scholar

8 Chae, C., Kim, M., & Kim, H. (2020). A study on Identification of development status of MASS Technologies and Directions of Improvement. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4564. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134564 Search in Google Scholar

9 Chen, H. (2024). Challenges Raised by Unmanned Ships and Flag State’s Possible Jurisdiction Cooperations with Other Stakeholders. In Brill | Nijhoff eBooks (pp. 206–236). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004706279_009 Search in Google Scholar

10 Choi, J., & Lee, S. (2021). Legal status of the remote operator in Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) under maritime Law. Ocean Development & International Law, 52(4), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2022.2036276 Search in Google Scholar

11 Devitt, S. K. (2024). Meaningful human command: advance control directives as a method to enable moral and legal responsibility for autonomous weapons systems. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (pp. 53–80). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204131.00011 Search in Google Scholar

12 Ghajour, N. (2024, August 15). How Autonomous ships are revolutionizing the maritime industry? Maritime Professionals. https://maritime-professionals.com/how-autonomous-ships-are-revolutionizing-the-maritime-industry/ Search in Google Scholar

13 Goerlandt, F. (2020). Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships from a risk governance perspective: Interpretation and implications. Safety Science, 128, 104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104758 Search in Google Scholar

14 Hasan, S. (2022). Analyzing the definition of “ship” to facilitate Marine Autonomous Surface Ships as ship under the law of the sea. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 15(3), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2022.2065115 Search in Google Scholar

15 Hwang, H., & Joe, I. (2024). An IoT-Based Cloud Data Platform with Real-Time Connecting Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships. In Lecture notes in networks and systems (pp. 208–220). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53549-9_21 Search in Google Scholar

16 Islam, M. S. (2024). Navigating modern era at sea: legal challenges and opportunities of unmanned and autonomous shipping. AI And Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00554-y Search in Google Scholar

17 Issa, M., Ilinca, A., Ibrahim, H., & Rizk, P. (2022). Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: Problems and challenges facing the regulatory process. Sustainability, 14(23), 15630. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315630 Search in Google Scholar

18 Kepesedi, A. (2022, December 13). Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: A critical “MASS” for legislative review [Press release]. UN Trade and Developemt - UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/news/transport-newsletter-article-no-97-fourth-quarter-2022 Search in Google Scholar

19 Kim, M., Joung, T., Jeong, B., & Park, H. (2020). Autonomous shipping and its impact on regulations, technologies, and industries. Journal of International Maritime Safety Environmental Affairs and Shipping, 4(2), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2020.1779427 Search in Google Scholar

20 Kim, T., & Schröder-Hinrichs, J. (2021). Research developments and debates regarding maritime autonomous surface ship: status, challenges and perspectives. In WMU studies in maritime affairs (pp. 175–197). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78957-2_10 Search in Google Scholar

21 Klein, N., Guilfoyle, D., Karim, M. S., & McLaughlin, R. (2020). MARITIME AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES: NEW FRONTIERS IN THE LAW OF THE SEA. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589320000226 Search in Google Scholar

22 Leopardi, M. R. (2022). Autonomous shipping: Some reflections on navigational rights and rescue at sea. In Brill | Nijhoff eBooks (pp. 451–470). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004518681_016 Search in Google Scholar

23 Maritime Safety Committee, International Maritime Organization. (2018). REPORT OF THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE ON ITS ONE-HUNDREDTH SESSION. In ANNEX 2 FRAMEWORK FOR THE REGULATORY SCOPING EXERCISE FOR THE USE OF MARITIME AUTONOMOUS SURFACE SHIPS (MASS): Vol. Annex 2 (MSC 100/20/Add.1). International Maritime Organization. https://www.mpa.gov.sg/docs/mpalibraries/mpa-documents-files/shipping-division/msc-reports/msc-100-20-add-1---report-of-the-maritime-safety-committee-on-its-one-hundredth-session-(secretariat).pdf Search in Google Scholar

24 Maritime Safety Committee, International Maritime Organization [MSC, IMO]. (2024). Maritime Safety Committee - 108th session (MSC 108), 15-24 May 2024. International Maritime Organization. https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/Pages/MSC-108th-session.aspx Search in Google Scholar

25 Maritime Safety Committee [MSC]. (2021). OUTCOME OF THE REGULATORY SCOPING EXERCISE FOR THE USE OF MARITIME AUTONOMOUS SURFACE SHIPS (MASS) (MSC.1/Circ.1638). International Maritime Organization. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Documents/MSC.1-Circ.1638%20-%20Outcome%20Of%20The%20Regulatory%20Scoping%20ExerciseFor%20The%20Use%20Of%20Maritime%20Autonomous%20Surface%20Ships...%20(Secretariat).pdf Search in Google Scholar

26 McKie, R. (2023, November 1). Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) and SAR. International Maritime Rescue Federation. https://www.international-maritime-rescue.org/news/maritime-autonomous-surface-ships-mass-and-sar Search in Google Scholar

27 Munari, F. (2020). Search and rescue at sea: Do new challenges require new rules? In Springer polar sciences (pp. 63–81). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44975-9_4 Search in Google Scholar

28 Mutual, S. (2007, January 1). Master’s duty to rescue persons at sea and recent IMO amendments. https://www.steamshipmutual.com/publications/articles/rescue0107 Search in Google Scholar

29 Papanicolopulu, I. (2016). The duty to rescue at sea, in peacetime and war: A general overview. International Review of the Red Cross, 98(902), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1816383117000406 Search in Google Scholar

30 Patanè, F., Bolhuis, M. P., Van Wijk, J., & Kreiensiek, H. (2020). Asylum-Seekers prosecuted for human smuggling: a case study of scafisti in Italy. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 39(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdaa008 Search in Google Scholar

31 Raviv, D. (2024, August 8). The positive effect of AI on maritime fuel efficiency. Orca AI. https://www.orca-ai.io/blog/the-positive-effect-of-ai-on-maritime-fuel-efficiency/ Search in Google Scholar

32 Ringbom, H., Røsæg, E., & Solvang, T. (2020). Autonomous ships and the law. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003056560 Search in Google Scholar

33 Ruhal, S. (2024). The evolving seascape of naval warfare: unmanned underwater vehicles and the challenges for international law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krae011 Search in Google Scholar

34 Sar, A. B. (2023). Considerations on assistance and rescue at sea in the light of the increasing autonomy in shipping. Marine Policy, 153, 105639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105639 Search in Google Scholar

35 Stępień, B. (2022). Can a ship be its own captain? Safe manning of autonomous and uncrewed vessels. Marine Policy, 148, 105451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105451 Search in Google Scholar

36 Stevens, F. (2020). Seaworthiness and good seamanship in the age of autonomous vessels. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 243–260). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003056560-20 Search in Google Scholar

37 Tan, S. Y., Taeihagh, A., & Tripathi, A. (2021). Tensions and antagonistic interactions of risks and ethics of using robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120686 Search in Google Scholar

38 Tsimplis, M. (2023). Designing norms for autonomous ships: the obligation to call for help and the duty to save life in danger at sea. In Studies in national governance and emerging technologies (pp. 99–118). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24740-8_6 Search in Google Scholar

39 Ulfbeck, V., & Arda, A. (2023). Remote control and Remote Risk of Liability? Vicarious liability for remotely controlled vessels in Scandinavian and English law. In Studies in national governance and emerging technologies (pp. 263–275). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24740-8_13 Search in Google Scholar

40 Veitch, E., & Alsos, O. A. (2022). A systematic review of human-AI interaction in autonomous ship systems. Safety Science, 152, 105778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105778 Search in Google Scholar

41 Vojković, G., & Milenković, M. (2019). Autonomous ships and legal authorities of the ship master. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(2), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.12.001 Search in Google Scholar

42 Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, G., Zhang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024). Harnessing the power of Machine learning for AIS Data-Driven maritime Research: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review, 183, 103426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103426 Search in Google Scholar

43 Yu, Y., Lakemond, N., & Holmberg, G. (2024). Resilience in emerging complex intelligent systems: A case study of search and rescue. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12626. Search in Google Scholar