[1. Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:115-126.10.1056/NEJM199901143400207]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1685-1695.10.1056/NEJMra043430]Search in Google Scholar
[3. VanderLaan PA, Reardon CA, Getz GS. Site specificity of atherosclerosis: site-selective responses to atherosclerotic modulators. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:12-22.10.1161/01.ATV.0000105054.43931.f0]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA. 1999;282:2035-2042.10.1001/jama.282.21.2035]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Stone P, Coskun A, Yeghiazarians Y, et al. Prediction of sites of coronary atherosclerosis progression: in vivo profiling of endothelial shear stress, lumen, and outer vessel wall characteristics to predict vascular behavior. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2003;18:458-470.10.1097/00001573-200311000-00007]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Gimbrone MA Jr., Topper JN, Nagel T, Anderson KR, Garcia-Cardena G. Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;902:230-239.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06318.x]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Cunningham KS, Gotlieb AI. The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Lab Invest. 2005;85:9-23.10.1038/labinvest.3700215]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Arterial wall shear and distribution of early atheroma in man. Nature. 1969;223:1159-1160.10.1038/2231159a0]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Asakura T, Karino T. Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1990;66:1045-1066.10.1161/01.RES.66.4.1045]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis. 1985;5:293-302.10.1161/01.ATV.5.3.293]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Moore JE Jr., Xu C, Glagov S, Zarins CK, Ku DN. Fluid wall shear stress measurements in a model of the human abdominal aorta: oscillatory behavior and relationship to atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1994;110:225-240.10.1016/0021-9150(94)90207-0]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Gambillara V, Chambaz C, Montorzi G, Roy S, Stergiopulos N, Silacci P. Plaque-prone hemodynamics impair endothelial function in pig carotid arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290:H2320-2328.10.1152/ajpheart.00486.2005]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Cheng C, van Haperen R, de Waard M, et al. Shear stress affects the intracellular distribution of eNOS: direct demonstration by a novel in vivo technique. Blood. 2005;106:3691-3698.10.1182/blood-2005-06-2326]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Buchanan JR Jr., Kleinstreuer C, Truskey GA, Lei M. Relation between non-uniform hemodynamics and sites of altered permeability and lesion growth at the rabbit aorto-celiac junction. Atherosclerosis. 1999;143:27-40.10.1016/S0021-9150(98)00264-0]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Stone PH, Coskun AU, Kinlay S, et al. Effect of endothelial shear stress on the progression of coronary artery disease, vascular remodeling, and in-stent restenosis in humans: in vivo 6-month follow-up study. Circulation. 2003;108:438-44.10.1161/01.CIR.0000080882.35274.AD12860915]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Wentzel JJ, Corti R, Fayad ZA, et al. Does shear stress modulate both plaque progression and regression in the thoracic aorta? Human study using serial magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:846-854.10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.02615766817]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Chatzizisis YS, Jonas M, Coskun AU. Low endothelial shear stress (ESS) is responsible for the heterogeneity and severity of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: an in-vivo IVUS natural history study (abstr). Circulation. 2006;114:II23.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Chatzizisis YS, Jonas M, Coskun AU. Low endothelial shear stress (ESS) predicts the development of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a correlative IVUS and histopathology natural history study (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:Suppl A:334A.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Chatzizisis YS, Jonas M, Coskun AU. Low endothelial shear stress (ESS) leads to expansive remodeling of atherosclerotic coronary subsegments: an in-vivo follow-up IVUS study (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:SupplA:335.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Cheng C, Tempel D, van Haperen R, et al. Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation. 2006;113:2744-2753.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.59001816754802]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Gambillara V, Montorzi G, Haziza-Pigeon C, Stergiopulos N, Silacci P. Arterial wall response to ex vivo exposure to oscillatory shear stress. J Vasc Res. 2005;42:535-544.10.1159/00008834316179795]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Stone PH, Coskun AU, Kinlay S, et al. Regions of low endothelial shear stress are sites where coronary plaque progress and vascular remodeling occurs in humans: an in-vivo serial study. Eur Heart J. 2007:28:705-710.10.1093/eurheartj/ehl57517347172]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Wentzel JJ, Janssen E, Vos J, et al. Extension of increased atherosclerotic wall thickness into high shear stress regions is associated with loss of compensatory remodeling. Circulation. 2003;108:17-23.10.1161/01.CIR.0000078637.21322.D312821552]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Wentzel JJ, Kloet J, Andhyiswara I, et al. Shear-stress and wall-stress regulation of vascular remodeling after balloon angioplasty: effect of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Circulation. 2001;104:91-96.10.1161/01.CIR.104.1.9111435344]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. 5th edition. London: A Hodder Arnold Publication, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJ, et al. The role of shear stress in the generation of rupture-prone vulnerable plaques. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005;2:401-407.10.1038/ncpcardio0274]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Munson BR, Young DF, Okiishi TH. Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Feldman CL, Ilegbusi OJ, Hu Z, Nesto R, Waxman S, Stone PH. Determination of in vivo velocity and endothelial shear stress patterns with phasic flow in human coronary arteries: a methodology to predict progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Am Heart J. 2002;143:931-939.10.1067/mhj.2002.123118]Search in Google Scholar
[29. MacIsaac AI, Thomas JD, Topol EJ. Toward the quiescent coronary plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1228-1241.10.1016/0735-1097(93)90442-4]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Katranas SA, Kelekis AL, Antoniadis AP, Ziakas AG, Giannoglou GD. Differences in stress forces and geometry between left and right coronary artery: a pathophysiological aspect of atherosclerosis heterogeneity. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2015;56:217e223.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Wentzel JJ, Chatzizisis YS, Gijsen FJ, Giannoglou GD, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Endothelial shear stress in the evolution of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vascular remodelling: current understanding and remaining questions. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;96:234e243.10.1093/cvr/cvs21722752349]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M, Edelman ER, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2379e2393.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.05917599600]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Kwak BR, Back M, Bochaton-Piallat ML, et al. Biomechanical factors in atherosclerosis: mechanisms and clinical implications. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3013-3020.10.1093/eurheartj/ehu353481080625230814]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Tousoulis D, Papageorgiou N, Synetos A, Stefanadis C. Assessing vulnerable plaque: is shear stress enough? Int J Cardiol. 2014; 172:e135-e138.10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.10824485228]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Koskinas KC, Sukhova GK, Baker AB, et al. Thin-capped atheromata with reduced collagen content in pigs develop in coronary arterial regions exposed to persistently low endothelial shear stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1494-1504.10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300827395449623640495]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Chatzizisis YS, Baker AB, Sukhova GK, et al. Augmented expression and activity of extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes in regions of low endothelial shear stress colocalize with coronary atheromata with thin fibrous caps in pigs. Circulation. 2011;123:621-630.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970038306607821282495]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Koskinas KC, Feldman CL, Chatzizisis YS, et al. Natural history of experimental coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling in relation to endothelial shear stress: a serial, in vivo intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2010;121:2092-2101.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.901678290286420439786]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Xu Q. Disturbed flow-enhanced endothelial turnover in atherosclerosis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2009;19:191-195.10.1016/j.tcm.2009.12.00220211434]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Quillard T, Araujo HA, Franck G, Shvartz E, Sukhova G, Libby P. TLR2 and neutrophils potentiate endothelial stress, apoptosis and detachment: implications for superficial erosion. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1394-1404.10.1093/eurheartj/ehv044445828725755115]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Cicha I, Worner A, Urschel K, et al. Carotid plaque vulnerability: a positive feedback between hemodynamic and biochemical mechanisms. Stroke. 2011;42:3502-3510.10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.62726521998063]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Corban MT, Eshtehardi P, Suo J, et al. Combination of plaque burden, wall shear stress, and plaque phenotype has incremental value for prediction of coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability. Atherosclerosis. 2014;232:271-276.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.11.04924468138]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC, Suo J, et al. Association of coronary wall shear stress with atherosclerotic plaque burden, composition, and distribution in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e002543.10.1161/JAHA.112.002543348735123130168]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Samady H, Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC, et al. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2011;124:779-788.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.02182421788584]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Otsuka F, Finn AV, Yazdani SK, Nakano M, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. The importance of the endothelium in atherothrombosis and coronary stenting. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9:439-453.10.1038/nrcardio.2012.6422614618]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Bourantas CV, Papafaklis MI, Kotsia A, et al. Effect of the endothelial shear stress patterns on neointimal proliferation following drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: an optical coherence tomography study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:315-324.10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.03424529931]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Wentzel JJ, Krams R, Schuurbiers JC, et al. Relationship between neointimal thickness and shear stress after wall stent implantation in human coronary arteries. Circulation. 2001;103:1740-1755.10.1161/01.CIR.103.13.1740]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Brugaletta S, Heo JH, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Endothelial-dependent vasomotion in a coronary segment treated by ABSORB everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system is related to plaque composition at the time of bioresorption of the polymer: indirect finding of vascular reparative therapy? Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1325-1333.10.1093/eurheartj/ehr466]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Papafaklis MI, Bourantas CV, Theodorakis PE, et al. The effect of shear stress on neointimal response following sirolimus and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation compared with bare-metal stents in humans. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:1181-1189.10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.01821087755]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Dangas G, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic risk score for major bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral approach. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1936-1945.10.1093/eurheartj/ehm194]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Van Werkum JW, Heestermans AA, Zomer AC, et al. Predictors of coronary stent thrombosis: The Dutch stent thrombosis registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1399-1409.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.055]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Mahnken A, et al. Artifact-free coronary magnetic resonance angiography an coronary vessel wall imaging in the presence of a new, metallic coronary magnetic resonance imaging stent. Circulation. 2005;111:1019-1026.10.1161/01.CIR.0000156462.97532.8F]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Di Mario C, Borgia F. Assimilating the current clinical data of fully bioabsorbable stents. EuroIntervention. 2009;5:F103-F108.10.4244/EIJV5IFA18]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Stefanini GG, Kalesan B, Serruys PW, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease (LEADERS): 4 year follow-up of a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1940-1948.10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61672-3]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Yamaji K, Kimura T, Morimoto T, et al. Very long-term (15 to 23 years) outcomes of successful balloon angioplasty com- pared with bare metal coronary stenting. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e004085.10.1161/JAHA.112.004085354161923316303]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Brugaletta S, Gogas BD, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Vascular compliance changes of the coronary vessel wall after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in the treated and adjacent segments. Circ J. 2012;76:1616-1623.10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1416]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Gomez-Lara J, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y, et al. A comparison of the conformability of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds to metal platform coronary stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:1190-1198.10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.01621087756]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Ormiston JA, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, et al. First serial assessment at 6 months and 2 years of the second generation of absorb everolimuseluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:620-632.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.97154923048057]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Bourantas CV, Zhang Y, Farooq V, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Bioresorbable scaffolds: current evidence and ongoing clinical trials. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012;14:626-634.10.1007/s11886-012-0295-5343278822810889]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Nakazawa G, Ladich E, Finn AV, Virmani R. Pathophysiology of vascular healing and stent mediated arterial injury. EuroIntervention. 2008;4:C7-C10.]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Nakazawa G, Otsuka F, Nakano M, et al. The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1314-1322.10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.011309331021376502]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Oberhauser JP, Hossainy S, Rapoza RJ. Design principles and performance of bioresorbable polymeric vascular scaffolds. EuroIntervention. 2009;5: F15-F22.10.4244/EIJV5IFA322100671]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Iqbal J, Sumaya W, Tatman V, et al. Incidence and predictors of stent thrombosis: a single-centre study of 5,833 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery stenting. EuroIntervention. 2013;9:62-69.10.4244/EIJV9I1A1023685296]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Bioresorbable scaffold: the advent of a new era in percutaneous coronary and peripheral revascularization? Circulation. 2011;123:779-797.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971606]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Bourantas CV, Raber L, Zaugg S, et al. Impact of local endothelial shear stress on neointima and plaque following stent implantation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup-analysis of the COMFORTABLE AMI-IBIS 4 trial. Int J Cardiol. 2015;186:178-85.10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.16025828109]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Khorsand A, Glogar D. Longitudinal straightening effect of stents is an additional predictor for major adverse cardiac events. Austrian Wiktor Stent Study Group and European Paragon Stent Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1580-1589.10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00570-2]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Gomez-Lara J, Brugaletta S, Farooq V, et al. Angiographic geometric changes of the lumen arterial wall after bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and metallic platform stents at 1-year follow-up. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:789-799.10.1016/j.jcin.2011.04.00921777888]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Bourantas CV, Papafaklis MI, Lakkas L, et al. Fusion of optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data for more accurate evaluation of the endothelial shear stress patterns and neointimal distribution after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: comparison with intravascular ultrasound-derived reconstructions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:485-494.10.1007/s10554-014-0374-324458955]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Kimura T, Kozuma K, Tanabe K, et al. A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus- eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3332-3342.10.1093/eurheartj/ehv43526330419]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Ellis SG, Kereiakes DJ, Metzger DC, et al. Investigators AI. Everolimuseluting bioresorbable scaffolds for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1905-1915.10.1056/NEJMoa150903826457558]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Wykrzykowska JJ, Kraak RP, Hofma SH, et al. Investigators A. Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Stents in Routine PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2319-2328.10.1056/NEJMoa161495428402237]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Collet C, Asano T, Miyazaki Y, et al. Late thrombotic events after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2559-2566.10.1093/eurheartj/ehx15528430908]Search in Google Scholar
[72. Otsuka F, Pacheco E, Perkins LE, et al. Long-term safety of an everolimuseluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and the cobalt-chromium XIENCE V stent in a porcine coronary artery model. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:330-342.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.00099024895447]Search in Google Scholar
[73. Raber L, Brugaletta S, Yamaji K, et al. Very late scaffold thrombosis: intracoronary imaging and histopathological and spectroscopic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1901-1914.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.85326493663]Search in Google Scholar
[74. Finn AV, Nakazawa G, Joner M, et al. Vascular responses to drug eluting stents: Importance of delayed healing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:1500-1510.10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.14422017510464]Search in Google Scholar
[75. Foin N, Gutierrez-Chico JL, Nakatani S, et al. Incomplete stent apposition causes high shear flow disturbances and delay in neointimal coverage as a function of strut to wall detachment distance: implications for the management of incomplete stent apposition. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:180-189.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.00093124642998]Search in Google Scholar
[76. Holme PA, Orvim U, Hamers MJAG, et al. Shear-induced platelet activation and platelet microparticle formation at blood flow conditions as in arteries with a severe stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:646-653.10.1161/01.ATV.17.4.646]Search in Google Scholar
[77. Martorell J, Santoma P, Kolandaivelu K, et al. Extent of flow recirculation governs expression of atherosclerotic and thrombotic biomarkers in arterial bifurcations. Cardiovasc Res. 2014;103:37-46.10.1093/cvr/cvu124467088424841070]Search in Google Scholar
[78. Nam D, Ni CW, Rezvan A, et al. Partial carotid ligation is a model of acutely induced disturbed flow, leading to rapid endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297:H1535-H1543.10.1152/ajpheart.00510.2009277076419684185]Search in Google Scholar
[79. Bark DLJr, Ku DN. Wall shear over high degree stenoses pertinent to atherothrombosis. J Biomechanics. 2010;43:2970-2977.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.01120728892]Search in Google Scholar
[80. Bark DL, Para AN, Ku DN. Correlation of thrombosis growth rate to pathological wall shear rate during platelet accumulation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:2642-2650.10.1002/bit.2453722539078]Search in Google Scholar
[81. Fukumoto Y, Hiro T, Fujii T, et al. Localized elevation of shear stress is related to coronary plaque rupture: a 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study with in-vivo color mapping of shear stress distribution. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:645-650.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.03018261684]Search in Google Scholar
[82. Brugaletta S, Radu MD, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Circumferential evaluation of the neointima by optical coherence tomography after ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: can the scaffold cap the plaque? Atherosclerosis. 2012;221:106-112.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.12.008]Search in Google Scholar
[83. Lane JP, Perkins LE, Sheehy AJ, et al. Lumen gain and restoration of pulsatility after implantation of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold in porcine coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:688-695.10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.02424835327]Search in Google Scholar
[84. Tateishi H, Suwannasom P, Sotomi Y, et al. investigators of the ABSORB Cohort B study. Edge Vascular Response After Resorption of the Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold – A 5-Year Serial Optical Coherence Tomography Study. Circ J. 2016;80:1131-41.10.1253/circj.CJ-15-132526936236]Search in Google Scholar
[85. Tamburino C, Latib A, van Geuns RJ, et al. Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds: a European perspective. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:45-52.10.4244/EIJY15M01_0525599676]Search in Google Scholar