The impact of home therapy interventions on treatment adherence and patient independence in haemophilia management in Assam, India
Artikel-Kategorie: Clinical Practice
Online veröffentlicht: 21. Juli 2025
Seitenbereich: 71 - 81
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jhp-2025-0010
Schlüsselwörter
© 2025 Anupam Dutta et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Haemophilia, a hereditary X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of clotting factor VIII (haemophilia A) or factor IX (haemophilia B), continues to pose significant health challenges globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including India [1,2,3]. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with the high cost of factor replacement therapy and limited access to specialised care, severely hampers effective management and quality of life (QoL) for affected individuals.
The World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) emphasises the importance of prophylactic treatment as the gold standard to prevent bleeding episodes, preserve joint health, and improve long-term outcomes [4]. However, despite these evidence-based recommendations, implementation remains suboptimal in India due to economic, infrastructural, and educational barriers.
One of the most critical issues is the financial burden associated with treatment. In many regions of India, people with haemophilia (PWH) depend on self-funded clotting factors, leading to high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures. A cost-benefit analysis of a government intervention in Maharashtra demonstrated that state-supported access to clotting factors led to a 21% reduction in annual OOP expenses and showed a benefit-cost ratio of 1.89, indicating substantial economic merit in public health investment [5].
Geographical challenges exacerbate access issues. Patients living in remote or rural areas often face long travel times to reach tertiary centres, leading to treatment delays and complications. This is particularly concerning during acute bleeding episodes, where timely intervention is critical. The resulting logistical constraints underscore the need for decentralised care models such as home-based therapy, which could provide timely and accessible treatment, reducing dependency on hospital-based infusions [5,6].
Additionally, educational gaps among healthcare providers further limit optimal haemophilia care delivery. A survey across Asia-Pacific haemophilia treatment centres found that lack of training, funding constraints, and limited access to continuing medical education hindered provider competence and guideline implementation [7].
In recent years, home-based therapy has emerged as a viable and patient-centric alternative that promotes independence, improves adherence, and enhances quality of life. International studies highlight the role of telehealth and remote interventions, including mobile reminders and digital infusion logs, in supporting self-management practices and improving patient outcomes [6,8]. Moreover, nurse-led educational interventions have been shown to significantly improve prophylactic treatment uptake and reduce healthcare provider dependence [8,9].
Given the complex landscape of haemophilia care in India, this study evaluates the feasibility, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction associated with structured home-based therapy in a resource-constrained setting. By focusing on real-world implementation at Assam Medical College and Hospital, this research aims to provide practical insights into scalable models of care that align with global standards while being responsive to local challenges.
This study was designed as a prospective interventional study to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction associated with home-based therapy for haemophilia at Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh. Conducted from January 2023 to January 2024, the study aimed to identify barriers to home therapy, assess its impact on adherence and quality of life, and evaluate the role of nursing and educational interventions (Figure 1). A total of 29 PWH were enrolled in the program, with each participating for six months.

Outline of the four key components of the structured program designed to help patients overcome treatment barriers: onboarding, counselling, home therapy, and awareness training. These services were provided through coordinated in-clinic support and home visits by nurses with doctor oversight, ensuring patient education, self-infusion training, regular monitoring, and improved adherence to prophylactic treatment.
The study included patients diagnosed with haemophilia A or B (mild, moderate, or severe), aged ≥2 years, previously dependent on hospital-based infusion therapy, and willing to provide informed consent. Patients were excluded if they had active inhibitors against clotting factors, cognitive or physical disabilities preventing self-infusion, or severe comorbid conditions limiting home-based care. The sample size was determined based on prior pilot data, assuming a 50% improvement in adherence, with a 95% confidence interval and 80% power.
The study employed a clearly defined model of structured home therapy, involving a planned, multi-component intervention designed to enable PWH and their caregivers to independently administer clotting factor concentrates at home with competence and confidence. This model encompassed four core elements: patient education, practical infusion training, supervised transition to home-based care, and continuous follow-up and support. Implementation began following the baseline survey conducted in February 2023, which assessed patient demographics, disease severity, treatment history, and barriers to home therapy. Eligible patients were enrolled between February and May 2023, each participating in the program for six months.
The training program (Table 1) was delivered by trained haemophilia nurses under the supervision of the treating physician, and guided by internal standard operating procedures (SOPs) developed at Assam Medical College. Training included:
Monthly self-infusion workshops held at the treatment centre, where patients practiced venipuncture using arm mannequins and vein-locator devices; Video demonstrations on the reconstitution and administration of clotting factor concentrates, storage guidelines, and safe disposal of sharps; Individualised education sessions covering prophylactic schedules, recognition of bleeds, emergency contact plans, and maintaining treatment logs.
Each session typically lasted 45–60 minutes, and materials were provided in both English and local language (Assamese).
Structured Training Plan
1 | Objective | To equip patients and caregivers with the skills and confidence to safely perform self-infusion and manage haemophilia at home |
2 | Target audience | People with haemophilia A or B (age ≥2 years) and their caregivers (if applicable) |
3 | Trainers | Trained haemophilia nurses and educators under supervision of the treating physician |
4 | Training timeline | Initial onboarding (Week 1), followed by |
5 | Training duration | Each session lasts |
6 | Mode of delivery |
In-person group workshops (monthly at the treatment centre) One-on-one bedside or home-based training during nurse visits Digital resources (videos, pamphlets, visual aids in English and Assamese) |
7 | Standard training content |
|
8 | Training tools |
Printed |
9 | Assessment methods |
Practical demonstration by patient/caregiver- Q&A checklist on dosing, preparation, and complication recognition Periodic nurse evaluation during follow-up home visits |
10 | Standardisation protocol |
All trainers (Nurses) follow a common SOP Patient handouts and videos used uniformly across all sessions |
11 | Documentation | Training logs, session attendance, and competency checklists maintained by nurses and submitted monthly. |
12 | Challenges addressed |
Fear of venipuncture: Overcome with repeated mannequin practice Literacy issues: Resolve via pictorial instructions and caregiver involvement Remote access: Home visits to ensure no patient is left unsupported |
To support the transition to home therapy, nurse-led home visits were conducted at least once every month, during which patients demonstrated the infusion process under observation. Nurses offered real-time correction of technique, reinforced dosing reminders, and addressed any infusion-related concerns. During implementation, the team encountered logistical challenges, particularly in scheduling visits to remote outstation locations, and occasional interruptions in factor supply, which required coordination with government procurement agencies. Some patients initially expressed apprehension regarding venous access or needle phobia; these were mitigated through repeated counselling and caregiver involvement. This structured approach ensured that home therapy was not only introduced safely but was also sustained through regular reinforcement, supervision, and capacity-building at the household level.
Nurses played a pivotal role as educators and care coordinators in the structured home therapy program. They began with conducting hands-on training sessions, where study participants and caregivers were taught proper self-infusion techniques using arm mannequins and vein-locator devices. The nurses also facilitated video-based education on factor preparation, administration, and storage; following training, they undertook monthly home visits to monitor adherence to treatment, assess technique accuracy, and provide real-time feedback. During these visits, they reinforced dose timing, addressed complications, and documented progress. They also provided a point of liaison between the patients and the treatment centre, promptly reporting clinical concerns to the haematologist, coordinating factor availability, and ensuring continuity of care. Their ongoing support was central to building patient confidence and sustaining safe home therapy practices.
Throughout the study, participants completed two follow-up surveys: a mid-home therapy (HT) survey in October 2023 to assess initial improvements in adherence and satisfaction, and a post-HT survey in December 2023, evaluating treatment compliance, self-infusion proficiency, and quality of life changes. The intervention specifically addressed key barriers such as long travel distances (enabled home therapy), unavailability of clotting factors (ensured supply), and lack of awareness (provided counselling and education). The intervention strategies included clinical support from nurses, educational materials such as training videos and patient manuals, and technology-driven adherence tools like SMS reminders for dosing and factor administration.
All PWH were assessed for annual bleed rate, joint health, functional state and QoL, before and after implementation of home therapy, using standard validated methods including Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia (FISH) and EQ-5D-5L. Adherence to therapy and patient satisfaction were assessed using structured questionnaires developed by the patient support program (PSP) team, based on WHO adherence frameworks and patient-reported outcome measures. Though not externally validated, these tools were piloted for clarity and cultural relevance. Data were collected at three time points — pre-therapy (February 2023), mid-therapy (October 2023), and post-therapy (December 2023) — via face-to-face interviews during clinic visits and nurse-led home visits (Table 2).
Questionnaire to assess adherence to therapy and patient satisfaction
1. How many doses of factor therapy were you prescribed per week? |
□1 □2 □3 □Other:_____________________________________ |
2. In the past month, how many times did you miss a scheduled dose? |
□0 □1–2 □3–5 □>5 |
3. If you missed doses, what were the reasons? (Tick all that apply) |
□Forgot |
□Factor not available |
□Travel issues |
□Felt well |
□Fear or difficulty with infusion |
□Other:_____________________________________ |
4. Who usually administers the infusion at home? |
□Self □Parent/Caregiver □Nurse □Go to hospital |
5. Do you follow the prescribed dosing schedule regularly? |
□Always □Often □Sometimes □Rarely □Never |
6. How satisfied are you with the self-infusion training you received? |
□1 □2 □3 □4 □5 |
7. How helpful were the nurse visits to your home? |
□1 □2 □3 □4 □5 |
8. How confident do you feel in managing your condition at home? |
□1 □2 □3 □4 □5 |
9. Do you feel you have adequate knowledge about your treatment? |
□1 □2 □3 □4 □5 |
10. Overall, how satisfied are you with the home therapy support provided? |
□1 □2 □3 □4 □5 |
Statistical analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, proportions, and percentages) to summarise participant characteristics. Comparative analyses included paired t-tests to evaluate pre- and post-intervention changes in self-infusion rates and adherence. The effect size (Cohen's d) was calculated to assess the magnitude of change following the intervention, and multivariate regression was used to identify predictors of improved adherence.
The study adhered to strict ethical guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (H), Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh (Reg no. ECR/636/Inst/AS/2014) No. AMC/EC/5876 dated 3rd June 2021. Informed consent was collected from all adult participants and guardians of minors. Patient confidentiality was maintained by anonymising data and securing records. The study was independently conducted without pharmaceutical sponsorship, ensuring no conflict of interest.
The baseline profile of the 29 haemophilia patients enrolled in the study reveals important demographic and clinical characteristics (Table 3). Nearly half of the patients (48%) were aged 21 years and above, while smaller proportions belonged to younger age groups, including 12–16 years (17%), 16–20 years (14%), 2–6 years (11%), and 7–11 years (10%). Educational background varied, with the majority having only primary (28%) or pre-school education (38%), and fewer patients reporting higher secondary (24%), secondary (7%), or graduate-level education (3%). In terms of disease severity, 59% of patients were classified as having severe haemophilia, 24% moderate, and 17% mild, indicating a significant need for continuous and accessible treatment. Regarding treatment regimens at baseline, 56% of patients were on prophylactic therapy, while 44% were still dependent on on-demand treatment, underscoring the need for improved awareness and adherence to preventive strategies. These insights formed the foundation for targeted interventions delivered throughout the home therapy program.
Baseline demographics of study participants (n=29)
2–6 years | 3 | 11% |
7–11 years | 3 | 10% |
12–16 years | 5 | 17% |
16–20 years | 4 | 14% |
21 years & above | 14 | 48% |
Pre-School | 11 | 38% |
Primary | 8 | 28% |
Secondary | 2 | 7% |
Higher Secondary | 7 | 24% |
Graduate | 1 | 3% |
Mild | 5 | 17% |
Moderate | 7 | 24% |
Severe | 17 | 59% |
On-demand | 13 | 44% |
Prophylaxis | 16 | 56% |
The baseline survey identified barriers encountered by participants in accessing haemophilia treatment, and the key difficulties faced in their daily lives at the time of enrolment in the home therapy training program (Figure 2).

Baseline challenges and difficulties reported by study participants
Long travel time to the treatment centre was reported by 90% of participants, highlighting the burden of distance and inadequate local healthcare availability. Unavailability of clotting factor concentrates was a barrier for 93%, indicating frequent stockouts and supply chain issues. Presence of disability or complications affected 72% of patients, reflecting the long-term musculoskeletal impacts of poorly controlled bleeding. Difficulty in getting infusions administered was noted by 7%, suggesting that while most patients had some access, a minority still faced procedural barriers.
Mobility issues were experienced by 72% of participants, consistent with haemophilic arthropathy and joint damage. Unexpected bleeding was still a concern for 3%, implying improved bleed anticipation or control for the majority. Pain and discomfort were reported by 93%, underscoring chronic pain as a significant contributor to decreased quality of life. Lack of awareness was reported as negligible (0%), indicating good basic understanding of the disease among this cohort.
Significant improvements were observed in participants following structured training, support and nursing interventions (Figure 3). Self-infusion adoption increased from 38% to 75%, indicating enhanced patient confidence and autonomy in managing their condition. Prophylactic treatment uptake improved by 56%, reducing the reliance on on-demand therapy. Adherence to twice-weekly dosing increased from 76% to 83%, while the proportion of patients taking doses only once in two weeks decreased from 10% to 7%. This reflects better compliance with prescribed regimens.

Patient outcomes following regular nursing support services
From the patient perspective, 93% reported better knowledge about their disease and its management, 82% were able to perform self-infusion safely at home and manage medical waste, 100% understood the importance of timely and regular dosing, and 86% reported improved pain management and fewer joint bleeds. Patient outcomes demonstrated marked improvements in quality of life, with 93% reporting better mobility and 82% experiencing reduced joint pain and bleeding episodes.
The healthcare providers (HCPs) involved reported enhanced patient-doctor relationships, increased patient competence, successful home-based self-infusion, reduced bleeding episodes with better pain control, and greater awareness and acceptance of home therapy among participants. These outcomes demonstrate the impact of consistent nursing guidance and patient education on self-management and treatment adherence.
HCP dependence was significantly reduced, with all participants transitioning to self-infusion or caregiver-assisted therapy (Figure 4). Initially, 38% of patients required HCP assistance. With structured nursing support and PSP intervention, HCP dependence dropped by 55% by the midpoint and was eliminated entirely by the end of the study period. Consequently, the proportion of patients self-infusing rose by 47% by the end of the program. Seven patients shifted to caregiver-supported infusions (mostly young children aged 2–9 years), and 22 transitioned successfully to self-infusion. This shift highlights the effectiveness of nursing guidance and educational interventions in empowering patients and families, improving treatment adherence, and reducing reliance on clinical support.

Progressive shift towards self-infusion following nursing support and patient support program (n=29)
The overall patient satisfaction score was 99%, with training, counselling, and home nursing support receiving near-perfect ratings. Patient testimonials highlighted increased confidence in self-management and improved disease awareness.
All 29 patients who received structured home therapy training showed significant improvements across all key outcome measures. The mean Annual Bleed Rate (ABR) decreased from 11.31 ± 5.90 at baseline to 6.86 ± 6.71 at follow-up (p < 0.00001). Similarly, the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) improved from 12.83 ± 6.60 to 10.48 ± 8.36 (p = 0.0016), while the Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia (FISH) increased from 14.97 ± 4.49 to 13.76 ± 5.35 (p = 0.0021). QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L score, improved significantly from 9.24 ± 2.28 to 8.17 ± 3.24 (p = 0.0039). These findings indicate that the structured home therapy intervention effectively reduced bleeding frequency, improved joint health, enhanced functional independence, and positively impacted overall QOL (Table 4).
Results of joint health, functional status and quality of life of participants following home therapy intervention (n=29)
Annual Bleed Rate (ABR) | 11.31 ± 5.90 | 6.86 ± 6.71 | 4.45 | < 0.00001 |
Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) | 12.83 ± 6.60 | 10.48 ± 8.36 | 2.34 | 0.0016 |
FISH (Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia) | 14.97 ± 4.49 | 13.76 ± 5.35 | 1.21 | 0.0021 |
EQ-5D-5L (Quality of life) | 9.24 ± 2.28 | 8.17 ± 3.24 | 1.07 | 0.0039 |
These findings suggest that structured home therapy interventions can enhance treatment adherence, improve patient independence, and reduce healthcare burden, demonstrating a sustainable model for haemophilia care in resource-limited settings.
The structured implementation of a nurse-led home therapy (HT) programme for PWH treated at Assam Medical College and Hospital demonstrated notable improvements in patient autonomy, uptake of prophylactic treatment, adherence to dosing schedules, joint health, and overall QoL. These outcomes are consistent with global evidence supporting patient-centred, decentralised models of care as the standard for chronic bleeding disorders [10,11].
In our cohort, the proportion of patients capable of performing self-infusion rose significantly from 38% at baseline to 75% post-intervention. This improvement is clinically meaningful, as self-management – the ability of PWH to actively manage their daily health and healthcare – supports better bleed management, which is vital in haemophilia care [4]. This progress was achieved through the dedicated efforts of haemophilia nurses, who empowered patients by providing sustained training and conducting regular home visits.
The importance of the nurse role in empowering PWH to self-manage their condition has been recognised and continues to be developed elsewhere, with nurses providing education and support in all aspects of self-management, including bleed recognition, prevention and management, and home treatment [12,13]. In the UK, the Haemophilia Nurses Association's core competency framework for haemophilia nurses includes a range of competencies linked to communicating with and supporting patients and their families. This includes teaching and reviewing self-management skills, enabling PWH to manage bleeding symptoms independently, and delivering patient education [14].
Our findings reinforce the vital contribution of the haemophilia nurse and the need for a structured learning module to advance haemophilia care. Integrating telehealth-based mentoring, digital infusion logs, and remote counselling can further enhance skill retention and promote self-efficacy among PWH—an approach particularly valuable for those in rural and semi-urban settings.
Our data revealed a 56% increase in the uptake of prophylactic therapy following the structured nursing intervention. Prophylaxis remains the gold standard for preventing spontaneous bleeds and preserving long-term joint function [11,15]. However, suboptimal compliance remains a widespread challenge in many low- and middle-income countries [16]. Evatt underscores the need for sustainable decentralised models to overcome systemic barriers and improve patient outcomes worldwide [13]. Our findings reaffirm that accessible, context-sensitive nursing support is pivotal for expanding prophylaxis uptake in India.
Adherence to the recommended dosing frequency is vital for bleed prevention and long-term joint health. In our cohort, adherence to the prescribed twice-weekly dosing schedule improved from 76% to 83%, while infrequent dosing patterns decreased. Counselling has been shown to be an effective approach that nurses can use to supplement other methods, building a multifaceted strategy to enhance adherence; tackling non-adherence seems to demand continuous efforts and follow-up [17]. Khair highlights how proactive nursing engagement fosters trust and reinforces treatment routines [12].Furthermore, consistent prophylaxis initiated early in life can prevent joint disease, justifying continued investments in adherence support [15].
Improved mobility and pain reduction were reported by 93% and 82% of patients, respectively, following the intervention. These self-reported gains align with existing literature showing that well-managed prophylaxis and timely infusions effectively preserve joint function and reduce disability [15,18]. García-Dasí et al. demonstrate a clear correlation between adherence to prophylaxis and better QoL scores in paediatric patients, highlighting the broader psychosocial benefits of optimal disease control [9]. Integrating adjunct interventions — such as remote physiotherapy and structured pain education — has further potential to maximise functional outcomes.
One of the most significant outcomes in our study was a 55% reduction in reliance on hospital-administered infusions, illustrating a successful transition to patient-managed or caregiver-administered treatment. This shift is consistent with global efforts to decentralise haemophilia care, thereby reducing the burden on tertiary care infrastructure and reallocating resources to patients with complex needs [11]. Home therapy has been shown to not only reduce hospitalisation costs but also to improve cost-effectiveness by preventing expensive complications associated with untreated bleeds [11,19].
This study provides important regional evidence supporting structured nursing interventions and home therapy in an Indian context. By implementing a tailored educational programme complemented by telehealth tools, we have demonstrated that sustainable, patient-centred models are feasible even in resource-limited settings. Future programmes should consider broader digital integration for real-time dose tracking and remote monitoring, as suggested by recent trials [20]. Additionally, training caregivers — particularly in paediatric cases — can ensure equitable access to home-based therapy for younger patients who cannot self-infuse independently [21].
Despite these encouraging outcomes, the study has some limitations. The sample size was modest and derived from a single institution, meaning the results may not be generalisable. The sample size was determined based on feasibility and resource availability within the defined program duration, rather than formal power calculations based on effect size assumptions. However, a significant proportion of PWH at the treatment centre were already on home therapy at baseline, meaning the study could specifically targeted those patients who faced significant barriers to adopting or sustaining home-based care, as identified through the baseline survey. Therefore, while the small sample size may limit generalisability, the study provides valuable insights into real-world implementation challenges and practical solutions in a resource-constrained setting, forming a basis for larger multicentre or regional studies in the future.
The implementation of a structured home therapy intervention at Assam Medical College and Hospital has significantly improved treatment adherence, self-infusion practices, and quality of life for PWH attending its haemophilia centre. The findings of this study demonstrate that empowering patients through education, nursing support, and self-infusion training can reduce dependence on healthcare providers while enhancing treatment outcomes. The increase in self-infusion rates (from 38% to 75%), along with a 56% rise in prophylactic treatment uptake, highlights the effectiveness of the intervention in promoting self-management.
Study participants reported reduced joint pain, improved mobility, and better disease understanding, leading to greater independence in their care. The decrease in reliance on direct healthcare provider support reinforces the potential of home therapy in alleviating the burden on the healthcare system. Participants' overall satisfaction score (99%) suggests that structured counselling, periodic follow-ups, and patient education were well received and instrumental in achieving high compliance rates.
Further multicentre studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-ups are necessary to validate these findings, assess the sustainability of improvements, and develop a robust framework for nationwide implementation of home therapy in haemophilia care. Future interventions could benefit from the integration of telehealth solutions, such as remote monitoring and digital adherence tracking, to enhance patient engagement and long-term treatment success.
In conclusion, this study reaffirms the role of home-based interventions in transforming haemophilia care by making treatment more accessible, patient-centric, and sustainable. The success of this model highlights its potential applicability to other resource-limited settings, offering a scalable approach to improving chronic disease management beyond haemophilia.