[
Al-Zoubi, M., Alrowwad, A., & Masa’deh, R. (2019). Exploring the relationships among tacit knowledge sharing, mentoring and employees’ abilities. Vine Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 50(1), 34–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-04-2019-0048
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alexander, H. R., Qi, J., Hensen, A. H. R., & Qi, J. (2020). Hierarchical business value of information technology : Toward a digital innovation value chain. Information & Management, 57(4), 103209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103209
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andriani, S., & Nasution, Y. (2020). The effect of social capital on innovation through the mediation of ambidexterity and knowledge sharing in cement industry. The 5th International Conference on Family Business and Entrepreneurship Proceeding, 98-109.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Artanto, F. A., Fahlevi, R., & Rachmayani, N. A. (2021). Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Pada Hubungan Kepuasan Konsumen Terhadap Produk (Studi Kasus Perkumpulan Penggiat Programmer Indonesia). Surya Informatika, 11, 4045.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berraies, S., Hamza, K. A., & Chtioui, R. (2020). Distributed leadership and exploratory and exploitative innovations: mediating roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing and organizational trust. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1287-1318. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0311
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berta, W., Cranley, L., Dearing, J. W., Dogherty, E. J., Squires, J. E., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2015). Why (we think) facilitation works: Insights from organizational learning theory. Implementation Science, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bremer, J., & Linnenluecke, M. (2016). Determinants of the perceived importance of organisational adaptation to climate change in the Australian energy industry. Australian Journal of Management, 42(3), 502-521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896216672273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cabello, A. (2022). The impact of innovation: How to measure it and why measure innovativeness with context. https://trainingmag.com/the-impact-of-innovation-how-to-measure-it-and-why/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R & D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cela, O., Cortes-Cornax, M., Front, A., & Rieu, D. (2019). Methodological framework to guide the development of continual evolution methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11483 LNCS, 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21290-2_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chapelon, A., Chapellier, P., & Mignon, S. (2018). The generation of management innovation in microentreprises: absorptive capacity and entrepreneur-CPA relationship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 35(1), 27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesb.2018.10015457
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, S., & Zheng, J. (2022). Influence of organizational learning and dynamic capability on organizational performance of human resource service enterprises: moderation effect of technology environment and market environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 889327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crossan, M.M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537. https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-3138
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Djurfeldt, L. (1995). Organizational learning: Dimensions for a theory. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(4), 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028835
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Damanpour, F., Walker, R., & Avellaneda, C. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dedahanov, A. T., Rhee, C., & Yoon, J. (2017). Organizational structure and innovation performance: Is employee innovative behavior a missing link? Career Development International, 22(4), 334-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-12-2016-0234
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783-796. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Enwereuzor, I. (2021). Diversity climate and workplace belongingness as organizational facilitators of tacit knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(9), 2178-2195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2020-0768
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fazil, M. (2018). Characteristic of information and communication technology (Ict) innovation and its application: A descriptive study in lhokseumawe city. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3403-23
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferreira, C. C. (2020). Experiential learning theory and hybrid entrepreneurship: Factors influencing the transition to full-time entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26(8), 1845-1863. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2019-0668
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Firican, D. A. (2022). The influence of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions on attitude towards change and innovation in oganizations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 16(1), 509-518. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fu, J. (2020). Understanding the Internal and external communicative drivers of organizational innovativeness. Communication Research, 49(5), 675-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220981299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105-1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0190
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghozali, I. (2021). Partial least squares menggunakan program smartPLS 3.2.9. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2018). Determinants of process innovation introductions: Evidence from 115 developing countries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 39(5), 515-525. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2922
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greve, H. R. (2020). Learning theory: The pandemic research challenge. Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1759-1762. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12631
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gumusluǒlu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership and organizational innovation: The roles of internal and external support for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 264-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00657.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLSSEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haned, N., Mothe, C., & Nguyen-Thi, T. U. (2014). Firm persistence in technological innovation: The relevance of organizational innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(5-6), 490-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.895509
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harjanti, D., & Halim, A. D. (2022). The role of social capital in building knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior in holding company. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 24(2), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v24i2.1577
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hatjidis, D., Griffin, M., & Younes, M. (2019). Linking universal network quality perception and change readiness: The mediating roles of tacit knowledge and organizational climate. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(4), 1017-1035. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2018-1442
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliman, A., Cheng, F., & Waldeck, D. (2022). Adaptability, Personality, and social support: Examining links with psychological wellbeing among Chinese high school students. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 11(2), 125-152. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.8880
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015615
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, L., & Randel, A. E. (2014). Knowledge sharing in teams: Social capital, extrinsic incentives, and team innovation. Group and Organization Management, 39(2), 213-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114520969
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, R., Li, Y., Huang, J., Zhang, Y., Jiang, R., & Dunlop, E. (2023). Psychological capital and breakthrough innovation: The role of tacit knowledge sharing and task interdependence. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1097936
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones, G. R. (2013). Design and change global edition. Pearson Education Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khan, N. A., & Khan, A. N. (2019). What followers are saying about transformational leaders fostering employee innovation via organisational learning, knowledge sharing and social media use in public organisations? Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, H., Im, J., & Shin, Y. H. (2022). The impact of employees’ perceived restaurant innovativeness on adaptive behavior: The mediating role of job engagement. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 50, 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.02.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kising’U, T., Namusonge, G., & Mwirigi, F. (2016). The role of organizational learning in sustainable competitive advantage in universities in Kenya. Account and Financial Management Journal, 1(5), 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v3i9.24
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kmieciak, R. (2020). Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: Empirical evidence from Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kreiser, P. M. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation and organizational learning: The impact of network range and network closure. Entrepreneurship: Theory and practice, 35(5), 1025-1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00449.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kucharska, W. (2021). Leadership, culture, intellectual capital and knowledge processes for organizational innovativeness across industries: The case of Poland. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(7), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2021-0047
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kucharska, W., & Bedford, D. A. D. (2019). Knowledge sharing and organizational culture dimensions: Does job satisfaction matter? Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3406496
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kucharska, W., & Bedford, D. A. D. (2020). Love your mistakes! - they help you adapt to change. How do knowledge, collaboration and learning cultures foster organizational intelligence? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1329-1354. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0052
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kucharska, W., & Erickson, G. S. (2023). Tacit knowledge acquisition & sharing, and its influence on innovations: A Polish/US cross-country study. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102647
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kucharska, W., & Rebelo, T. (2022). Transformational leadership for researcher’s innovativeness in the context of tacit knowledge and change adaptability. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2022.2068189
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, J., Zhu, Y., Serapio, M., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2019). The new generation of millennial entrepreneurs: A review and call for research. International Business Review, 28(5), 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martínez-Sánchez, A., Vicente-Oliva, S., & Pérez-Pérez, M. (2020). The relationship between R&D, the absorptive capacity of knowledge, human resource flexibility and innovation: Mediator effects on industrial firms. Journal of Business Research, 118, 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maurseth, P. B., & Svensson, R. (2020). The importance of tacit knowledge: Dynamic inventor activity in the commercialization phase. Research Policy, 49(7), 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKinsey Explainers (2022). What are Industry 4.0, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and 4IR? https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-are-industry-4-0-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-and-4ir
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Musyaffi, A. M., Khairunnisa, H., & Respati, D. K. (2022). Konsep dasar structural equation modelpartial least square (sem-pls) menggunakan smartpls. Penerbit Pascal Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen, V. T., Siengthai, S., Swierczek, F., & Bamel, U. K. (2019). The effects of organizational culture and commitment on employee innovation: Evidence from Vietnam’s IT industry. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(4), 719-742. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-09-2018-0253
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olaisen, J., & Revang, O. (2018). Exploring the performance of tacit knowledge: How to make ordinary people deliver extraordinary results in teams. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 29-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, S., & Park, S. (2019). Employee adaptive performance and its antecedents: Review and synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 18(3), 294-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319836315
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, S., & Park, S. (2021). How can employees adapt to change? Clarifying the adaptive performance concepts. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(1), E1-E15. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21411
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perin, M. G., Sampaio, C. H., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. (2016). Network effects on radical innovation and financial performance: An open-mindedness approach. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 13(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2016160057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phung, T. M. T., Tran, D. T., Vermeulen, P. A. M., & Knoben, J. (2021). The effects of internal and external innovation strategies on process innovation in Vietnamese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-08-2020-0134
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, V. M. J. (2001). Descriptive and normative research on organizational learning: Locating the contribution of Argyris and Schön. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005395
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sarstedt, M., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, W., Erez, M., Jarvenpaa, S., Lewis, M. W., & Tracey, P. (2017). Adding complexity to theories of paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change: Introduction to organization studies special issue on paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change. Organization Studies, 38(3-4), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617693560
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, M. B., & Webster, B. D. (2018). Narcissus the innovator? The relationship between grandiose narcissism, innovation, and adaptability. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suhana, S., Suharnomo, S., Mas'ud, F., Mansyur, A., Febrianto, B., & Santoso, I. H. (2020). Investigating the role of the knowledge sharing and innovative behavior in supply chain management. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 871-880.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sumintono, B. (2014). Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Trim Komunikata.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vincent, M. K., Holliman, A. J., & Waldeck, D. (2024). Adaptability and social support: examining links with engagement, burnout, and wellbeing among expat teachers. Education Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Volberda, H. W., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Mihalache, O. R. (2014). Advancing management innovation: Synthesizing processes, levels of analysis, and change agents. Organization Studies, 35(9), 1245-1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614546155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, N., Yin, J., Ma, Z., & Liao, M. (2021). The influence mechanism of rewards on knowledge sharing behaviors in virtual communities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(3), 485-505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2020-0530
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yean, T., Tan, F., & Nadarajah, D. (2022). Determinants of adaptability and its impact on the change readiness of civil servants. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(5), 622-639. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-12-2021-0263
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Li, G., Zhang, Z., & Fa, T. (2022). Chinese nurses’ innovation capacity: The influence of inclusive leadership, empowering leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(6), 1990-1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13654
]Search in Google Scholar