<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><sec><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We study the proportion of Web of Science (WoS) citation links that are represented in the Crossref Open Citation Index (COCI), with the possible aim of using COCI in research evaluation instead of the WoS, if the level of coverage was sufficient.</p></sec><sec><h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3><p>We calculate the proportion on citation links where both publications have a WoS accession number and a DOI simultaneously, and where the cited publications have had at least one author from our institution, the Czech Technical University in Prague. We attempt to look up each such citation link in COCI.</p></sec><sec><h3>Findings</h3><p>We find that 53.7% of WoS citation links are present in the COCI. The proportion varies largely by discipline. The total figures differ significantly from 40% in the large-scale study by Van Eck, Waltman, Larivière, and Sugimoto (blog 2018, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.cwts.nl/blog?article=n-r2s234">https://www.cwts.nl/blog?article=n-r2s234</ext-link>).</p></sec><sec><h3>Research limitations</h3><p>The sample does not cover all science areas uniformly; it is heavily focused on Engineering and Technology, and only some disciplines of Natural Sciences are present. However, this reflects the real scientific orientation and publication profile of our institution.</p></sec><sec><h3>Practical implications</h3><p>The current level of coverage is not sufficient for the WoS to be replaced by COCI for research evaluation.</p></sec><sec><h3>Originality/value</h3><p>The present study illustrates a COCI vs WoS comparison on the scale of a larger technical university in Central Europe.</p></sec></abstract>

PurposeWe study the proportion of Web of Science (WoS) citation links that are represented in the Crossref Open Citation Index (COCI), with the possible aim of using COCI in research evaluation instead of the WoS, if the level of coverage was sufficient.Design/methodology/approachWe calculate the proportion on citation links where both publications have a WoS accession number and a DOI simultaneously, and where the cited publications have had at least one author from our institution, the Czech Technical University in Prague. We attempt to look up each such citation link in COCI.FindingsWe find that 53.7% of WoS citation links are present in the COCI. The proportion varies largely by discipline. The total figures differ significantly from 40% in the large-scale study by Van Eck, Waltman, Larivière, and Sugimoto (blog 2018, https://www.cwts.nl/blog?article=n-r2s234).Research limitationsThe sample does not cover all science areas uniformly; it is heavily focused on Engineering and Technology, and only some disciplines of Natural Sciences are present. However, this reflects the real scientific orientation and publication profile of our institution.Practical implicationsThe current level of coverage is not sufficient for the WoS to be replaced by COCI for research evaluation.Originality/valueThe present study illustrates a COCI vs WoS comparison on the scale of a larger technical university in Central Europe.

Can Crossref Citations Replace Web of Science for Research Evaluation? The Share of Open Citations

Journal of Data and Information Science

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

PurposeWe study the proportion of Web of Science (WoS) citation links that are represented in the Crossref Open Citation Index (COCI), with the possible aim of...

Can Crossref Citations Replace Web of Science for Research Evaluation? The Share of Open Citations

Article Category: Research Paper

Online veröffentlicht: 02. Sept. 2020

Seitenbereich: 35 - 42

Eingereicht: 08. Feb. 2020

Akzeptiert: 06. Aug. 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0037

Schlüsselwörter
Open citations, Crossref Open Citation Index, Web of Science, Current Research Information System

© 2020 Tomáš Chudlarský et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Can Crossref Citations Replace Web of Science for Research Evaluation? The Share of Open Citations

Article Category: Research Paper

Online veröffentlicht: 02. Sept. 2020

Seitenbereich: 35 - 42

Eingereicht: 08. Feb. 2020

Akzeptiert: 06. Aug. 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0037

SchlüsselwörterOpen citations, Crossref Open Citation Index, Web of Science, Current Research Information System

© 2020 Tomáš Chudlarský et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
Open citations, Crossref Open Citation Index, Web of Science, Current Research Information System