This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Aagaard K., Bloch C. W., Schneider J. W., Henriksen D., Lauridsen P. S., Ryan T. K. (2014). Evaluation of the Norwegian Publication Indicator (in Danish). Oslo: Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions.AagaardK.BlochC. W.SchneiderJ. W.HenriksenD.LauridsenP. S.RyanT. K.2014Evaluation of the Norwegian Publication Indicator(in Danish)OsloNorwegian Association of Higher Education InstitutionsSearch in Google Scholar
Aagaard, K. (2015). How incentives trickle down: Local use of a national bibliometric indicator system. Science and Public Policy, 42(5), 725–737.AagaardK.2015How incentives trickle down: Local use of a national bibliometric indicator systemScience and Public Policy42572573710.1093/scipol/scu087Search in Google Scholar
Aagaard, K., Bloch, C. W., & Schneider, J. W. (2015). Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator. Research Evaluation, 24(2), 106–117.AagaardK.BlochC. W.SchneiderJ. W.2015Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication IndicatorResearch Evaluation24210611710.1093/reseval/rvv003Search in Google Scholar
Ahlgren, P., Colliander, C., & Persson, O. (2012). Field normalized rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research funds. Scientometrics, 92(3), 767–780.AhlgrenP.CollianderC.PerssonO.2012Field normalized rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research fundsScientometrics92376778010.1007/s11192-012-0632-xSearch in Google Scholar
Aksnes, D.W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., Sivertsen, G. (2013). Are mobile researchers more productive and cited than non-mobile researchers? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Research Evaluation, 22(4), 215–223.AksnesD.W.RorstadK.PiroF.SivertsenG.2013Are mobile researchers more productive and cited than non-mobile researchers? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientistsResearch Evaluation22421522310.1093/reseval/rvt012Search in Google Scholar
Bloch, C., & Schneider, J. W. (2016). Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 371–382.BlochC.SchneiderJ. W.2016Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual levelResearch Evaluation25437138210.1093/reseval/rvv047Search in Google Scholar
Chi, P. (2014). Which role do non-source items play in the social sciences? A case study in political science in Germany. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1195–1213.ChiP.2014Which role do non-source items play in the social sciences? A case study in political science in GermanyScientometrics10121195121310.1007/s11192-014-1433-1Search in Google Scholar
Chi, P. (2015). Changing publication and citation patterns in political science in Germany. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1833–1848.ChiP.2015Changing publication and citation patterns in political science in GermanyScientometrics10531833184810.1007/s11192-015-1609-3Search in Google Scholar
Díaz-Faes, A. A., Bordons, M., & Leeuwen, T. N. (2016). Integrating metrics to measure research performance in social sciences and humanities: The case of the Spanish CSIC. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 451–460.Díaz-FaesA. A.BordonsM.LeeuwenT. N.2016Integrating metrics to measure research performance in social sciences and humanities: The case of the Spanish CSICResearch Evaluation25445146010.1093/reseval/rvw018Search in Google Scholar
Engels, T. C. E., Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Spruyt, E. H. J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 93(2), 373–390.EngelsT. C. E.OssenblokT. L. B.SpruytE. H. J.2012Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities 2000–2009Scientometrics93237339010.1007/s11192-012-0680-2Search in Google Scholar
Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Engels, T.C.E., Ingwersen, P., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., Verleysen, F.T., Zuccala, A.A. (2016). Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries. Scientometrics, 107(2), 685–699.Giménez-ToledoE.Mañana-RodríguezJ.EngelsT.C.E.IngwersenP.PölönenJ.SivertsenG.VerleysenF.T.ZuccalaA.A.2016Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countriesScientometrics107268569910.1007/s11192-016-1886-5Search in Google Scholar
Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Sivertsen, G. (2017). Scholarly book publishing: Its information sources for evaluation in the social sciences and humanities. Research Evaluation, 26(2), 91–101.Giménez-ToledoE.Mañana-RodríguezJ.SivertsenG.2017Scholarly book publishing: Its information sources for evaluation in the social sciences and humanitiesResearch Evaluation2629110110.1093/reseval/rvx007Search in Google Scholar
Hammarfelt, B., & de Rijcke, S. (2015). Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University. Research Evaluation, 24(1), 63–77.HammarfeltB.de RijckeS.2015Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala UniversityResearch Evaluation241637710.1093/reseval/rvu029Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.HicksD.2012Performance-based university research funding systemsResearch Policy41225126110.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Jonkers, K., & Zacharewicz, T. (2015). Performance based funding: A comparative assessment of their use and nature in EU Member States. Brussels: JRC Science for Policy Report.JonkersK.ZacharewiczT.2015Performance based funding: A comparative assessment of their use and nature in EU Member StatesBrusselsJRC Science for Policy ReportSearch in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E. (2017). Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland. Research Evaluation, 26(1), 41–52.KulczyckiE.2017Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in PolandResearch Evaluation261415210.1093/reseval/rvw023Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E., Engels, T.C.E., Pölönen, J., Bruun, K., Duskova, M., Guns, R., Nowotniak, R., Petr, M., Sivertsen, G., Starcic, A.I., Zuccala, A. (2018). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries. Scientometrics, 116(1), 463–486.KulczyckiE.EngelsT.C.E.PölönenJ.BruunK.DuskovaM.GunsR.NowotniakR.PetrM.SivertsenG.StarcicA.I.ZuccalaA.2018Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countriesScientometrics116146348610.1007/s11192-018-2711-0Search in Google Scholar
Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(1), 54–71.KyvikS.TeigenM.1996Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivityScience, Technology and Human Values211547110.1177/016224399602100103Search in Google Scholar
Larivière, V. & Costas, R. (2016). How many is too many? On the relationship between research productivity and impact. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0162709. 10.1371/journal.pone.0162709LarivièreV.CostasR.2016How many is too many? On the relationship between research productivity and impactPLoS ONE119e016270910.1371/journal.pone.0162709504043327682366Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ossenblok, T. L., & Engels, T. C. (2015). Edited books in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Characteristics and collaboration analysis. Scientometrics, 104(1), 219–237.OssenblokT. L.EngelsT. C.2015Edited books in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Characteristics and collaboration analysisScientometrics104121923710.1007/s11192-015-1544-3Search in Google Scholar
Ossenblok, T. L., Guns, R., & Thelwall, M. (2015). Book editors in the social sciences and humanities: an analysis of publication and collaboration patterns of established researchers in Flanders. Learned Publishing, 28(4), 261–273.OssenblokT. L.GunsR.ThelwallM.2015Book editors in the social sciences and humanities: an analysis of publication and collaboration patterns of established researchers in FlandersLearned Publishing28426127310.1087/20150405Search in Google Scholar
Ossenblok, T. L., Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. (2014). Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000–2010). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 882–897.OssenblokT. L.VerleysenF. T.EngelsT. C.2014Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000–2010)Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology65588289710.1002/asi.23015Search in Google Scholar
Ossenblok, T. L.B., Engels, T. C., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science – a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9). Research Evaluation, 21(4), 280–290.OssenblokT. L.B.EngelsT. C.SivertsenG.2012The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science – a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9)Research Evaluation21428029010.1093/reseval/rvs019Search in Google Scholar
Piro, F. N., Aksnes, D. W., & Rørstad, K. (2013). A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 307–320.PiroF. N.AksnesD. W.RørstadK.2013A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishingJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology64230732010.1002/asi.22746Search in Google Scholar
Puuska, H. M. (2009). Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics, 82(2), 419–437PuuskaH. M.2009Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics82241943710.1007/s11192-009-0037-7Search in Google Scholar
Puuska, H.-M., Guns, R., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., & Engels, T.C.E. (2018). Proof of concept of a European database for social sciences and humanities publications: Description of the VIRTA-ENRESSH pilot. Helsinki: CSC & ENRESSH, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5993506PuuskaH.-M.GunsR.PölönenJ.SivertsenG.Mañana-RodríguezJ.EngelsT.C.E.2018Proof of concept of a European database for social sciences and humanities publications: Description of the VIRTA-ENRESSH pilotHelsinkiCSC & ENRESSHhttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5993506Search in Google Scholar
Sandström, U. & van den Besselaar, P. (2016). Quantity and/or quality? The importance of publishing many papers. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0166149. 10.1371/journal.pone.0166149SandströmU.van den BesselaarP.2016Quantity and/or quality? The importance of publishing many papersPLoS ONE1111e016614910.1371/journal.pone.0166149511761127870854Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Savic, M., Ivanovic, M., Surla, B.D. (2017). Analysis of intra-institutional research collaboration: a case of a Serbian faculty of sciences. Scientometrics, 110(1), 195–216.SavicM.IvanovicM.SurlaB.D.2017Analysis of intra-institutional research collaboration: a case of a Serbian faculty of sciencesScientometrics110119521610.1007/s11192-016-2167-zSearch in Google Scholar
Schneider, J. W., Aagaard, K., & Bloch, C. W. (2015). What happens when national research funding is linked to differentiated publication counts? A comparison of the Australian and Norwegian publication-based funding models. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 244–256.SchneiderJ. W.AagaardK.BlochC. W.2015What happens when national research funding is linked to differentiated publication counts? A comparison of the Australian and Norwegian publication-based funding modelsResearch Evaluation25324425610.1093/reseval/rvv036Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. & Larsen, B. (2012). Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics, 91(2), 567–575.SivertsenG.LarsenB.2012Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potentialScientometrics91256757510.1007/s11192-011-0615-3Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their relationship with research assessment. Science, Technology & Innovation Indicators 2014. Thematic Paper 2. Utrecht: Dialogic.SivertsenG.van LeeuwenT.2014Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their relationship with research assessmentScience, Technology & Innovation Indicators 2014. Thematic Paper 2UtrechtDialogicSearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter, 6(1), 22–28.SivertsenG.2010A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutionsISSI Newsletter612228Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2014). Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their coverage in Scopus and Web of Science. In proceedings of the Science and Technology Indicators Conference 2014 Leiden (pp. 598–604). Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies.SivertsenG.2014Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their coverage in Scopus and Web of Scienceproceedings of the Science and Technology Indicators Conference 2014 Leiden598604LeidenCentre for Science and Technology StudiesSearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2016a). A bibliometric indicator with a balanced representation of all fields. In proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 910–914). Valencia: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.SivertsenG.2016aA bibliometric indicator with a balanced representation of all fieldsproceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators910914ValenciaEditorial Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaSearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2016b). Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 107(2), 357–368.SivertsenG.2016bPatterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanitiesScientometrics107235736810.1007/s11192-016-1845-1483382227122643Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2016c). Data integration in Scandinavia. Scientometrics, 106(2), 849–855.SivertsenG.2016cData integration in ScandinaviaScientometrics106284985510.1007/s11192-015-1817-xSearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2017). Unique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspective. Palgrave Communications, 10.1057/palcomms.2017.78SivertsenG.2017Unique, but still best practice?The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspectivePalgrave Communications, doi10.1057/palcomms.2017.78Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2018). Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as data sources for studies of research. In Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.SivertsenG.2018Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as data sources for studies of researchSpringer Handbook of Science and Technology IndicatorsHeidelbergSpringer Verlag10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_25Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G., & Schneider, J. W. (2012). Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikator. Oslo: NIFU.SivertsenG.SchneiderJ. W.2012Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikatorOsloNIFUSearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G., Rousseau, R., Zhang, L. (2018). Measuring Scientific Production with Modified Fractional Counting. Journal of Informetrics (submitted).SivertsenG.RousseauR.ZhangL.2018Measuring Scientific Production with Modified Fractional CountingJournal of Informetrics(submitted)10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.010Search in Google Scholar
Technopolis Group. (2013). Evaluation of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the social sciences and humanities (VABB-SHW). Technopolis Group, Executive summary. Amsterdam.Technopolis Group2013Evaluation of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the social sciences and humanities (VABB-SHW)Technopolis Group, Executive summaryAmsterdamSearch in Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T.N., van Wijk, E., Wouters, P.F. (2016). Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university. Scientomet-rics, 106(1), 1–16.van LeeuwenT.N.van WijkE.WoutersP.F.2016Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch universityScientomet-rics106111610.1007/s11192-015-1788-y470937626798160Search in Google Scholar
Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. (2014a). Internationalization of peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed book publications in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1431–1444.VerleysenF. T.EngelsT. C.2014aInternationalization of peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed book publications in the Social Sciences and HumanitiesScientometrics10121431144410.1007/s11192-014-1267-xSearch in Google Scholar
Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. (2014b). Barycenter representation of book publishing internationalization in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 234–240.VerleysenF. T.EngelsT. C.2014bBarycenter representation of book publishing internationalization in the Social Sciences and HumanitiesJournal of Informetrics8123424010.1016/j.joi.2013.11.008Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L. & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Productivity versus citation impact: A study of persons, not just authors. In proceedings of 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (pp. 970–975). Wuhan: www.issi2017.orgZhangL.SivertsenG.2017Productivity versus citation impact: A study of persons, not just authorsproceedings of 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics970975Wuhanwww.issi2017.orgSearch in Google Scholar
