Uneingeschränkter Zugang

On-Pump Beating Heart versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Short-Term Follow-up Outcomes of a Single Center


Zitieren

1. Gaudino M, Angelini GD, Antoniades C, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: 30 Years of Debate. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e009934. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009934.10.1161/JAHA.118.009934620139930369328Search in Google Scholar

2. Malvindi PG, Margari V, Mastro F, et al. External aortic cross-clamping and endoaortic balloon occlusion in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;7:748-754. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.10.09.10.21037/acs.2018.10.09628820630598888Search in Google Scholar

3. Moss E, Puskas JD, Thourani VH, et al. Avoiding aortic clamping during coronary artery bypass grafting reduces postoperative stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.011.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.011427265725293356Search in Google Scholar

4. Al-Sarraf N, Thalib L, Hughes A, et al. Cross-clamp time is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in lowand high-risk cardiac patients. Int J Surg. 2011;9:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.10.007.10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.10.00720965288Search in Google Scholar

5. Sarkar M, Prabhu V. Basics of cardiopulmonary bypass. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:760-767. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_379_17.10.4103/ija.IJA_379_17561360228970635Search in Google Scholar

6. Wang W, Wang Y, Piao H, et al. Early and Medium Outcomes of On-Pump Beating-Heart versus Off-Pump CABG in Patients with Moderate Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;34:62-69. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0207.10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0207638584330810676Search in Google Scholar

7. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation. 2007;116:1145-1152. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675595.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.67559517709642Search in Google Scholar

8. Chikwe J, Lee T, Itagaki S, Adams DH, Egorova NN. Long-Term Outcomes After Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting by Experienced Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1478-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.029.10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.02930236310Search in Google Scholar

9. Bakaeen FG, Thourani VH. Is off-pump CABG off base? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1487-1489. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.030.10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.03030236311Search in Google Scholar

10. Puskus JD, Martin J, Cheng DC, et al. ISMICS consensus conference and statements of randomized controlled trials of off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2015;10:219-229. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000184.10.1097/imi.000000000000018426371452Search in Google Scholar

11. Gomes WJ, Angelini GD. On- or Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Is the Debate Settling Down? Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;34:VIII-XI. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0281.10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0281Search in Google Scholar

12. Xia L, Ji Q, Song K, et al. Early clinical outcomes of on-pump beating-heart versus off-pump technique for surgical revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: the experience of a single center. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12:11. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0572-x.10.1186/s13019-017-0572-xSearch in Google Scholar

13. Gamal A-S, Farag I. On-pump beating versus arrested heart (conventional) revascularization in severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Egypt Soc of Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2017;25:398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jescts.2017.05.007.10.1016/j.jescts.2017.05.007Search in Google Scholar

14. Matkovic M, Tutus V, Bilbija I, et al. Long Term Outcomes of The Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting In A High-Volume Center. Sci Rep. 2019;9:8567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45093-3.10.1038/s41598-019-45093-3Search in Google Scholar

15. McDonagh DL, Berger M, Mathew JP, Graffagnino C, Milano CA, Newman MF. Neurological complications of cardiac surgery. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:490-502. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70004-3.10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70004-3Search in Google Scholar

16. Mali S, Haghaninejad H. Pulmonary complications following cardiac surgery. Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2019;4:e280-e285. doi: 10.5114/amsad.2019.91432.10.5114/amsad.2019.91432719193732368683Search in Google Scholar

17. Pooria A, Pourya A, Gheini A. Postoperative complications associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery and their therapeutic interventions. Future Cardiol. 2020;16:481-496. doi: 10.2217/fca-2019-0049.10.2217/fca-2019-004932495650Search in Google Scholar

18. Çakalağaoğlu KC, Selçuk E, Erdem H, Elibol A, Köksal C. Analysis of Readmissions to The Intensive Care Unit After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Ten Years’ Experience. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;35:732-740. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0299.10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0299759897633118739Search in Google Scholar

19. Ascione R, Caputo M, Calori G, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Angelini GD. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after conventional and beating heart coronary surgery: a prospective, randomized study. Circulation. 2000;102:1530-1535. doi: 10.1161/01. cir.102.13.1530.Search in Google Scholar

20. Järvinen O, Laurikka J, Tarkka MR. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass. Comparison of patient characteristics and early outcomes. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2003;44:167-172.Search in Google Scholar

21. Velioglu Y, Isik M. Early-Term Outcomes of Off-Pump versus On-Pump Beating-Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67:546-553. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1679923.10.1055/s-0039-167992330836396Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2457-5518
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Medizin, Klinische Medizin, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, Radiologie, Allgemeinmedizin, Innere Medizin, Kardiologie