The cohesive force of the norm

1CARRUTHERS, Peter (2006): The Architecture of the Mind. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. 482 s.Search in Google Scholar

2DOLNÍK, Juraj (2012): Sila jazyka. Bratislava: Kalligram. 366 s.Search in Google Scholar

3DOLNÍK, Juraj (2017): Jazyk v sociálnej kultúre. Bratislava: Veda, vydavateľstvo SAV. 264 s.Search in Google Scholar

4ELQAYAM, Shira – EVANS, Jonathan St. B. T. (2011): Substracting ‘outht‘ from ‘is‘: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking. In:Search in Google Scholar

5Behavioral and Brain Sciences, roč. 34, č. 5, s. 233 – 248. DOI 10.1017/S0140525X11000001X. Dostupné na: https://www.academia.edu/. [cit. 01-10-2022].Search in Google Scholar

6ELQAYAM, Shira – THOMPSON, Valerie A. – WILKINSON, Meredith R. – EVANS, Jonathan St. B. T. – OVER, David E. (2015): Deontic Introduction: A Theory of Inference From Is to Ought. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, roč. 41, č. 5, s. 1516 – 1532. DOI:10.1037/a0038686. Dostupné na: https://researchgate.net/ [cit. 11-10-2022].Search in Google Scholar

7ELQAYAM, Shira – OVER, David E. (eds.) (2016): From is to ought: Place of Normative Models in the Study of Human Thought. Laussane: Frontiers Media SA, 7/628. 189 s. DOI: 10.3389/978-2-896-2. Dostupné na: https://researchgate.net/. [cit. 11-10-2022].Search in Google Scholar

8ELQAYAM, Shira – EVANS, Jonathan St. B. T (2020): How and why we reason from ‘is’ to ‘ought’. In: Synthese, roč. 197, č. 5, s. 1429 – 1466. DOI: 0.1007/s11229-018-02041-4. Dostupné na: https://researchgate.net/. [cit. 01-10-2022].Search in Google Scholar

9EVANS, Jonathan St. B. T. (2014): Two minds rationality. In: Thinking and Reasoning, roč. 20, č. 2, s. 129 – 146. DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2013.845605. Dostupné na https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.845605. [cit. 11-10-2022].Search in Google Scholar

10HUME, David (1969): A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Penguin Books. 678 s.Search in Google Scholar

11HORECKÝ, Ján (1976): Povinovatý, povinovatosť. In: Slovenská reč, roč. 41, č. 4, s. 253 – 254.Search in Google Scholar

12SEARLE, John R. (1964): How do derive “ought” from “is”. In: The Philosophical Review, roč. 73, č. 1, s. 43 – 58. DOI: 10.2307/2183201. Dostupné na: www.jstor.org [cit. 14-01-2022].Search in Google Scholar

13STRAWSON, Peter F. (1992): Analysis and Metaphysics. An Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. 144 s.Search in Google Scholar

14SAUSSURE, Ferdinand de (1989): Kurs obecné lingvistiky. Preklad F. Čermák. Praha: Odeon. 467 s.Search in Google Scholar